News Sections
'Traffic-shaping' likely to slow Internet users
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(55)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Mon. Apr. 7 2008 10:47 PM ET
Independent Internet service providers who use Bell Canada's telephone lines say some of their customers face slower download times because of new 'traffic-shaping' policies being implemented by the telecom giant.
Last week, the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP), filed an official complaint with the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission over the 'traffic-shaping' measures.
CAIP alleges Bell is using a technique known as Deep Packet Inspection, or DPI, to examine the types of data moving across the Internet. CAIP claims Bell is then restricting the movements of certain types of data -- primarily large files such as movies or music over peer-to-peer networks.
The complaint alleges that the measures are in violation of several section of the country's telecommunications act.
CAIP chairman Tom Copeland, who also owns Internet service provider Eagle.ca, said the traffic-shaping typically takes place between 4 p.m. to 2 a.m.
"They have eliminated our ability to decide how we manage that level of service between us and our customers," Copeland told CTV.ca.
He said independent Internet service providers have approximately 100,000 users in Ontario and Quebec who will be affected by the measure.
"There has been a bit of a misunderstanding that all we do is re-sell Bell service -- that's not the case," said Copeland. "We're purchasing a physical link between us and the customer but we provide the Internet services outside of anything we purchase from Bell.
"It's the point on their network before it reaches the customer that they're choking and preventing the traffic from flowing."
Switching your account directly to Bell Canada won't help either since the company has already imposed 'traffic-shaping' on its existing customers since last year.
Elsewhere in Canada, major carriers, both telecom and cable, have not implemented 'traffic-shaping' policies, said Copeland.
Bell's response
Bell claims the new policies are meant to prevent a small group of users from hogging bandwidth from others online.
Mirko Bibic, Bell's chief of regulatory affairs, rebuffed the CAIP complaint saying that Bell has a right to maintain the integrity of its network.
He said DPI technology is a useful way to monitor traffic online.
"Bandwidth doesn't just fall from the sky,'' Bibic told The Canadian Press, adding that more bandwidth would not resolve congestion issues.
He also said traffic shaping was part of a "multi-pronged" strategy used to prevent congestion.
Still, Copeland said if congestion is the problem then "why won't adding bandwidth improve the situation?"
He also said the measure appears to be impacting all forms of encrypted traffic, not just peer-to-peer.
"Things like Voice over IP and VPNs (Virtual Private Networks) -- are being slowed down," he said.
CAIP says the full extent of the measures from Bell will be in place by Monday.
As a result, downloading a video that used to take two hours could now take four-times as long, said Copeland.
Rogers Communications has had similar policies in place for its own customers. However, Rogers doesn't have many independent Internet service providers as clients.
The restrictions have sparked a debate over the level of competition allowed in the industry and the availability of options for Internet users wanting fast service.
"The ability of a select number of Internet providers to limit their access, to advertise certain speed but deliver far less when Canadians go to use the Internet, I think has very serious implications," Internet law expert Michael Geist told CTV News.
Richard Morochove, a Toronto-based IT consultant, said average users have little input in the level of service they receive.
"It really comes down to consumers and a lack of real choice of broadband internet service,'' Morochove told The Canadian Press.
"We're having . . . a near monopoly situation in Canada with respect to high-speed broadband access."
Morochove said he sees the move as being motivated by a desire to limit competition from independent providers.
According to the CAIP complaint, Bell has also done away with its unlimited Internet plan and will, starting June 30, bill customers based on how much bandwidth they use.
Rogers recently announced similar measures and will soon charge between $1.25 and $5 for every extra gigabyte a customer uses.
"It strikes us as funny that if you are going to be billing your customers based on what they consume, why would you limit what they consume?" questioned Copeland.
He said the fear among independent Internet providers is that they too will be charged on a usage base also.
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(55)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
John in London
said
It is bad enough they do it with cell phones, but I personally won't tolerate it with internet access.
Johann
said
No notification, no warning and it was not in my contract when I signed.
In fact they were still announcing "unlimited useage" at the time.
There will be a backlash and a petition for sure and similar to ones in other countries that halted the spread of "add ons".
Did
said
A MacDonald
said
Wake up and "smell the coffee"!
said
Brian
said
Johann
said
I would sue in a heartbeat for what they are doing. i pay my $30+ / month to have HIGH speed...not choked speed. I called Bell a few months ago and they said they were having issues b/c of new hardware installations. Fast forward to now and it's the same and worse. At times, i feel as if I'm on dial up. :(
Pam
said
There are some of us that don't download these items so why should we be penalized for their greed?
RK
said
Carl Bainbridge
said
in the month when i did the most downloading and uploading recently i still barely hit 25% of my allowed capacity and we run 2 computers about 12 hours a day
pp
said
Anyway what is everyone complaining for - I only get dialup where I live - Bell has been 'promising' for years that I will have DSL 'within the year' hmmmm yep been 8 yrs now... don't care anymore cannot stand the 'net....
Marion
said
freedom lover
said
Dennis in Toronto
said
Robinhood
said
... if that is the case then I totally agree with the policy. Why should a few users jam up the internet for everyone else as they download stolen copies of music and movies?!
The user "hogs" have no more right to use the internet than everyone else. That being said this policy should not be permitted as a means by the telecom companies of avoiding more investment in the Web's infrastructure if increased bandwidth is needed.
Truth Sayer
said
The hardware used to do this can also do the following:
A debate is raging in the UK over ISPs' use of deep packet inspection hardware to watch consumer surfing habits and sell them targeted ads.
Also:
"A team of researchers have found that Comcast has quietly rolled out a new traffic-shaping method, which is interfering with web browsers in addition to p2p traffic.
Brian
said
....when rogers introduced this plan in the maritimes i did look how it compared to the amount of service i actually used In the month when i did the most downloading and uploading recently i still barely hit 25% of my allowed capacity and we run 2 computers about 12 hours a day"
I certainly agree with this, as I do not use even close to the maximum amount. But a portion of my cost is for UNLIMITED use. If they are taking that away, why am I still paying the same amount?
Ralph
said
Jack Rumney
said
Robert Brise
said
This why I don't carry a cell phone anymore and If the internet becomes the same, I'll dump that too!!!
Who really needs it, except for convenience sake!
Mike
said
rural and abused
said
Michael
said
Eric G
said
When ISPs started this in 1995, quality plummetted and all dropped it or charged more for it.
A buck a GB is quite reasonable. What exactly are you guys downloading?
Mike
said
I'm a Telus Subscriber in BC. I've been trying to diagnose why the audio on an audio/ video news feed from CNN is all broken up for 2 days now. I wonder if it has anything to do with this restriction that the other providers are imposing. Anyone???
Lisa
said
Dennis in Toronto pretty much summed it up in a couple of sentences. Until we the citizans take a stand, gouging corporations like these get away with this type of legalized mofia every day. I would like to see a lawyer here in Canada take a stand and put an end to this ridiculous, unjustified NEW so called Pricing!! How can you possibly justify this. What people do with their time on the internet is their business and should not require Bells or any other business's permission to do so unless a crime is being committed. Take a stand!!!
Bandwidth Hog
said
When a company advertises high speed internet, I expect high speed internet all the time for all my data, not just some of the data some of the time.
These ISP's need to focus on expanding capacity instead of trying to limit the load.
By failing to expand capacity they are saving billions of dollars. The Canadian Government needs to step in and legislate these companies to put some of their profits toward improving their infrastructure.
As we are relying more and more on data and technology we can't just sit back and take this bullying from our service providers.
The CRTC needs to allow greater Foreign Investment as to allow more competition so the consumers don't get screwed.
Jim
said
sarah
said
Did has it right: 'Less service, bigger prices, what is it? Canadian Business Model'.
sheri
said
Gord
said
It is excessive Government Regulation which has created the lack of competition in the first place!
We need LESS Government Regulation and MORE Free Market Competition. The Free Market will succeed where the Government has failed.
Increase in supply will force price competition!
said
Kaine
said
Mary Mary
said
A quote from the above news story: "Bell Canada recently decided to quietly restrict the amount of file-sharing traffic..." says it all.
Why "quietly" Bell Canada?
Could it be because you garnered contracts with consumers based on "unlimited" but now you'd like to "quietly" rescind and negate your promises?
Looks like people have decided to "noisily" complain. Are you paying attention Bell?
Johann der Kraut
said
Bell and Rogers made this 'similar' decision INDEPENDANTLY? Give me a break.
Where is the anti-competition bureau? Still insisting there is no collusion among gas companies?
Even today I got a little note from Rogers suggesting I sign up for $29.95 and in timy letters with no explanation is a note "Plus other fees".
Interesting as think they made a mistake as I got my first warning after 4 days of April saying I exceeded 100% of bandwidth but I am an OAP and do not download movies, videos nor music and am seldom on the internet during peak hours.
Something stinks.
Brian
said
Since when is "unlimited service" a viable business model?
Eric,
Ever eaten at an all you can eat buffet? Gone to an amusement park? Joined a gym? All examples of unlimited usage for a specific contractual time period & set price. I have never heard of a gym offering a monthly fee for unlimited usage of the gym, only to charge for additional visits b/c people were using the service too much.
I feel no sympathy for companies that advertise high-speeds knowing full well they cannot deliver them. Until this new 'polciy' was unveiled, I am pretty sure I watch dozens of Rogers & Bell commercials telling people something quite different.
bls
said
What we have is better than dialup, to be sure, but there is room for improvement with the entire ISP industry.
Canada really needs to shape up its internet infrastructure, and I think the CRTC needs to be involved to ensure quality, reliability, & fair business practices.
Mamad
said
Alex D
said
Another problem is that this HINDERS the progress of the internet, which is fast moving to an entire rich media experience. CTV's website alone has tonnes of videos of news casts and other things that take up considerable amounts of bandwidth. Companies like CTV are at risk of losing this service because Bell throttled the speed between CTV and a Sympatico customer and the customer gave up waiting for the video to load.
Yes, P2P takes up a lot of bandwidth, but as the days go on, streaming music and streaming video will increasingly become common place and increasingly improve in quality. Is North America to be left out of this while Europe and Asia enjoy unfettered, cheaper, and considerably faster internet access than us?
Frankly, it's not the customer that needs to fight back, it's companies that are adversely affected, especially now that traditional media companies are scrambling to move themselves onto the internet.
I sense large court room battles brewing...
Lorne
said
Lorne
said
Frank
said
Bernard Romanycia
said
Denise
said
This comment from CAIP chairman Tom Copeland sums it up for me:
"It strikes us as funny that if you are going to be billing your customers based on what they consume, why would you limit what they consume?" questioned Copeland.
That says to me that Bell just wants to police P2P users, which would protect them from lawsuits filed by the music and movie industries perhaps? At the same time, however, they would be collecting larger profits from those users.
Slow Lane on the Info Highway
said
A. Conda
said
Carl Chester
said
Math Hurtz
said
The cap rate is 30kB/sec, while the service is up to 500kB/sec (5Mbps).
The download can be 16 times longer.
Steve
said
What is the purpose of CRTC, nothing but to make us pay more. I am canadian, I temporarely live into another country. Telephone base line cost $7.00, cell phones: 2 cents a minute, no contract.
In canada it's 30 cents a minute? Thanks CRTC! You're doing a great job!
Sean - Montreal
said
casper's can opener
said
Seems a pity that there is not some way to channel all the porn sites onto a separate channel that those individuals whose interests lie in that direction could subscribe to as an "extra"
It seems as well that the time will come when the internet as a whole will need a clean up of all the out of date sites and links etc that seem to be cluttering up the overall performance of our computers.....
The "net" as a whole is the most fantastic learning tool yet devised by man and to me seems like having the Library of Congress in your living room.
Pity it has to be destroyed by misuse and greed.
Just my 10cents worth !
Sick and tired
said
I pay 30$ a month for dial up and i have no other way to go and i live in a small town. I cam have hig speed but at 50$ plus a month
realist
said
Downey
said
Gord said:
I can't help but be annoyed by the calls for MORE Government Regulation!
It is excessive Government Regulation which has created the lack of competition in the first place!
We need LESS Government Regulation and MORE Free Market Competition. The Free Market will succeed where the Government has failed.
wasting my money
said
For those who are wondering who uses all the bandwith, Online gaming. I have kids and XBOX live. I don't know what I'm using, but I'm sure it's getting used. I would love options because the price keeps rising, but my service has never increased.