CTV News | Canada must protect its water from U.S.: report

Canada -   

Canada must protect its water from U.S.: report

Viewer

CTV News Video

Canada AM: Tony Clarke, Polaris Institute
Canada AM: Tim Flannery, 'An Explorer's Notebook'

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(45)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Thu. Apr. 3 2008 1:24 PM ET

The Canadian government needs a better strategy to protect the country's fresh water in the face of growing U.S. demand, says a report released Thursday by an Ottawa-based think tank.

The Polaris Institute report, called "Turning on Canada's Tap," says the Conservative government has shown little movement on developing an official policy on water exports, even though Prime Minister Stephen Harper promised one in the throne speech of 2007.

The report will be presented on Parliament Hill on Thursday morning. It was written by the think tank's director, Tony Clarke.

"(Canada doesn't) have much at all in place," he told CTV's Canada AM on Thursday. "We don't have legislation dealing with bulk water exports. What's required is federal legislation; a federal ban."

The existing legislation, which Clarke doesn't see as effective, is called the International Boundary Waters Treaty Act. It prohibits bulk removal of water from the Canadian portion of boundary waters. There is also a water export accord between Canada and the provinces in which the provinces promise not to sell water from the country's interior to foreign buyers.

The Polaris document warns of a future where American companies will supersede domestic demand for Canada's water. Water is included within the scope of the North American Free Trade Agreement so if Canada starts exporting water, it will be forced to make continue doing so, says the report.

According to Environment Canada, the country contains about seven per cent of the world's fresh water resources.

With the United States' southern cities seeing increasingly depleted reservoirs, many will soon begin looking north, writes Clarke. The report states that "24 per cent of America's medium sized cities and 17.3 per cent of its large cities are expected to face serious water shortages by 2015."

Ohio's Lt.-Gov. Lee Fisher recently mused his state may eventually sell Lake Erie water to drought-stricken states, despite a compact between eight Great Lakes states and two Canadian provinces prohibiting it. He soon retracted the statement, but not without worrying environmentalists about the implications of his suggestion.

The Quebec Liberal party has also spoken in favour of bulk water exports, Clarke said.

He says U.S. President George Bush and former U.S. Ambassador to Canada Paul Cellucci have both requested publicly that Canada begin making bulk water exports to the Unites States.

"It is not at all clear that either Ottawa or the provinces are in a position to deal with a challenge coming from Washington to turn on the taps," writes Clarke. "Simply put, there is a serious deficiency in terms of Canadian water policy and governance."

In a press release issued in April 2007, Environment Minister John Baird said the government has no intention of negotiating bulk water exports.

"Canada has restrictions in place to prohibit bulk removal of water, including diversion, backed by serious fines and/or imprisonment," the release stated. "Canada is committed to protecting water in its natural state and to preserving the integrity of ecosystems, and will continue to do so."

Calls to the Ministry of the Environment on Thursday were not immediately returned.

The Polaris report recommends the government:

  • Rebuild Canada's water protection capacities
  • Establish a federal ban on bulk water exports
  • Remove water protection restrictions in trade regimes
  • Utilize bi-national water treaty mechanisms
  • Implement bold water conservation measures

The Polaris Institute publishes books and reports on water preservation and other issues surrounding Canada's policy on natural resources.

Clarke has written numerous books including "Blue Gold: The Battle Against the Corporate Theft of the World's Water," on which he collaborated with Council of Canadians National Chairperson Maude Barlow.

Water as a human right

Meanwhile, human rights advocates including Barlow are pointing the finger at Canada for derailing United Nations efforts to list water as a basic human right.

The Toronto Star reported Thursday that the UN Human Rights Council ended a three week session without passing the resolution, which was backed by Germany and Spain.

Ashfaq Khalfan of the United Kingdom-based Right to Water Program told The Star he believes the resolution would have passed if it wasn't for the Canadian delegation's resolute lobbying efforts.

Barlow of the Council of Canadian said Canada "derailed" the process with support from the United States, which doesn't have a seat on the Human Rights Council.

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

FreakAlert
said

Once Codex Alimentarius is implemented Dec 31, 2009, water might be regulated to 10 gallons per person.


RRD
said

Of course,when you want to keep those great looking golf courses green in a desert environment, you will eventually run out of water and take what you think you are entitled to, especially when you consider yourself RULERS of the Earth.


KPK
said

I agree with the government's stand against making water a basic human right. Barlow doesn't seem to realize that doing so would give the Americans and other countries an excuse to demand we ship OUR water to them.


Gabriel DG
said

Currently American companies take Albertan oil, refine it, and sell it back to us at double the price US citizens pay...

American companies will eventually do the same with water... and we'll have to cross the border to buy our own water at half the price...

What a wonderful future lies in store for Canada! And this is only possible because politicians like Harper are so willing to let it happen.


Mike
said

Listen up people. Forget the rhetoric, and the partisan politics and demand action now. 5 years from now will be too late.
Maybe the Clinton/Obama threat to gut NAFTA is the best possible news we will ever see from the American Dream Teams.


Carol
said

Water ... the 21st Century's Oil


Just wondering
said

why is it when the Manning Center For Democracy of the Frazier Institute release a report, it is always qualified with "right-wing think tank", or the like, while all through out this article, not one mention how both The Polaris Institute and The Council of Canadians are both on the extreme left? Just asking


engineer guy
said

The problem with U.S. water shortages lies with their crumbling infrastructure(water loss)not a lack of water. It is probably cheaper for them to buy cheap water from us than to pay to fix all of the leaks.


michael
said

I have no sympathy for the Maude Barlow's of the world. It won't be all that long before we have our backs against the wall.

If you want to have 'it' you better be prepared to hold 'it'.


JB
said

Wow now water, they already want the north .
Lets start shipping the women and children next.
I am sure SAtephen Harper will fix this . Hahaha


Rhody
said

Once again the U.S. is manouevering to get what they want, when they want, with no regard for anyone else. I agree that we have to put very stringent measures in place to protect our resources, including and especially water. I also think that the Americans need to take a tough look at their wasteful practices - industry in America wastes and pollutes on a mind-numbing level. But they still have the attitude that they are entitled to anything and everything, anywhere.


Jim in the West
said

Dead on the money KPK.

While I personally beleive in the right to water, I'm far too familiar with the abuses that this UN inititave would expose us to.


H2O
said

We should protect our water. What would happen if the States takes our water and we have none? Water should never have neen agreed to in NAFTA. The States and Mexico were smart in getting it in the agreement, Canada was a little slow on that.



terry
said

What America wants, America takes. Witness what is going on in the ME.
We are heading towards being the 51st state, and the current government is bending over to making it a reality. See North American Union, and also the agreement that was quietly signed on Feb.14 in Texas, that paves the way for militaries from either nation to send troops across each others borders during an emergency.


PBW
said

Those who waste water on lawns and golf courses while living in deserts do not deserve anyone else's water while they continue their spendthrift ways. Similarly, how many cubic litres of clean drinking water are wasted daily by Canadians for the sole purpose of making their personal vehicle look better than that of their neighbor? How many Canadians run their shower at full flow every day, instead of fitting a low-flow shower head - or use an old style flush toilet instead of a modern one that uses less than half the water when no solids are to be flushed.

During WWII in Britain, a sign became popular over toilets, very necessary because of water shortages caused by bombing raids: "if it's yellow, let it mellow, if it's brown flush it down" a simple but effective reminder not to waste water.

It behooves us all, on both sides of the 49th parallel, not to waste our fresh water. With adequate water conservation laws in place - and enforced - and planning permission denied to those who - out of personal vanity and too much disposable income - want to create a jungle in the Mojave, we may yet delay the pillage of our as-yet untouched fresh water reserves. It is also important that governments at all levels enact legislation to protect those resources from those who make no effort to protect their own.

Do write your MP on the matter; do e-mail the Prime Minister and Minister of Natural Resources (or whatever s/he is called in the latest renaming frenzy) and do remember to send copies to the opposition critics of each party. The more who make their voice heard, thore more likelihood of positive action.




Pam from SW Ontario
said

Now that the medical scientific world has decided that 8 glasses of water a day is not really needed then maybe the water companies needn't bottle quite so much.

IF Mother Nature and your God wanted perfect lawns they would have provided them and churches and hospitals in my town wouldn't leave sprinklers running 8-10 hours a day in the hottest days of the year.

We knews the water table levels in the U.S. were getting low and drying up, especially in the Platte river area, back in the early 1970's. Did they do anything then, No, they were waiting for "are good neighbours in the North" to rescue them.

Canada has been the U.S. back-up system for far too long.

The U.S. dictate to Canada and Mexico as dictator for all of North America. We need to stand up for our rights of oil, water, lumber, air, industry, and all the other things they want to control.


John
said

I agree with the comments that are made that Canada has been to relaxed in the past when it comes to protecting our resources from america. They waste what they have and when they run out they come to Canada to supply them with it. I am not against sending water to the states but we need to do it our way and not jump when they tell us to.


Frank Buchan
said

Every time they try to extend the definition of "human rights" I cringe. A law professor once told me we haven't any rights, only priviledges. We'd be far better off if we viewed what we have in that context, because when you strip away the entitlement factor, what is left is worth fighting for.

We have no right to water, we have the priviledge of an excess (presently) in most parts of this country. If we start thinking otherwise it will be the same mentality that corporate America (corporate anywhere, in fact) suffers.


pdm
said

Typical American thinking - instead of conserving water or funding ways to recycle water - let's just take Canadian water until it's gone.


Layton in Moncton
said

Of course water is a basic human right, however, as soon as that is stated in the letter of law, it will be corrupted by US politicians and the corporations that control them. If the US needs water that bad, then I know where they can find an ice cube 7 times the size of Manhattan Island, cause they can have my water when they pry the fawcet from "my cold dead hands". Thank you Charleton Heston


M. Cameron
said

It doesn't matter since yesterday's news they told us that water is not necessary.


MLR
said

Perhaps the US should take a serious look at ramping up THEIR water conservation efforts! The last thing we need is a situation where Canada puts a high emphasis on water conservation just to have it practicaly STOLEN by WASTEFUL Americans.


Nadia
said

Is there anything the Americans don't over consume? Even water, for goodness sake.

Water is a human right & shame on our nation for blocking this initiative!


Paul
said

Water is something Canada should not give away for free.


Nadia
said

KPK:Barlow doesn't seem to realize that doing so would give the Americans and other countries an excuse to demand we ship OUR water to them.

==

That is a great point and lead me to recind my earlier statement; ... Now I understand that Canada is protecting our precious natural resources from the predatory Americans. Thank you KPK.


Joan Peterson
said

Why do we not (US & Canadians) conserve water? Stop watering lawns and golf courses. Stop having 20 minute showers. Stop washing your clothes when they are still clean.

How can we export water when we are facing water shortages ourselves. Our glaciers that feed Alberta and Saskatchewan may be gone within 20 years? Then where do we get water from?

Groundwater resources in Alberta are also being reduced due to the oil industry sucking it up.

Water should NEVER be exported to the US. Oh well, they will probably see WMD in Toronto and come in to protect the water supply.


wasteful water
said

Maybe they should just cut the supply to Las Vegas by half... i'm sure that would help them keep a few other cities full up on water for years.


Steve in Ottawa
said

In 1988 with the Free Trade Agreement was being shoved down Canadians collective throats, warning were flowing from everywhere to safeguard Canada's water supply.

It fell on deaf ears.

Here we are 20 yrs later and the same warnings are being expressed.

Are we listening this time???


Jeanne
said

The Americans need to take a tough look at their wasteful practices - industry in America wastes and pollutes on a mind-numbing level. But they still have the attitude that they are entitled to anything and everything, anywhere.

Harper had better put his foot down on this one, or this will DEFINITELY be the end for him. I agree with the person who said we should end our NAFTA agreement as soon as possible.






Roadrobber
said

I absolutely agree with KPK. One the UN makes water a basic human right there would be nothing Canada could do to stop anyone who wants our water. To do so would be a violation of their human rights.

With regards to the statement by Gabriel DG that the Americans are taking our oil, I didn't realize they were doing that. I thought Canada was selling the oil to the Americans.


Linda
said

Water water everywhere.... not a drop to drink ???
U.S. has water but what are they doing with it ?
Canada has water, but are we going to give it away or preserve it ? This will become Canada's Gold.


Al Gore for Prez (of Cuba.)
said

Won't global warming make more water available? The caps melt, raising water levels all over the globe. More water means more water vapor, and more rain. The great lakes will fill up, won't they? Bless Al Gore. Hope he's right! (There's still snow on our yard. I'd love some REAL global warming...)


Sean
said

I don't mean to burst any body's bubble here but I believe that every one of our Great Lakes is on the Canada-US border, excluding Lake Michigan which is entirely in the US. Doesn't that make it a shared resource between the 2 countries? I'm just a frost bitten Canadian boy throwing this question out there.


reece@telus.net
said

In Capitalism it is neccessary for populations to continue to grow despite finite resources like water & food. I believe eventually we will have to change our ways and adopt a more mature capitalistic system in order to avoid war, starvation & thirst; however, our leaders won't act until it's too late.


Richard D
said

Just Wondering

I have to admit, I was thinking the exact same thing when I first started reading this.

As for the UN resolution, the last thing we want to do is let some well-meaning resolution force us to give up our water without being able to do anything about it. The UN has been known to rush ill-thought-out resolutions before without knowing the consequences afterwards (such as the Indigenous Peoples Rights resolution, that would give massive rights to indigenous peoples without thinking how it would affect the nations those peoples are in) and this one ranks right up there in the "be very careful" category.


Barney in Trenton
said

The US puts excess tariffs on our lumber, our cattle are still not fully allowed into the US, we have to show a passport to enter their country. It isnt our water...we are just keeping it fresh and cold for when they want to take it.


ARJAY
said

To KPK and Michael- you just don't get it. By making water a human right, Barlow and the Council of Canadians would have placed it outside of trade agreements, so that NAFTA wouldn't apply, stopping America from bargaining for our water. That's why the Americans helped the Conservative government shoot down this idea. Never mind "if you want to have it you'd better be prepared to hold it"- that's exactly what the "left wing" is trying to do- protect Canada from right-wing, Conservative/Republican plans to sell off our resources. But in order to do so, they have to have the support of the people. And too many average joes have been convinced by the Ann Coulters of the world that liberal means bad. And so you end up defending the very people who are quietly ripping you off. As Lincoln said, you can fool some of the people all of the time.


Michael
said

How is it that this was not addressed in NAFTA? Someone certainly dropped the ball on that one. Our government must address this asap, and secure our own sovereign rights with regard to our water resource. Those who don't see the absurdity in maintaining golf courses in the desert while their own citizens are lacking water, will not think twice about "taking" it from us.


richie
said

A recent CTV article claims, "drinking water has little benefit for healthy people living in cooler climates." That would be us folks... CTV I'm wondering if you are trying to get us to accept that we need water less than those in the southern U.S.?? Why else would you post these two articles on the same day? What's the endgame here? I don't actually expect you to post this comment because I know it would wake up far too many readers to your true agenda...


Mark5
said

You know, I think there is something here many people are missing. We say its "our" water. But is it really? Where did this water come from? It comes from the sky which in turn comes from evaporation of the oceans and lakes and rivers. The westerly winds caused by the rotation of the earth picks this water vapour up and it just so happens that this water precipitates onto our land more than other places. Water actually belongs to everyone on the planet, just like air.Really, we can not claim ownership of the air or the water because it is not really ours.The U.S. "owns" a large part of the great lakes. If they want to take water from there, they can do so. Water does come back to the earth after evaporation. The only water that doesn`t is that which being pumped into the earth to replace extracted oil in Alberta.


ME
said

Leave it to Americans. They think the whole world is theirs to exploit. Will water be like oil? Will we give it to the Americans and let them sell it back to us at higher prices. I hope and pray that the Canadian Government will hold on to our most precious resource. Nobody, neither Canadians or Americans, should be allowed to export water from the Great Lakes!

We will all have to conserve what we have. I agree about the golf courses; they take clean water and spray it on their grass and we get it back into the sewer system loaded with all manner of pesticides and herbicides and fertilizer residue. They could keep their grass green by planting drought resistant grass and leave the weeds--though a healthy lawn will sprout very few weeds--just mow them or pull them by hand and using compost to fertilize. This goes for homeowners too. We live in the country where there are open fields, and hence lots of weed seed.

We adopted these practices and we have the greenest and best lawn around and we seldom water and when we do we use a soaker hose and only on the spots that really need it. This way the water gets to the plant roots Those sprinklers waste water by spraying the air and the roots never get saturated. We also use a rain barrel for water for the flowers. It can be done!!


LynnO (Ottawa)
said

The Americans have been "hunting" Canadian water since the NAWPA project back as far as the 1950's. It's sad that our elected officials have yet to institute a policy 50 years later. Hopefully it will be one that favours the future for Canadians. I support the efforts of Maude Barlow and the Council of Canadians in this regard. Let's not set ourselves up for problems in the future with this natural resource as well.


Michele
said

Don't worry with Harper in power water won't be fully privatized; it'll be a P3 arrangement! I'm sure the Americans are looking at Quebec's Hydro as well.


JP
said

This is extremely important to Canada and I think our current government, who has shown disdain for anything environmental, are not the right people to tackle this issue. This needs to be done swiftly. The US isn't going to drag it's heels trying to take our water. Why should we drag our heels trying to prevent it?


jb
said

It's time Canada developed nuclear weapons to protect ourselves from the aggressors that will surely come to take our natural resources when theirs run out


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

Related Websites

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz