Canada -
News Sections
Canada must protect its water from U.S.: report
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(45)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Thu. Apr. 3 2008 1:24 PM ET
The Canadian government needs a better strategy to protect the country's fresh water in the face of growing U.S. demand, says a report released Thursday by an Ottawa-based think tank.
The Polaris Institute report, called "Turning on Canada's Tap," says the Conservative government has shown little movement on developing an official policy on water exports, even though Prime Minister Stephen Harper promised one in the throne speech of 2007.
The report will be presented on Parliament Hill on Thursday morning. It was written by the think tank's director, Tony Clarke.
"(Canada doesn't) have much at all in place," he told CTV's Canada AM on Thursday. "We don't have legislation dealing with bulk water exports. What's required is federal legislation; a federal ban."
The existing legislation, which Clarke doesn't see as effective, is called the International Boundary Waters Treaty Act. It prohibits bulk removal of water from the Canadian portion of boundary waters. There is also a water export accord between Canada and the provinces in which the provinces promise not to sell water from the country's interior to foreign buyers.
The Polaris document warns of a future where American companies will supersede domestic demand for Canada's water. Water is included within the scope of the North American Free Trade Agreement so if Canada starts exporting water, it will be forced to make continue doing so, says the report.
According to Environment Canada, the country contains about seven per cent of the world's fresh water resources.
With the United States' southern cities seeing increasingly depleted reservoirs, many will soon begin looking north, writes Clarke. The report states that "24 per cent of America's medium sized cities and 17.3 per cent of its large cities are expected to face serious water shortages by 2015."
Ohio's Lt.-Gov. Lee Fisher recently mused his state may eventually sell Lake Erie water to drought-stricken states, despite a compact between eight Great Lakes states and two Canadian provinces prohibiting it. He soon retracted the statement, but not without worrying environmentalists about the implications of his suggestion.
The Quebec Liberal party has also spoken in favour of bulk water exports, Clarke said.
He says U.S. President George Bush and former U.S. Ambassador to Canada Paul Cellucci have both requested publicly that Canada begin making bulk water exports to the Unites States.
"It is not at all clear that either Ottawa or the provinces are in a position to deal with a challenge coming from Washington to turn on the taps," writes Clarke. "Simply put, there is a serious deficiency in terms of Canadian water policy and governance."
In a press release issued in April 2007, Environment Minister John Baird said the government has no intention of negotiating bulk water exports.
"Canada has restrictions in place to prohibit bulk removal of water, including diversion, backed by serious fines and/or imprisonment," the release stated. "Canada is committed to protecting water in its natural state and to preserving the integrity of ecosystems, and will continue to do so."
Calls to the Ministry of the Environment on Thursday were not immediately returned.
The Polaris report recommends the government:
- Rebuild Canada's water protection capacities
- Establish a federal ban on bulk water exports
- Remove water protection restrictions in trade regimes
- Utilize bi-national water treaty mechanisms
- Implement bold water conservation measures
The Polaris Institute publishes books and reports on water preservation and other issues surrounding Canada's policy on natural resources.
Clarke has written numerous books including "Blue Gold: The Battle Against the Corporate Theft of the World's Water," on which he collaborated with Council of Canadians National Chairperson Maude Barlow.
Water as a human right
Meanwhile, human rights advocates including Barlow are pointing the finger at Canada for derailing United Nations efforts to list water as a basic human right.
The Toronto Star reported Thursday that the UN Human Rights Council ended a three week session without passing the resolution, which was backed by Germany and Spain.
Ashfaq Khalfan of the United Kingdom-based Right to Water Program told The Star he believes the resolution would have passed if it wasn't for the Canadian delegation's resolute lobbying efforts.
Barlow of the Council of Canadian said Canada "derailed" the process with support from the United States, which doesn't have a seat on the Human Rights Council.
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
Related Websites
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(45)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
Two questions:
1) What does Mr Colvin personally have to gain by what he is exposing ?
2) What has the Goverment gain or protect by discrediting Mr Colvin?

Comments are now closed for this story
FreakAlert
said
RRD
said
KPK
said
Gabriel DG
said
American companies will eventually do the same with water... and we'll have to cross the border to buy our own water at half the price...
What a wonderful future lies in store for Canada! And this is only possible because politicians like Harper are so willing to let it happen.
Mike
said
Maybe the Clinton/Obama threat to gut NAFTA is the best possible news we will ever see from the American Dream Teams.
Carol
said
Just wondering
said
engineer guy
said
michael
said
If you want to have 'it' you better be prepared to hold 'it'.
JB
said
Lets start shipping the women and children next.
I am sure SAtephen Harper will fix this . Hahaha
Rhody
said
Jim in the West
said
While I personally beleive in the right to water, I'm far too familiar with the abuses that this UN inititave would expose us to.
H2O
said
terry
said
We are heading towards being the 51st state, and the current government is bending over to making it a reality. See North American Union, and also the agreement that was quietly signed on Feb.14 in Texas, that paves the way for militaries from either nation to send troops across each others borders during an emergency.
PBW
said
During WWII in Britain, a sign became popular over toilets, very necessary because of water shortages caused by bombing raids: "if it's yellow, let it mellow, if it's brown flush it down" a simple but effective reminder not to waste water.
It behooves us all, on both sides of the 49th parallel, not to waste our fresh water. With adequate water conservation laws in place - and enforced - and planning permission denied to those who - out of personal vanity and too much disposable income - want to create a jungle in the Mojave, we may yet delay the pillage of our as-yet untouched fresh water reserves. It is also important that governments at all levels enact legislation to protect those resources from those who make no effort to protect their own.
Do write your MP on the matter; do e-mail the Prime Minister and Minister of Natural Resources (or whatever s/he is called in the latest renaming frenzy) and do remember to send copies to the opposition critics of each party. The more who make their voice heard, thore more likelihood of positive action.
Pam from SW Ontario
said
IF Mother Nature and your God wanted perfect lawns they would have provided them and churches and hospitals in my town wouldn't leave sprinklers running 8-10 hours a day in the hottest days of the year.
We knews the water table levels in the U.S. were getting low and drying up, especially in the Platte river area, back in the early 1970's. Did they do anything then, No, they were waiting for "are good neighbours in the North" to rescue them.
Canada has been the U.S. back-up system for far too long.
The U.S. dictate to Canada and Mexico as dictator for all of North America. We need to stand up for our rights of oil, water, lumber, air, industry, and all the other things they want to control.
John
said
Frank Buchan
said
We have no right to water, we have the priviledge of an excess (presently) in most parts of this country. If we start thinking otherwise it will be the same mentality that corporate America (corporate anywhere, in fact) suffers.
pdm
said
Layton in Moncton
said
M. Cameron
said
MLR
said
Nadia
said
Water is a human right & shame on our nation for blocking this initiative!
Paul
said
Nadia
said
==
That is a great point and lead me to recind my earlier statement; ... Now I understand that Canada is protecting our precious natural resources from the predatory Americans. Thank you KPK.
Joan Peterson
said
How can we export water when we are facing water shortages ourselves. Our glaciers that feed Alberta and Saskatchewan may be gone within 20 years? Then where do we get water from?
Groundwater resources in Alberta are also being reduced due to the oil industry sucking it up.
Water should NEVER be exported to the US. Oh well, they will probably see WMD in Toronto and come in to protect the water supply.
wasteful water
said
Steve in Ottawa
said
It fell on deaf ears.
Here we are 20 yrs later and the same warnings are being expressed.
Are we listening this time???
Jeanne
said
Harper had better put his foot down on this one, or this will DEFINITELY be the end for him. I agree with the person who said we should end our NAFTA agreement as soon as possible.
Roadrobber
said
With regards to the statement by Gabriel DG that the Americans are taking our oil, I didn't realize they were doing that. I thought Canada was selling the oil to the Americans.
Linda
said
U.S. has water but what are they doing with it ?
Canada has water, but are we going to give it away or preserve it ? This will become Canada's Gold.
Al Gore for Prez (of Cuba.)
said
Sean
said
reece@telus.net
said
Richard D
said
I have to admit, I was thinking the exact same thing when I first started reading this.
As for the UN resolution, the last thing we want to do is let some well-meaning resolution force us to give up our water without being able to do anything about it. The UN has been known to rush ill-thought-out resolutions before without knowing the consequences afterwards (such as the Indigenous Peoples Rights resolution, that would give massive rights to indigenous peoples without thinking how it would affect the nations those peoples are in) and this one ranks right up there in the "be very careful" category.
Barney in Trenton
said
ARJAY
said
Michael
said
richie
said
Mark5
said
ME
said
We will all have to conserve what we have. I agree about the golf courses; they take clean water and spray it on their grass and we get it back into the sewer system loaded with all manner of pesticides and herbicides and fertilizer residue. They could keep their grass green by planting drought resistant grass and leave the weeds--though a healthy lawn will sprout very few weeds--just mow them or pull them by hand and using compost to fertilize. This goes for homeowners too. We live in the country where there are open fields, and hence lots of weed seed.
We adopted these practices and we have the greenest and best lawn around and we seldom water and when we do we use a soaker hose and only on the spots that really need it. This way the water gets to the plant roots Those sprinklers waste water by spraying the air and the roots never get saturated. We also use a rain barrel for water for the flowers. It can be done!!
LynnO (Ottawa)
said
Michele
said
JP
said
jb
said