CTV News | First-born kids more likely to succeed: study

Sci-Tech -   

First-born kids more likely to succeed: study

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Rob Brown examines the sibling study
Canada AM: Joseph Price, Brigham Young University

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(41)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Tue. Mar. 25 2008 10:10 PM ET

A new study finds that while first-born children get the most attention, secondborn kids are more likely to attend private school -- just two of the fascinating results of a new birth order study.

The study, completed by researchers at Brigham Young University, analyzed research that tracked the daily schedules of 15,000 children from 10,000 families.

Joseph Price, the researcher who led the study, told CTV's Canada AM the study begins to answer questions about why children's outcomes in life tend to be affected by where they fall in the birth order.

"We've always wondered why first-borns have better outcomes. So this might explain the birth order difference in test scores or educational attainment. And the other thing is it might actually teach us how important parental time is," said Price, speaking from Salt Lake City, Utah.

The study finds parents spend 30 per cent more quality time -- such as minutes spent on homework, meals, reading time or sports -- with first-borns than with subsequent children between the ages of four and 13.

That works out to about 3,000 extra hours of quality time for oldest children, and seems to have an effect that continues throughout the child's life.

"They score better on standardized test scores, have higher IQs, are more likely to go to college, have higher incomes later in life and they're less likely to engage in risky behaviour," said Price, an economics professor who has four kids of his own.

The trend seems to continue even after other children are born, with each subsequent child getting less of their parents' attention. This finding contradicts the myth that the youngest child tends to get the most attention later in life, when they get to experience something akin to "only child" status.

Rather, the study finds that parent/child interaction is so low by the teenage years that the spike in attention doesn't compensate for the lack of quality time in the early years.

But the discrepancy isn't because parents tend to favour their oldest children. Price's research shows parents generally spend equal time with their kids on a given day, but less time overall as the family ages.

For example:

  • A mother of two children will spend 136 minutes of quality time per day with their first-born at age seven.
  • The second-born, when he or she reaches the same age, will only receive 114 minutes of quality time per day -- a gap that increases as years go by.

Margo Kirk, the executive director of the Dalhousie University Children's Centre, is not surprised by the study's findings, but thinks the way the entire family interacts could also have an impact on each child.

"It would be interesting to see what other family dynamics are going on," Kirk told CTV Atlantic. "What kind of total family time, quality family time, would be happening when there are two or three children in the family as well."

It's not all bad news for younger children. The study finds that parents spend more money on their second-born children, that they are more likely to go to private school and that they have more extra-curricular hobbies and activities.

That may be explained by the fact parents feel they are in a better position to afford the extras -- such as sports or music lessons -- by the time they have their second child.

And if parents are spending more time with kids thanks to extracurricular activities, all the better, said Kirk.

"Many parents may be driving to soccer tournaments, hockey tournaments, that sort of thing, but they also volunteer as coaches," said Kirk. "That all counts, or should count."

The study was based on information from the American Time Use Survey.

With a report from CTV Atlantic's Paul Hollingsworth

Comments are now closed for this story

MM
said

No wonder why my sister is an engineer already and is starting her masters at 24 and I haven't finished more than 3 credits in college yet at 19.5 years old.


AAE
said

Well in my family my older brother is a high school drop out and I currently doing my master.


Vahan
said

I don't believe a word of this study. Both my wife and I are first born. The way it worked out with us is that our parents were using our upbringing as a dry run, while our siblings got the new and improved parents. Even into adulthood the older children of retiring parents bear the brunt of the awkward new lifestyle and the angst of "living on fixed incomes" while the younger siblings get the more mellow experienced parent to deal with.They even used our children as practice grandchildren.


Leslie Tobias
said

It seems to make sense. Reveryone knows that the first born are the "test". Parents learn what works and what doesn't with the first born. Most first borns are closer to their parents that is the natural order of things.
By the time you get to the last child. Parents have already learned what works and what doesn't. I have noticed that most parents do not get involved with the younger sibling and therefore the youngest does get cheated out of quality time and are less likely to achieve. The Youngest becomes the "toy" of the family and relatives, friends
The 2nd competes for attention and tries harder and has more stamina especially if the 1st & 2nd are close in age. The first born I have observed is more stable and are given alot of responsiblities at an eary age.


William Westcott
said

I am the 9th born, I guess that explains my reason for being the black sheep of the family:)


Julianna
said

I am a first born and I can see this, but please don't use your birth order as an excuse to what you are doing with your life. I would wonder if my own sister wrote the above comment, but she is already 21.


JP
said

This has been known since at least the time of the ancient Greeks, if not longer. And the reason is obvious; first borns 1) likely get more quality attention, and 2) Perhaps being the first born is physically healthiest from the mother's body point of view.
Oh wow I knew the main reason without reading the article (I just read it now, and lo and behold...)


PaulB
said

Any stats on time spent if you are the youngest of 6?
Siblings spent more time with me than parents. However, it does fall under the same declining curve they are referring to in this study.


Leanne Hanuschuk
said

I spend a lot of time on my youngest child, but maybe because he is 7 years younger than my middle child. I spent a lot of time on my older kids too. This was a worthwhile investment in them as they are both doing well.


pp
said

What????

Private School?

What the heck? who has the money to send ANY of their children to private school. This sounds like they only looked at (very) upper middle class and wealthy families.

The rest of us REAL people have to make do with Public School for all our kids... And I can tell you my parents made ok money and my sister did not go to private school...!

OH - And in my family it is a mixed bag of who is 'successful' or not and it is evenly divided between 1st and second born... and the parents all made similar income, kids all had similar education and educational outcomes, and they all had the same opportunities.

Now that tells me more than some guy with a PHD (which by the ways does stand for 'piled higher and deeper') who is only studying 'theory'...

Like any stats sounds like it is flawed in some way...




GREG TROLLEY
said

I always knew I was smrter then my siblings. And now thanks to this study I have proof. All I need now is someone to do a study stating that the Civic was the best car ever created and my life would be complete.


mnrah
said

hmmm ...

My husband is the second youngest of 7. He is by far the "most successful" of the group when you look at education, relationships and parenting ability. It had nothing to do with his parents or for that matter birth order... it has everything to do with the fact that he has dedicated to serving the Lord! Good news for all of us! :-)


Leslie Tobias
said

Hi again, It's me. I am the youngest in my family. I was deprived of "nuturing". I became independent out of necessity. In my youth up into my 40s I was able to cope. Now in the 50s indenpendence is costing me dearly and not in a positive way. For those of you who have children, spend as much quality time with each of your children and ensure responsibility is shared equaly and fairly according to what each child is capable of.


Gilles, Montreal
said



I am from a family of 6 boys, the oldest is a math teacher and the rich of the family, the second is a professional photographer, I won’t say for the rest but brother one and two are strangely the closest to me, baby of the family. One and two always were the bright ones.


Lisa
said

When you have only one child, you have only one focus but then when you have two you have to devide your time. Birth order has nothing to do with it. A lot of mothers have the first child and go to work and years later have another and decide to stay at home. Also doesnt it also depend on the health of the child, if the second has more health /problems then would not you spend more time with them! It is just a thought!


David
said

Shouldn't a study have a point? The findings in this one are akin to finding out there is more light during the day. So what??
How can this possibly affect anyone??
No, wait! I know!! I will make sure all my kids are first borns! That way they will ALL be successful!
Then I will do a study into what news organizations publish on slow days!!


first born in family of three
said

It seems most readers missed what the research was really about. The journal article is entitled "Parent-Child Quality Time:
Does Birth Order Matter?" and is about how much time parents spend with their children. Stands to reason the more quality time a child has with your parents the better off they will be. My siblings and I are all successful because we all got quality time with parents, even if it was of varying amoounts, especially when we were younger. The lesson to take away from this journal article is that you need to spend quality time with your kids!


Sal - last born, first born female
said

What a waste of a study - this information has been known for eons!
What birth order decided that this study needed to be done? The ones that have never read or who have never done any research before???


Rod R
said

If there is any truth to this type of study..... it just says that while all children are born equal, there is some environmental and cultural influence on how they live their lives.

In general though, I think this sort of study is just a load of crap... only serving the needs of some people who pity themselves and need some form of justification for their status or their state of life.


Don R
said

Oh.. look at poor little me!.... don't blame me for the way I turned out ... I was not the first born.

Everyone who is not a first-born might as well buy a T-shirt that says "don't blame me!" so that we all can see the label that they like to wear!

What a load of crap to use this as j


Robin the Hood
said

Another flawed study??..
First borns generally are under more pressure to succeed which can work for them.. or against them later in life.
Perhap, instead, they should consider sex as a factor... and not at girls but now look at how young boys are being treated differently at home and school - which results in poor reading skills effectively inhibiting later success as adults. For example, allowing them to waste hours of time playing video games instead of reading is effectively discriminating against their chances of future success. Fault of the parents really who seem to assume their boy's success is somehow more assured,.. time to wake up,.. it is not! Or perhaps they are simply too lazy to deal with the typical young male's objections to reading and studying. I'm certain a lack of male teachers to act as role models in the primary schools is another factor. Oops, said too much, here come the Feminists to censor my comments as discriminatory and sexist!



MS
said

My sister works in a top company, makes a lot of money, and is a manager. I am perpetually on the bottom rung, constantly struggling to make my way. This study does not surprise me at all! I've known it for years. First borns get the main course, and the second borns get the leftovers.


B
said

I, as the first born, constantly heard as a child 'Why can't you be more like your sister?' My younger sister has a great new job, and is getting married in November. Our baby brother is following his dream to work on cars. I am overeducated for my job and have cats. Yes, being first born sure helped me.


Todd
said

I can't believe so many people are actually reading this story and then using it to justify their position in life.
Really? That is the best people can come up with?
I am a second born and in my life I have made choices. Some good and some bad.

Byron
said

I'm the youngest of the five and the black sheep in the family. My parents were too busy building socialism for I can safely say that my siblings raised me. As for olders being smarter?! I can contest that is not the case (at least in our family). They make mistakes and I try learning from their mistakes rather than making my own.





THE MIDDLE CHILD
said

As I see it, this report or study only did one thing. Add more fuel to the fire in sibling rivalries. Now the oldest who already thought of themselves the smartest and best has fuel to torment the others with. Mother's can now feel guilty because they did not do as well for the 2nd child onward. Fathers can feel they have failed their children because they were unable to offer private schooling.

The middle child feels less welcome in the family than before. Younger kids can now use this study as an excuse to sit on their butts and do nothing with their lives.

This was a waste of someone's time and a study that has no merrit or point.

Our family of 3 does not even fit in this, we have all been successful in our lives and best of all, our children (each of us have 2) are successful. We are not even upper class, just ordinary middle class Canadian's living our lives, paying our taxes and proving once again all studies do not ring true.



Darren Cecchetto
said

I was the first born of 6 children and in my family it is the exact opposite. My youngest brother made it rich in the popcorn industry and I still live in my mom's basement. I can't seem to hold down a job and just last week the repo depot came and reposessed my Smart car so I beg to differ with these findings!!


Moe
said

Cool, I am the oldest and that explains why I am so smrt....ooppsss, smart :)


RH
said

I do not disagree with this study. I am a first born and my younger brother got enrolled in private school 2 years longer than I did.

Also, I don't agree with first borns being guinea pigs because they tend to learn everything from their parents, while the other children end up learning from their siblings.. the ones with less experience.


Anne M
said

I was the first born and was resented by my mother, who viewed me as locking her into a marriage she did not want. She didn't have the time of day for me, but loved the other three that followed. They were always the apple of her eye and I was the ugly duckling. Yes, I succeeded but only because I wanted to get out of that dysfunctional situation.


Happy with life
said

I'm the first born and I think my only sibling and I are just as successful. But I wonder just what do they base success on? I think being successful is if you are truly happy with your life...it has nothing to do with how much money you have spent on yourself getting a higher education. I can be very happy in life making $30K with a college education and I would consider that more successful than the next person making $250K with a PHD who is not happy with their life because they are always striving to make more money and they work long hours and never see family/friends. I think this study is a waste of time and money. but, hey, those people with PHDs have to do something with their time!


Bill
said

Well I'm the youngest of six and quite frankly the smartest of all and oh yes the best looking of all also. My brothers and sisters know the score. Of course Mom loved me the most also.


Gregg
said

Didn't work in my family, oldest lives at home at 44 and is a bum and me, at 42, own my own business plus have a college education. guess though the oldest did get mommy's attention.


island girl
said

I certainly disagree with the IQ finding. My IQ is 30 points higher than my sister's. (She is the oldest, I am the youngest.) I have also received higher marks throughout our educations.


cmmcleod
said

where there are siblings there be quiblings


Gren
said

It's not what happens to me or not for that matter....I decide how my life works out...I decide how to deal with what i was given or not given...as soon as we all GET that we can get on with achieving our dreams...if you don't grasp that reality you are destined to be a victim...my parents did it to me or someone else had it better...Always be grateful for what you have and not disapointed with what you don't have...work for what you don't have if it is truly what you desire....the you can be grateful!




Matt
said

Well it's interesting that this study says this. I am not sure how much to believe, but growing up in a family with 4 children, me being the second one, i can slightly relate to this story.
My older brother was asked to be bumped up a grade in public school, and attended a "gifted" program all through his school years. He is very intelligent, and has just been accepted into mac university for nuclear engineering.
I on the other hand never got asked to move up and never went to the program. I struggled through much of public school and couldn't read very well until about gr. 4. I curently am involved in 2 school clubs, 3 school sports teams and 2 sports teams out side of school.
I am on an exchange trip in france at the moment, and although i payed the majority of the cost, my parents definitely helped me out.
Now, on the other hand, i also have competed at the national science fair competition 3 times, placing with bronze medals twice and a "special" award once. so i guess its kinda how you look at it.
My other 2 siblinghs are also in the gifted program, and are not in quite as many clubs/sports as i am.
Interesting but perhaps slightly modified to make results sound better is my vote.


Andreas
said

Doesn't make sense. I am the first born and my mother beaten me up on a daily basis for nine years. She hates men. Yet my sister, being a girl, had plenty of quality attention. I still have a higher IQ than my sister. I am in university in a top field, while my sister has a poor job.


MX
said

I wonder if there is more to this than just parental attention. If it was just that wouldn't the headline read "Singletons most likely to succeed" because their parental attention had never been shared by a later sib?


Coincidence
said

From my workplace intranet, here is today's quote:

Life is like a game of cards. The hand that is dealt you is determinism; the way you play it is free will.
- Jawaharlal Nehru



Lisa R.
said

I do believe that 1st born do get more positive attention and are given more responsibilities from parents while younger siblings get less. But I do not think that birth order is a factor for whether you become successful or not in life. Success in life depends on the person's mentality (thoughts) ie. believing that he/she will succeed and taking necessary actions to achieve success.


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz