News Sections
First-born kids more likely to succeed: study
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(41)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. Mar. 25 2008 10:10 PM ET
A new study finds that while first-born children get the most attention, secondborn kids are more likely to attend private school -- just two of the fascinating results of a new birth order study.
The study, completed by researchers at Brigham Young University, analyzed research that tracked the daily schedules of 15,000 children from 10,000 families.
Joseph Price, the researcher who led the study, told CTV's Canada AM the study begins to answer questions about why children's outcomes in life tend to be affected by where they fall in the birth order.
"We've always wondered why first-borns have better outcomes. So this might explain the birth order difference in test scores or educational attainment. And the other thing is it might actually teach us how important parental time is," said Price, speaking from Salt Lake City, Utah.
The study finds parents spend 30 per cent more quality time -- such as minutes spent on homework, meals, reading time or sports -- with first-borns than with subsequent children between the ages of four and 13.
That works out to about 3,000 extra hours of quality time for oldest children, and seems to have an effect that continues throughout the child's life.
"They score better on standardized test scores, have higher IQs, are more likely to go to college, have higher incomes later in life and they're less likely to engage in risky behaviour," said Price, an economics professor who has four kids of his own.
The trend seems to continue even after other children are born, with each subsequent child getting less of their parents' attention. This finding contradicts the myth that the youngest child tends to get the most attention later in life, when they get to experience something akin to "only child" status.
Rather, the study finds that parent/child interaction is so low by the teenage years that the spike in attention doesn't compensate for the lack of quality time in the early years.
But the discrepancy isn't because parents tend to favour their oldest children. Price's research shows parents generally spend equal time with their kids on a given day, but less time overall as the family ages.
For example:
- A mother of two children will spend 136 minutes of quality time per day with their first-born at age seven.
- The second-born, when he or she reaches the same age, will only receive 114 minutes of quality time per day -- a gap that increases as years go by.
Margo Kirk, the executive director of the Dalhousie University Children's Centre, is not surprised by the study's findings, but thinks the way the entire family interacts could also have an impact on each child.
"It would be interesting to see what other family dynamics are going on," Kirk told CTV Atlantic. "What kind of total family time, quality family time, would be happening when there are two or three children in the family as well."
It's not all bad news for younger children. The study finds that parents spend more money on their second-born children, that they are more likely to go to private school and that they have more extra-curricular hobbies and activities.
That may be explained by the fact parents feel they are in a better position to afford the extras -- such as sports or music lessons -- by the time they have their second child.
And if parents are spending more time with kids thanks to extracurricular activities, all the better, said Kirk.
"Many parents may be driving to soccer tournaments, hockey tournaments, that sort of thing, but they also volunteer as coaches," said Kirk. "That all counts, or should count."
The study was based on information from the American Time Use Survey.
With a report from CTV Atlantic's Paul Hollingsworth
User Tools
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(41)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
Some members talked about kicking Canada out of the commonwealth--good, let it happen.The name itself tells you what it is about---COMMON--WEALTH. Meaning of course that Canada will give our money to other countries who cannot ,or in most cases will not, work to develop their own countries

Comments are now closed for this story
MM
said
AAE
said
Vahan
said
Leslie Tobias
said
By the time you get to the last child. Parents have already learned what works and what doesn't. I have noticed that most parents do not get involved with the younger sibling and therefore the youngest does get cheated out of quality time and are less likely to achieve. The Youngest becomes the "toy" of the family and relatives, friends
The 2nd competes for attention and tries harder and has more stamina especially if the 1st & 2nd are close in age. The first born I have observed is more stable and are given alot of responsiblities at an eary age.
William Westcott
said
Julianna
said
JP
said
Oh wow I knew the main reason without reading the article (I just read it now, and lo and behold...)
PaulB
said
Siblings spent more time with me than parents. However, it does fall under the same declining curve they are referring to in this study.
Leanne Hanuschuk
said
pp
said
Private School?
What the heck? who has the money to send ANY of their children to private school. This sounds like they only looked at (very) upper middle class and wealthy families.
The rest of us REAL people have to make do with Public School for all our kids... And I can tell you my parents made ok money and my sister did not go to private school...!
OH - And in my family it is a mixed bag of who is 'successful' or not and it is evenly divided between 1st and second born... and the parents all made similar income, kids all had similar education and educational outcomes, and they all had the same opportunities.
Now that tells me more than some guy with a PHD (which by the ways does stand for 'piled higher and deeper') who is only studying 'theory'...
Like any stats sounds like it is flawed in some way...
GREG TROLLEY
said
mnrah
said
My husband is the second youngest of 7. He is by far the "most successful" of the group when you look at education, relationships and parenting ability. It had nothing to do with his parents or for that matter birth order... it has everything to do with the fact that he has dedicated to serving the Lord! Good news for all of us! :-)
Leslie Tobias
said
Gilles, Montreal
said
I am from a family of 6 boys, the oldest is a math teacher and the rich of the family, the second is a professional photographer, I won’t say for the rest but brother one and two are strangely the closest to me, baby of the family. One and two always were the bright ones.
Lisa
said
David
said
How can this possibly affect anyone??
No, wait! I know!! I will make sure all my kids are first borns! That way they will ALL be successful!
Then I will do a study into what news organizations publish on slow days!!
first born in family of three
said
Does Birth Order Matter?" and is about how much time parents spend with their children. Stands to reason the more quality time a child has with your parents the better off they will be. My siblings and I are all successful because we all got quality time with parents, even if it was of varying amoounts, especially when we were younger. The lesson to take away from this journal article is that you need to spend quality time with your kids!
Sal - last born, first born female
said
What birth order decided that this study needed to be done? The ones that have never read or who have never done any research before???
Rod R
said
In general though, I think this sort of study is just a load of crap... only serving the needs of some people who pity themselves and need some form of justification for their status or their state of life.
Don R
said
Everyone who is not a first-born might as well buy a T-shirt that says "don't blame me!" so that we all can see the label that they like to wear!
What a load of crap to use this as j
Robin the Hood
said
First borns generally are under more pressure to succeed which can work for them.. or against them later in life.
Perhap, instead, they should consider sex as a factor... and not at girls but now look at how young boys are being treated differently at home and school - which results in poor reading skills effectively inhibiting later success as adults. For example, allowing them to waste hours of time playing video games instead of reading is effectively discriminating against their chances of future success. Fault of the parents really who seem to assume their boy's success is somehow more assured,.. time to wake up,.. it is not! Or perhaps they are simply too lazy to deal with the typical young male's objections to reading and studying. I'm certain a lack of male teachers to act as role models in the primary schools is another factor. Oops, said too much, here come the Feminists to censor my comments as discriminatory and sexist!
MS
said
B
said
Todd
said
Really? That is the best people can come up with?
I am a second born and in my life I have made choices. Some good and some bad.
Byron
said
THE MIDDLE CHILD
said
The middle child feels less welcome in the family than before. Younger kids can now use this study as an excuse to sit on their butts and do nothing with their lives.
This was a waste of someone's time and a study that has no merrit or point.
Our family of 3 does not even fit in this, we have all been successful in our lives and best of all, our children (each of us have 2) are successful. We are not even upper class, just ordinary middle class Canadian's living our lives, paying our taxes and proving once again all studies do not ring true.
Darren Cecchetto
said
Moe
said
RH
said
Also, I don't agree with first borns being guinea pigs because they tend to learn everything from their parents, while the other children end up learning from their siblings.. the ones with less experience.
Anne M
said
Happy with life
said
Bill
said
Gregg
said
island girl
said
cmmcleod
said
Gren
said
Matt
said
My older brother was asked to be bumped up a grade in public school, and attended a "gifted" program all through his school years. He is very intelligent, and has just been accepted into mac university for nuclear engineering.
I on the other hand never got asked to move up and never went to the program. I struggled through much of public school and couldn't read very well until about gr. 4. I curently am involved in 2 school clubs, 3 school sports teams and 2 sports teams out side of school.
I am on an exchange trip in france at the moment, and although i payed the majority of the cost, my parents definitely helped me out.
Now, on the other hand, i also have competed at the national science fair competition 3 times, placing with bronze medals twice and a "special" award once. so i guess its kinda how you look at it.
My other 2 siblinghs are also in the gifted program, and are not in quite as many clubs/sports as i am.
Interesting but perhaps slightly modified to make results sound better is my vote.
Andreas
said
MX
said
Coincidence
said
Life is like a game of cards. The hand that is dealt you is determinism; the way you play it is free will.
- Jawaharlal Nehru
Lisa R.
said