News Sections
Trashed blueprints give 'key' to anti-terror unit
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(24)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Thu. Mar. 20 2008 10:11 PM ET
Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day says he's launched a probe to find out how blueprints for a new military counter-terrorism unit ended up in a downtown Ottawa garbage can.
The probe was launched after the discovery of blueprints containing sensitive details on the unit.
Anthony Salloum, policy analyst for the left-leaning Rideau Institute, says he and his spouse came upon seven cardboard tubes of blueprints in a pile of trash during a walk on Bank Street on Oct 13.
The documents were stamped with Department of Defence markings and dated March 5, 2007.
Salloum took one tube home and soon discovered he had something important.
His find contained 26 separate blue prints detailing every inch of the new military complex to be housed at CFB Trenton.
"This is very serious," he told CTV News. "These are the schematics of a highly classified anti-terrorism unit built in Trenton."
The other six sets of plans are missing.
The Department of Defence, which sent the blueprints to a number of engineering firms for bids, has not said if the documents are classified.
A military analyst says he's been told the matter is not being considered a security breach because the plans were part of a rejected draft for a new building, which will be the home of the Canadian Joint Incident Response Unit at CFB Trenton.
"After (the engineering firm) didn't get it, I assume they just threw the plans in the garbage,'' said Alain Pellerin of the Conference of Defence Associations.
The Canadian Joint Incident Response Unit is the military's first response team in case of a terrorism attack involving nuclear, chemical or biological agents.
"As you can well imagine the government has repeatedly said it's top secret, it's classified, it's national security concerns prevent them from discussing the details of this," Salloum said on CTV Newsnet's Mike Duffy Life.
"So the irony isn't lost on me that I happened to be walking by on my way to have supper ... and I literally stumble on a garbage bag full of rolled up schematics, with proposals and outlines of existing facilities at Trenton," he added.
The blueprints apparently showed the locations of the:
- Security fence
- Electrical grid
- Sewage system.
- Storage bay for robots used to detect chemical and biological agents
"Basically (the blueprints) give the key to the building to these people," says Michel Juneau-Katsuya, a former CSIS agent.
"A trained eye could look at this and obtain quite a lot of sensitive information -- what will be happening in this building, what will be stored in this building."
But Day has warned the public against jumping to conclusions about the contents of the documents until a report comes out.
"We'll wait for the actual report in terms of what exactly these documents are," he said.
"If there is some kind of security breach . . . that's of huge concern. We're going to wait for all the details."
Salloum said he hopes the Department of National Defence reassesses its bids process.
"If that's the biggest thing that comes out of this story, that DND looks at how it tenders these construction projects, and how it deals with bids that aren't successful," he said.
"In terms of laying out procedures for their destruction, whether its deleting files on computers or actually shredding documentation or returning them to DND -- maybe we can see those protocols in place now."
Meanwhile, opposition members pounced on what they said was a major lapse.
"This government is so secretive, it's Mister No Comment," Liberal Defence Critic Coderre said.
"And then they have this shocking lapse."
Coderre called on someone to lose their job over the matter. His NDP counterpart Dawn Black called the situation "absolutely unbelievable."
"It's quite incredible," Black said. "It's kind of a black farce."
In addition to the probe launched by Day, the military has also started its own investigation.
With a report from CTV's Craig Oliver
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(24)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Scott
said
jim
said
Lemme guess Tories, time for yet another public inquiry as to why/how these non-classified blueprints got there? I still can't believe my taxes pay for Day to look into this.
Andrew W
said
Howard in Calgary
said
Would you be as cavalier about someone throwing printouts with your SIN number on them?
People who have access to data, whether confidential or not, need to be held to a higher standard.
In this day and age, data is a valuable commodity, and many groups and governments would have paid money to see those documents. That they are for a new military unit would guarantee as much.
Joe
said
And Scott, I highly doubt that your home's bluebrint is a matter of national security.
Matt
said
Documents such as these (accepted or rejected) need to be disposed of properly, not simply just thrown in the trash with everything else.
Tori
said
Why would the couple only take one of the rolls home? Now where are the other 6? They probably should not have removed anything but contacted the authorities immediately.
Should the documents not have been classified there would not be a "security breach"
I hope they discover soon who mistakenly placed these important papers in a garbage can.
Why was this couple looking in the garbage can? Only someone expecting to find somethign of interest would be looking there?? hmmm
This is going to get interesting, unless of course it is swept under the garbage lid.
Brian
said
Richard D
said
The way they're looking at it, it may not have been a serious breach, but obviously there's a hole in their security somewhere.
Seth
said
Scott
said
Derek
said
Gudink
said
abc
said
Lyndon
said
Reality Check
said
Spencer
said
Hugh
said
I wonder about the motives of the people that found these documents...they went to the media instead of returning them to the original office.---------------------------------I'm with you. I was always taught to return found property to the owner or to the police so it could get to the owner.
We are doomed!
said
PBW
said
If I can take the time to shred junk mail bearing my name and address in the name of personal security, government employess - who are paid to be security conscious - should take time to do the same with every piece of unwanted paper. In the case of secure shredding, it can then be incinerated; the rest can be de-inked and recycled.
In this case, the employee concerned should at the very least be reprimanded. As for the immediate manager, he/she should be fired, as he/she is obviously not a) training his/her staff adequately and b) not managing that office effectively.
Gerry Ennis
said
Retired
said
If you read the article again, it says that DND has not said whether the documents were classified or not.
In the posts, in ignorance, the term “confidential” is used, quite liberally and interchangeably with the term “classified.”
FYI -- The term “classified” is a generic term simply meaning that the item is not Unclassified. Within “classified” there are many levels of classification:
- Restricted
- Protected (3 levels)
- Confidential
- Secret
- Top Secret
- Many levels above Top Secret, which relate to specific material, differentiated by the particular the subject material, the source of the material, and selectively permitted distribution.
Being cleared to any of these levels does not provide blanket authorization for the individual, so cleared, to access all material at that level. The underlying principle is the NEED TO KNOW. Two people cleared to the same level, do not necessarily have the need to know the information that the other has.
At this point, until the classification is determined, the severity and significance of the incident can’t really be judged. Technically there is a security breach, because essentially all military information is at the very least Restricted, unless categorized and labelled as Unclassified.
The persons finding the material were wrong in going to the media first (if they did) if they thought the material was sensitive or classified. Doing so put the potentially highly sensitive material in the position of being compromised, and put the persons in jeopardy of violating the Security of Information Act. A dumb move for their 15 minutes of fame.
If it was a contractor who disposed of them in such a careless manner, he might, and should, have difficulty getting future contracts.
Marc
said
J from Ontario
said