CTV News | Critics question independence of RCMP reform panel

Top Stories -   

Critics question independence of RCMP reform panel

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Newsnet: Tony Cannavino on the report
CTV Newsnet: Norman Inkster, fmr. RCMP comm.
Canada AM: Graham Richardson explains the overhaul
Mike Duffy Live: Staff Sgt. Brian Roach of the RCMP

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(17)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Thu. Mar. 20 2008 5:23 PM ET

Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day's announcement Thursday of a new panel intended to oversee reforms slated for the RCMP was quickly dismissed by rank-and-file police officers.

The creation of an RCMP Reform Implementation Council was one of the key recommendations of the Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP, which followed the RCMP pension scandal and allegations of corruption within the ranks.

Some Mounties who had complained about problems in the force were demoted or transferred, and many officers said they were afraid to speak out for fear of a backlash from the top. The council is supposed to make the force more accountable.

"It's time to move on with changes, significant changes, that will bring this historic force well into the 21st century in terms of its capabilities and moving forward," Day said at a news conference.

The council will serve in an advising capacity to Day as he oversees reforms to the organization. It will be led by former Alcan executive David McAusland, and will include Beverley Busson, a veteran Mountie who briefly led the RCMP in 2006 and 2007.

The Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP called for more independence from government for the RCMP as well as the creation of a civilian body to oversee the force. But the head of the Canadian Police Association questioned how independent the new council will be.

"You don't put people who have caused the problem in charge -- to bring out a new modernized RCMP," Tony Cannavino told CTV Newsnet on Thursday afternoon.

"Where's the part where the members will be protected? How can they come out and speak freely and announce any situation where they have been threatened. There's nobody there. There's no independent association ... Why are they so reluctant or afraid to appoint on this committee a representative of the (RCMP) members."

Cannavino noted that rank-and-file Mounties need the same protection to highlight abuses as other police officers in Canada.

But Day said the panel will help implement reforms with "independence and transparency, and McAusland said he wants to ensure that the Mounties will be better run in the future.

"My experience is that regardless of the type of organization you're dealing with . . . excellence in management and excellence in leadership is driven by organizational excellence," he said.

The council is intended to help RCMP Commissioner William Elliott as reforms are carried out, and regularly report to Day on progress.

Its first report is due by the fall, with the following report due in March of 2009.

Please Add Comments( )

Mark
said
0 0

Let's hope this is a good start


Darryl NB
said
0 0

Why should a civilian panel be involved in a non-civilian orginization. Unless they have experience within the RCMP then their imput is not very useful. It is like a civilian panel reviewing something in the military. It don't work. Improvements are always welcome but please do it using an objective body of the RCMP and not a civilian review board with no experience. I'm not asked to review nuclear physics or rocket science mainly be because I don't know it. If I missed the part where they mentioned the panel is experienced disregard the above. I applaud the effort the men and women for keeping the roads and communities safe. Thanks


Bender
said
0 0

Who are these people? What are their qualifications? I would hope that they have some direct or indirect experience in law enforcement otherwise this will turn into an exercise in futility.


TC from BC
said
0 0

Change is definitely needed but I think a "civilian body to oversee the force" can be risky. At least one of the Implementation Council members, Beverley Busson, is ex-RCMP. This is a very good thing. A Council that is totally blind to the inner works of policing can be detrimental to a Force that is already suffering from constant negative media attention, high attrition rates and a non-existent collective bargaining system. I hope good things come from this.


JDF
said
0 0

Good for them. Hopefully, they will start with paying recruits at Depot...what a great recruiting incentive.

At Bender: Bev Busson was the A/Commissioner for a bit while they appointed a new one. I'm sure she would proved valuable feedback / support for the implentation of appropriate changes.


Pat NS
said
0 0

To answer your concerns noted. Bev Busson has many years of RCMP experience at or near the top level of the Force. She is very well respected within the RCMP from the bottom up and will bring her expertise to the table I am sure.


GGE
said
0 0

Unfortunately or fortunately, however you see it, it is clear that some sort of independent oversight committee was needed. Unfettered organizations, particularly those with high levels of authority, power and control, have a habit of overstepping their boundaries and need to be reeled in. That is the reality for the RCMP. A wonderful organization that crossed the line wayyyyyy too many times and became corrupt, unjust,insular and secretive. That can't work for a public institution that is mandated to protect the citizens of Canada. My hope, as I expect it is for all of us, is that this newly founded Council will be able to fix some of the inherent problems in the system , in the RCMP and once again the RCMP can be a proud and successful organization for Canada and its people.


Gregory Boudreau
said
0 0

Maybe now the RCMP can get back to doing what its mandate is, to combat crime, and maintain security for the citizens of Canada


dmc
said
0 0

Will this new task force oversee the need to exonerate Darlene Mary Chidley? 14 yrs. a victim of a falsified police record. Forced to live in pain and poverty with a bastardized reputation, while authorities reap from the proceeds of crime!


Rick Butler
said
0 0

I think it is stretching a bit to claim "it is significant that all the members are civilians"--please, Graham check Ms. Busson's c.v. Dah!!!


RCMP Officer
said
0 0

I am very encouraged to hear that this panel has been appointed. I am also very pleased that Bev BUSSON, the former RCMP Commissioner, has been added to the list. She is very likely one of the most respected officers ever by the rank and file of the force. I am anxious for several of these changes to take place to make the force better.


John Caron
said
0 0

John, ex RCMP BC
It is about time that the government acted in this manner. I respect Bev Busson but I think it is inappropriate that she be on the panel. I feel that because the RCMP is in such bad need of repair that the panel should have been chosen with absolutely no attachment to the force. Busson has been in the Force for so long and held such a capacity that she may not see the damage that has been done by her ex co workers. She has been so loyal to the Force that she may not see the need for drastic change and civilian oversight. I dont think that she can be considered to be civilian because of her background.


FreakAlert
said
0 0

It's all optics. True intention, I would think, is how the RCMP could better protect themselves.


terry
said
0 0

The RCMP, should always be under the oversight of the government. i.e., the people.


Archie
said
0 0

Mr. Fraser is right that all commissioners are civilians, but Beverley A. Busson served as Commissioner of Royal Canadian Mounted Police from December 2006 to July 2007.


Joseph BC
said
0 0

Darryl NB should realize that the panel includes former RCMP Commissioner Bev Busson, who has ample knowledge and expertise in police matters. The function of the civilian members is not to meddle in police work but to update the administration of the force - e.g. install a workable collective bargaining procedure and redefine the boundaries between legitimate and unlawful police activity. These are tasks for lawyers and administrators, not police officers.


Zhimmy
said
0 0

Re: John Caron's post

I think then its good that Bev Busson is on the Board. We need some people that are "loyal" to the RCMP "for a change".

Let's face it the real problem with the RCMP started when all these "special interest and minority groups" started trying to "reform" the Force back in the 1980s.

Now look at what's happenned!

I'm scared to death of a "civilian oversight" committee. For me it just seems to be another forum for these "special interest and minority groups" to gain control and further decimate a once proud, noble and globally respected "Canadian" Police Force.

The real problem with the RCMP is that it was infiltrated by people both within and outside the Force whose real intention was to destroy it as a means to destroy Canada!

Who will we see on this "Oversight committee" in the future? Whoever some politican wants to place to get them the support of some minority group? Members of the BlOC? I'm sure they already are exerting their influence in Parliament. Let's go on and give them and other groups more "out of sight and unaccountable" power within these committees.



Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz