News Sections
Critics question independence of RCMP reform panel
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(17)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Thu. Mar. 20 2008 5:23 PM ET
Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day's announcement Thursday of a new panel intended to oversee reforms slated for the RCMP was quickly dismissed by rank-and-file police officers.
The creation of an RCMP Reform Implementation Council was one of the key recommendations of the Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP, which followed the RCMP pension scandal and allegations of corruption within the ranks.
Some Mounties who had complained about problems in the force were demoted or transferred, and many officers said they were afraid to speak out for fear of a backlash from the top. The council is supposed to make the force more accountable.
"It's time to move on with changes, significant changes, that will bring this historic force well into the 21st century in terms of its capabilities and moving forward," Day said at a news conference.
The council will serve in an advising capacity to Day as he oversees reforms to the organization. It will be led by former Alcan executive David McAusland, and will include Beverley Busson, a veteran Mountie who briefly led the RCMP in 2006 and 2007.
The Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP called for more independence from government for the RCMP as well as the creation of a civilian body to oversee the force. But the head of the Canadian Police Association questioned how independent the new council will be.
"You don't put people who have caused the problem in charge -- to bring out a new modernized RCMP," Tony Cannavino told CTV Newsnet on Thursday afternoon.
"Where's the part where the members will be protected? How can they come out and speak freely and announce any situation where they have been threatened. There's nobody there. There's no independent association ... Why are they so reluctant or afraid to appoint on this committee a representative of the (RCMP) members."
Cannavino noted that rank-and-file Mounties need the same protection to highlight abuses as other police officers in Canada.
But Day said the panel will help implement reforms with "independence and transparency, and McAusland said he wants to ensure that the Mounties will be better run in the future.
"My experience is that regardless of the type of organization you're dealing with . . . excellence in management and excellence in leadership is driven by organizational excellence," he said.
The council is intended to help RCMP Commissioner William Elliott as reforms are carried out, and regularly report to Day on progress.
Its first report is due by the fall, with the following report due in March of 2009.
User Tools
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(17)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Please Add Comments( )
Mark
0
said
0
Darryl NB
0
said
0
Bender
0
said
0
TC from BC
0
said
0
JDF
0
said
0
At Bender: Bev Busson was the A/Commissioner for a bit while they appointed a new one. I'm sure she would proved valuable feedback / support for the implentation of appropriate changes.
Pat NS
0
said
0
GGE
0
said
0
Gregory Boudreau
0
said
0
dmc
0
said
0
Rick Butler
0
said
0
RCMP Officer
0
said
0
John Caron
0
said
0
It is about time that the government acted in this manner. I respect Bev Busson but I think it is inappropriate that she be on the panel. I feel that because the RCMP is in such bad need of repair that the panel should have been chosen with absolutely no attachment to the force. Busson has been in the Force for so long and held such a capacity that she may not see the damage that has been done by her ex co workers. She has been so loyal to the Force that she may not see the need for drastic change and civilian oversight. I dont think that she can be considered to be civilian because of her background.
FreakAlert
0
said
0
terry
0
said
0
Archie
0
said
0
Joseph BC
0
said
0
Zhimmy
0
said
0
I think then its good that Bev Busson is on the Board. We need some people that are "loyal" to the RCMP "for a change".
Let's face it the real problem with the RCMP started when all these "special interest and minority groups" started trying to "reform" the Force back in the 1980s.
Now look at what's happenned!
I'm scared to death of a "civilian oversight" committee. For me it just seems to be another forum for these "special interest and minority groups" to gain control and further decimate a once proud, noble and globally respected "Canadian" Police Force.
The real problem with the RCMP is that it was infiltrated by people both within and outside the Force whose real intention was to destroy it as a means to destroy Canada!
Who will we see on this "Oversight committee" in the future? Whoever some politican wants to place to get them the support of some minority group? Members of the BlOC? I'm sure they already are exerting their influence in Parliament. Let's go on and give them and other groups more "out of sight and unaccountable" power within these committees.