News Sections
Unhappy Albertans poised to re-elect Tories
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(66)
Bill Doskoch, CTV.ca News
Date: Sun. Mar. 2 2008 10:56 PM ET
Ed Stelmach will probably remain premier of Alberta in his first electoral test on Monday, but when it's over, no one will likely be calling him King Ed.
Stelmach took over in late 2006 from Ralph Klein, who did wear the political crown in Alberta for 14 years as Progressive Conservative leader and premier.
But even Klein -- who famously proclaimed, "Welcome to Ralph's World," after a landslide victory in 2001 -- saw his popular support erode for the first time in the 2004 provincial election.
The Tories still held 60 of 83 seats going into this campaign.
However, "people are unhappy," Calgary-based political commentator Joan Crockett told CTV.ca.
Media-sponsored polls there have suggested that with the campaign winding down, more than 25 per cent of Alberta voters are undecided about which party to support, she said, adding a substantial number would like to see a change in government.
The Tories are estimated to have about 40 per cent support provincially (the party captured 46 per cent of the vote in 2004), the Liberals less than 20 per cent and the NDP tied with the Green party with around five per cent.
A Strategic Counsel poll for CTV and The Globe and Mail found 50 per cent of Albertans were likely to support the Tories, down eight points from January. Here's the other parties:
- Liberals - 25 per cent
- Wildrose Alliance - 10 per cent
- NDP - 8 per cent
- Greens - 8 per cent
The poll was conducted Feb. 27 and 28 and surveyed 750 people. The margin of error is 3.6 per cent, 19 times out of 20.
"It's going to be a Conservative majority government, but what is worth noting is that there's a decline in the number of people who think the province is on the right track or an increased number of people who think it's time for a change," The Strategic Counsel's Peter Donolo told CTV.ca. "Beneath the prosperity, there's a growing anxiety, but it hasn't found a vehicle."
Albertan and former Reform Party leader Preston Manning told CTV's Question Period on Sunday that he's worried about low voter turnout. "People do want change, but they don't know where to get it from," he said.
Ed's conundrum
Stelmach is in a strange situation: He's the latest steward of a political dynasty that began with Peter Lougheed's stunning victory over a 36-year-old Social Credit government in 1971.
The province's energy-driven economy is the strongest in Canada and has lured hundreds of thousands of newcomers. Yet prosperity and hyper-growth have brought their own problems, like labour shortages for employers, soaring rents and housing prices for workers and infrastructure everywhere creaking under the strain.
Some companies have recently suggested the pace of oilsands development should be slowed down. Stelmach has rejected that, although he is trying to sound more pro-environment.
All this had the two main opposition parties, the Liberals (16 seats) and NDP (4 seats, all in Edmonton), attacking the Tories as a tired party unable to manage the pressures buffeting the province.
Those two parties are to the left of the Tories, but on the right is the Wildrose Alliance (1 seat; there was one independent MLA and one vacancy at dissolution), whose members think the Tories have drifted away from true conservatism. And in central Alberta, an activist who led a fight against a power line hopes to become the first elected Green Party politician in Canada.
Stelmach tried to sell his party as the one best positioned to deliver change -- despite having been in power for 37 years so far.
His campaigning style has been described as wooden. But even if Stelmach is today's Harry Strom (the last Social Credit premier), none of the opposition leaders appears likely to play the Peter Lougheed role on Monday.
Liberal Leader Kevin Taft, NDP Leader Brian Mason and Wildrose Alliance Leader Paul Hinman all trail Stelmach in leadership, according to polling conducted for CTV Edmonton and CTV Calgary by Teleresearch Inc.
The Calgary problem
Where Stelmach might have a problem is in Calgary.
He won the party leadership as a compromise candidate, mainly through his strength in Edmonton and rural areas. In his first cabinet, Stelmach surrounded himself with loyalists - few of whom were from Calgary.
In a byelection for Klein's old seat, the voters of Calgary-Elbow sent Stelmach a message -- they elected a Liberal.
Last fall, Stelmach announced changes to the province's energy royalties regime, seen by some analysts as under-charging for Alberta's non-renewable resources of oil and natural gas. He announced the province would increase its royalty take by $1.4 billion by 2010 - about 25 per cent less than a panel recommended.
Crockatt said the natural gas industry is the real driver of Alberta's economy, and that sector is furious. Some energy companies are planning on spending their exploration budgets in other jurisdictions, "just to make a point," she said.
Crockatt listed some other controversies:
- Stelmach wouldn't approve Craig Chandler, a controversial social conservative, as a party candidate. Chandler is now running as an Independent; and
- He got into spat with former TV journalist Arthur Kent, considered one of the party's star candidates in Calgary.
Stelmach spent all day Saturday in Calgary, which he called Alberta's "Conservative heartland."
Leadership at stake?
Crockatt noted that to win power in Alberta, you need two of the three pillars: Calgary, Edmonton and the rural vote.
Mount Royal College political scientist Keith Brownsey told CTV.ca that Edmonton and Calgary account for 42 of the 83 seats, Red Deer and Lethbridge a couple seats each -- with the rural areas holding virtually everything else.
The rural areas are over-represented relative to their population, he said - and Stelmach is likely to win at least 35 seats there.
"That means he needs 10 more and he's got a majority," he said.
Teleresearch's mid-February poll for CTV Edmonton put the Tories well ahead there. The Strategic Counsel poll buttresses that finding. While Crockatt said the Liberals could win 11 seats in Calgary, up from four, that means the Tories could still win up to 12.
The math is there for a Tory victory. But Ralph Klein was gone within two years of winning 62 seats. Brownsey suspects if Stelmach only delivers a bare majority, his continued hold on the leadership is by no means assured.
"What's going on with the Conservative party now is you have a full-blown leadership race going on," he said. "People are manoeuvring for a post-Stelmach leadership run. They expect him to do very poorly."
Brownsey said there are those who want to take the party further right, those who are more urban and socially liberal -- "and then there's Ed Stelmach."
The potential exists for the Progressive Conservative party to fracture in the future over these factional pressures, he predicted.
"But who knows what's going to happen in this election? (Stelmach) could win 55 or 60 seats and all is well with him."
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(66)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
The chance of the destruction of our planet is very very small with this collider, but who are these people to decide what risks are acceptable for all of mankind? It puts me at unease and adds to my anxiety. CERN acknowledges that there are miniscule risks -- they admit to it so please spare the convoluted retorts.

Comments are now closed for this story
Steve
said
Rob
said
James
said
Kim
said
Scott
said
Government. This is why they have missed the target here.
We have Ed Stelmach , We are getting to know Ed Stelmach. He Is no Ralph Klein! (and that is good thing !)
N. Burman
said
Po
said
It's not so much about liberalism vs. conservatism, it's about what works bets in the current world.
Keeping the pace of development of the oilsands or increasing it will only hurt Alberta (if memory serves me right, it's usually conservative groups that scream "Save the children!" whenever something morally reprehensible happens)... so how do you explain that you have no objections to the contamination of a large amount of pure water to filter out the oil in the oilsands project?
I'm not an environmental nut but if I saw the pools of toxic waste water that I've seen in Alberta in my home province, I would go absolutely ballistic! These things are huge and toxic... and it's not lie they're being kept underground and sealed, no, they're kept in huge lakes of brown disgusting liquid that can easily seep through to your sources of drinkable water.
Anne
said
Given the royalty fiasco, I challenge all Albertans in the oil and gas industry to vote for a change. Let's put your money where your mouths are.
Given there is no concrete plan for health care in Alberta, I challenge all of the rural voters to keep this in mind when you place your votes. If you vote PC again, I hope we don't have to hear about how far you have to travel for decent health care. Eliminating the AHC premiums is nothing more than an empty campaign promise....PC's love this approach to suck the voters in.
Infrastructure and education - now this is the plan...toss a small sum and ask Albertans to fund the rest through private donations/funding.
The best one of all, Ed Stelmach has rolled up his sleeves and is seeking to appeal the insurance cap on soft tissue injuries. I just have one question - how much have the insurance companies contributed to Stelmach's campaign? Every Albertan was promised a reduction in insurance premiums as a result of the cap - my decrease was a grand $6 and I have never had a accident or ticket in almost 25 years of driving. For those who have been hindered by recovery for medical expenses - get out and vote.
Ryan
said
anu bose
said
Jennifer Nevermind
said
Kathy
said
The rural vote along with the few urban seats they retain will keep the PCs in power but I feel there is an undercurrent of mistrust against the PCs. The real story begins on Monday night as Alberta reflects on the election outcome.
cantuc
said
Drilling rigs shut down , highways that need improving or twinning ,hospitals that need building and Stelmach spends $50,000,000.00 on "the arts" .I wish Stelmach had to drive to work every at 6:00am morning on the #3 between Medicine Hat and Taber . Might see some actual governing then .
Michael
said
His lack of leadership and lack of political gumption are just plain pitiful; but not equated to any political ideology.
The Stelmach campaign isn't about change that works for the people. It can barely be called change that works for the corporations. It's not change.
It's just plain bad.
Mike
said
Dean
said
jg
said
Out of Dodge
said
I've often said Albertans are simply going to start cannibalizing eachother.
Leaving Alberta
said
Nick J Boragina
said
As for the NDP, they are not doing well at all. One of the reasons is "why vote NDP". Two or three decades ago, there were many answers, but today the NDP is seen as "justanother" party. with "justanother" platform. The Greens, even if they are not as left-wing as the NDP, are picking up support because they are truly "different". That leaves only the Liberals to challenge the Tories. The Liberals, however, are not ready to win. They can set themselves up this round to make a serious run at it next time, perhaps with a more charismatic, or more well known leader (just what HAS anne mcclellan been up to recently anyway?)
Sadly, I think the only excitement this round will be weather stelmach’s majority will be by one dozen or two dozen seats.
WJC
said
JS
said
If Taft gets in, say hello to higher taxes, higher energy costs, higher. Say goodbye to jobs.
Sam
said
Darryl
said
jeremy
said
People like Steve need to realise that. Fiscal conservatists buy when the time is right not when prices are high,Ralph forgot to do this,and now we have an infrastructure debt that is massive.
Kevin Aubie
said
lee
said
To Jennifer Nevermind, the nonsense you spout is amazing. Stepping over your neighbours are you. Perhaps you should have complained about being stuck in traffic with all the brand new SUV's if you wanted to be believable.
While the province may have some problems in fact it has very few, try living in Quebec for a couple of years or perhaps head to Vancouver and see what a real affordable housing crisis looks like, or better yet move to southern Ontario and enjoy your 2 hour daily commut to work since the only house you can afford is in Guelph.
Wake up, quit whining and go vote.
Darrell
said
Anne M
said
Mike Fulop
said
Colin Creado
said
When are we going to get a government that will fix the rural problem of being over-represented. As a person living in Calgary and not out in the boonies and paying damn well more taxes for doing it, i feel i deserve a stronger voice!!
Dixie grateful to be an Albertan
said
Curt
said
Thanos
said
1) the capping of soft-tissue injuries at $4000 maximum is an insult to anyone who gets injured at work or a road accident
2) governing the province by promoting an urban vs rural power divide is moronic; the way Stelmach and his closest loyalists insulted Calgary (the largest tax base in the province) is just ridiculous
Tories are just starting to reap the whirlwind of the "anyone but Jim Dinning" attitude that ruined the last leadership race. I know who I vote for won't win but I still won't be voting for Stelmach and his rednecks.
Kevin - Edmonton
said
The conservatives will take a convincing victory as always simple because there is no credible alternative. Alberta politics has become a joke, with no options do we really have a democratic choice to make or are we all just resigned to accepting the inevitable.
Conrad
said
Denis P
said
And how can anybody be "unhappy" in Alberta? We're the economic engine of Canada, and we know the Conservatives are at least partly responsible for that.
To Ontarians; we see who you just voted in, and we don't want that. In Alberta, it's not heresy to be right wing. As a matter of fact, we quite enjoy it. So, if the media is expecting a Conservative fall from power, you might as well pack up now, and in the case of the CBC, save the tax payers some money.
Ground Zero
said
Too much growth too fast has caused housing and rent and all services to become very unaffordable. When you have a couple 100 thousand people move here in such a short time, the result is gridlock. That gridlock is traffic, housing, rental shortages, almost all services etc. basically affordability of everything. And they wonder why everyone is miserable? A slow sustained growth would have assured longterm continual growth. All we are setting ourselves up for is another Bust, this time MUCH worse. The Oil sands construction will inevitably come to an end. There is only so much fresh water that can be exploited for the extraction process and there will be mounting world anger at a time when the rest of the world is trying to cut back C02, Alberta is doubling and quadrupling it.
Small businesses and Big businesses such as Dell and others have shutdown and moved from Alberta because the costs are atrocious. What is going to happen when the growth ends? It will be VERY UGLY!! Because there is nothing to fall back on in this "one trick pony" Alberta economy. We will have thousands and thousands of trades people and laborers out of work once the out of control boom finally runs it course. As I said, it will get very ugly.
Lauren Baker
said
Warner.
Lee
said
Rick
said
First of all, most of the anger and whining is coming to this province from those that have relocated here during the boom. Yes there is going to be major growing pains associated with the largest engineering expansion on the planet. What do you expect. You wanted the healthy pay cheque, now put up with the healthy problems that go with. And by the way, how many of those paycheques are being sent out of province??
I do agree that Ed should listen to the citizens and business's when a slow down is called for. It will allow us to patch some of the holes and it certainly won't stop the rising price of oil. That was something that King Ralph did quite well and was even seen reversing himself over. The true mark of a leader.
I also agree that none of the other parties have anything to offer but mud slinging. Not an intelligent approach.
One thing I think Ed should take the lead on is not only fixing the support structure in Alberta, but protecting the environment, namely water and keeping a close eye on those who want to eport our raw resources to others and losing the jobs that go with it. He's shown that he will stand up to big business.
I'm voting PC because I think Ed is just getting started and I want to give him a chance to do a better job.
jg
said
True Albertan
said
Bob,Calgary
said
Ontario
said
Geoffrey
said
To address some of the above comments,
Rob - Ed Stelmach is a huge change from Ralph Klein. We have gone from a "leader" with no plan who shot from the lip, and may or may not have thought later about what he said to a real leader who, although not the most exciting guy in the room, thinks carefully before he makes a decision, and then makes the best decision he can.
An example is his commitment to solving a huge pension issue with teachers that had gone on for decades. He promised to solve it, and he has.
Regarding the royalties, while the left wanted them higher, the right was screaming not to raise them, and one of the commission members suddenly began contradicting her own report after it was published. Ed made the best decision he could.
Regarding slowing the economy, I can't imagine supporting someone who campaigns with the line "Vote for me and I'll destroy the economy!"
Kim is upset at the reporting? I agree with lee. I've been following the polls since before the campaign, and every single one predicts a Tory majority. The big question is the large undecided vote, but I wonder what percentage of these will actually turn out to vote if they haven't made up their minds by this time.
And anu bose wonders how Stelmach became the leader? Because his was the voice of reason between the front-runner candidates on the extreme left and right of the party, who argued that if the left candidate won, Tories would switch to the Alliance, and if the right candidate won, Tories would switch to the Liberals. Ed seemed the best hope for the PC Party and its unity, and party members voted accordingly. Hopefully, they made the best decision, but we'll see after the fallout from whatever happens Monday night.
Jennifer Nevermind
said
The 'nonsense' I spouted is simply life in Calgary, honestly as I've lived it. I wonder where you draw such vitrol from to direct towards people you don't know about experiences you obviously have no sympathy for.
This nonsense you mention about SUVs is beyond me because I couldn't possibly afford a car and so couldn't possibly be affected by commuting that way. Maybe you should take your mouth away from your latte for just a moment and look around you at how the other half live. You know, the working poor? They're a well known phenomenon and they're increasingly made up of nine to fivers engaged in well paying jobs in Calgary.
I've lived in Calgary for the past several years in the same rundown slummy apartment, whose owners decided last year that they were justified in almost doubling our rent, making it completely out of my reach - even though I make a good wage and I'm far from the welfare line - at a time when anything less expensive was simply unavailable. Lucky for me I've been able to rely on my family to make up the extra but many of my neighbors were not. As anyone who lives or works downtown in Calgary knows, there are countless people who are not so lucky.
The city of Calgary's affordable housing page states that "Over 58,000 households in Calgary are having difficulty affording adequate housing due to the high cost of living and low wages." This and other bona fide info can be found at their website: http://tinyurl.com/28pphq
Unfortunatly they only talk about low income people having trouble, a common misconception which is promoted by the Alberta government because it's less embarrassing than the reality. But there are community action groups formed by those affected which are trying to raise awareness.
Anyone who lives or works in downtown Calgary has seen the numerous poor on the streets, they just may not take the time to know how those people got there.
And for the record I have lived on both the West coast of BC and in Southern Ontario, and I've never experienced the same level of unaffordability in either of those locals as I do in Calgary. Lack of affordable housing is a real issue in Alberta, and it does not just affect the poor.
dale b
said
I am hoping for a total change. A Conservative majority can only bring dissaster. The Province's growth is a runaway train and Stemach refuses to touch the brakes even though it appears that that is the wish of at least 75% of Albertans. He is a man who will not listen to the people no matter what he says.
......lets be real here if 75% of albertans were not happey as you say we would have a change of goverment we wont .i have lived in alberta for a very long time i live in medicine hat small city of 55,000 lots of jobs lots of very nice people rent you can get a nice 2 bedroom appartment 595.00 a month cheep utilitys and good paying jobs a class one driver will make 80,000-120,000 a year house price are still resonable. you do not have to move to calgary or edmonton. there are lots of smaller communitys that have a very good standard of living . so its still where you want to live i have lived in other provinces and i would never move from alberta low taxes.i dont get the big city problems high rent and no doctors i see my doc about 4 times a year and spend 1hr with him and we chat had surgery from a car accident dr were ggreat profetional and hardly any waight time so i know who i am voting for the same as my family so thats 8 vots for the pc
Vince M.
said
Which is sad because those decisions are so poor he would be better off not making any at all.
For example, his decision to give the teachers $1.4 BILLION to cover THEIR shortfall in THEIR pension plan was purely to stop them from holding a strike during the election. That was taxpayers' money spent poorly - and it was his decision to do so.
Dave S
said
Eric in Grande Prairie
said
That leaves the Conservatives. I genuinely believe that Mr. Stelmach is a good, honest man and will deliver on his believable and attainable goals. Let's be honest: like it or not, nobody dared go against Klein at the height of his power at risk of being thrown out. That's respect for the leader not completely different from Trudeau or Chretien. He's gone and long past due changes are already happening. I think they'll continue to happen.
Outsider Looking In
said
Anyway, as I said, I don't live in Alberta, but if I did, based on what I've heard, I believe I would be voting for the Wildrose Alliance. They appear to be the only reasonable alternative to the PCs, in my opinion.
Joe
said
Joan
said
I am displeased with the continued growth (and dangers) of sour gas and methane coal bed production. We are destroying our environment with no forward look to the future.
This governement is also not protecting our water. Oil & gas consume tremendous amounts of water which can not be considered a renewable resource. What happens to all the communities feeding on the rivers when the glaciers are expected to be gone in 20 years?
And nuclear power? I remain vehemently opposed to it. I lived in Germany during the Chernobyl disaster and one could read radiation with a meter outide their homes. And nuclear energy is NOT green - uranium mining is very destructive. And where does one safely place the spent fuel for thousands of years?
Anne M
said
Bill
said
KW
said
I moved to lethbridge from Saskatchewan in 1999 to go to school. I never paid over 475 for an apartment before, utilities were ridiculously affordable, and I was more or less content.
Nine years later, I actually think that a 1 bedroom suite for 600 dollars is a "good deal", my utilities eat up most of my paycheck that car insurance and rent doesn't (I haven't had an accident in a very long time), I can't even go to Burger King or even Tim Horton's after I get off work at 1 AM without seeing signs stating "closed due to employee shortages" because nobody can afford to pay these employees what they actually need to make to get by. and it's an absolute joke that unless i have a job that provides it, I have to pay health care premiums monthly where in Saskatchewan, if i recall correctly, you apply for the card and don't pay a dime to have it. At 13 dollars an hour, I barely make rent. Yes, Calgary and Edmonton are probably a hell of a lot worse and I dont know how anyone there does it. I hear stories of people being forced to sleep in their cars that work 40 hours a week
Once I complete my degree, I'd be more than happy to leave Alberta if things don't change, and if my home province's economic state improves and if i don't have to move to B.C (Also known as Bring Cash). Stelmach will win, I'm quite sure, but I hope he does poorly enough that the party considers replacing him with someone who is at least fit to run a village post office.
Cheaper rent, cheaper utilities, and being able to go order a double double at 1 AM... That's all I'm asking for.
Dick Varley
said
Debbie (moved on from Alberta)
said
wendy
said
Jared
said
Almost a year ago now, a talk he gave at the University of Alberta about the need to slow down and stagger the oilsands development up in Fort MacMurray-he said it was "like the surface of the moon." At the same time, he's been expressing worry about the shipments of our water south of the border, and inflation hurting lower-income families.
Here's the ironic part...
The same things Lougheed is worried about are the same things that left-wing groups like the Council of Canadians are worried about these same problems, while right-wing groups like the Canada West Foundation are concerned with whether we're making smart investments by saving some of the oil royalties in the Heritage Fund, the way Lougheed did back in the 1970s.
I wonder whether slowing down the oilsands development might not have several advantages:
1) We cut down on the pollution that other posters in this thread have mentioned, which would probably help out the people at Fort Chipewyan, whose hunting and fishing are being ruined by pollution;
2) We give the infrastructure in Fort MacMurray some time to catch up-the mayor up there has been pleading for help.
3) Inflation could slow down, thus taking off some of the pressure on lower-income families.
Besides which, surely there's more we could be doing to meet our modern challenges, and contribute to Canada as a whole?
-We could take steps to diversify the provincial economy, the way Peter Lougheed did, and make some investments in green technology, new sources of energy so we remain an industrial and energy powerhouse when the oil runs out...
-We could insist that the bitumen currently being shipped to the U.S. for refinement has to be refined in Canada, thus ensuring the jobs remain in Alberta...
-We could form partnerships with the other provinces and the federal government for the companies down there to invest more in our oilsands, thus insuring that, if the jobs can't stay in Alberta, they can at least stay in Canada...
-We could make interest-free loans to other provinces in money and/or oil, the way Lougheed did, both to help out our fellow Canadians and stick it to any idiot who thinks that Alberta doesn't care about the rest of the country...
...and in many ways, these are the things Lougheed did with our natural resources.
Now, don't get me wrong: The NEP was stupid, stupid, stupid. As was typical for Trudeau, he didn't even bother consulting Alberta for its position before implementing the NEP, which probably could have led to a compromise reached beforehand without all the acrimony and economic damage that sorry excuse for a program gave us. Instead, what we got was Albertans pissed off at our Eastern countrymen, and the rest of the country seeing Alberta as greedy and selfish, something that, if you look at the huge interest-free loans Lougheed gave to other cash-strapped provinces, is completely ridiculous.
That's the difference between the conservatism of guys like Peter Lougheed and Robert Stanfield, and the conservatism of guys like Ralph Klein and Stephen Harper: Red Tories like Lougheed and Stanfield know that there needs to be a balance between the private sector and the government, and that the marketplace can't solve everything.
Guys like Klein and Harper, and similarly guys like Dick Cheney and Mike Harris, put so much blind faith in the private sector that it's almost like a religious ideology.
In a way, it's almost like Communism. Communism was a disaster that showed you still need business and the private sector, and that trusting every single thing to the government is stupid. On the other hand, I'm not so sure that a blind faith in the marketplace and the private sector is necessarily the right way to go, either; the shitty conditions for workers in the early 19th century in the early days of capitalism were what gave rise to communism in the first place.
I hope this won't be taken as blind socialism. Like I said, a blind faith in government is stupid; but, as many of the people on here have shown, a blind faith in the private sector, and simply sitting back and letting the marketplace look after everything, as Klein did when he was premier, isn't necessarily any better.
Sask Jim
said
Brett
said
Anyway, they should be happy if Ed Stelmach wins - Ed is a Liberal, as are most of his cronies. That is why Kevin Taft has so much difficulty getting any traction: you can't get much more tax-and-spend than the Stelmachian PCs.
Robert Ward
said
Wildrose gets my vote.
I hope they get a few seats and a bigger voice in the legistlature.
Les
said
Lloyd
said
We need change!!!