News Sections
Prudent Conservative budget has some surprises
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(97)
Andy Johnson, CTV.ca News
Date: Tue. Feb. 26 2008 11:35 PM ET
OTTAWA Finance Minister Jim Flaherty's new budget offers few big-ticket items but serves up a few surprises, making a virtue out of thrift.
While the budget offers no new taxes and no major tax cuts, it introduces a brand new tax-free savings account, breaks for seniors, $400 million to hire 2,500 new police officers and $500 million for public transit infrastructure.
But perhaps more important than what is included in the budget is what's missing. There appears to be no 'poison pill' item that the Liberals will reject, and Stephane Dion suggested that his party would not vote against the document when it comes before the House of Commons for a vote on March 5.
MPs will debate the budget in the coming days with the opposition parties getting their chance to propose amendments before the final vote on Tuesday.
Budget bills are considered matters of confidence, meaning the government would fall and an election would be triggered if it failed to pass.
After the release of the budget, the New Democratic Party and Bloc Quebecois both said they would reject the plan. But without the Liberals voting against it, the budget is expected to pass.
The centrepiece of the document, and one of its few surprises, is a new tax-free savings account that will allow Canadians to invest $5,000 per year, with the freedom to make withdrawals at any time, for any purpose. The income earned in the account is tax free, including capital gains.
The fund is the first of its kind and appears aimed at winning votes among middle-class Canadians who have the ability to put money away.
"Some say we should not have provided tax relief for individuals, families, workers and seniors,'' Flaherty told the Commons in his budget speech.
"They call it 'blowing the surplus.' Well, Mr. Speaker, it takes a certain kind of Ottawa politician to view giving people their hard-earned money back as 'blowing the surplus.'''
The fiscal plan also:
- Provides $300 million to help Atomic Energy of Canada to develop Candu nuclear technology and support safe operations at the Chalk River plant;
- Provides $440 million for Research and Development;
- Allows pensioners to income-split for the first time;
- Provides $400 million for 2,500 new front-line police officers.
Far and away, the biggest spending commitment in the budget is the $10.2 billion that will go towards knocking the debt down to $457 billion.
The 400-plus page document is laced with references to what the federal government did in the last budget and the fall fiscal update -- when they spent $60 billion on tax relief -- and ways those promises and pledges will carry through the 2008-09 period.
Flaherty said the lack of big spending in this budget reflects the current economic climate.
He said the government is running surpluses and paying down debt and reducing taxes, and inflation and interest rates are low. But he added that "Canada is not an island" and factors such as the slowing U.S. economy mean prudence is necessary.
"Meeting these challenges is critical. Not just for our country, but for our families," Flaherty said.
Transit
The feds will also spend $500 million on public transit infrastructure, most of which will be spent in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver -- cities where no Conservative MPs were elected and where the Tories are desperate to gain ground.
The projects which will receive the lion's share of the funding are the Evergreen Light Rapid Transit System in Vancouver, the re-establishment of a rail link between Peterborough, Ont. and Toronto's Union Station, and new equipment and upgrades to the Aeroports de Montreal.
Green initiatives
The budget also sinks $250 million over five years into "developing innovative, greener, more fuel-efficient vehicles."
On reducing greenhouse gases, the fiscal plan sets out $250 million for a carbon capture and storage demonstration project, and research on the potential for carbon storage in Nova Scotia.
But it puts an end to the rebate program for fuel-efficient vehicles that attracted so much attention in the 2007 budget.
The two-year program will not be extended beyond 2008.
Aaron Freeman, policy director for Environmental Defence, told CTV.ca the Conservatives seem to have no clear direction on the environment.
"Even their shiny bauble from last year is not going to be continued," he said, referring to the rebates.
"It's hard to know where this government is going on the environment. You had water and Great Lakes protection in the Throne Speech and yet there's nothing in this budget to back it up."
There is some positive news for the environment, however. Freeman said the announcement of $500 million in transit spending is a good thing, as is $113 million that will go towards protecting consumers from toxins in products.
Overall though, he said the Conservatives don't seem to be making the environment a priority.
Students
The budget also has a number of tidbits designed to develop the "best-educated, most-skilled and most flexible workforce in the world," according to the document.
Students will benefit from the following measures under the budget:
- A $350 million grant program in 2009-10, rising to $430 million by 2012-13, that will reach 245,000 college and undergrad students;
- $123 million over four years starting in 2009-10 to update the Canada Student Loans Program;
- Increases to the length of time Registered Education Savings Plans can remain open, from 25 to 35 years;
- The creation of a new $25 million Canada Graduate Scholarship award for top doctoral students.
Seniors
Seniors, especially those on fixed or low incomes, are expected to receive half of the benefits from the new tax-free savings account. They will be able to split their incomes for tax purposes for the first time.
"But we can do more to support our seniors. Today, we are increasing the Guaranteed Income Supplement exemption to $3,500, from the current maximum of $500. This will benefit low and modest-income seniors who choose to continue working," the budget states.
User Tools
Related Stories
Related Websites
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(97)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I certainly don't blame him. He wants to at least have a fair shot at a World Series ring -- and it is highky unlikely that would be in Toronto, in his lifetime.
Even the "Beast and Pat team" won't be able to pull off that miracle!
Thanks Doc, for the memories. It was great to have you here this long.
Best wishes for that Ring wherever you land.

Comments are now closed for this story
Kevin
said
IAN
said
steve
said
Tony
said
Bang up budget.
Leonard R.
said
GGE
said
Sask. Jim
said
Imre Attila Janos Torma
said
Choice? Most seniors that keep on working HAVE NO CHOICE in the matter!!
What a joke that statement is!!!!
They are working to their death. Shame on our rich society that neglects so, so many people including the seniors.
SuperDave
said
Karen Foubert
said
Fred
said
Mark
said
Canada is indeed on the right track.
Denise
said
Harry
said
Cory
said
Hatrock
said
Cameron
said
Pat -Winnipeg
said
bob
said
Adam
said
Brian
said
Maneesh Vaidya
said
Why spend so much on police force. Why not spend that public transit.
Spend in Ontario and major cities so Conservative can get vote.
john
said
Mike
said
Although I don't agree with all of their stances, they represent Canadians well both at home and abroad. This budget is another example of their commitment to polital and fiscal balance. And you can't get any more Canadian than that!
This is the best federal governement I've seen. I am very impressed with how much they have accomplished as a minority government.
It's time to give them the majority! They've earned it.
Albertaview
said
michelle
said
Very telling, policy driven by the need to stay in power, is this how our system has evolved to work? Why does Ontario still get overtaxed so much disproportionately. 9 billion dollars or so a year is being taken - mostly to pay down the debt of the entire country. Is this fair to Ontarians?
Jenna
said
GP
said
Just get rid of Mr. Harper's control issues and neo-conservative policies and I'm onboard all the way.
Kim
said
Harper needs the minority to do the right thing and the Liberals need the Conservatives to implment changes that they should have done long ago.
Too bad no one speaks up for the environment.
Mike
said
Court challenges program?
R.E.A.L. Women is not cutting it. Not even close.
Equality through advocacy is what we need.
Beel
said
Luke
said
JF
said
Vince
said
Good move Harper, great Budget.
David Longhurst
said
raj
said
I like this budget.I saw that Dion didnt like it, but he wont fight it.
Layton didn't see it, and already stated he wont vote with it.
Rick
said
Mickeyko
said
Mau
said
Dump this government.
André Lavergne
said
Too bad it's only a bone.
Deanne Wuttunee
said
Brooke - Alta
said
Bhavna
said
FreakAlert
said
UN reports that worldwide food shortages and soaring prices(infation) will lead to civil unrest globally. So, new armed officers will be needed.
One of the four C-17 Globemaster military cargo planes costs, plus to maintain it, 1 billion dollars. Could of continued leasing Russian cargo planes at a mere $25 million/year. You do the math. But, I guess, $500 million for public infrastructure is better than nothing.
As far as paying down the nearly half trillion dollar national debt, ask how much of that is interest and how much is principle. The answer is shocking.
After so many years of surplus, the Harper regime spent the peoples money, leaving them all but a few crumbs.
Michael
said
HB
said
Infraestructure crumbling down, cities going bankrupt, health care going down, education without enough funds for materials and resources, homelessness growing steadily and the environment, not even a concern. Oh yeah, it's great...
John Flatt
said
rosie
said
James
said
Robert
said
Gail
said
Jim
said
Are these specialized accounts or any old savings account? And what are we really getting out of this? If I put 5G's in an account, at 4% savings, I would earn $200 for the year. If my tax rate is 30% then ll I'm saving is $60 for the year....$5 a month. BIG DEAL!
Or am I missing something else? Does the 5 G's fall under this tax shelter too? If so, then I can see advantages BUT if not...its waste of paperwork.
wc
said
As far as climate change nothing will happen till the US gets on side so save your breath. We are going through the bio fuels transition first and the comes nuclear.
What an irony, all that environmental complaining yields a renewed commitment to nuclear. Makes me laugh.
brenda from the prairies
said
You are wrong about seniors having to work...some do, many don't have to, they want to.
My sister is 75 years old, and is still working part time because she LOVES HER JOB...she says she would die if she had to give her job up.
Love this budget..love the Conservatives...they ROCK!
Muskoka Helena
said
Dave in Surrey
said
the new crime bill is about to pass putting more people in jail for longer periods, yet not one single penny to build and maintain the prision system...
Who in Canada has an additional $5,000 to put into a savings account, the average 'middle class' Canadian is not even remotely close to filling their RRSP's and now instead of saving for retirement they will put it into a savings account, using the capital gains yearly which is tax free... This is suppose to help?
500 Million for infrasture, that won't even pave the roads every MP lives on...
My neck hurts from shaking my head...
Elwyn Peters
said
Don J
said
Peggy
said
B.
said
Evan
said
Herb
said
Michael
said
Steve
said
2. Why do people begrudge the conservatives enacting policies that will help them get re-elected? If they're governing well, why wouldn't we want to re-elect them?
3. Why is it that, after two + years, we're still hearing the "hidden agenda" bogeyman from people? Aren't Liberals capable of hidden agendas, too?
Angus
said
DON HAMMER
said
I hate to say it but it is not the job of the Government to bail out low income earners with tax dollars. We already live in a welfare country which helps out the poor in many ways. How much more are tax payers expected to give up to non-tax payers?
If Canadians are not going to take care of their own family members with low incomes then why should they expect everyone else too?
Poverty will always be with us no matter how much money we throw at it.
David H
said
For better or worse, welcome to a majority government Mr.Harper and Co. - pretty much anytime you like -
To Mike I: give him a shake please.
ILTIS
said
2500 cops and all this spending on the military...it's starting to feel like an eastern bloc country around here.
By the way! Like every Neo-Con government fm the past the tab for all this will eventually come.
superman
said
Mr. Harper continues to impress. He has converted me, as long as he is Prime Minister I will vote for his party.
freedom lover
said
The profit from exploitation of national natural resource wealth should be distributed to every citizen of Canada, not just to special-interest Canadians.
joe c.
said
And do the middle and lower classes have any money to save? Most are in perpetual debt. Any 'savings' go to bills and rent. Rent is 50% of income for most poor and middle class. Why not put 400$ million in affordable housing instead of beefing up the police force? isn't crime down?
Being tough on crime could be better affected by investing in social services, training programs, increased recreation, and education/public health programs for lower and middle clases.
No tax breaks, but a 12 billion + surplus. That sounds fiscally responsible to me. A true conservative would recognize the irony in this budget. I don't see how Harper is going to be able to distinguish himself from the liberals in the next election.. (maybe that's the strategy for Harper to hold onto seats)
Both parties might as well merge already - less than 25% of canadians are conservative voters anyway
David fm NS
said
Mack
said
Harvey
said
The TFSA will do nothing for me. Even if I could put the maximum 5000$ away, the tax savings are only about 80$ per year.
Then, if I decide to withdraw my money at any time, it looks like I'm expected to recontribute it later?
Why not just invest the 5000$ in a GIC in an RRSP.
This seems like smoke and mirrors. The middle class really don't benefit, the lower class cannot benefit, and only those with an extra 5k will maximize their benefit. I don't see how this is 'huge' people.. enlighten me please.
RRR Lethbridge
said
You are wrong about Seniors having to work. My husband and I are seniors and we live a very good life on the OAS, Canada Pension and GIS. We pay rent and live very comfortably and still donate hundreds to charity. It is a matter of management. This is a good budget and I love this Conservative Government
A. Farmer
said
RJC
said
Dan
said
It also slows down spending and thus the economy.
IT Manager in Calgary
said
Kashif Ahmed
said
kate
said
Let's see this is same middle class that want to own half million dollar homes, drive 2 SUV's, want free day care, spend more on luxury items than any other generation prior, spend a week or two in Mexico every year? If you chose to live the high life without saving for the future - your problem not mine.
Ask some poor sod working at Wal Mart what it's like to live on their pay cheque and try to support a family. Better yet, trying being an aboriginal person and living on a reserve without even the basic fundamentals of life like clean water that you and I take for granted.
Excellent budget, prudent and help for seniors as well - about time we help those who have made our high standard of life possible.
We need to give this government a majority.
Mark in Calgary
said
Ki-Som
said
Jeri
said
Dave B
said
Continued government increases in spending like this have put the Harper government higher in government spending than a litany of preceding Liberal governments.
At least two more brand new crown corporations? How does big government like that play into Conservative philosophy?
It's obvious Harper is sucking deep, going after votes in the large urban eastern municipalities where he came up short the last election.
Will he succeed in buying more support with our tax dollars? I think not. Progressive voters have a continuing underlying unease about how the leopard might change his spots with a majority while hard core Conservatives should be rightly ticked at the reckless increase in big government spending under Harper.
rb
said
JD
said
The only objection I would have would be the idea of giving 500 million to the transit system. I mean ya, it is a great idea to finally invest in it, however, if the money is going to only go to the projects they mentioned, then I disagree with them. It should go to the everyday transit systems, like busses. Montreal, I know, needs new busses big time.
All aside, I really hope this budget gets passed, and that Prime Minister Harper gets a majority.
G Lancaster
said
An Old Lady
neilpk
said
Max
said
Ed
said
Kim
said
Kevin G.
said
living in saskatchewan
said
Munro
said
Dave in Surrey
said
How many of you folks have put in for Capital Gains on your income tax before??? Right, no one from the lower to middle class... Get the point???
I have a sweet bridge for sale, you suckers want in on it?
John Moore
said