CTV News | Budget to devote funds for auto sector, infrastructure

Top Stories -   

Budget to devote funds for auto sector, infrastructure

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Robert Fife with exclusive budget details
Mike Duffy Live: Opposition MPs outline their expectations for the budget
Mike Duffy Live: Glen Hodgson, Chief Economist for the Conference Board of Canada
Canada AM: Robert Fife and Jane Taber on the budget
Canada AM: BNN's Michael Kane on the budget impact

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(42)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Mon. Feb. 25 2008 10:17 PM ET

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty will unveil the federal budget Tuesday, and it's expected to include plans to help Canada's struggling automotive sector and boost infrastructure, sources have told CTV News.

Auto companies will be able to tap into a new fund of more than $200 million, so they can build more fuel-efficient cars to stave off sluggish sales and job losses.

"What that does is allow manufacturers to write off new machinery and equipment that they're purchasing," Craig Alexander, deputy chief economist for TD Bank, told CTV News.

The budget is also expected to include plans for a job-creating fund called Build Canada. It would devote $500 million towards roads, bridges and other infrastructure in the country's major urban areas.

Armine Yalnizyan, of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, said crumbling infrastructure is becoming a major issue in Canada's cities, along with poor public transit.

"We're operating in this bizarre period of almost Depression-era politics with mayors going to the federal government with cap in hand, saying, 'We can't deal with the pressures that are facing growing cities,'" she told CTV Newsnet.

Flaherty warned Monday that the budget won't have any major spending initiatives, but the government is expected to disclose a surplus with an extra $1 billion.

The surplus for the fiscal year ending March 31 will be $13 billion, a government official told The Canadian Press on Monday. It was previously thought to be about $11.5 billion.

At least two-thirds of the surplus will go towards debt reduction.

"We are doing spending, but we're doing spending in a controlled way, given the economic circumstances this year and next year," he said.

"People ought not to expect any big spending items because we have to stay within our means and be prudent and fiscally responsible, which we will be tomorrow."

The International Monetary Fund predicts economic growth of 1.8 per cent in Canada in 2008. Last fall, the IMF predicted 2.8 per cent growth for Canada this year.

Flaherty starts delivering his budget at 4 p.m. ET on Tuesday. He promises the budget will be balanced and that the government has looked for ways to cut spending.

In question period on Monday, Bloc Quebecois Leader Gilles Duceppe said he wanted to see the budget do something to help struggling manufacturing and forestry companies.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper said his government's corporate tax cuts have helped Quebec companies.

NDP Leader Jack Layton accused the Tories of helping big banks and oil companies at the expense of forestry, manufacturing and the middle class. He said one-third of a million well-paying jobs have been lost.

Harper said while there have been job losses in some sectors, job creation has far outstripped the losses.

The unemployment rate in January was 5.8 per cent -- a 33-year low.

"The problem the opposition has is it is not all doom and gloom out there," he said.

"This government is making sure that we don't just blow the spending in this country, that we keep this economy going," Harper said, adding tax and debt reduction will continue to be priorities.

With a report by CTV's Robert Fife in Ottawa

Please Add Comments( )

raj
said
0 0

I think it will be a good budget.Let's face it, everytime we have one.No matter who is in power,we have the same whining from the other parties.

Dave in Surrey
said
0 0

'Prudence' and 'Controlled Spending' have never been part of Flaherty's budgets before, I doubt he even knows what those words mean...

Worst Finance Minister Canada has ever seen, right up there with O'Conner as Minister of Defense...


Stephen Evans
said
0 0

I feel it is very unbecoming of a Finance Minister to A) continue talking about the negative downturn in the economy; and, B) through his own tax cuts for the wealthy, cause us to be in a situation where Government can no longer stimulate the economy. Your right Mr. Flaherty, you need those shoes resoded because you soon will be out canvassing for support.


Chris
said
0 0

The budget should have something in it this fiscal for everyone. Oh and as for manufacturing sector, it was going down waaaaay before the conservatives were in power, its capitalism and corporate greed that caused that mess, not governments.

I agree with the forestry sector getting a little extra help. The Americans and the softwood tariff hurt that industry badly.

This budget should be interesting to see!!!


Lance
said
0 0

Oh it can't be a good budget because Jack Layton isn't voting for it. He and 12% of Canadian voters know what's best for the rest of us. Jack is probably upset that there won't be any money in it for the poor Taliban, other than what goes to our armed forces to buy bullets.


lk
said
0 0

I see no reason why there should be any reason to bring down a government on any issue such as a budget. I am a liberal and always will be, the conservative platform is far from my personal beliefs, but after seeing Peter McKay talk about the Afghanistan issue, I think that is how all issues in Parliament should be handled. In a democracy, the voting public gives the government a mandate. The government should have their full 4 years to govern and if consensus cannot be met, all parties should work together to come up with a solution that can be supported by all or a majority of Canadians. I know that is wishful thinking as most politicians seem to digress back to their childhood maturity levels as soon as they get to Ottawa, but as shown today, they do have the ability to work together. Time to get rid of confidence motions and put this country back on top of the world where it belongs. If you vote them in, give them their full term to govern.


MRM
said
0 0

Mr. McGuinty's statement "If you live by a lie, you'll likely die by the lie," are prophetic. After all he and the Liberal Party should know. It was the lies and theft of the Sponsor Ship Scandal that killed their last government and it will be the lingering effect of that along with their lies on the environment, Afghanistan and tax reduction among others that will kill them in the next election.


Zhimmy Kanada
said
0 0

The country right now is rich even when it is poor.

As for the Finance Minister talking down about the economy. We need people that are real. Otherwise chaos occurs because then people aren't expecting problems. When you shift gears suddenly that is when mistakes and over reaction occurs.

The Canadian people are "mature" adults. Shouldn't they be treated like it? Or do you enjoy being lied to or bribed with your own money?




Lance
said
0 0

I see the rose coloured glasses party is speaking out. Read the news folks. Flaherty didn't issue the IMF report stating that Canada's economy is slowing down nor does he dictate U.S. economic reality. (Just a heads up to the tragically uninformed, the U.S. buys the majority of stuff that Canada produces) Just what would the rose coloured glasses party have it's finance minister say and do. Lie to Canadians about the realities of the world? Come to think of it, from listening to their leaders, they don't have a clue about reality anyway so I guess you couldn't really call it lying.


V. Joe
said
0 0

Nothing he puts in the budget will make me forgive the conservatives for cutting taxes for high income earners and corporations.


RRR, Lethbridge
said
0 0

I have every confidence in this Government, that they will bring forth a good budget that will reflect the economic times. Harper is an economist and the smartest Prime Minister this country has ever seen. I look forward to the budget tomorrow.


Davey Legasse
said
0 0

Stephen - "can no longer stimulate economy"

Government stimulus of the economy has never worked and it never will work. Taking money away from people (taxes) to give to special interest groups and whiners - has ALWAYS led to unpleasant results.




TONY
said
0 0

Keep paying down the debt.

We can not leave this for the future generations.


Wes
said
0 0

To Dave in Surrey,

The last two budgets have been good. I think that Flaherty is doing a good job. As for O'Conner as the Minister of National Defense, he did a good job. Having been a General he knew that we specifically needed the C-17, C-130H, the Leopard 2A6M, Chinook medium helicopters and was able to work well with the senior military staff. We finally got the equipment that we should have had years ago. This was much to the disappointment of the Liberals and their civillian staff that rake in the money carrying out worthless studies and redesigning requirments to buy from their friends. O'Conner served his purpose by knowing what we needed and getting it.


Mark E
said
0 0

Hopefully the new budget will look towards a downsize in government, reducing or privatising the CBC, and putting more money in the pockets of Canadians and small business. For those of you who simply need the government to take care of you, may I suggest moving to a warmer climate such as Cuba or Venezuela?


Mark T
said
0 0

WHY so few Canadians ever talk about getting our taxes reduced??? I work my butt off and makes me sick I have to pay for a number of useless social programs.
Wake up CANADA ! Wealth creation is not exactly a strong educational point in this country.


Get Riehl
said
0 0

Laugh, all this honesty from a finance minister is so unbecoming. I guess you prefer a Liberal government that cheated and stole from the public tax payers. Wow, if you Liberal supporters honestly cannot say you have saved money then you truly are Lie berals.


VancouverDave
said
0 0

Prudence would be a nice surprise from any government, but I won't hold my breath waiting for it.


Luc
said
0 0

Dave is right, Flaherty is worst Finance Minister EVER, he's a lawyer for Pete's Sake and our PM is not far behind for accusing retailers of overcharging Canadians compared to USA when financially savvy people ALL know, it's the manufacturers who control the CDN prices.....Americans and Japanese....HUH!


Dean
said
0 0

V.Joe
Get a grip. It's the high income earners and corporations that provide good decisions and also provide jobs for people. If the corporations don't make profits, why would they want to stay in business in Canada and provide you and your family with an opportunity to feed and clothe yourselves. Let's see you put your house up and open a business. Would you expect any different.


Ian
said
0 0

Sounds like not a bad idea Mark E. Would move to a warmer climate anyday. But if we all did as you say, who would be left to pay taxes to keep you happy.On the other hand there would be lots of those low paying jobs available. And Cuba does have a better healthcare system than ours right now anyway.But I wouldn't get as disgusted and frustrated with seeing these giant corporations getting ludicrous tax breaks then would I. How can a company like Exxon make $600 billion profit a year say they had a bad year. Our whole country doesn't have a budget that big for god's sake.


Mike Webster
said
0 0

Why is it that some people fantasize about broad based tax cuts being "for the rich"? They benefit everyone in Canada. Every time you buy something, those GST cuts are saving you money. Flaherty has done an admirable job and so has Harper. For the first time in a very long time, we have a Prime Minister and a government that we can be proud of. The sooner they get a majority, the better.


Devon K.
said
0 0

I think its an unfair comment to say Flaherty's budgets lack prudence and controlled spending as Dave in Surrey states. This is the third budget he's going to give and of the first two we've had the following:

1. Tax Cuts for everyone
2. Tax Credits for families
3. Large scale debt repayment
4. Restored funding to the provinces in several areas
5. No deficits

He has a record for the past two years and its a good one. Depending if you are right or left wing you may see it as great or not so good but I think calling it poor or bad isn't fair either.

As to the forestry industry - well there's nothing the government can do there. Seriously there's nothing they can do. Today a raw log's value is at a 30 year low. Lumber itself isn't much better. That's the market and there's nothing to do but wait till demand picks up. It will eventually as it always has. I know this because I build inventory and invoicing systems for the industry.

Would government help actually help? Nope. I've seen it before and it never does.


Tanya Hill
said
0 0

How about real 'Income Splitting'! My husband and I have chosen to have one of us stay home and provide our own care to our children yet we are penalized (both income and taxes).


Misty
said
0 0

Re-soled shoes...have you had a pair of good leather shoes re-soled lately?? Cheaper to by new.
Some ole Conseratives recycled crap.


Lart from Above
said
0 0

Flaherty's budget has turned the corner on the Canadian economy, from more than a dozen years of solid growth to an uncertain future. Following the Conservative practice of blaming everyone but themselves, he cites the IMF report as an excuse for inaction rather than as a call for correction. Now the rest of the country can learn the lesson that Ontario already got the hard way.


Dave laughing at Wes
said
0 0

Wes, You blame the Liberals for the short comings in the military due to budget cuts, yet you ignore Harper was calling for deeper cuts to the military back when Chretien was making the cuts...

O'Conner was a joke, hence why he was punted from his post...

Flaherty is a joke, first two budgets basically sucked the Canadian advantage the Liberals gave to him down the drain... He wasn't preaching the possible recession when he was cutting the GST, he simply ignored all the signs and forged ahead ignoring every single economist in Canada that a income tax cut would be more of a stimulas than the gst cut... Ignored the economist when they preached that Canada needs to become for effecient, and reducing a consumption tax does not help... Also note, the equipment you mentioned, our Senator in charge of purchases, did them through a no bid contract... Alberta would implode if Chretien had done that...


306Student
said
0 0

As a University Student studying in Canada, it is important to me that a Government has long term plans and is fiscally prudent in terms of the way it manages its money.

I am very impressed with the sustainability and prudence Minister Flaherty has shown in his budgets.

His ability to deal with the Finance Portfolio get him an A+ in my books.


Bernard Romanycia
said
0 0

A conservative budget that will do absolutely nothing for the elderly and the handicapped. Tax cuts for business and more funds for the military and of course a lot of pompous bull shit.


Vic
said
0 0

As a young Canadian, I am impressed with the Conservatives' run. Working with a minority government is tough at the best of times, and Harper has shown that it can be done.

Those 'tax cuts for the wealthy' are a great encouragement for those pursuing post-secondary education. It reminds me that once I'm a doctor, I'll actually be able to keep some of the money I worked so hard to get to.

It's refreshing to see Flaherty being honest when he says that there will be a recession - he's being striaghtforward rather than blinding us - it gives me a lot of faith in the Conservative government and it will be nice to see the Conservatives get in with a majority.


Ray in Ontario
said
0 0

I am sure that the finance minister will yet again give us a prudent budget. He has been paying down our debt to free up money for a much wiser use of our money than interest payments, and ALL Caadians have enjoyed some tax cuts. This government has kept their word on all their promises and are leading Canada in a positive direction. After enduring years of Chretien's rule when our military was gutted and untold promises were broken or ignored, followed by Martin's dithering, I have never felt more proud of being Canadian since Mr Harper and his government have gotten into power.


GP
said
0 0

Dollar goes up, oil goes down, but no relief at the pumps...lets see some consumer protection built into this budget, its time for a winfall tax. And its not just oil that's gouging.

Its time to tax unsustainable greed.


Mel Brass
said
0 0

Why should a Government that is running the country in a prudent manner be defeated?
Elections cost us a great deal of money.
The NDP are a Joke and the Liberals are not in a position to lead this country at this time.
It would be a waste of time to go to the polls at this time



Andy in Cambridge
said
0 0

"Oh it can't be a good budget because Jack Layton isn't voting for it. He and 12% of Canadian voters know what's best for the rest of us. Jack is probably upset that there won't be any money in it for the poor Taliban, other than what goes to our armed forces to buy bullets."

Great social commentary Lance
I don't think I could've said it any better



DM
said
0 0

I agree Mel Brass. Elections cost us a lot of money and it interrupts progress. Besides, our lack lustre opposition is so divided in this country, how could any of them come out on top. Remember, there's a surplus in the budget and the PC's are using it to pay down the debt and make some tax cuts for middle class people. Promises have been kept by this government.


Carol - HARPER EARNED MAJORITY
said
0 0

I think it is clear we have has very good government and the conservatives have earned a majority.

Bugets have Billions of dollars but about 3% wiggel room after health care and pensions etc so an election over 3% would be crazy.


Bob Lobblaw
said
0 0

We need more military spending 22 billion is not enough.

We must be able to kill more and more effectively to support the lies of the US war of terror.

Or more corporate welfare. Who cares about the poor, the uneducated, homeless, health care, infastructure.

We are starting to see why the Tories were not in power for over a decade.

Only incompetence could possbily have screwed up a war economy. The tories were given a gift of a well running econmoy only to fumble it and send it the other way.

ya, great leadership....

ya.....


Andrew
said
0 0

That does not surprise me, with all my salary going to taxes! We are the highest tax paying country in the world! Wake up people!


Walter Orlowski
said
0 0

Well it appears that the ghost of John Diefenbaker has re-surfaced through the cloak of the "Neo-Conservative" Harper Government. The Harper "click" is by means not a transparent ruling body for ALL Canadians and will ultimately fragment Canada and mess up the economy. It's truly an enigma and mysterious Political Sect.
Good old John D., similary like Mr. Harper was somewhat reclusive, insensitive regionally, dominant and overall power hungry. With the country under his deploy,the unemployment lines swelled and were long in Ontario way back in the 1950's as I fondly recall.(In those days you had to line up at an office outside in the cold to receive a UIC check.... no mail delivery...there simply was no money left for stamps to send you the cheques during the Chief's stay!)

On a happier note,lest we not forget,that the old Federal Progressive Conservative Party died on the election table with Joe Clark with only 2 seats remaining. They had some credibility of sort. You have to wonder,where's good old Joe now? Why hasn't he been appointed to a position in the new "super" Harper Conservative Government like many others? Is he not a Conservative too?

Sadly,what has emerged is an assembly of Rooky Alliance/Reform and leftover burned out former Ontario Provincial Conservative all now practicing deadbeats pushing the money buttons at the Federal level. Like you guys blew it under Mike Harris& Ernie Eves on the Provincial level; minus 5.6 billion deficit dollars and a nearly demolished Ontario's health system (through Tony Clement's skillful handling of same)before being run out of the Province by the people of Ontario! Boy,would I like an accounting of how much money has been already sloughed off behind closed doors by Mr. Harper/Mr.Flaherty and to whom during your current term? Please do follow your own newly introduced Accountability Act....or does it apply to you?

Dave
said
0 0

Government debt numbers are a lie. Federal debt at $500 billion? Don't make me laugh. Total government debt is more like $2.7 trillion when you count unfunded liabilities such as CPP and OAS. Each Canadian taxpayer owes $171,000.

We need to keep paying down the debt like the last few governments have been doing, but we have to stop lying about how much money we owe.


Nicole
said
0 0

A conservative budget that will do absolutely nothing for the elderly and the handicapped

Didn't Flaherty just bring in income splitting for seniors and increase the disability tax credits, in addition to bringing in registered savings accounts for people with disabilities? It's always what have you done for me lately? Maybe giving me back more of my own money and allowing me to spend it as I see fit, in addition to reducing our debt for our children and grandchildren isn't good enough for some. Not to mention the hated GST (which Chretien promised to get rid of but never delivered on because he loved the windfall) and NAFTA which paved the way for all those surpluses not Liberal genius as some suggest. You also forget the massive cuts to provincial transfer payments which lead to significantly higher provincial income tax and massive cuts to medicare funding. Oh that Harper he's soooooooo scary - meanwhile Dion is flopping all over like a fish - him running the country would be scary!!


Bern
said
0 0

Okay, the Tory script-readers really need to check the thesauraus and stop using the word prudence on this board.

Flaherty plunged Ontario into an never-before-seen deficit when the economy was GOOD. He can't manage our finances. Yes, the tax cuts only benefit the rich; whatever joker up there is insinuating that saving 2 cents on my coffee is significant is ridiculous. Our surplus is gone, and you didn't see mention of the billions that will be spent on military equipment we don't even use.

But whatever you think of the budget, if the Flaherty parrots could just stop saying 'prudence', it would be a lot easier to swallow.

Looks like Buckley's, tastes like.


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz