CTV News | 'Conspiracy of silence' on tarsands, group says

Top Stories -   

'Conspiracy of silence' on tarsands, group says

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Newsnet: Matt Price, Environmental Defence

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(27)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Fri. Feb. 15 2008 9:14 PM ET

A new report accuses the federal government of allowing Alberta's tarsands to become "the most destructive project on earth".

The study was commissioned by Environmental Defence, a health organization, and features satellite imagery of the vast project.

Alberta's tarsands are second only to Saudi Arabia as the world's largest oil reserve.

"The enormous toxics problems go hand-in-hand with massive global warming pollution and the impending destruction of a boreal forest the size of Florida," the report says in its introduction.

Group spokesperson Matt Price blames Ottawa for failing to enforce federal environmental laws.

"I think there's sort of a conspiracy of silence, especially on the part of the federal government, with regards to the tar sands," Price said, "because there's an agenda to expand it dramatically over the next 10 to 15 years."

The report says the federal government needs to address environmental concerns ranging from greenhouse gases and cancer levels, to polluted water.

It also estimates that greenhouse gas emissions from the tarsands are likely to grow enough by 2020 to completely offset Ontario's planned emissions cuts.

Effects the report says are already being noticed:

  • Toxic pollution from the tarsands has created what amounts to a slow motion oil spill in the region's river systems, and could be worse than the Exxon Valdez oil spill.
  • First Nations living downstream are already seeing deformed pickerel and walleye in Lake Athabasca.
  • Game animals are being found covered with tumours and mutations.
  • In humans, unusual cancers and autoimmune diseases have been cropping up in the community of Fort Chipewyan.

The report says that instead of properly managing the tarsands, government has "outsourced" monitoring to the industry, "creating a classic situation of the fox guarding the henhouse."

This isn't the first such report on the oilsands industry. In 2006, The World Wildlife Fund Canada's warned that the expansion of the industry was threatening Canadian freshwater reserves.

The report on water resources also warned that even a small amount of global warming could have a dire impact on flows in bodies such as the Great Lakes and Athabasca River.

Comments are now closed for this story

GG
said

If Harper figures the environment issue won't come up at the next election he is sadly sadly sadly sadly mistaken. Everyday his government dawdles on doing the ' right' thing his ability to maintain the next parliament dwindles by the same degree. He has no clue that Canadians are watching his action/inaction on this file. Time is ticking....ticking..ticking..ticking. Time to address the Oilsands Mr. Harper..Mr.Stelmach faces the same redress...their provincial grip is ticking too


True Motive?
said

In my opinion, a report paid for as a bash and smear campaign against Canada developing its oil reserves.

So I ask then, which organization(s) would feel most threatened by tar sands development? OPEC?




Chris - Winnipeg
said

I 100% agree with this article. Action must be taken. I will not vote for a party that will not make the environment a priority.


Darsh Ramrattan
said

The pollution of the air, land and water that is caused by the production of oil from the oil sands would have a serious effect on all living things not only within our province but neghboring provinces as well. Generations to come will suffer from immune related diseases and learning disabilitites. Are we willing to risk the future of our children and their children's future by ignoring the tremendous devastation that uncontrolled oil sands expansion will cause? The secret deal between the conservative government and the two giant oil producers Syncrude and Suncor which give those companies royalty tax breaks until 2016 is proof enough that Albertans who voted in this government are not being represented fairly by their elected officials. The time has come for a drastic change in the attitide and sincerity of our government representatives. We have to ensure that those who we vote for in the future will represent us so that we can live healthier and better lives and take care of our environment.


garry
said

Stupid Humans
All great dead civilizations had one thing in common, they could not get rid of their garbage. This is apparently happening to us. I hope we can clean it up. G


Former Liberal
said

I had no idea of the seriousness of pollution which has wreaked havoc in Alberta for years.

How could the former Liberal government allowed this to happen?

Thankfully, Canada now has a Government which has introduced the toughest plan in Canadian history to address these concerns.

Under the Conservatives' plan, all the major polluters will have to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, and that includes the oilsands. The plan requires absolute reductions of 20 per cent by 2020.

Unfortunately Liberals will continue to hang on to unachievable and worthless Kyoto as their only idea, however fortunatley if a vote is required in Parliament Liberals will abstain, for fear of losing their seats, therefore Canada's New Green Plan will be passed, for the benefit of all Canadians including those who live in Alberta.





Gerald Skowronski
said

I tend to take this story with a grain of salt. If it had any merit, it would have contained more precise information. One needs only to travel along the Athabasca River to see the oil sand spilling into it as a natural occurance. Once again someone's nose is in someone else's business. Much ado about very little.


richie
said

I think the real conspiracy of silence here is about why we pay more for gasoline when there's problems in the middle east when we have the 2nd largest oil reserve in the world? anyone else catch my drift?


Ton
said

Tar sands

I'm not surprised given the philosophy of a conservative government
that feels the most efficient way of running a country is to trust private industry to do what is best for every one.
My idea of an efficient government is one that protects us from the ruthlessness of the market place where profit is the only consideration - never mind the cost to our environment, the disgrace of relegating a large segment of our society to the fringes and conditions of poverty, sickness, homelessness, hopelessness, and crime.

One day the world will run out of fossil fuels. Why do we want to wait until that happens before we begin to invest significantly in alternatives?

This present government is so incredibly short-sighted.
What benefit is reducing GST by 2%? All this does is encourage us to buy and pollute more. Imagine if that 2%were put into efficient city transporation? Imagine if it went into lower rates for public transporation?





Fraz
said

What else can we expect when the federal and provincial govenments are lap dogs to the oil industry? This needs to change and change fast.


Michael Le Couteur CD
said

Is this a surprise? Does any rational person think that the bottom line isn't the most important thing to any mega company? Especially one that is involved in the oil industry. Maybe it is a good time for a throttle back on the tar sands. It would seem that the payout isn't worth the cost of business. Personally, I couldn't sleep at night knowing I was responsible for an environmental disaster as the oil sands have become. Maybe those in charge aren't part of our human race. I don't destroy where I live. I do not destroy my neighbours house so mine can be built.


JD in Alberta
said

The study was done by Enviromental Defence, an organization that has David Suzuki as an honorary board member. Just by seeing his name I don't trust the report. This is the guy who wants jail time for global warming skeptics. Can we say enviromental fascists.

Funny we never see any reports in the news about the polluters in the east. Look at the condition of the Great Lakes.




C
said

Under the conclusions part of this report, the authors recommend that producers switch to "Dry Tailings" instead of wet tailings.

As someone who works in the oil sands industry and occasionally on projects related to tailings, I would love for the authors to inform me of how we can magically make "Dry Tailings". Through chemicals? That's already been tried. Through massive driers? Well, you'll end up burning more gas that way. Filters likely won't work either due to the extreme solids loading of the system.

Everybody in the industry would love to hear how to make these "Dry Tailings". Would the authors' care to enlighten us?



WC
said

Politicians, oil companies, big business are all in this together and it is about funds for everything from Health care to the corner store. We all like the vast wealth it creates. If we didn't we would change, but we don't. It is a fact accept it.
Remember all that exists in the universe is truth and resistance to it. Truth is the power of the voice of the universe.


Snowbound in QC
said

The oilsands is classic money-speak. A place where it takes the equivalent of three quarters of a barrel of oil to produce a barrel of oil. It's a place where Canada rips the guts out of the earth to satisfy the consumer-lust of the certifiable Yankee interests.
The oilsands is as earth destructive as anything going on in the Amazon, Indonesia or China.
And Canadians are supposed to be smarter than that. Looks like our souls are sold too.



Graham
said

I have 2 comments for some of the others who responded to this article. Have any of you ever been up to the Oilsands ? It is disgusting. If any of you cannot see the damage and collateral damage, then you are either ignorant, naive or evil. Secondly, I am not surprised that big business, and in this case, big oil, the governments that are in their pockets, protecting their power/control/greed etc. as evil as I view them. But at least I can understand the root of all evil. What does always surprise me however are the sheep who believe in them and yet do not benefit like them. How is that possible ? What synapses and neurons have been twisted in your minds to even go there. That I will never understand. But as long as they have you in their grips I guess you will continue to support the evildom. Sad actually.


B. Gordon
said

No where in this article or in the posted comments that follow is there any reference made to the role the Alberta Government plays in this environmental disaster. Albertan's have an opportunity on March 3 to elect a more forward thinking government. Let's hope they do so.


Craig
said

All of you critics, please list what you do to help the environment.

Do you enjoy driving your car, flying, buying anything? Then you are using oil that is being produced from the oilsands. This resource is not only used for gasoline, it is incorporated into plastics, transport companies etc.

Most critics always do the same thing. They whine and moan that the government is doing too little but will not change their own lifestyle. What happened to personal responsibility?

Yes, the government should do their part, but you should also do yours.


Dan
said

Canada has to sell something if it is going to remain a prosperous country. The world wants our oil, and we have tonnes of it - cha ching!


Lyndon
said

The reason this is happening is because of the general population. People who sit at the drive-thru, who use their car starters, buy big gas guzzlers. We are the problem people. The oil sands just supply the need.


Kevin - Alberta
said

I want to explain that not every Albertan is happy with the oilsands development. I have no problem with industry making money but having set foot in the tarsands (syncrude project) I feel compelled to point out how drastically irresponsible it is to minimize the environmental impact in anyway. The area is a wasteland and the air is toxic right now and it will only get worse. I only wish the rest of Alberta would realize that.


Alex March
said

It is not just an Alberta secret. A high percentage of the staff and residents in Fort McMurray are from Newfoundland and Atlantic Canada. Why haven't they spoken out about the situation there. Why aren't their Premiers calling for action to protect them. They will eventually go home and cost the local economies for health problems for generations to come.


James
said

Ask yourself who is this Environmental Organization and where they get the information from. What about the air pollution in China or India, that is one of the worlds worst environmental disasters. in my opinion.

Canada has strict environmental policies and they do the best to enforce them, if you like your car and 21st Century travel methods then we must get the oil out of the ground.


Winnipegger
said

"Alberta's tarsands are second only to Saudi Arabia as the world's largest oil reserve."
That statement left me asking "This is a problem, why?"

Any polultion released into rivers is oil that isn't captured to sell to customers. It's about efficiency. Just recycle all water used and you collect all oil without poluting. Duh!


BC
said

i have a strong feeling that a lot of the people posting on this are taking this "study" hook line and sinker! The environmental defence group sounds alot more like extreme lefties to me. And what is the difference to the "Wasteland" of the oilsands and urban areas covered in concrete? Do you honestly think that ANY government would put the brakes on an industry that has billions of dollars worth of investment every year? and the report of animals and fish deformaties heck i could go tromping around the bush of the most pristene place in the world and find these things and write a report that sounded a lot like this one!! do some reaserch people before you believe any thing that was written as vaguely as this one.


Mike
said

I'll be very surprised if the government steps up and takes serious action against the tar sands. Unfortunately, not enough people complain for any change to happen. I think David Suzuki was right when he said "the signs are there, our actions are having an affect on the environment but it's going to take a serious disaster before anything changes". What kind of world are we going to leave our children? We have to make changes now.


ian in BC
said

Good Point. The tar sands are put there by nature. And for 1000's of yrs the run off has been in the environment. Are we not taking the tar out of the environment? Let those who want to pay $3/litre, do so when they want to drive up to Ft Mac and protest. Just send that extra $2/liter to your local soup kitchen, or tree planter. As for deformed fish, well nature is not perfect, you are going to find that and 4 leaf clovers anywhere on the planet.

Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz