News Sections
Appeals court strikes down controversial 'iPod tax'
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(50)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Fri. Jan. 11 2008 11:02 AM ET
A proposed levy on digital storage devices, known as the "iPod tax," has been quashed by the Federal Court of Appeal after opponents argued it assumed illegal behaviour on the part of Canadian consumers.
Following hearings on Jan.9, the court ruled that the Canadian Copyright Board did not have the right to impose new taxes on digital music players and storage devices. The taxes were to be introduced later this year.
The proposed levies included a $2 tax on 1 GB removable electronic memory cards, $5 tax on digital audio players no more than 1 GB and an extra $75 on digital audio players more than 30 GBs.
In its decision, the FCA stated: "The Copyright Board erred in law when it concluded that it has the legal authority to certify the tariff that CPCC (Canadian Private Copying Collective) has proposed for 2008-2009 on digital audio recorders."
Small tariffs are currently in place for such items as rewritable CDs and cassettes. The CPCC, a non-profit agency that represents the music industry, first requested a levy on removable electronic memory in its 2003-2004 tariff proposal.
The Retail Council of Canada opposed the tax, saying it created a non-competitive market environment for retailers and assumed anyone that owned a storage device was illegally copying and sharing digital files.
"On behalf of retailers and consumers, RCC welcomes this decision," Diane J. Brisebois, president of the Retail Council of Canada, said in a statement Thursday.
"This has been a very long battle, but a necessary one. Retailers have fought against these levies since their creation in 1997 because it taxes a product based on what a consumer possibly could use it for."
The Copyright Board initially concluded that there was insufficient evidence to warrant a new tax; however, the CPCC noted the growing popularity of digital memory devices is cause for concern.
"Our surveys show the vast majority of copies that people put on their iPods come from sources other than legitimately purchased copies," said David Basskin, the director of the CPCC.
According to a CPCC media release, "During the period from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006, 25 per cent of all the content copied onto electronic memory cards, including cards of all formats and capacities, was music, and 14 per cent of respondents copied only music."
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(50)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
JJ
said
canucklehead
said
Ron - Cambridge
said
Glad it was struck down.
Lynn
said
Thank you all retail outlets who took the leadership role on this issue.
Gord in Victoria
said
Gary Pocock Ottawa Canada
said
Blake from Montreal
said
Ki-Som
said
Ian
said
Once in a while we get a ......
said
Kevin
said
JW
said
tonysop.
said
sherry
said
Bart F.
said
Bonnie
said
Billy
said
Karl Marx
said
Pat_Pending
said
Industry groups like CPCC have got to realize that the world is changing, and the industry must change along with it. The CPCC represents "middle men" who stand between the artist and the consumer. I doubt that any of the money raised through the new tax would have made its way into the pockets of struggling new artists. It's time for the "middle men" to step aside.
Rock on music lovers, rock on.
An Apple Dealer in BC
said
Assuming illegal behaviour on the part of consumers is a serious mistake.
Furthermore, the CPCC is an unelected body, and has no right to tax.
I am sure this issue will rear its head again in the future until the Supreme Court of Canada finally puts a stop to this insanity. Mark my words.
Ernie
said
Bob
said
MQJ
said
And where does the money go anyway?
Sorta like taxing paper because I might Xerox copyrighted print material -- hey, there's an idea!!
LMAO....
said
RK
said
Tom
said
To tax all storage devices due to the possiblity of illegal use is absolutely absurd. What is next taxing the memory that is inside my computer? What about the sale of satalitte receivers which can only pick up illegal channels? This taxation should be removed or in the least restricted to portable MP3 players. Let the musicians cry that they can't sell a $.50 CD for $20-30.
"
The value of a product or service is governed by what a buyer is "willing" to pay and feel worth that amount.
Either the music companies think they garbage is worth more than the consumer is willing to pay, or the consumer is willing to pay that amount because they feel its worth it.
With the second option its clear some consumers have voiced they opinion(s) with downloading or other venue streams.
Downloading Pete
said
This tax was silly from the start and was motivated by record companies. Musicians make most of their $ from touring not record sales where there see only a very small fraction of the sale value.
The music industry continues to pay for not adapting quick enough to a more conveinant and simple way of accessing music. Instead they have chosen to hold on to a practice that has over charged music buyers for decades. They will continue to lose money until they wise up and embrace the technology and use it to their advantage for sales and promotion.
I have no sympathy for records companies as I have not bought a CD for well over a decade. I support the bands by buying tickets to their shows. Most tickets are over priced these days, but that is fair enough and I think bands make up for lost revenues quite easily with $150 seats. I will not buy their music any longer in the old cd version, which might as well be an 8-track or even record for that matter.
Sierra
said
I dispute that survey result... and the courts were exactly right in thier decision. I may be in the minority but everything on my I-pod and hard-drive and other media has been legitmately purchased. I'm glad the court got it right this time.
GJM
said
Check out recent US litigation involving the recording idustry saying that converting your own CDs to mp3 is a violation of copyright. You may own the CD, but only in the format in which it was originally purchased. Let's hope we don't see that extended to Canada.
Artists like to eat too ....
said
2) Downloading copyrighted material without permission or compensating the artist is STEALING however you may try to justify it to yourself.
3) This ruling is appropriate as it was wrong to assume the use of the device would be for illegal purposes.
4) If you like an artists work then pay for it in whichever format you prefer to get it be it a file or CD.
J
said
Try reading up on copyright law!
Mark - Powell RIver
said
Bob
said
You bring up an unfortunate case of failure to read. Most of the articles about the ripping CDs being illegal is blown out of proportion. They usually left out the "in your Shared Folder"...meaning you can/will upload them. That's what that was about...not the ripping as a process. Though...in reading it, it is very confusing (even to the person who was trying to explain it!).
To Artists like to eat too:
Downloading copyrighted material is NOT stealing...otherwise it would be a CRIMINAL OFFENSE, not CIVIL liability. The word your looking for is INFRINGEMENT.
And a question to your last point about file or CD. Are you suggesting that people buy two copies of music if they want it on Ipods and CD's? I'm curious.
Note: Capitalization is for emphasis.
K White
said
Since I am now getting charged for copying music on to CDs, I now let my kids do it. We're paying for it regardless, and not to use a service we've paid for would be a waste.
BL
said
This is the same sort of mentality that taxes me $100 for air conditioning in my car - never mind the tests which have proven that a/c is more fuel effecient than driving with your windows rolled down! BTY - I do drive with my a/c on (to stay cool) AND with my window down ('cause I like the fresh air) - why not, I've paid my a/c fuel waster tax so I can darn well do as I please!
wayno
said
Marc
said
Shan
said
Richie
said
J-F (Ottawa)
said
However for those who want to purchase an iPod, I agree with this decision. The proposed tax made no sense.
Joe
said
GJM
said
Apologies - I'll make it more apparent for you next time.
GJM
said
And yes, the upshot of the argument of the US music industry is that they would expect you to make individual purchases in each desired format. Look into it for yourself, it's just a few mouseclicks away.
Johnson Mapple
said
Terry H.
said
N
said
Kim
said
Sheesh! Thanks God the appeals court developed some sense for a change!
RC
said
Paul Mense
said
DW
said
Better yet why do we keep electing politicians of this calibre it makes me wonder who is the stupid one the politicians or us for electing them.