Canada -
News Sections
Lunn knew of reactor issues in September: report
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(75)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Wed. Jan. 9 2008 11:58 PM ET
Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn may have known in September that the Chalk River reactor needed improvements to protect public safety, months before it was shut down, according to an auditor general report released Tuesday.
Auditor general Sheila Fraser said she presented a report on Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. (AECL) to the corporation's board on Sept. 5, 2007.
The cover page of the audit says: "We would like to draw your attention to a significant deficiency related to the unresolved strategic challenges that the Corporation faces ... it is our view that this report contains information that should be brought to the attention of the Minister of Natural Resources. Accordingly, following consultation with the Board, we will be forwarding a copy of the report to the Minister."
The report goes on to highlight "three strategic challenges" AECL faced, including "the replacement of aging facilities at Chalk River Laboratories (CRL)."
Liberal MP Omar Alghabra, the natural resources critic, had asked Fraser's office to audit AECL. He has suggested Lunn was slow to take action on the aging Chalk River reactor.
"We have reports -- and the minister has yet to answer these questions -- that he may have known about this way before December third," Alghabra told CTV's Mike Duffy Live before the audit was released. "If he knew on Nov. 22 or even sooner, why didn't he act sooner?"
Earlier Wednesday, oposition leaders called for the resignation of Lunn, following accusations that he improperly interfered with an arm's-length nuclear regulator.
Lunn is currently engaged in a very public dispute with Linda Keen, the president of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC), over the shut down of the Chalk River nuclear reactor in Ontario late last year.
"We believe that the minister should be fired, the prime minister should apologize for having put into question the neutrality of a senior official," Liberal Leader Stephane Dion told reporters Wednesday.
The CNSC is responsible for setting licensing, health and safety rules for the country's nuclear facilities.
In a letter dated Dec. 27, Lunn threatened to fire Keen for her involvement in keeping the reactor closed.
"These events have cast doubt on whether you possess the fundamental good judgment required by the incumbent of the office of President of the Commission, and whether you are duly executing the requirements of the office," wrote Lunn.
He ended the letter by saying he was considering making a recommendation that Keen's "designation as President of the Commission be terminated."
On the CNSC website, Keen has posted both Lunn's letter and her response -- in which she says:
"The nature of the allegations which have been made, coupled with your threat to have me removed as President, seriously undermine the independence of the CNSC."
The Liberals want Lunn to appear before the Natural Resources committee to explain his actions regarding the Chalk River isotope crisis. They also want Keen to appear.
On Wednesday, the Green Party of Canada called for Lunn's resignation for his "interference with and threats to the independent nuclear regulator."
"Minister Lunn's threats... cross the line of appropriate political deference to an independent regulator. Such directives and threats weaken the credibility of nuclear safety in Canada," Green Party leader Elizabeth May said in a press release.
The Green Party wants a full inquiry into the nuclear industry.
On Tuesday, the NDP called on the government to create a special committee to investigate what went wrong.
"Instead of making allegations, the Minister should ask his colleagues to get to work and fix the government appointment process, something Harper promised to do," said NDP critic for government operations Charlie Angus.
"The Commissioner is an independent watch dog and should not be taking the fall for the Minister's incompetence. The Minister should have systems in place to ensure that things like this don't happen."
Chalk River problems
The Chalk River reactor stopped production for scheduled repairs on Nov. 18 and was expected to restart within five days.
But the CNSC refused to allow the reactor to restart after finding it had been operating without a backup emergency power system for cooling pumps for 17 months.
The reactor produces radioactive substances used in diagnostic tests for cancer, heart problems, and bone ailments. It provides enough medical isotopes for about 25 millions tests and treatments each year.
As a result of the extended closure, an international shortage of the substance occurred and thousands of tests were delayed and/or cancelled.
"What was going on was a major international health crisis, because of essentially an argument between two agencies over paperwork," said Conservative MP Jason Kenney.
"The issue was not really substantially about safety, it was about licensing, about one part in a back-up system that would only be relevant in a once-in-50,000-years seismic event."
In December, emergency legislation passed by Parliament side-stepped the CNSC's objections and allowed the Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. to restart the reactor for 120 days in order to alleviate the isotope shortage.
Judy Wasylycia-Leis, the NDP health critic, said the government should have been aware of the reactor's problems long before the situation escalated.
"Issues around Chalk River have been raised time and time again -- issues about safety," she said. "The Conservative government chose to ignore the problems and to wait until a crisis loomed before the Canadian population."
With files from CTV's David Akin and The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(75)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Allan Eizinas
said
It is like smelling a gas leak in your home, calling for assistance and then watching the Fire Chief and Police Chief in a fistfight once they arrive on the scene.
Hey folks – People trust the government and experts to guarantee their safety. Get your act together or there will never be another nuclear reactor built in Canada.
Greg from Kitchener
said
Doug
said
barry
said
Elizabeth Atkinson
said
Roch
said
Dave in Surrey
said
Time to end this governments reign and time for a new competent team to step up and run this country the way Canadians deserve!!!
Jim R
said
If Mr. Harper does not fire Mr. Lunn, then I hope there will be a CPC leadership convention very soon.
Jeannette Bolli
said
Po
said
So the situation now is that there is no international shortage of the medical isotope but we have a nuclear reactor in Chalk River that doesn't have a backup system in case of a meltdown? Is it just me or are Canadians living around Chalk River being overlooked? Should their safety not be the primordial concern of our politicians?
Ian
said
Michael
said
Ivel Nhoj
said
Leach
said
A. Conda
said
Paul
said
Keen should not be fired. She did her job and someone else didn't!
CM
said
He attacks Harper for not getting the reactor back on-line to save the sick people - then he attacks him for getting it back on-line.....
Is whining Dion's only capability?
Richard Padgett
said
Craig
said
You cannot have it both ways Dion. Stephane Dion does this on every issue, he states something then changes his mind to fit the polls.
That is not leadership. That is what killed Paul Martin.
John
said
cloke
said
Observer
said
Pat_Pending
said
Roch
said
It took all party agreement to make that happen.
Bill Workman
said
Jonathan
said
John from Saskatchewan
said
What's even more painfully obvious - most people don't even appear to address the article before posting comments...
JM
said
And next time when the scientists and technologists who work on the NRU decide to go on strike again, as they've done in the past, lets fire them all as well for the same reasons.
cloke
said
Shamaro
said
Neil
said
The whole mess shows that the people in these arms length agencies do not always provide a vital service that people depend on. I do not like "political interference", but do not confuse that with an elected minister acting in a responsible manner. I would hope that the opposition parties would do the same if in power.
Kevin Dallaire
said
Nathan
said
Kevin
said
The Liberals appointed Linda Keen and by insisting that the production of Isotopes be halted she showed no regard for the many thousands of Canadians and others around the world who would suffer due to her decision. It is clear as an appointee of the Liberals she was far more interested in trying to embarras the government then protect peoples health. Also by publicly posting the exchange between her and Minister Lunn she again clearly demonstrates the liberal philosophy of making political mileage at every opportunity.
The NDP have called for another inquiry, what a surprise! I believe thats the 5th one they've called for in the last 3 months. We can expect endless calls for inquiries from Layton and his gang because it allows them to appear to be pro-active without actually having to make a stand. Imagine an NDP government endless inqueries, wasted millions and a return to deficit spending.
The Conservatives are true to form whether you like them or not. They take action! Health versus safety was the issue and they weighed the risks and made the choice while at the same time forcing the liberals to support or not there decision. The liberals caved in once again and are now trying to make an issue out of Lunn versus Keen.
Finally the media should be exposed for their biased reporting on the issue. Who was the nuclear engineer who reported to parliment on the risks involved if the reactor was restarted afterall he was the only qualified person involved in this whole matter. Remember what he said? Of course not it hasn't appeared in any of the media reports on this issue. And please ctv tell us what qualifications Linda Keen has to be the head watchdog of our vital nuclear industry?
Mark
said
Tell me again how this is the Conservatives fault? I would ask Mr. Dion to speak to Mr. Martin and Chretien about Chalk River.
Andrew in Edmonton
said
Bob
said
There should be no talk of a "small chance" of a nuclear accident. Any incident in a nuclear reactor is an event that should be reviewed and if the management did not follow the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission regulations there should be an open and transparent review of the reasons why they did not act.
This was a major international black eye for Canada not caused by Ms. Keen but by the operators of the Chalk River reactor.
The Minister should immediatley apologize to Ms. Keen and the CNSC staff.
GP
said
Unfortunately Canadian politics is looking more and more like the dysfunctional America system every day. It’s about getting and keeping power and satisfying self-serving interests. Time to send a message. I ask all Canadians that are tired of these clowns to take a chance and send a message by voting for the any Green Party candidate that has a depth of understanding past just environmental issues. It's working in Europe, why not give it a try here for one election.
larry
said
He should have realized that his letter would end up in the public domain with so many 'left' supporters in the public service.
DEF Sask
said
Elizabeth Atkinson
said
According to expert opinion from university professors, nuclear engineers and others who testified in parliamentary hearings, yes the risk to the public was minimal. As for Ms Keen, what are her qualifications? She has a degree in Agricultural Sciences, great if she worked at the Wheat Board but probably not appropriate for a nuclear safety organization. Perhaps someone with a Mechanical and/or a Nuclear Engineering background would be more appropriate.
Jeff
said
MJ
said
Well...not exactly. I am a Canadian, and I certainly have not lost confidence in Prime Minister Harper. As always, his government shows conviction and clarity of vision.
M.E. Archer
said
Dana
said
The reactor will still need to be shut down to do that. As well the supply of isotopes will have to be assured from an alternate source. We know there is an alternate source because we've had to acquire them from them in the past.
And since everyone has either forgotten or is wilfully neglecting to mention - the Chalk River reactor is old enough that it was the location of the very first civilian nuclear accident in the world in 1952 followed a few years later by the second ever in 1958.
Furthermore the reactor is situated in an earthquake zone and there have been a few small ones lately.
Politics be damned. This is a major safety issue on more than one front and should not be left to self-seeking publicity hounds in Parliament, of any persuasion, to monitor or oversee.
Kevin
said
http://www.nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/newsroom/issues/corr_page.cfm
On it's face, it appears that AECL dropped the ball by failing to comply with the terms of their license, then compounded the problem by playing chicken with the CNSC. Lunn, meanwhile, has made an ass of himself by overstepping the bounds of his statutory powers, failing to know what was going on in his own office, and trying to turn Ms. Keen into a scapegoat.
JJ
said
James - Chatham Ont.
said
It is AECL's and the government's responsibility to follow the operating standards and to ensure that there is an adequate supply of isotopes, not the CNSC.
Ms. Keen's and CNSC's actions in this matter where correct.
John
said
Ted
said
JK
said
These watchdogs and commissions exist for a reason. Granted, the reactor ran without incident for years - but for all of you who believe that is a valid argument, I suggest you google Chernobyl and see what is left of that city...
peter jones
said
Perhaps Mrs Keen decided to galvanize the goevernment into correcting this issue, and was willing to spark a mini-crisis to get Ottawa off its bum and prioritize nuclear safety.
wayne ewen
said
Chris
said
Matt
said
Parliament (including Dion) legislate an override to get the reactor back up.
Even Dion though her judgment was flawed enough to pass a law overrulling her.
Minister Lunn simply wrote a letter questioning her judgment.
If she lacks the judgment to perform her role, she should be removed. If Dion thought her judgment was acceptable, they didn't need to overrule her.
Chris
said
Human life is worth something. Public safety should be at the top of any list of priorities.
The delays at picking and the other reactors in Ontario, I guess are attributed to this new regulation also.
People get your head out of the sand, chances that this reactor for the 120 days they have started it up for, to have a massive accident that would cause leaks, the odds of winning the lottery are much better.
Brett
said
There is more then adequate cooling for the reactor. And there is even a fully functional backup pump in case of emergency.
What we are talking about here is the 3rd backup pump that was taken off-line for repairs. Still leaving the main backup pump online.
In other words, Linda Keen decided to keep the reactor shut down because if the thousands of fail-safe's failed, and the extremely unlikely chance that they couldn't shut it down, the backup pump kicks in. And then for some unknown reason, they still cant shut the reactor down, and the even more unlikely situation that the backup pump doesn't work, then they are in trouble.
Risking lives because the backup to the backup to the backup was not online, is irresponsible. That is why the entire House voted to bring it back online.
Linda Keen was having a pissing contest with the AEC, and put thousands of lives in danger. Lunn's letter is fully warranted.
Chris L
said
She should be fired!
JSmith
said
Gar
said
neilpk
said
Rod
said
These guys are paid (very good dollars) to use their best judgment, which clearly the tax payer is not getting.
Firing Lunn is like saying Keen was right, which according to the nuclear professionals AND house of commons, she wasn't!
David Koch
said
These are arms length agencies/gov policies that haven't changed between both PC and previous Liberal govts. It seems like throwing rocks in a glass house to be critical of original situation when nothing has changed for years.
What one can be critical of or praise is the govt response after it became involved directly.
Austin
said
Blair
said
In a hierarchial government, pressure and an overuling decision was made by parliament to reopen Chalk River due to the high demand of isotopes on this nuclear plant??! Sure. How do you weigh human risk? Always a difficult question! Does a preventative major disaster prevail over a current ailing need? What is worse??!! We are currently experiencing extreme weather conditions which I'm sure has increased the risk of a disaster - and what about terrorist activity? Does this mean we are prone to attack. Should we not take preventive care here??!
Minister Lunn was wrong in attacking President Keen the way he did. This is a sensitive issue and can bring emotional responses however a high position in the Canadian government demands a composed character not an arratic one. Lunn should have respected the decision made from the independent body of CNS and its president. Instead he has started a bureaucratic and political fight that is an embarrassment to Canada! Harper has done a decent job as a minority government and if he wants to keep a strong opinion of the public he needs to discipline Lunn.
Aside from the political battle - we need to seriously attend to Chalk River! This plant needs to get up to the standards of the CNSC ASAP and once this has been completed the government needs debate the dependency the world has on a 50 year old plant. That is unacceptable. We live in a world where substitute products and alternate supplies surround us. Other plants, other countries need to provide for this highly demanded isotope!
Barb
said
fall out boy
said
PH
said
1. CNSC added a new requirement for seismically protected backup generators for 2 coolant pumps. The 2 coolant pumps already had backup generators, they weren't seismically protected. The plant had been running for ~50 years without seismically protected backup generators.
2. There are 8 coolant pumps, it takes one pump to pump the coolant.
3. AECL got one of the backup generators upgraded, the parts for the other generator weren't all available.
4. CNSC refused to allow the plant to restart without the second seismically protected backup generator.
In order for there to be a problem there would have to be an earthquake large enough to knock out the power grid (or maybe 2 power grids if the plant is on multiple grids), the backup generator without seismic protection would have to fail and so would the seismically protected backup generator. Even then the reactor could be shut down by inserting the control rods that stop the fission.
The odds of a problem are astronomical at least millions, perhaps billions or higher to 1.
Keen was responsible to calculate the odds and weigh the risk against the certain risk to Canadians of losing the supply of isotopes.
Keen failed miserably. She should be fired and IMHO the government has cause.
This looks to me like a bureaucratic power play. Instead of coming to a compromise, like getting the second backup generator done in 6 months, Keen chose to display her power.
The head of AECL has already resigned (he may have got a similar letter). Keen needs to go too.
Brenda Williams
said
It's about global safety and an organization that shut their facility down for scheduled repairs which obviously did not include installing a working back up system and would have started up their reactor AGAIN for who knows how long without the proper safety measurements implemented. As far as I am concerned, they are the ones that should be to blame for not being able to provide their product. If a trucking company cannot deliver goods to their client because their truck did not pass inspection it is not the fault of the inspector that fails their vehicle.
If this situation had not come to the public's attention now after 17 months of operationing in a non safe capacity, how much longer would it have continued? I am grateful that we have found out and I would like to know how it was possible for the facility to operate for 17 months without having the proper back up system in place in the first place.
As far as the correspondence between the two parties go, this is just another example of bullying in the workplace. Bullying someone who is doing their job is unacceptable.
If we are worried about other countries and their capability to use nuclear facilities responsibly then we better make sure our own house is in order or we might find out that Iran or North Korea or the US are imposing sanctions on our country because we are idiots who are endangering not only our own citizens but the rest of the world.
Preston Jacob
said
Ian
said
Flanagan
said
Keen, a career bureaucrat was smeared by Harper. No wonder senior members of the public service fear and despise these clowns...
Sean Calder
said
The issue was about having a backup for an already existing backup. Basically, a second backup system that was seismically protected in the event that an earthquake took out the regular backup system.
Second, Mr. Lunn's actions. The Opposition is complaining about Mr. Lunn "interfering" with this agency, and then turning around and complaining why he didn't to it sooner? Come one, either he can, or can't interfere. Make a decision!
As for reading the letters/correspondence, I've read all 38 pages of Ms. Keen's rebuttal, and while the AECL didn't seem to be able to figure out what they wanted to do, the CNSD was content to sit on their hands over it and wait the AECL out, claiming they are only acting in accordance with the law.
Forget about mitigating and extenuating circumstances. Forget about being responsible enough to weigh risk vs safety. Forget about being pro-active in getting things done so that this never happened.
No. Instead, it took Mr. Lunn to see that they were going NOWHERE fast, and took appropriate action in the interest of public health and cut through the bureaucratic BS from BOTH agencies.
And as for Mr. Lunn's letter, he himself was not going to fire her. He was going to submit a recommendation to the appropriate authority, but was giving her an opportunity to explain her actions in this matter.
Jay
said
First of all, for those who find it stupid for Minister Lunn to have threatened Ms. Keen of being fired, it is actually a legal necessity. Ms. Keen, as she has stated on numerous occasions, serves "at good behaviour". This means that she may not be fired at the Government's whim. In this type of situation (which reminds me much of the Jean Pelletier fiasco)the Government must advise the individual that it considers she has not fulfilled her obligations or has behaved in a way that is deemed unethical. Once the Government has signified its intention, Ms. Keen has the right to defend herself against the accusations she faces. This is exactly what both parties have done, although it is quite unusual for this exchange to be done publicly.
As for the political interference question, Canadian jurisprudence has strongly established the arms-length relationship that must exist between, quasi-judicial tribunals and the Government. Now, I feel it is important to clarify that Government and Parliament are two different things. The Government is the Party that is in power, in this case the Conservatives. Parliament, however, includes all Members of Parliament which were elected by the citizenry. While the CNSC must indeed respect any laws passed by Parliament, the ministerial code of conduct clearly states that Ministers are not allowed to try to influence a specific case appearing before a tribunal (the Minister of Justice for example would not be allowed to tell a judge he must find Pickton guilty of first degree murder).
The questions raised by this controversy could have an enermous effect on Canadian regulators and other tribunals.
So please, before commenting, forget your political affiliations and instead look at the very important legal questions that are arising from this situation.
As for who is right and who is wrong, time will tell. In the meantime, I am sure quite a few lawyers are going to make some good money trying to clear this thing up.
Dan
said