CTV News | Obama, Huckabee win Iowa presidential caucuses

Top Stories -   

Obama, Huckabee win Iowa presidential caucuses

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Tom Clark with more details from Iowa
CTV News: Robert Fife on how the vote affects Canada
CTV Newsnet: Scotty Greenwood, political analyst
CTV Newsnet: David Dougherty, political consultant
Canada AM: Allan J. Lichtman, presidential historian at American University
CTV Newsnet: Eleanor Clift, Newsweek Magazine

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(55)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Thu. Jan. 3 2008 11:49 PM ET

Senator Barack Obama and former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee have emerged the victors in Iowa Thursday, winning the presidential caucuses.

Obama, a first-term senator, won with a significant lead over his main rival and Democratic front-runner, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. Senator John Edwards came in second but Clinton came in at a very close third while votes were being tallied.

Meanwhile, Huckabee, a Baptist preacher-turned politician, won the Republican caucus. He defeated Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney. Former senator Fred Thompson and Senator John McCain were in a tight race for third place.

Going into Iowa, the first big test of the presidential race, Huckabee and Romney were neck-and-neck in the polls.

Although Romney outspent Huckabee by about $20 to $1, the former governor had the support of more than half of Republican voters in Iowa who said in entrance polls they were either born-again or evangelical Christians.

Romney said that despite the loss, he was satisfied with the gains he made in the polls.

"I've been pleased that I've been able to make up ground and I intend to keep making up ground, not just here but across the country," he said.

According to her aides, Clinton called Obama to congratulate him. But her campaign manager said the fight for presidency was far from over.

"This race begins tonight and ends when Democrats throughout America have their say," she told The Associated Press. "Our campaign was built for a marathon and we have the resources to run a national race in the weeks ahead."

Political pundits said Obama's win in an overwhelmingly white state is a great triumph as he tries to become the first African-American president of the United States.

Now, the dynamic of the race has shifted for Clinton who also hopes to make her mark by being the first female president of the U.S.

Tight race

Earlier Thursday, Democrat and Republican candidates vying for first place in Iowa's presidential caucuses didn't waste a minute trying to reach voters with their message.

"This thing could really be close," Senator John Edwards told his supporters in Iowa City. "This thing could be really close. We need you to make calls, talk to your friends."

Tom Clark, CTV News' Washington bureau chief, said Edwards' campaign is in a lot of trouble.

"He's been campaigning here virtually for four years. His whole strategy said he had to win Iowa," Clark told CTV News. "He didn't win Iowa tonight. Edwards is in a lot of trouble."

Clark said the night's biggest loser turned out to be former mayor of New York City Rudy Giuliani, who is running as a Republican candidate.

"He virtually ignored Iowa and guess what, tonight Iowa ignored Rudy," he said.

Iowa is the first state contest on the road to the party nominations and the official start of what is expected to be the longest White House race in history.

While the state is tiny and the voter numbers low, political analysts such as presidential historian Allan J. Lichtman say Iowa matters because it can make or break a candidate's chances in the other 49 states.

"You know, Iowa is all about expectations," he told CTV's Canada AM Thursday. "And nobody cares about the handful of delegates that are selected. The only thing that matters is the story that's going to be written the day after the Iowa caucuses."

Huckabee decided to take the unusual step of leaving Iowa and to make an appearance on Jay Leno's Tonight Show on Wednesday.

Huckabee played up his personable side, jamming on his bass guitar with Leno's band and trading jokes with the host.

Lichtman noted that Huckabee had a lot riding on tonight's outcome.

"If Romney wins Iowa and then New Hampshire, he could well be the Republican nominee," he said

High voter turnout crucial

Over in the Democratic race, Clinton made a last-minute appeal for support Wednesday, telling supporters her experience makes her the most effective leader.

"Long before cameras started following me around I worked to try and do what I could to make positive change to improve people's lives," she said.

Obama quickly rejected that notion.

"You can't be steeped in the conventional wisdom of Washington on issues as profound as war and then somehow believe you're going to chart a new bold direction on foreign policy," he said.

Clark also notes that that the candidates have had to customize their campaigns for the unique perspective of Iowa voters.

"The interesting thing about these races is this is not the general population that's voting. These are the party activists, the committed people, the committed Republicans, and committed Democrats. And they tend to come from special interest points of view.

"And so the candidates play to that. And they do that process throughout the primaries and then of course their campaigns change when they appeal to the general voter."

About US$40 million has been spent on campaigning in Iowa, which averages out to be more than $400 for each voter expected to attend the caucuses.

The figures could make this the first-ever billion-dollar presidential election.

The Canadian connection

Canadians are overwhelmingly supportive of Democrat candidates, said Peter Harder, Canada's former deputy minister of foreign affairs.

Of the Democrat candidates, Clinton is the one that knows Canada the best but she's far from being the country's best friend, said Peter Donolo with the Strategic Counsel.

"She's particularly tough on Canada," he said. "She's been anti-Canada when it served her political purposes."

As for Obama, he isn't too well-versed in Canadian politics.

"I would immediately call the president of Mexico, the president of Canada to try and amend NAFTA," he once said.

Democrats aren't too keen on the free-trade agreement, which could spell trouble for Canadian jobs.

With files from The Associated Press, The Canadian Press and reports from CTV's Tom Clark and Robert Fife

Please Add Comments( )

Scott
said
0 0

It sure will be interesting, if candidates like Hillary and Obama make it to the end of this race. They all say they will tackle the huge corporate monsters that have taken control of the country through lobbying etc. Restore the middle class etc. I think these are great ideas, but whether this can be accomplished is another matter, especially when these candidates receive so much campaign money from these lobbies themselves. One thing for sure, the country needs change, same as when we got rid of the Liberals. Whether it's a Democrat or Republican in office next time, they have huge changes to make.


Janice - Toronto
said
0 0

The Hill Billy tag team on the democratic side is scary and can't be trusted.
Bill Clinton not only came to Canada to run down his own country he did that all over the world, the damage he has done to the USA image because they are not in power means they should never get power.
George W. Bush was just voted in the states as the most respected.
The nation voted the Democrats into majority in the Senate and they have done nothing since.
So my hunch is the Republicans will win the presidency because to have a senate and President from the Democrats is a risk the USA will not take.



Jeanne
said
0 0

I'm hoping Clinton will win, and I believe she will.

Obama just doesn't have the experience she has, and just doesn't have what it takes. He can't hold his own in the discussions they have had - he just doesn't have what it takes to be president of the USA.

I remember when Bill Clinton won the election, and how wonderful things were with him and Gore there for eight wonderful years. Now we have Bush, who has almost driven the US into bankruptcy, and has LIED to the US people about the war in Iraq - we NEED someone who is going to do a great job, and put the US back on the map - and Hillary will.

With Bill beside her - we can expect great things!! Go Hillary go!!!


S. Hillier - No Election in Canada - Please
said
0 0

NO ELECTION IN CANADA PLEASE.
We don't need an endles cycle of elections here, let's just watch the one in the States, it will be more interesting.


ance
said
0 0

The Democrats unquestionably have the superior candidates and platform.

If their 2 front runners were not a woman and a black man, no one would be talking any "if" when referring to a Democratic victory in the next election.

The big question is are Americans as a whole ready to look beyond gender and racial prejudices and elect a black or female president?

For their own good and ours I sure hope they are.


DJT
said
0 0

Boring - must we keep watching this daily for the next 11 months, maybe I will be watching BBC WORLD news now.


Mo
said
0 0

Jeanne,

I disagree with you that Hillary should win. She does not look trusthworthy and would say anything to become the president. She is not decisive, and does not have a mind of her own. At least Barrack Obama is consistent.


Change is only good when it is good
said
0 0

US history has shown they have had their share of self serving presidents like Andrew (Slave master) Jackson, Bill (sex starved) Clinton, Richard (Watergate) Nixon, Ronald (Contra Deal) Regan etc in the White House. we don't need a Hillary (wannabe) Clinton.

Mike Huckabee is a man of the people, a man of principle, better he than grandpa McCain, a Vietnam left over.

Roch
said
0 0

Clinton is all make-up, no substance, can't comment without a script.

America needs Obama, the First Black President.
Obama appears intellectual, focused and rational.

Clinton appears preachy, screechy and beechy.

Kirk Rodgers
said
0 0

Bill Clinton will be remembered as the President who had sex 'between the Bushes". If Hillary does win (Bush->Clinton->Bush->Clinton) what will the joke become?
Will the Georges be remembered as the "Bushes near Bill's Hill"? Maybe.


Allan Eizinas
said
0 0

The United States is not ready for either a woman or black as president. To win the Democrats would require that some of those who voted Republican during the last election switch to a Democrat. Republicans would never vote for a woman or black.

Most Democrats understand this and as the date for the election approaches I believe that we will see a movement towards a third candidate that is considered electable like Edwards or Biden or Kurcinich or even someone coming out of the woodwork.

If they do not, then the Republicans could rally behind a moderate like John McCain who could run against the Bush record and get elected.


John
said
0 0

Barack Obama is the man needed by US at this point in history. Experience is not a substitute for good judgement. Hillary will say, act, dance and do anything required to be the President. Unfortunately for her the more people know her the more they dislike her. Joe Biden, Edwards and Obama are the candidates to look for. Goodluck IOWA!


Lart from Above
said
0 0

Last time the US had a Democratic president, the economy created 20 million jobs and the government balanced the budget. Clinton cleaned up the Balkans after the war that Bush failed to prevent, and he got Palestinians and Israelis close to a peace settlement, which would have helped calm things in the rest of the Middle East. The rest of the world will breathe a sigh of relief when George II's reign of terror comes to an end.


Peace
said
0 0

I hope either Obama or Huckabee win. They both profess to be christians and Obama has a good worldview and I would like to see it put into practice. Huckabee can be relied on to keep the government out of issues of morality. Something Canada lacked for 13 years of liberal rule. I hope our Prime minister has good relations with the next president no matter which party he or she is from.


J-F (Ottawa)
said
0 0

To Scott: You say Canada needed to get rid of the Liberals? Are you seriously saying that Harper (a.k.a. Bush's puppet) was the right choice for our country?

I completely agree with Jeanne. What's wrong with all of you bashing Clinton? Are you seriously judging Clinton's term as President on the "sex" scandal??? Do you not realize Clinton brought the U.S. economy to an all time high? He was one of their best leaders and I believe Hillary will do even better. Go Liberals and go Democrats!



PBW
said
0 0

About US$40 million has been spent on campaigning in Iowa, which averages out to be more than $400 for each voter expected to attend the caucuses.

What a waste. I'm glad we don't have primaries here.


Justin
said
0 0

"Experience" should not be the deciding factor. Experience as a governor didn't prevent GWB from being an total disaster. And Hillary's experience as a junior senator and first lady doesn't come close to comparing to governor experience.

If Americans want to see real improvements, they need to look outside the jaded, out-of-touch washington bulldog circle. The Clintons have been around forever and are now nothing but a slick, cold, ruthless political machine fueled by lobbyist money.

Someone fresh with new ideas, optimism and unfettered by deep ties to lobbyists would be just what the doctor ordered (on either side of the isle)


Joe Green
said
0 0

I think the US is in very deep trouble. I think when you have a President who orders war crimes and you have a Democratic opposition that had the power to stop him, but shirking in that responsibility, makes them as liable as the White House is today. The US has lost nearly all of its international crediblity, legitimacy and respect and I hope that whomever is elected, can restore, or at least set a new course for the US to come back to a state of reason and humanity.


GW
said
0 0

Should be fun to watch this year and I tend to agree with above comment we don’t need a 2008 election in Canada. We’d likely just end up with a slightly bigger minority Conservative government.

Had to chuckle to myself the other day while watching an old sci-fi movie where the currency was referred to as “Hillary’s”.

Democrats: I like Hillary better than Obama. I think the experience pitch works well for her and Bill at her side is a big plus. I feel if the going get tough, Obama may not be able to handle the pressure. Besides, Obama sounds too much like Osama.

Republicans: I like Giuliani. I like the way he handles big social issues. He’s against abortion and discourages it but respects people’s free will. I think that’s the way it should be.



Samuel
said
0 0

"..the war Bush failed to prevent." Interesting, part of Bush's current philosophy seems to be pre-emptive warfare which he is not very popular for. "Cleaning up in the Balkans" was a another blunder of US foreign policy. Job creation doesn't necessarily mean anything as communist countries have had very high employment and relatively bleak standards of living. It is hard for me to grasp why people would vote for the democrats. Perhaps it is just because they are supposedly different than the Republicans. They both make huge mistakes and drag the American *empire* down into the dirt. The only candidate I could seriously consider if I was voting in their election is Ron Paul.


Lance
said
0 0

Ron Paul is the only hope that the USA has in turning itself around for the good.

Anyone else would spell sheer disaster for the American people.

Vote Ron Paul my fellow Americans,...RON PAUL!!!!!


IAN
said
0 0

The only reason one can vote for Clinton is because having been in the white house, and knowing what is happening around the world from her husband, as a senator she voted in favour of the war in Iraq knowing there was no choice. Having the strength to do that is her sole qualification.


Lucy
said
0 0

I would like Hilary to win in Iowa. I think she is the most capable of handling the job. I think as voters we have to be careful to not let candidates swing the focus to topics they would prefer to handle. Once in the President's chair, they are immediately drawn away from local issues and into geopolitics. Do you hear of Bush's progress on education, his topic of choice?


LR
said
0 0

I would like to see Hilary win the Iowa caucus. As a former Iowan, I think that she is definitely the best candidate for the Presidency. Yes, she displays some characteristics that are not 100% consistent, but have you listended to the politicians in Canada recently? I believe that Hilary would make a good president because she has to clear the Clinton name that is associated with the scandal that Bill perpetuated. She has experience, tactics, and the killer instinct that is necessary to deal with the current global terrorist threat. The Islamic nations will think twice about squashing women's rights with a lady president. Besides, Hillary has the drive, intelligence and experience to do the job. It is time for a woman president and Hillary gets my vote.


JL
said
0 0

I find it amazing that CTV hasn't given one mention about Ron Paul.
If you haven't heard of him google his name.
He is ALL about restoring the US Constitution, which has been destroyed over the last couple of decades.
He is the only candidate that isn't in it for the money or special interests. He is in it for the American people.
I think he would repair the US economy which is what Canada needs to happen for our own well being.
I think he would work great with PM Harper.


Sharla
said
0 0

I am a Canadian female whom is following the Obama-Clinton coverage.I think that the turnaround for U.S would be to elected a Black First Lady & Black President.As they would represent all females & males or all races


MG Ottawa
said
0 0

Boooooooooooring.

Who cares?

All the US media is going to talk about for the rest of the year is this race and absolutely nothing else.

Why don't they discuss their crumbling economy on CNN this much. I am sure that's much more important than covering a hoard or candidates in the least important and corn growing, red neck, hillybilly state.

And we are still a year (almost) away from the elections.

Jon - Calgary
said
0 0

All I can say is GO RON PAUL!! The US needs this dark horse candidate or I fear the worst with anyone else...


Kanatian
said
0 0

The end of Bush's tenure of terror can not come fast enough for the world. The right wing governments of the west have commercialized illegal wars adn set up doomed economies on those factors. It is time to wash our hands of the barbarity that the right wing has brought to the world, again.

It would be great to see ol' Bubba get named to cabinet.

I find it amuzing that people say that Clinton can not be trusted, yet a trillion dollar fabricated terror industry has been created by the Bush regime and supported by banal government leaders in the west to fuel an increaes in the price of oil. There are nearly a million people dead because of the lies of Bush and company. And Clinton can not be trusted?


Rona from Canmore
said
0 0

Since we're going to be bombarded with Yankee election news for the next year whether we like it or not, let's pray that it will be anyone BUT warmongering McCain (13%)or Giuliani(24%). Go Huckabee (22%)! I believe he congratulated Canada on having our first igloo in one of Rick Mercer's specials, so he needs to get out of Arkansas!


JF
said
0 0

For the Democrats they had better hope that Edwards is nominated.. fact is that he is the most electable of the 3 and has the best chance of defeating the Republicans... unfortunately there are still too many middle class white Americans who are, purposely or otherwise, sexist and racist so a woman or black man is at a disadvantage for that reason alone. If the Republicans win then the US will mostly continue down the path set by Bush as the great undertaker of US influence around the World in the long term but this will also mean continued destructive political tensions and environmental degradation in the foreseeable future.



RS
said
0 0

The democrats would bring America into further dissaray. They are weak on the economy (want to raise taxes)weak on foreign policy and would hand the country over to the terrorists and they are weak on moral issues and immigration. Say what you will about Bush but America is safer now than before 9/11. Every sing pundit in the world predicted a quiz retaliation to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan but through the resolve of the strong Republican party any potential terrorist attack has been twarted. That being said the election will be won by a Republican. Will it be Romney who has steady conservative credentials all along the board? Will it be Huckabee, a catalyst for true social conservative? Or will moderates such as McCain and Giuliani who are seen as uniters get the nod? Should be interesting!


John
said
0 0

Here's hoping Ron Paul supporters turn up in massive numbers, giving the mainstream media no choice but to report on this guy, who is without a doubt, the only hope left for America.


IAN
said
0 0

It seems to me those who favour Clinton or Obama do so solely based on one being a woman and the other a black man. Bit shallow, no?


Exiled Canadian
said
0 0

The Republican nominee will win no matter who it is. Terrorism is still the #1 issue with Americans and will continue to be so as long as this war continues and the radical Islamists continue to bomb anyone who disagrees with them, including other muslims like Bhutto.

I do think Hillary will win on the Democratic side but her disapproval ratings are too high in the general population to win.

On the Republican side, Joh McCain will emerge as Super Tuesday approaches. Giuliani will never win the nomination because he can't get the social conservatives on board. Huckabee and Romney will tear each other down while both proclaiming to be the "true" conservative, which neither of them are. Thompson is too laid back to win but would be my personal choice since he has the experience and the common sense to lead the nation. The others are irrelevant. Ron Paul is a Libertarian and shouldn't even be running for the Republican nomination.

As far as Republicans not voting for blacks and women, that's stereotypical history. Yes, there are still some racists of bigots out there but the vast majority of them if they has a candidate that agreed with their concerns and happened to be a woman or black. Think Colin Powell or Condi. I certainly would not vote for someone I disagreed with because they were black or a woman. That the real reason why Republicans will never vote for Obama, Clinton or Edwards: They are just too far left for them.


Doug
said
0 0

Like a lot of other people,including many Americans,I will be glad to see the last of Mr.Bush.
However,given the huge "protectionist",and "isolationist" forces in the Democratic party, I find the thought of a democratic government running the affairs of our biggest market to be more than a little troubling.I'm curious as to how so many people have missed Hillary's very anti Canadian rhetoric over the last few years.
Once the nominees are selected,the political messages tend to change for the actual election race.In this case,I sure hope so.Especially if a Democrat is heading for the whitehouse.
That said,American politics is a very complex arrangement.It can easily be that the president can be left with very little power when it comes to passing legislation.A bit like a minority government here.
So,as someone else said about the race for president,"booooooring".


ance
said
0 0

When it comes to government, there should be no "moral issues".

Deciding personal morality should NEVER...EVER be a pervue of any democratic government.

Intrusion into such areas by government has always been and always will be wrong...

Some decisions should rest ONLY with the individual making them.




JL
said
0 0

To Exiled Canadian:

Why wouldn't Ron Paul be considered a Republican because he is a Libertarian?! United States is called the land of Liberty! Looks like you've been following too much televison.

Ron Paul will win either from his Republican nomination or running as an independant. He is the only true Conservative out of any of the candidates anyway. What you call "conservative" has only been created by the media the last couple of decades.


Moral leaders make for happy campers
said
0 0

Morality IS absolutely the business of government. To think otherwise is simply ludicrous and ignoring thousands of years of history. A nation prospers under righteous leadership and regresses under immoral leadership.


MH from Ontario
said
0 0

I can say this for EVERYBODY IN WHOLE WORLD..... We don't care who is next president of USA long as BUSH is out of office~! :-) Can't wait...... Wondering if there will be fireworks on night when BUSH is offically out of office. :-)


Shawn - Toronto
said
0 0

The biggest issue in America is their highly damaged economy. A report showed over 80% of Americans believe they are already in a recession or are about to be in one, and yet only 30% think the economy is the most important issue.

The best option for this presidential race is to put party aside and choose the candidate who can fix financial woes, and leave other social issues for later. Ending the war, socializing healthcare, abolishing the IRS all would be great, but they are miniscule in comparison to the turmoil within the economy.


Nathan
said
0 0

Why is there no mention of Ron Paul?

Even the Canadian media is biased against this candidate.

He is one of the only candidates without a Neoconservative agenda.

I guess I just answered my own question.

Bob Smith
said
0 0

RON PAUL IS THE ONLY AMERICAN WHO DOESN'T EAT BABIES! END OF STORY


Lorne
said
0 0

If Clinton wins. I believe we will have another "World War".


John
said
0 0

RON PAUL is the sanest of all the candidates. His message of an end to war and ALL American troops being brought back home has peaceful ramifications for the entire world. GO RON GO...GO RON GO...


FreakAlert
said
0 0

Ron Paul is the only worthy candidate. I hope he wins but I doubt it. He's is up aganst the whole international money changing establishment


Chris B, Winnipeg
said
0 0

After reading each candidate's profile, I would have to say Ron Paul is the only one that appeals to me, and a great deal at that. If only I had the US citizenship to vote for him :(


Jeffrey Glitz
said
0 0

Who cares who will win ? Anyone of them will bomb at least another one "non-democratic" countries...


James Black
said
0 0

Hey everyone, just a quick reminder, the U.S. Election is not Clinton vs Bush, or Obama vs Bush, or either of these candidates against the party that gwbj represenets. There are some seriously great contenders here for the next U.S. President. I'd like to see Obama vs Huckabee for the final run =).


Tyrone - McCain sold out
said
0 0

Huckabee and McCain 39% together.
Thompson and Romeny 39%
together.

McCain is already a cheerleader for Huckabee he must want to be a vice President.

Mitt Romney has lots of money and it takes money to get your message out.



Nancy - Hillary Lost Number 3 bye bye Hillary
said
0 0

Hillary says pull the troops and support them at home.
They need support in the war zone.
Hillary is Scary and you can't trust her, she wants to lead the country in the wrong direction.



Marc
said
0 0

Obama did say he would meet with the Canadian President if elected. For this educated statement it would be quite a laugh if he did win. When one runs for office in U.S. or Canada or wherever else the candidate should make for certain they know what the heads of state are called. Not that hard I would imagine.


Michelle
said
0 0

After reading the Clinton biography My Life, I knew Hillary was the candidate for the job. She's been involved with the Democratics as long as Bill, and understands the natrure of the party and the job. Although I like Obama, he doesn't have the experience or the substance.



Rae - Hillary's green Scarf cost her credibility
said
0 0

Hillary wore a green scarf tonight at the begining of the caucas in Iowa tonight and it cost her credibility.

Her Global warming end of the world senarios just are not credible now.


J
said
0 0

I'm ecstatic that Obama won so clearly in the Iowa caucus, since it was a real test of the dedication of voters. I wouldn't trust Hillary as far as I could throw her, and she's every bit the politician's politician. This is bad.

At least Obama's willing to state his ideas for the direction this country needs to go and not just press on buttons like, "Oh noes withdraw everyone from Iraq by the way I am a woman vote for me women did I mention I am a woman"


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz