News Sections
Obama, Huckabee win Iowa presidential caucuses
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(55)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Thu. Jan. 3 2008 11:49 PM ET
Senator Barack Obama and former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee have emerged the victors in Iowa Thursday, winning the presidential caucuses.
Obama, a first-term senator, won with a significant lead over his main rival and Democratic front-runner, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. Senator John Edwards came in second but Clinton came in at a very close third while votes were being tallied.
Meanwhile, Huckabee, a Baptist preacher-turned politician, won the Republican caucus. He defeated Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney. Former senator Fred Thompson and Senator John McCain were in a tight race for third place.
Going into Iowa, the first big test of the presidential race, Huckabee and Romney were neck-and-neck in the polls.
Although Romney outspent Huckabee by about $20 to $1, the former governor had the support of more than half of Republican voters in Iowa who said in entrance polls they were either born-again or evangelical Christians.
Romney said that despite the loss, he was satisfied with the gains he made in the polls.
"I've been pleased that I've been able to make up ground and I intend to keep making up ground, not just here but across the country," he said.
According to her aides, Clinton called Obama to congratulate him. But her campaign manager said the fight for presidency was far from over.
"This race begins tonight and ends when Democrats throughout America have their say," she told The Associated Press. "Our campaign was built for a marathon and we have the resources to run a national race in the weeks ahead."
Political pundits said Obama's win in an overwhelmingly white state is a great triumph as he tries to become the first African-American president of the United States.
Now, the dynamic of the race has shifted for Clinton who also hopes to make her mark by being the first female president of the U.S.
Tight race
Earlier Thursday, Democrat and Republican candidates vying for first place in Iowa's presidential caucuses didn't waste a minute trying to reach voters with their message.
"This thing could really be close," Senator John Edwards told his supporters in Iowa City. "This thing could be really close. We need you to make calls, talk to your friends."
Tom Clark, CTV News' Washington bureau chief, said Edwards' campaign is in a lot of trouble.
"He's been campaigning here virtually for four years. His whole strategy said he had to win Iowa," Clark told CTV News. "He didn't win Iowa tonight. Edwards is in a lot of trouble."
Clark said the night's biggest loser turned out to be former mayor of New York City Rudy Giuliani, who is running as a Republican candidate.
"He virtually ignored Iowa and guess what, tonight Iowa ignored Rudy," he said.
Iowa is the first state contest on the road to the party nominations and the official start of what is expected to be the longest White House race in history.
While the state is tiny and the voter numbers low, political analysts such as presidential historian Allan J. Lichtman say Iowa matters because it can make or break a candidate's chances in the other 49 states.
"You know, Iowa is all about expectations," he told CTV's Canada AM Thursday. "And nobody cares about the handful of delegates that are selected. The only thing that matters is the story that's going to be written the day after the Iowa caucuses."
Huckabee decided to take the unusual step of leaving Iowa and to make an appearance on Jay Leno's Tonight Show on Wednesday.
Huckabee played up his personable side, jamming on his bass guitar with Leno's band and trading jokes with the host.
Lichtman noted that Huckabee had a lot riding on tonight's outcome.
"If Romney wins Iowa and then New Hampshire, he could well be the Republican nominee," he said
High voter turnout crucial
Over in the Democratic race, Clinton made a last-minute appeal for support Wednesday, telling supporters her experience makes her the most effective leader.
"Long before cameras started following me around I worked to try and do what I could to make positive change to improve people's lives," she said.
Obama quickly rejected that notion.
"You can't be steeped in the conventional wisdom of Washington on issues as profound as war and then somehow believe you're going to chart a new bold direction on foreign policy," he said.
Clark also notes that that the candidates have had to customize their campaigns for the unique perspective of Iowa voters.
"The interesting thing about these races is this is not the general population that's voting. These are the party activists, the committed people, the committed Republicans, and committed Democrats. And they tend to come from special interest points of view.
"And so the candidates play to that. And they do that process throughout the primaries and then of course their campaigns change when they appeal to the general voter."
About US$40 million has been spent on campaigning in Iowa, which averages out to be more than $400 for each voter expected to attend the caucuses.
The figures could make this the first-ever billion-dollar presidential election.
The Canadian connection
Canadians are overwhelmingly supportive of Democrat candidates, said Peter Harder, Canada's former deputy minister of foreign affairs.
Of the Democrat candidates, Clinton is the one that knows Canada the best but she's far from being the country's best friend, said Peter Donolo with the Strategic Counsel.
"She's particularly tough on Canada," he said. "She's been anti-Canada when it served her political purposes."
As for Obama, he isn't too well-versed in Canadian politics.
"I would immediately call the president of Mexico, the president of Canada to try and amend NAFTA," he once said.
Democrats aren't too keen on the free-trade agreement, which could spell trouble for Canadian jobs.
With files from The Associated Press, The Canadian Press and reports from CTV's Tom Clark and Robert Fife
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(55)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Please Add Comments( )
Scott
0
said
0
Janice - Toronto
0
said
0
Bill Clinton not only came to Canada to run down his own country he did that all over the world, the damage he has done to the USA image because they are not in power means they should never get power.
George W. Bush was just voted in the states as the most respected.
The nation voted the Democrats into majority in the Senate and they have done nothing since.
So my hunch is the Republicans will win the presidency because to have a senate and President from the Democrats is a risk the USA will not take.
Jeanne
0
said
0
Obama just doesn't have the experience she has, and just doesn't have what it takes. He can't hold his own in the discussions they have had - he just doesn't have what it takes to be president of the USA.
I remember when Bill Clinton won the election, and how wonderful things were with him and Gore there for eight wonderful years. Now we have Bush, who has almost driven the US into bankruptcy, and has LIED to the US people about the war in Iraq - we NEED someone who is going to do a great job, and put the US back on the map - and Hillary will.
With Bill beside her - we can expect great things!! Go Hillary go!!!
S. Hillier - No Election in Canada - Please
0
said
0
We don't need an endles cycle of elections here, let's just watch the one in the States, it will be more interesting.
ance
0
said
0
If their 2 front runners were not a woman and a black man, no one would be talking any "if" when referring to a Democratic victory in the next election.
The big question is are Americans as a whole ready to look beyond gender and racial prejudices and elect a black or female president?
For their own good and ours I sure hope they are.
DJT
0
said
0
Mo
0
said
0
I disagree with you that Hillary should win. She does not look trusthworthy and would say anything to become the president. She is not decisive, and does not have a mind of her own. At least Barrack Obama is consistent.
Change is only good when it is good
0
said
0
Mike Huckabee is a man of the people, a man of principle, better he than grandpa McCain, a Vietnam left over.
Roch
0
said
0
America needs Obama, the First Black President.
Obama appears intellectual, focused and rational.
Clinton appears preachy, screechy and beechy.
Kirk Rodgers
0
said
0
Will the Georges be remembered as the "Bushes near Bill's Hill"? Maybe.
Allan Eizinas
0
said
0
Most Democrats understand this and as the date for the election approaches I believe that we will see a movement towards a third candidate that is considered electable like Edwards or Biden or Kurcinich or even someone coming out of the woodwork.
If they do not, then the Republicans could rally behind a moderate like John McCain who could run against the Bush record and get elected.
John
0
said
0
Lart from Above
0
said
0
Peace
0
said
0
J-F (Ottawa)
0
said
0
I completely agree with Jeanne. What's wrong with all of you bashing Clinton? Are you seriously judging Clinton's term as President on the "sex" scandal??? Do you not realize Clinton brought the U.S. economy to an all time high? He was one of their best leaders and I believe Hillary will do even better. Go Liberals and go Democrats!
PBW
0
said
0
What a waste. I'm glad we don't have primaries here.
Justin
0
said
0
If Americans want to see real improvements, they need to look outside the jaded, out-of-touch washington bulldog circle. The Clintons have been around forever and are now nothing but a slick, cold, ruthless political machine fueled by lobbyist money.
Someone fresh with new ideas, optimism and unfettered by deep ties to lobbyists would be just what the doctor ordered (on either side of the isle)
Joe Green
0
said
0
GW
0
said
0
Had to chuckle to myself the other day while watching an old sci-fi movie where the currency was referred to as “Hillary’s”.
Democrats: I like Hillary better than Obama. I think the experience pitch works well for her and Bill at her side is a big plus. I feel if the going get tough, Obama may not be able to handle the pressure. Besides, Obama sounds too much like Osama.
Republicans: I like Giuliani. I like the way he handles big social issues. He’s against abortion and discourages it but respects people’s free will. I think that’s the way it should be.
Samuel
0
said
0
Lance
0
said
0
Anyone else would spell sheer disaster for the American people.
Vote Ron Paul my fellow Americans,...RON PAUL!!!!!
IAN
0
said
0
Lucy
0
said
0
LR
0
said
0
JL
0
said
0
If you haven't heard of him google his name.
He is ALL about restoring the US Constitution, which has been destroyed over the last couple of decades.
He is the only candidate that isn't in it for the money or special interests. He is in it for the American people.
I think he would repair the US economy which is what Canada needs to happen for our own well being.
I think he would work great with PM Harper.
Sharla
0
said
0
MG Ottawa
0
said
0
Who cares?
All the US media is going to talk about for the rest of the year is this race and absolutely nothing else.
Why don't they discuss their crumbling economy on CNN this much. I am sure that's much more important than covering a hoard or candidates in the least important and corn growing, red neck, hillybilly state.
And we are still a year (almost) away from the elections.
Jon - Calgary
0
said
0
Kanatian
0
said
0
It would be great to see ol' Bubba get named to cabinet.
I find it amuzing that people say that Clinton can not be trusted, yet a trillion dollar fabricated terror industry has been created by the Bush regime and supported by banal government leaders in the west to fuel an increaes in the price of oil. There are nearly a million people dead because of the lies of Bush and company. And Clinton can not be trusted?
Rona from Canmore
0
said
0
JF
0
said
0
RS
0
said
0
John
0
said
0
IAN
0
said
0
Exiled Canadian
0
said
0
I do think Hillary will win on the Democratic side but her disapproval ratings are too high in the general population to win.
On the Republican side, Joh McCain will emerge as Super Tuesday approaches. Giuliani will never win the nomination because he can't get the social conservatives on board. Huckabee and Romney will tear each other down while both proclaiming to be the "true" conservative, which neither of them are. Thompson is too laid back to win but would be my personal choice since he has the experience and the common sense to lead the nation. The others are irrelevant. Ron Paul is a Libertarian and shouldn't even be running for the Republican nomination.
As far as Republicans not voting for blacks and women, that's stereotypical history. Yes, there are still some racists of bigots out there but the vast majority of them if they has a candidate that agreed with their concerns and happened to be a woman or black. Think Colin Powell or Condi. I certainly would not vote for someone I disagreed with because they were black or a woman. That the real reason why Republicans will never vote for Obama, Clinton or Edwards: They are just too far left for them.
Doug
0
said
0
However,given the huge "protectionist",and "isolationist" forces in the Democratic party, I find the thought of a democratic government running the affairs of our biggest market to be more than a little troubling.I'm curious as to how so many people have missed Hillary's very anti Canadian rhetoric over the last few years.
Once the nominees are selected,the political messages tend to change for the actual election race.In this case,I sure hope so.Especially if a Democrat is heading for the whitehouse.
That said,American politics is a very complex arrangement.It can easily be that the president can be left with very little power when it comes to passing legislation.A bit like a minority government here.
So,as someone else said about the race for president,"booooooring".
ance
0
said
0
Deciding personal morality should NEVER...EVER be a pervue of any democratic government.
Intrusion into such areas by government has always been and always will be wrong...
Some decisions should rest ONLY with the individual making them.
JL
0
said
0
Why wouldn't Ron Paul be considered a Republican because he is a Libertarian?! United States is called the land of Liberty! Looks like you've been following too much televison.
Ron Paul will win either from his Republican nomination or running as an independant. He is the only true Conservative out of any of the candidates anyway. What you call "conservative" has only been created by the media the last couple of decades.
Moral leaders make for happy campers
0
said
0
MH from Ontario
0
said
0
Shawn - Toronto
0
said
0
The best option for this presidential race is to put party aside and choose the candidate who can fix financial woes, and leave other social issues for later. Ending the war, socializing healthcare, abolishing the IRS all would be great, but they are miniscule in comparison to the turmoil within the economy.
Nathan
0
said
0
Even the Canadian media is biased against this candidate.
He is one of the only candidates without a Neoconservative agenda.
I guess I just answered my own question.
Bob Smith
0
said
0
Lorne
0
said
0
John
0
said
0
FreakAlert
0
said
0
Chris B, Winnipeg
0
said
0
Jeffrey Glitz
0
said
0
James Black
0
said
0
Tyrone - McCain sold out
0
said
0
Thompson and Romeny 39%
together.
McCain is already a cheerleader for Huckabee he must want to be a vice President.
Mitt Romney has lots of money and it takes money to get your message out.
Nancy - Hillary Lost Number 3 bye bye Hillary
0
said
0
They need support in the war zone.
Hillary is Scary and you can't trust her, she wants to lead the country in the wrong direction.
Marc
0
said
0
Michelle
0
said
0
Rae - Hillary's green Scarf cost her credibility
0
said
0
Her Global warming end of the world senarios just are not credible now.
J
0
said
0
At least Obama's willing to state his ideas for the direction this country needs to go and not just press on buttons like, "Oh noes withdraw everyone from Iraq by the way I am a woman vote for me women did I mention I am a woman"