CTV News | Parties rush bill to relieve isotope shortage

Top Stories -   

Parties rush bill to relieve isotope shortage

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Graham Richardson on the political battle
Question period: Harper addresses the shortage

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(47)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Tue. Dec. 11 2007 11:50 PM ET

Following eleventh-hour talks with the Liberals, the federal government introduced emergency legislation Tuesday evening that will compel Ontario's Chalk River nuclear reactor to restart immediately.

The Liberals had threatened to refuse to give the bill the unanimous support necessary to bypass the legislative process.

But in an unusual sitting of the House of Commons Tuesday evening, all of the political parties agreed to fast-track the legislation through the House and Senate.

MPs passed the vote late Tuesday night, with the NDP and Bloc Quebecois backing it.

The Liberal-dominated Senate, which also agreed to stay late, was expected to put the bill to a vote by early Wednesday.

The Tory bill is an attempt to put a quick end to the critical shortage of medical isotopes that are necessary to diagnose diseases such as cancer.

The new bill will suspend the oversight role of the regulator at the plant for 120 days.

During that time, the reactor's operators will be expected to bring in the changes that CNSC has said are needed.

PM blasted Opposition

The Tory legislation was the topic of heated debate during Tuesday's question period, with Opposition members demanding to know whether it was safe to re-open a facility the country's nuclear watchdog has said does not meet safety standards.

"There will be no nuclear accidents," said Prime Minister Stephen Harper, responding to heckles from Opposition members. What there will be, he said, is a growing medical crisis if all members of the House don't support the legislation.

Harper also accused the Liberals of being part of the problem.

He said past Liberal appointments to the CNCS which overseas the AECL that runs the plant are partly to blame. Harper believes bickering between the AECL and the CNCS has exacerbated issues.

"The continuing actions of the Liberal-appointed nuclear safety commission will jeopardize the health and safety and lives of tens of thousands of Canadians," Harper said.

The Liberals shot back.

"Attacking the regulator -- taking him out of the process -- is going to make the problem worse," charged Liberal deputy leader Michael Ignatieff.

Safety concerns

CNSC director general Barclay Howden refused to get drawn into the political debate. But Howden noted that the commission made its decisions based on advice from scientists and engineers.

He said the Chalk River reactors' main cooling pumps must have access to power at all times so that the core doesn't meltdown in an emergency situation.

The plant has proposed a temporary solution that would have one pump linked to emergency power during repairs. But the CNSC wants to wait for a detailed plan before giving the proposal the go-ahead.

Radioisotope shortages

The National Research Universal (NRU) reactor in Chalk River, Ont. is now 50 years old.

The AECL shut down the reactors for maintenance in November, and then decided to extend the shutdown.

The reactor was supposed to have been decommissioned in 2005. But a plant designed to replace the aging facility is six years behind schedule and will not produce radioisotopes until late 2008.

The CNSC extended NRU's operating licence until the problems with the new reactors can be sorted out.

But the commission's director-general, Barclay Howden, said the licence was issued based on assurances from AECL that an emergency power system connected to cooling pumps had been installed.

Safety regulators found out only last month that that those pumps were not installed.

The CNSC has said several new safety standards must be met before the reactor can be reopened.

AECL said in a statement Tuesday that teams of employees and its suppliers "continue to work around the clock on the installation and connection of the upgraded equipment in preparation for return to service.

"AECL employees are in the process of completing the installation of one pump and have secured all necessary components to assemble the second pump."

The company says returning the NRU reactor to service, on an interim basis, using one coolant pump with the emergency backup power connected while work is completed on the second pump will allow the "safe operation of the reactor."

The shutdown has led to radioisotope shortages throughout North America and other parts of the world that have delayed diagnostic testing, therapies and surgeries involving nuclear medicine. AECL has said it is unlikely the reactor will be back to full production until mid-January.

More than two-thirds of the world's medical isotopes are produced at the publicly owned reactor.

Comments are now closed for this story

Ottawa
said

BAD BAD idea. I know people are dying because of this mess, however given this reactors proximity to a large population of about a million people (Ottawa). The consequences of a meltdown or serious accident far outweigh what will happen to those who are waiting for treatment. We are talking nuclear materials. By the sounds of things I do not think anyone involved has even taken this into consideration.


Scott Hobbs
said

I think it makes sense too reopen it until such time as the new plant is ready to go later next year... 120 days would at least limit the shortage for a little while, allowing people to get necessary medical testing.


Rob in YOW
said

Sounds like a burst of leadership. It is clear to me that "managed risk" for the benefit of a GLOBAL population outweighs the potential risk to the Upper Ottawa valley populace. It would be nice to see this action paired with the required fund injection to ensure the MAPLE Reactor comes online as soon and safe as possible. Better that Canada be the acknowledged providor of these medical isotopes than running the risk of a less regulated nation assuming that responsibility.

Oh, and I do live within the Ottawa area. NIMBY be damned...


Gary
said

You would have thought that somebody would have addressed the situation with respect to the isotopes well before the shutdown.( That reactor only supplies the vast amount of the GLOBAL supply of the isotopes) Especially since they were down to only one reactor already. Does anybody have a clue in government or AECL ? We are ONLY talking about ' NUCLEAR' here..good grief.


Bob
said

The feds have little choice but to reopen it for 120 days. People are dying throughout the world and the risk of a melt down is very slight.


Doug
said

Of course it should be done.The article states clearly that it can be done safely.I'm sure no one would make that claim if there was a serious cocern.
These isotopes are needed,and doing all we can to safeguard our reputation as a reliable source should be dismissed without carefully considering all the options.


KD
said

It was safe and running before it was shut down for new modern updates. If it was an unsafe operation it would have been shut down long ago. Get your planning parts and labour in place ready to do the work before it's shut down. You are playing with lives all over the world. Every day there is new technology emerging. Have all your safeties in place and a week later there will be something better that could be done to make it even safer.
Start it back up now. It could be affecting your health tomorrow.


Rose Transporto
said

I thought we had these regulatory commissions to be independent and make their decisions based on what is right not what pressure is coming from Ottawa.


ance
said

What kind of frightening industrial and regulatory failure and incompetence got us into this position in the first place?

Depending on a 50 year old nuclear facility for something so vital!

And the current government wants to expand and further deregulate our nuclear industry!?!?

better build a fallout shelter quick if that ever comes to pass...




Bill
said

This is a no brainer....how would you like to be the one that needs the treatment.....open it.


Douglas Brown (Newmarket, ON)
said

KD, It was running, but how do you know it was safe? You have a lot of confidence in saying it would have been shut down long ago if it was unsafe. The reality is that it is a 50 year old reactor without backup and what appears to be little done over the years to upgrade, yet it supplies the majority of the world's medical isotopes. It should never have got to this point, especially in Canada. There is really no excuse for it. So, because of inaction and negligence, now we have a much bigger issue with safety and people potentially dying due to the shutdown.


Jeanne
said

Why on EARTH would Harper decide the plant should be opened again?? Is he out of his mind? That is a rhetorical question, as I believe he is. The plant should be left shut down, until the new one can take over, and whoever is to BLAME for this - and there is someone - should be put in jail for life - as he will have caused numerous deaths!! What a joke - our government at work here - for US? I am in shock and we should all be in shock that this could happen - in CANADA??


d
said

It should never have been shut done and whoever shut it down should be fired. Lives have likely been lost and the damage to a value export business has been done. It was very poor judgement to shut it down because it of a potential earthquake!


Dan
said

This is just a case of politics playing over technical assessment. I agree with Rose, that is why we have an independent commission. The reactor was already in non-compliance before it was shut down for maintenance and upgrade. It wasn't operating safely.
And now Harper comes and says (as if he really could) that "There will be no nuclear accidents". Well Mr Harper... I just want to remind you that the first Canadian nuclear reactor incident involving radiation leakage did happen at Chalk River in 1957.


Rob
said

Facts: There were numerous upgrades put in place over the last 10 years. Part of the upgrades were starters on 2 of the 8 main coolant pumps that would be powered by a seismically qualified back-up emergency power system.(this would replace an existing back-up starter powered by an emergency power supply that is not seismically qualified)All the other upgrades were installed but the 2 starters were missed. One is now installed, it will take a few more weeks to install the second. AECL submitted a case to the CNSC to run with 1 starter finished and a scheduled deadline to complete the second over a short period of time. The CNSC refused that plan and insisted both be completed. Saying the reactor was operating unsafely is incorrect. It was operating in violation of the operating license issued last year that specified all the upgrades were to have been completed. If you're going to insist on waiting for a back-up reactor you had better hope you don't get sick in the next 2 years.


Chris Rumbold
said

Given that the NRU reactor was due to be decommissioned in 1995 and the replacement is 6 years behind schedule, shouldn't we be blaming the Liberals instead of the Conservatives for the shut down? Judging by my calculations the new isotope plant should have been opened in 2002 when the Liberals were in power. The question that needs be asked is why did the Liberals allow the delay in the construction of such a crucial medical facility? This is beginning to sound like another Liberal boondoggle to me.


Craig
said

Have any of you actually read the article. It clear states that the reactor was shut down due to NEW safety standards. This isn't a case of a reactor becoming dangerous; its a case of a watchdog tightening its leash (which the CNSC tends to do -- I actually work with them). If this reactor was unsafe, the government would not be pushing for it to be reopened permanently. And the 120 days is giving the reactor time to come up to the new rules.

Clearly the government is doing what is right. Medical treatments are necessary and as long as the reactor can get up to the new specs in the next 4 months, I cannot see what the problem is. We're not talking about Chernobyl here peoples. Don't be so paranoid.


Ray
said

I believe that it should not be up to "Prime Minister" Harper to decide wheather or not a Necular plant be restarted. There are people WAY more qualified that should have more input regarding the safety concerns. I hope that Mr. Harper's Necular Engineering deploma is in the mail. Please don't listen to someone with a political degree over a qualified ACEL manager. ACEL engineers are qualified and are some of the best educated professionals in the world. If they say it is ok to turn it back on turn it on but if they say it is too early or unsafe for all of our sake please listen to them.


Winnipeg
said

We wouldn't be in this mess if nuclear research/energy didn't get such a bad rap from so-called evironmentalists. AECL Pinawa has a mothballed facility for this, and its actually newer than Chalk River. Time to get over the nuclear hysteria and reinvest.


Sean
said

A very good idea! Hopefully this reactor will be up and running as soon as possible in order to get these necessary materials to the people who need them most!


Mark
said

AECL needs to be brought to heel. It is well known in the Ottawa Valley area that surrounds Chalk River that it is an organization that is focused more on the perks and expense accounts of managers and executives than it is on the work of Nuclear Development. It is sad to see the delays this organization has presided over in bringing on a new reactor online able to produce these medically necessary isotopes. It certainly does not speak well of Canadian nuclear technology or the people managing it! I would hope that the Tories would have a good look into AECL and make some needed changes.


Gary Wilson
said

Mind-blowingly disgusting! How does something like this turn into a partisan attack? There are no limits to the putrid depths our current parliment will sink to in order to score points (or deflect blame). We need to flush the entire parliament and start over. Sick!


Neil
said

Here we go again, a facility that provides a product that is vital to health run by a government. The civil service divides up the responsibility to create in-fighting and leaving no one responsible. When the obvious occours our, our elected bleeps use it for a little political game. So much for government looking after our health. Harper is making the only decision that a leader can make. Tell the people "responsible" to open and solve the problem. Let's hope he can follow up and prevent a repeat.
Neil


IanM.
said

Since when is this reactor the -only- place in the world that makes these radioisotopes? Somebody else must be making them too. If they're so necessary to someone's health then IMPORT THEM.

If safety inspectors nuclear plant is unsafe to operate then why on earth are ordinary people saying it should reopen?

DCR
said

This should be opened immediately. The world is waiting...and dying for these isotopes.


PH
said

So, the isotope supply has been stopped because a second backup power generator hasn't been seismically protected?

So you'd have to have a power failure and a seismic event of over at least 5.5 to actually need this. It might be worth actually thinking about if you were in Vancouver. Last time I checked Chalk River was in the Canadian Shield and how many thousand years ago was the last major seismic event?

Think maybe its time that CNSC got somebody to do some risk assessment - lack of isotopes vs major seismic activity?


Winnipeg2
said

I agree with Winnipeg: it was Liberals who in the 1990s closed Pinawa, a reactor potentially capable of the same processes as Chalk River. That action literally put all our eggs in one basket with regard to medical isotopes.

I don't know how others feel, but it makes sense to me to have a second unit, in a different province, also producing the isotopes, so that the loss of one in a given area does not mean the loss of everything.

Sure, the MAPLE system will come online in 2008 (hopefully), but it, too, is at Chalk River. A new egg in the same old basket!


Sue
said

There sure is a lot of fear mongering going on in here, and a lot of assumptions, despite the fact that little technical information has been released.

That's what happens when the word "nuclear" is mentioned. Suddenly everyone is a scientist.

All that being said, even if there is negligible safety risk it's not Harpers position to influence the CNSCs decision, otherwise he undermines their entire purpose.


Mario
said

You think it's safe to restart - Read the article people... Here's an important clip.

"But the commission's director-general, Barclay Howden, said the licence was issued based on assurances from AECL that an emergency power system connected to cooling pumps had been installed. Safety regulators found out only last month that that those pumps were not installed. "

For those that feel so brave to talk, go up and turn the switches on and work there with the current situation.


Chalkriverite
said

Well, I happen to LIVE in Chalk River. If the site isn't "safe" to open then I'd prefer they stay shut-down until appropriate measures are taken place. You know, people actually do LIVE here... and with a CFB base with 5000 of our soldiers nearby -- please don't jeopardize our safety, eh? While I am sorry to hear there is a shortage (and cancer runs through my family so I appreciate the shortage for what its worth....) I do need to make sure me, my neighbours, the surrounding area and the workers at the facility who risk their lives on a daily basis working closely with such products, are taken care of....


Gabriel Breault
said

Dan,
You are totally mistaken when it comes to the incidents at the Chalk River plants. First you got the years all wrong and there were no leaks of radioactive material.

I strongly suggest you read the link below for accurate information. AECL has always had safety as their primary objective, there is no need to alert the public with erroneous information.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chalk_River_Laboratories
click on the links to read about the incidents of 1952 and 1958 and you'll see it's was not as dramatic as Dan led you to believe.


Close proxcimity
said

I live about 10km from the plant, so is the Army base that you people pretend to care about so much(thanks Rob).. if the people who run AECL think it's unsafe, leave it closed until the renos can be made!! Does anyone else find a problem in believing Harper is so concerned with the welfare of these poor sick people, when he WILL NOT commit to reducing the poisions(in our environment) that OUR industrial sector makes? Maybe if the global community were more worried about what's making these people sick in the first place...


Ian
said

Hmm let's see. The plant was supposed to be decommissioned in 2005 but is behind schedule and won't be ready until 2008. What did the Liberals do about that while in power?. We are now living with their legacy and our PM is forced to make tough decisions while the opposition one day screams, "you need to do something now" then the next day screams, "you can't do that". We have lived with a supposedly "unsafe" facility since 2005 (which was ok until now I guess) but suddenly when the poop hits the fan, and there are no more isotopes, the conservatives have to make a decision and are getting slammed as usual. If they did nothing they'd be criticized for "abandoning Canadians in a time of need"


Ron
said

Some facts to ponder NRU has been running safely for decades. Like any reactor it undergoes scheduled maintenance which is what this shutdown was initially. Reactors are designed to have defence in depth, meaning safety systems have backup safety systems. NRU is a huge Canadian success story, think about: 2/3 of the WORLD supply of medical isotopes and medical treatments innovated by AECL; it's the R&D facility that underpins the Canadian nuclear power industry; one Nobel Prize in Physics for materials reseasrch enabled by this facility. This highly successful Science & Technology national infrastructure is the product of a past Canadian Government's wise and visionary investment. It seeded a pool of talent that came to Canada that lead to many world firsts. The situation today is the result of many governments, of all flavours, afraid to lose votes and so choose to ignore the advice of experts that have been saying for well over 15 years that a new investment is essential. It's time the elected officials to have some vision, listen to their trusted experts, govern, and stop spending most of their time worrying about winning. A final word for those who worry about nuclear accidents, many of the country's scientific and engineering experts live near reactors; ask yourself if you believe we'd put out families at risk.


Steve
said

This is nonsense. Politicians should have nothing to do with the CNSC in terms of which regulations they choose to pass and choose to ignore. Let the CNSC and AECL do their job.

Quit with the "meltdown" talk as well. AECL will not start up a reactor that will meltdown. Harper could not legislate them to do so, and there are much more intelligent people than him that get to make the choice.

What the politicians should be asking is "why do we only have one reactor?" It's not clear that the Maple reactors will ever come online to replace NRU. This is a severe case of putting all your eggs in one 50 year old basket.

What Canada desperately needs is a new research reactor. The global value that NRU has provided since its inception 50 years ago has more than paid for the modest investment required.

NRU has benefited the global community in more ways than just isotopes. It was and is critical for CANDU reactor research, neutron research, and many other studies.

Go digging into NRC proposals, and you will find numerous requests to fund reactor facilities that have been ignored by politicians for years. Dig some of them up, and get some public support. People should realize how important these research reactors are, and we should fund a new one.


andrew
said

The chances of an accident are very slim. I say good on Harper.

People are dying because of this, restart the reactor so we can get these isotopes.


Calgary
said

It is time the Conservative government take responsiblity for events clearly occuring during their current tenure. The reactor shut-down was a known event and the federal government has been in office long enough to have taken action and have a plan B in place prior to the shut-down instead of rushing through a last minute bill. Nix the politics, the public relations, bold statements about 'no accidents' and do the job you were elected to do Mr. Harper. Stop blaming past governments for your lack of action on this issue.


Sean Calder
said

So essentially, there's nothing wrong with the plant, or it's current systems, and no foreseeable threats that might cause an incident.

The problem, it seems, is that two redundant backup systems in a geologically stable area, newly required systems mind you, haven't been installed as per the conditions of the license approval.

Sounds to me like this is purely a matter of bureaucratic BS and pencil pusher grandstanding.

Also, how did such a vital project as the MAPLE Reactor get 6 years behind schedule and STILL not meet safety standards? 6 years? Who's responsible for that and why wasn't action taken THEN to prevent this situation NOW? Why wasn't it a priority then when we produce 66% of the world's supply of this isotope?

Oh, that's right. We were too busy patting ourselves on the back and parading Kyoto promises....


Dave Conrad
said

When the expert opinion of engineers and applied scientists are by-passed or ignored by accountants, managers and polititions bad things can happen as shown in the past.

Space Shuttles can blow up, bridges can fall down, bad water can find its way to the public drinking glasses and nuclear reators can melt down. Safety standards were developed and implemented for a reason and should only be circumvented after careful consideration by those that actually understand the impacts of doing so.

I do hope that this Government has made this move with the proper advise, or I will have lost faith in what I had hoped would be a change in the right direction given the fact no one party can do as it pleases.

I do hope for the safety and well being of all that this is an issue blown out of proportion and the proper steps have been taken.


Guy Betrand
said

Plant should be closed for good because it's lifespan limit was reached. The nuclear waste it creates will start again. Regrettable to the hospitals involved.


retep
said

"There will be no nuclear accidents," said Prime Minister Stephen Harper: Isn't it wonderful that our PM is a nuclear expert. I now feel a lot safer . . . but should there be a problem I would take it that the Liberals would be responsible. Rather interesting one might say.


Andy in Cambridge
said

To Ottawa:

We're talking about radio isotopes used for medical purposes, not a power plant, the effects of a meltdown, would be nowhere near as severe


The old lady
said

My Question is what qualifications does the Group that ordered the plant closed have? Are they scientists or just people that the previous Government appointed. What is their education level in nuclear medicine or expertice in the running of these plants? I am waiting for a test to be done so please get the darn thing up and running. Thank you very much.


Boots
said

Good. Finally some sense. NRU operated successfully for 50 years, other than the fuel rod problem about 1957. I grew up 11 miles south of Chalk River, and was there when the 'accident' occurred. For some reason the CNSC decided a seismic power supply had to be installed after 50 years of operation in an incredibly low seismic risk zone. There is standby power for cooling. People around the world are dying or suffering life reduction because of this CNSC nonsense. NRU is about as dangerous as a tea kettle. Start 'er up.


Andrew G, Kingston ON
said

Why are people saying "Harper should not be the one to decide on his own to re-open the reactor"? It was a unanimous decision of the House of Commons. Any one of the political parties or members could have voted against it! The PM showed leadership in getting the consensus of the house. Good on him for that!
But for heaven's sake, quit blaming him for something the entire elected government agreed to for the benefit of the medically needy!


DE Gillis
said

Shame on you, Prime Minister. To think that you would politicize public safety and put the general public at risk of a nuclear incident is totally irrisponsible and goes against your basic responsibility of providing the citizens of this country Peace, Order and Good Government. Public safety officials should never be political appointees and should be backing the rank and file safety specialists that make sound public safety decisiona and directives based on facts and science.

If there was a failure, it was the failure to correct safety issues brought to the attention of the plant operators so that the supply of isotopes was not interrupted. May I suggest that you work with the nuclear plant to expeditiously correct safety deficiencies rather than put the public and specifically the plant workers at risk.


Eric
said

The backup generators for the pumps are a redundant safety system. The series of events that would have to take place in order for them to be needed is EXTREMELY unlikely to ever occur.

The reactor can absolutely be operated safely without them in place, as it has for 50 years. The reactor has many other safety systems to ensure it can be shutdown safely and quickly in an emergency.

Having said that, the nuclear industry is likely the most tightly regulated industry in the world and regulators operate on the principal that every backup system should have its own backup system and that's what this is all about.


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz