News Sections
Parties rush bill to relieve isotope shortage
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(47)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. Dec. 11 2007 11:50 PM ET
Following eleventh-hour talks with the Liberals, the federal government introduced emergency legislation Tuesday evening that will compel Ontario's Chalk River nuclear reactor to restart immediately.
The Liberals had threatened to refuse to give the bill the unanimous support necessary to bypass the legislative process.
But in an unusual sitting of the House of Commons Tuesday evening, all of the political parties agreed to fast-track the legislation through the House and Senate.
MPs passed the vote late Tuesday night, with the NDP and Bloc Quebecois backing it.
The Liberal-dominated Senate, which also agreed to stay late, was expected to put the bill to a vote by early Wednesday.
The Tory bill is an attempt to put a quick end to the critical shortage of medical isotopes that are necessary to diagnose diseases such as cancer.
The new bill will suspend the oversight role of the regulator at the plant for 120 days.
During that time, the reactor's operators will be expected to bring in the changes that CNSC has said are needed.
PM blasted Opposition
The Tory legislation was the topic of heated debate during Tuesday's question period, with Opposition members demanding to know whether it was safe to re-open a facility the country's nuclear watchdog has said does not meet safety standards.
"There will be no nuclear accidents," said Prime Minister Stephen Harper, responding to heckles from Opposition members. What there will be, he said, is a growing medical crisis if all members of the House don't support the legislation.
Harper also accused the Liberals of being part of the problem.
He said past Liberal appointments to the CNCS which overseas the AECL that runs the plant are partly to blame. Harper believes bickering between the AECL and the CNCS has exacerbated issues.
"The continuing actions of the Liberal-appointed nuclear safety commission will jeopardize the health and safety and lives of tens of thousands of Canadians," Harper said.
The Liberals shot back.
"Attacking the regulator -- taking him out of the process -- is going to make the problem worse," charged Liberal deputy leader Michael Ignatieff.
Safety concerns
CNSC director general Barclay Howden refused to get drawn into the political debate. But Howden noted that the commission made its decisions based on advice from scientists and engineers.
He said the Chalk River reactors' main cooling pumps must have access to power at all times so that the core doesn't meltdown in an emergency situation.
The plant has proposed a temporary solution that would have one pump linked to emergency power during repairs. But the CNSC wants to wait for a detailed plan before giving the proposal the go-ahead.
Radioisotope shortages
The National Research Universal (NRU) reactor in Chalk River, Ont. is now 50 years old.
The AECL shut down the reactors for maintenance in November, and then decided to extend the shutdown.
The reactor was supposed to have been decommissioned in 2005. But a plant designed to replace the aging facility is six years behind schedule and will not produce radioisotopes until late 2008.
The CNSC extended NRU's operating licence until the problems with the new reactors can be sorted out.
But the commission's director-general, Barclay Howden, said the licence was issued based on assurances from AECL that an emergency power system connected to cooling pumps had been installed.
Safety regulators found out only last month that that those pumps were not installed.
The CNSC has said several new safety standards must be met before the reactor can be reopened.
AECL said in a statement Tuesday that teams of employees and its suppliers "continue to work around the clock on the installation and connection of the upgraded equipment in preparation for return to service.
"AECL employees are in the process of completing the installation of one pump and have secured all necessary components to assemble the second pump."
The company says returning the NRU reactor to service, on an interim basis, using one coolant pump with the emergency backup power connected while work is completed on the second pump will allow the "safe operation of the reactor."
The shutdown has led to radioisotope shortages throughout North America and other parts of the world that have delayed diagnostic testing, therapies and surgeries involving nuclear medicine. AECL has said it is unlikely the reactor will be back to full production until mid-January.
More than two-thirds of the world's medical isotopes are produced at the publicly owned reactor.
User Tools
Related Stories
Related Websites
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(47)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Ottawa
said
Scott Hobbs
said
Rob in YOW
said
Oh, and I do live within the Ottawa area. NIMBY be damned...
Gary
said
Bob
said
Doug
said
These isotopes are needed,and doing all we can to safeguard our reputation as a reliable source should be dismissed without carefully considering all the options.
KD
said
Start it back up now. It could be affecting your health tomorrow.
Rose Transporto
said
ance
said
Depending on a 50 year old nuclear facility for something so vital!
And the current government wants to expand and further deregulate our nuclear industry!?!?
better build a fallout shelter quick if that ever comes to pass...
Bill
said
Douglas Brown (Newmarket, ON)
said
Jeanne
said
d
said
Dan
said
And now Harper comes and says (as if he really could) that "There will be no nuclear accidents". Well Mr Harper... I just want to remind you that the first Canadian nuclear reactor incident involving radiation leakage did happen at Chalk River in 1957.
Rob
said
Chris Rumbold
said
Craig
said
Clearly the government is doing what is right. Medical treatments are necessary and as long as the reactor can get up to the new specs in the next 4 months, I cannot see what the problem is. We're not talking about Chernobyl here peoples. Don't be so paranoid.
Ray
said
Winnipeg
said
Sean
said
Mark
said
Gary Wilson
said
Neil
said
Neil
IanM.
said
If safety inspectors nuclear plant is unsafe to operate then why on earth are ordinary people saying it should reopen?
DCR
said
PH
said
So you'd have to have a power failure and a seismic event of over at least 5.5 to actually need this. It might be worth actually thinking about if you were in Vancouver. Last time I checked Chalk River was in the Canadian Shield and how many thousand years ago was the last major seismic event?
Think maybe its time that CNSC got somebody to do some risk assessment - lack of isotopes vs major seismic activity?
Winnipeg2
said
I don't know how others feel, but it makes sense to me to have a second unit, in a different province, also producing the isotopes, so that the loss of one in a given area does not mean the loss of everything.
Sure, the MAPLE system will come online in 2008 (hopefully), but it, too, is at Chalk River. A new egg in the same old basket!
Sue
said
That's what happens when the word "nuclear" is mentioned. Suddenly everyone is a scientist.
All that being said, even if there is negligible safety risk it's not Harpers position to influence the CNSCs decision, otherwise he undermines their entire purpose.
Mario
said
"But the commission's director-general, Barclay Howden, said the licence was issued based on assurances from AECL that an emergency power system connected to cooling pumps had been installed. Safety regulators found out only last month that that those pumps were not installed. "
For those that feel so brave to talk, go up and turn the switches on and work there with the current situation.
Chalkriverite
said
Gabriel Breault
said
You are totally mistaken when it comes to the incidents at the Chalk River plants. First you got the years all wrong and there were no leaks of radioactive material.
I strongly suggest you read the link below for accurate information. AECL has always had safety as their primary objective, there is no need to alert the public with erroneous information.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chalk_River_Laboratories
click on the links to read about the incidents of 1952 and 1958 and you'll see it's was not as dramatic as Dan led you to believe.
Close proxcimity
said
Ian
said
Ron
said
Steve
said
Quit with the "meltdown" talk as well. AECL will not start up a reactor that will meltdown. Harper could not legislate them to do so, and there are much more intelligent people than him that get to make the choice.
What the politicians should be asking is "why do we only have one reactor?" It's not clear that the Maple reactors will ever come online to replace NRU. This is a severe case of putting all your eggs in one 50 year old basket.
What Canada desperately needs is a new research reactor. The global value that NRU has provided since its inception 50 years ago has more than paid for the modest investment required.
NRU has benefited the global community in more ways than just isotopes. It was and is critical for CANDU reactor research, neutron research, and many other studies.
Go digging into NRC proposals, and you will find numerous requests to fund reactor facilities that have been ignored by politicians for years. Dig some of them up, and get some public support. People should realize how important these research reactors are, and we should fund a new one.
andrew
said
People are dying because of this, restart the reactor so we can get these isotopes.
Calgary
said
Sean Calder
said
The problem, it seems, is that two redundant backup systems in a geologically stable area, newly required systems mind you, haven't been installed as per the conditions of the license approval.
Sounds to me like this is purely a matter of bureaucratic BS and pencil pusher grandstanding.
Also, how did such a vital project as the MAPLE Reactor get 6 years behind schedule and STILL not meet safety standards? 6 years? Who's responsible for that and why wasn't action taken THEN to prevent this situation NOW? Why wasn't it a priority then when we produce 66% of the world's supply of this isotope?
Oh, that's right. We were too busy patting ourselves on the back and parading Kyoto promises....
Dave Conrad
said
Space Shuttles can blow up, bridges can fall down, bad water can find its way to the public drinking glasses and nuclear reators can melt down. Safety standards were developed and implemented for a reason and should only be circumvented after careful consideration by those that actually understand the impacts of doing so.
I do hope that this Government has made this move with the proper advise, or I will have lost faith in what I had hoped would be a change in the right direction given the fact no one party can do as it pleases.
I do hope for the safety and well being of all that this is an issue blown out of proportion and the proper steps have been taken.
Guy Betrand
said
retep
said
Andy in Cambridge
said
We're talking about radio isotopes used for medical purposes, not a power plant, the effects of a meltdown, would be nowhere near as severe
The old lady
said
Boots
said
Andrew G, Kingston ON
said
But for heaven's sake, quit blaming him for something the entire elected government agreed to for the benefit of the medically needy!
DE Gillis
said
If there was a failure, it was the failure to correct safety issues brought to the attention of the plant operators so that the supply of isotopes was not interrupted. May I suggest that you work with the nuclear plant to expeditiously correct safety deficiencies rather than put the public and specifically the plant workers at risk.
Eric
said
The reactor can absolutely be operated safely without them in place, as it has for 50 years. The reactor has many other safety systems to ensure it can be shutdown safely and quickly in an emergency.
Having said that, the nuclear industry is likely the most tightly regulated industry in the world and regulators operate on the principal that every backup system should have its own backup system and that's what this is all about.