CTV News | Canada 4th-worst in climate change performance

Top Stories -   

Canada 4th-worst in climate change performance

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Newsnet: Gore calls for new climate treaty soon

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(58)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Fri. Dec. 7 2007 11:36 AM ET

Canada has ranked close to last on an annual index that evaluates and compares the climate protection performances of 56 industrialized and emerging countries.

The 56 countries are together responsible for more than 90 per cent of global energy-related CO2 emissions.

Canada placed 53rd on the index, down two spots from 2006.

The study, compiled by the environmental organization Germanwatch, compares the countries in three different ways, and then calculates a combined Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI).

Canada ranked 46th for its emissions levels, 43rd for its emission trends, and 55th for the effectiveness of its national government policies.

The report comes as officials from nearly 190 countries are in Bali for a massive UN conference on climate change. The focus of the conference is to begin negotiations on an international agreement to fight climate change after 2012 -- when the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol expires.

Matthew Bramley of the Pembina Institute, who contributed to the study, said Canada's credibility on the issue is being questioned.

"The government is still not making a serious effort to cut greenhouse gas pollution, and that leaves Canada at the back of the pack," Bramley said in a press release.

"The gap between the government's rhetoric and its action to date severely weakens Canada's credibility here in Bali."

China turnaround

The United States and Saudi Arabia ranked the worst on the list, at 55th and 56th.

Meanwhile, China was heralded as a leader on environmental initiatives even though it ranked in the 40th spot.

While still low on the list, the ranking is an improvement of four places from last year, mostly due to new policies to promote renewable energy use and slash industrial energy consumption.

"China's relatively positive political assessment gives hope that emission growth will slow down in the future," Germanwatch's Christoph Bals said in a press release.

Historically, China has maintained a defensive position over its environmental policies, but that seems to have given way recently to a more proactive stance at the Bali talks, according to delegates.

"China has made up its mind about a year ago that it was going to get serious," Hans Verolme, director of WWF International's Global Climate Change Program, told The Associated Press.

"They want to show to the world it understands and it wants to do what is necessary to stop dangerous climate change."

However there's little disagreement that China, which many believe has now surpassed the U.S. as the world's largest emitter of GHGs, still has a long way to go.

Sweden had the best record on the Germanwatch list but still only achieved two thirds of the total score.

According to reports from Bali, one of the major snags in the negotiations is over developing nations. Many nations, including Canada, have said they will only sign onto an emission reductions plan if developing countries such as China and India also take on binding targets.

But those countries say industrialized nations should take the lead since they are responsible for the majority of emissions.

UN climate chief Yvo de Boer said hope is ebbing away.

"Nothing has been ruled out," de Boer said. "Binding commitments from developing countries is not off the table, but is crawling toward the edge."

Environment Minister John Baird will attend the conference in Bali next week.

Index ranking of the 10 largest CO2 emitters:

Country Share of Global CO2 Emissions* CCPI Rank 2008 CCPI Rank 2007**
 Germany  3 %  2  4
 India  4.23%  5  9
 U.K.  1.95%  7  4
 China  18.80%  40  44
 Italy  1.67%  41  35
 Japan  4.47%  42  39
 Russia  5.69%  50  42
 Korea, Rep.  1.65%  51  48
 Canada  2.02%  53  51
 U.S.  21.44%  55  53
       
 * energy related   **Calculated with the most recent method

With files from The Associated Press

Please Add Comments( )

Brian Champ
said
0 0

China has large emissions in total, but the only fair way to look at comparing emissions is on a per capita basis ... how much does each person contribute in Canada and China ... when you look at those numbers Canada emits 10 times as much GHGs as China per person per year.

Canada only has 0.5% of the population of the world and we contribute 2% to 3% of GHGs - more than our "share"

We need less preaching to China and more action here, in the US and in the industrialized world, whose cumulative emissions over the past decades is the cause of the problem.

Brian Champ
Toronto Climate Campaign


Shamaro
said
0 0

People are getting on Canada's case about us over polluting the world. Note: Canada has a population of about 33million. China who is undoubtedly one of the worst polluters in the world is being praised. Note: Population 1.5billion people. And you wonder why the Canadian government won't go along with the Kyoto accord.


Rupert Kautzky
said
0 0

You would think a country like Canada with it's riches in technology, resources and innovation would have the wherewithal to be an example of cleaning up our environment. Instead we are the shame of the world for blaming others and doing nothing. If every one of our 33 million great Canadians takes one small step, it would be a great voyage.


Ken
said
0 0

If China can start taking it seriously, it's time for Canada to quit making excuses. Let get on board with the rest of the world.


Da Mai
said
0 0

You must be kidding me... China as a world leader in fighting climate change and polution? I live in Beijing and everyday the polution gets worse and worse. Nothing has changed here except the air and water is worse than it was the day previous. Nobody cares about the environment here. I see thousands of people throwing their litter on the streets every single day. Someone sweeps it up but that doesn't change the fact that nobody cares. There is something like 1000 new cars added to the streets of Beijing a day! Canadians are not bad polluters. I know the difference. There are days here that I literally can't see across the street because the polution is so thick. Attitudes have not changed here and you can't believe a thing said by the government. This society is not sustainable and to praise China for its pollution turn around is insane. I would wonder about the motives of anyone that praises China for its enviornmental policies.


Moe
said
0 0

Shamaro, right on brother! I am picking up what you are throwing down. China is not doing this out of the kindness of their heart. THEY HAVE TO DO THIS! They can't drink their water, breathing is an adventure and their soil is ruined. This GHG thing drives me nuts, forget about it. Eliminate all pollution instead of just focussing on emissions, the rest will follow. The Bali Conference is a joke! Let us not worry about all the others and develop a sensible made in Canada solution. Clean water, productive soil and clean air....we still have it and let's improve it.


Jason
said
0 0

Shamaro, that is nonsense. Per capita, China emits way way way less greenhouse gas than Canada, so your argument is completely backwards. Canada is one of the only industrialized countries in the world doing practically nothing about climate change, and now we're seeing more seriousness even from developing nations. What an embarrassment.


Ashamed
said
0 0

Canada was a leader for the Montreal Protocol stopping CFC's...What's happened? It's time for the Harper Government to step up as we are already leaders in green technology, time to use it!


Jeremy
said
0 0

Before we complain about our government's action - or lack thereof we had better check our own actions. I found myself complaining about the governments lack of policy etc. then realized that I didn't recycle, car pool, etc. My bet is that most of us are similarily hypocritical. Let us stop using energy to be frustrated and complain, and instead take it PERSONALLY and do something to help save and keep our world. If you're not doing something, stop complaining about others not doing anything either!


Layton
said
0 0

Do something. I try to make a slight change every day. I am always looking to find a way to conserve energy. Demand more from your retailers. If you want China to stop polluting stop buying products made there. Overseas goods require oil to be shipped here and then transport to market. Made in North America means no freighter, and a huge pollution reduction. Buy local and think global. What did you do today to conserve energy? I did something. You can too.


Hai
said
0 0

My father, who is a Chinese in his fifties, just bought his first car three years ago. He strongly opposed any binding target on China: Western countries must be kidding. They have driven cars for one hundred years and polluted the earth for one hundred years. I have dreamed of a car for forty years and finally I can afford one. But now they ask me to abandon my cars and return to use my bicycle. Absolutely no way! It's unfair!


Mark
said
0 0

I hope that anyone in their right mind realizes China has a horrible environmental track record, and is making no real progress in voluntary improvements.

This is a country that coats its toys in lead. Do you really think they care about the ozone layer?

The only reason they produce less pollution per capita, is that much of their suppressed population lives on small rice farms, own one cow, and have never seen a car. Once China begins to develop and the standard of living increases, they we be a pollution creating superpower.


meng
said
0 0

In order to make any kind of comparison between Canada and China in term of fighting climate change, one has to make the critical assumption that driving SUVs, or heating of empty rooms in your house, is of equal importance as economical development lifting 1/5 of human race out of poverty.

Canadian convenience vs fighting poverty, which is more important? That's the real debate.


Roger T
said
0 0

Let’s see how soon the US will start counter balance this news. It's only a matter of time before CNN will twist this positive news into something bad so the US can shine on world stage by blaming and deflecting their own wrongs.

John
said
0 0

Hmmm... down two spots from 2006 hey? Well I guess Harper's Conservatives don't have anything to hide behind now. Can't blame Liberal inactivity, what are they going to blame now?

cantuc
said
0 0

In the meantime China is building one new coal-fired plant every week . Chinese coal miners are getting killed at the rate of 7000 deaths per year. 30000 coal mines are releasing methane gas into the atmosphere , when it isn't exploding killing more . Yep, they are doing a fantastic job cleaning up the environment.


Martin
said
0 0

I think that China will be the world's green leader in 10 years.

Considering the breakneck speed at which it is growing, it has no choice but to consider the environment as essential to its political, economic and social survival.


Layton
said
0 0

Do we really need 45 thousand lights on our front lawn at Christmas? When you trade your SUV get a smaller car, easier on gas. Make one trip do it, get your running around done all at once. Switch to compact fluorescents, recycle. It's not enough to by a flexfuel vehicle you have to be able to get the E85 ask for it when you fill up. Our government isn't listening so we have to make the difference.

DD
said
0 0

I think people need to stop blaming China and India and start looking at their own consumption. GCC is primarily fought at home. Put in programmable thermostats, insulate the home better, use CF light bulbs, use energy efficient appliances, buy the car that you need not the one you want, drive less walk more, buy local produce, unplug unused electronic devices and use a power smart surge protector to stop idle leakage. Etc.

These are just some things we can do as individuals. My power bill is down $300 a year just from installing programmable Tstats. Installing CFLs has added another $100 or more in savings. I bought a car slightly smaller than the one I had and use 2 litres less per 100 km of gas.

No more excuses or blame. Don't depend on Harper to do anything...he won't. You have to do it!


Allan MacDougall
said
0 0

Da Mai, you are truly brave and doing an honorable thing by spiting your government and speaking out on a foreign news blog such as this. The Government in China is well known for distorting the truth and covering things up with articulately-planned deceptions, and I think that includes the environment.

Per-capita emissions are irrelevant. Thick, choking, vision-blocking pollution can have no excuse anywhere. We have smog in some cities in Canada, but I am aware that you are correct to say sometimes you cannot see across the street for the smog. As long as major governments can swindle their way out of having a practical and positive impact on the environment, the situation will get worse. The trick for a lot of politicians is to look like you're tackling the problem while trying to remove obligation from the actual polluters (large companies, etc). More deceptions are being shown, just different deceptions as what happened in the 80's and 90's. But deception is what will lead to disaster.

Any plan that doesn't bind all major polluters, regardless of per-capita emissions, is bound to be a continuation of what already exists; the inevitability of a global catastrophe unlike anything mankind has ever seen. The 50 and 60 year old politicians at the top, though, are very unlikely to ever suffer the effects.

It's time for an environmental *revolution* !!


Rick
said
0 0

To Brian Champ and others so negative on Canada:

Sure, Canada has a high GHG per capita. But at least most people are trying to reduce their personal emmissions, and large emissions reductions at the industrial level are coming with CO2 sequestration projects and additional nuclear and renewables coming on stream over the next few decades. Unless people want to revert to cave man existance, significant GHG reductions will take time.

Also who says China has the right to produce 1.3 billion people ?. If you are going to over-populate the earth that way your GHG emissions BETTER be much lower per person.

Also read Da Mai's comments - he lives in China !


Don
said
0 0

Fighting unproven human made global warming=higher taxes. I pay enough taxes.


Shamaro
said
0 0

Regardless of how much GHG's that Canada emits, the Chinese still have one of the worst environmental records in the world. They are burning coal for electricity at a higher rate than anywhere else in the world. World targets for GHG emissions should have standards that are set on per capita basis. Nobody can tell me that 33 million people here in Canada are emitting more then countries like China or even India.

JF
said
0 0

Canada's contribution, while much greater per capita, is insignificant compared to China's or the US. However, we need to take a lead here and set the example because if China and other developing countries don't go for serious cuts we're ALL toast anyway. However, the real culprit in terms of both per capita and volume GHG emissions is the US and, in particular, their Bush Govt. They are right to demand that all countries agree to CO2 cuts but to me this is also a delay tactic... fact is they exemplify how sheer greed will likely push everyone else into this potential climate hell we are heading into.
Hopefully this Bali meeting will at least establish a carbon credit system that will allow countries with any rainforests - a 'carbon sink' - to claim some compensation for preserving what’s left. Right now the existing forests and oceans are the most cost effective option we have and are the only things we have that sucks our CO2 out of the atmosphere.





Daryl H
said
0 0

Canadians may consume more energy per capita than Chinese people but this is rational and reasonable. First off, we have been in a position to consume energy for convenience during the past 100 years. Canadians endure very cold winters which require more energy for our homes to heat and more energy for our cars to drive. You can get around most metro areas on bikes in the summer and transit in the winter but with low population density and a highly mobile population, its no wonder we consume more per capita then the citizens of a burgeoning 1st world nation of extremely high population and density. If we compare to any other country as it relates to geography, climate and population density, I would say that Russia is the closest.
Where did they end up on this list?



Mark.E
said
0 0

Comparing the reason for emissions between China and Canada makes little sense. Our economy is one based on resources. Theirs is one based on light to heavy manufacturing. We do not pollute like China. We emit CO2 at a considerably higher rate per capita than the Chinese because our economy is already developed. Yes, we have larger homes with heated, empty rooms. Yes, we drive much larger vehicles with bigger engines. But! We do not POLLUTE like China does. We can afford to do better, but we will never compete with other developed nations on cutting CO2 output because of our economy and our climate.


Hugh
said
0 0

Support or not support Kyoto accord? Either way, your decision still will be criticized by someone anyway! Is this realy matter if a nation 've been labelled as a world leader in fighting climate change and polution? The answer is NO! what is more important is that if any nation want to show to the world it understands and it wants to do what is necessary to stop dangerous climate change, then we should give her the opportunity and the time to try to do it.


T-Roy
said
0 0

Harper's great environmental policies have caused us to drop two places. All us rhetoric about the liberals and he's worst and he is bringing the ire of the international community on us. Even China has made improvements. The fact is he cut all liberal policies as they were about to be implemented and they would have worked according to many scientific/research organizations. Canada's back? Really? Back of the pack is more like it. This government is a sham and lies to us on a daily basis. Three environmental plans, 2 years, 2 environmental ministers and 50 photo ops and nothing has been implemented. Kick them out of office before we get trade embargos against us.


Marc Kobayashi
said
0 0

55th out of 56 countries for the effectiveness of its national government policies!?!

This is NOT being "a leader".

Now China is taking steps that will make them even more competitive, and efficient while we get left behind with our heads in the (oil) sands.


GP
said
0 0

I have to start by declaring I am not affiliated with any political party.

Canadians have done a bad job of telling their politicians that they want resources and political capital spent on solving or at least seriously addressing this issue in Canada. The only short term option is the Green Party, which is actually doing quite well at governing in Europe.

The other mainstream Parties just don’t get it. It’s all rhetoric and spin. If you really want to get something going in Canada you MUST DO IT WITH YOUR VOTES, which means the very scary proposition of voting for a party you would not normally vote for. It will take 10 or 15 Green Party seats for the government of the day to get the message. If you live in a riding where your Green Party candidate appears to be reasonable person that understands that the environment is not the only consideration then I say send the message and vote for him/her…otherwise live with the rhetoric and spin cause that’s all that’s going to happen.



elizabeth
said
0 0

Don't forget China is producing all of the goods for westerners. Per capita they still pollute less compared to westerners.

Here in Canada the media isn't paying any attention to the Bali conference - they are obsessed with the Schreiber case, 15 year old news. What does that tell you?


Paul
said
0 0

If you're going to compare countries, you have to compare equivalent countries.

As a former researcher in energy consumption, I always kept the following in mind.

1. Latitude: How close to a pole is a country and how many months below 15°C do people in that country live in?

2. Population growth: Does the country have an expanding population?

3. Industrial growth: Does the country have an expanding or shrinking economy?

4. Type of industrial growth: Does the country have a primary based resource economy. Does it have refineries? Manufacturing facilities?

5. Distances for Transportation: Within the country, how far do people and goods have to travel?

If you think about these five questions, you'll see that Canada has one of the coldest climates in the world. We are the second largest country, and because we have a east/west population base (along the US border) we have the furthest distance of any country to transport people and goods. We have expanding populations and economies (unlike most of Europe) and we have a resource based economy. In addition we are expanding that economy by increasing our oil and gas production to meet world demand.

Taking into account all these issues, it is obvious that Canada should be one of the highest producers of CO2 and other emmissions per capita in the world. And, because we are an expanding economy, we are going to get worse.

Until someone comes up with a safe and more efficient source of energy for daily use than hydrocarbons, Canada will always lead the world per capita.

As a country, all we can do is try to be as efficient as possible. But as we are growing, there is no chance or hope of going backwards or even staying still in terms of CO2 production. Unless we go to a completely nuclear economy.




Proud to be Canadian
said
0 0

Thankfully after years of Liberal platitudes about Kyoto, and then doing nothing except providing actual results of 35% INCREASE in Greenhouse Gases under Stephan Dion's "environmental" plan, Canada now has a new fresh new approach, a vision and acheivable action plan to clean up the mess left behind by previous governments.


Bill in Seattle
said
0 0

1)The world needs population control. Canada is worse per capita, but unlimited population growth is a bigger threat.
2) Some of Canada's high per capita is due to the energy sector requiring a lot of energy to produce energy. (oil sands uses about 30% of the energy they produce to process the oil)
3) Countries closer to the poles are going to use more energy.


critic
said
0 0

I would really like to know who supplies these groups with data from China. China can say what they want they have no one to check their numbers as black clouds of pollution crosses the Pacific on its way to California each day. Canada can never win with these groups and I do not care to. We concentrate too much on CO2 and not enough on other pollution we need to do both but pollution should come first.


Keith
said
0 0

You can't compare apples to oranges. Developed or developing, a nation's land mass, infrastructure for travel, population per square km, is travel a necessity, industrilized ,or agriculture, and their climate. Everyone needs to do their part but don't rate a bad offender good just because they have made a small effort.

Roger T
said
0 0

How about our PM stop placing blames and start with our country's own goal? Who cares what countries are not reaching their targets when we CANADA is preaching rather than doing. This brings us back to elections when politicians promise but nothing gets done. Leave other nations alone and start focusing on when you promise for our country. When and WHEN we are reaching our goals than we can start pointing fingers in the mean time, who are we to tell or blame other nations for not achieving their targets? No one!


Ooi
said
0 0

Industrialized countries must take the lead because we are the ones who created the problem in the first place. Developing countries like China and India are contributing to the problem relatively recently, but they must still do their part to reduce emission because at the end of the day we will all be victims to climate change.

The Harper government is still trying to protect Alberta's fossil fuel industry at the cost of any other renewable alternatives. It is entirely feasible to move away from non-renewable energy industries and still be able to have a vibrant economy in Canada. We need leaders who can shift us away from high polluting industries and make us a world leader in the renewable resource industry.


GW
said
0 0

I like the Harper government better than the alternatives. I don’t like the message Baird is giving in saying we’re not going to do anything until the other big emitters get on board. It’s the wrong thing to say Baird! Just stick to the plan and message of steadily reducing emissions and being good stewards of the world and actually producing results.

Regardless of the controversy surrounding Global Warming there is no reason why Canada can’t lead or at least do better in this effort and there are enough good reasons already in place why we should. Granted the Liberals are the ones who totally botched this and created this mess but we can pick up the pieces and move forward.

Lets work toward and talk about Canada being a alternative clean energy leader while developing and supplying oil in the oil sands that will indeed be needed, all of it. I would actually hope that we can find clean ways to use oil too and it would great is Canada was the ones to do this.

Come on Canada lets lead the way.



Ryan - Windsor, ON
said
0 0

This is a joke! We contribute only 2% to the overall global CO2 and we get 53rd? Just another indication that the UN is biased to the European community and 2nd and 3rd world countries.

Canada is cold most of the year, therefore our emmissions will be high. You don't need to be a biased, liberal scientist to figure that one out. I don't see all the UN delegates comming to spend winter here, do I?

The UN has no say in our own national policy or national soverigny. The UN is a joke and the sooner we all come to that understanding, the better we will be in this country.

UN, stay out of Canada's affairs, unless every delegate would like to spend a winter here!






Me
said
0 0

population of India-- 1,027,015,247
Population of China--1,235,260,000
Population of USA-- 300,000,000
population of Russia--141,377,252
Population of Canada--33,000,000.
Yes Canada has to clean up it's act but even if we cut back to the bare minimum the world will still be polluted unless these countries do more than they are doing. Asking Canada to do the lions share is like saying to a family with 1 child you are not allowed to put out any garbage bags but the family down the street who has 10 children can put out one for each child + 1 for yours. Yes we should help developing nations to find ways and technology to cut back but unless they and the biggest polluter the USA do something we are whistling in the wind



Moe
said
0 0

Paul, I really like your well-though out answer. Good job. I wish more people would think deeply about the "Why" in regards to the issue rather then knee jerk, emotional comments. This is a time for balanced, intelligent thinking. I believe Harper is trying to do this, but is having a difficult time dealing with the radicals that want to eat tofu and live in grass huts while seated in the lotus position. Good luck when it's 20 below zero in the grass hut.


Layton
said
0 0

I remember about 20 years ago on the Nature of Things, a documentary about what we are experiencing right now. I see people worried about their taxes increasing, but that doesn't need to be the case. It's about scarcity. We are entering a period of unprecedented growth in highly populated areas of the world. Conservation is an individual responsibility. We look at the greatest generation and their sacrifices, we think we have no Great War, but we do. It's a different enemy, it's climate change and fossil fuel dependency. It's energy security.


Sandra
said
0 0

Climate re: Canada
What a waste of taxpayers money.
Give me a trip to Bali at this time of the year and I will say anything you want to hear.


Todd Young
said
0 0

I don’t think it is fair to rank countries' emissions purely on a per capita basis. You must also factor in other things like infrastructure. Think about the size of our country, and the infrastructure that has to be put in place to support it. You also have to look at the resources that we provide to the rest of the world. A lot of other countries depend on the resources that Canada provides.


Michel
said
0 0

Action on climate change by Canada's federal government would alienate 2 core Harper allies:
1) the US government
2) the Alberta Oil Patch

As long as Harper's Conservatives are hostage to these two groups, Canada Federal Government actions on climate change will continue to be superficial, duplicitous and ineffective.


Dave
said
0 0

The emissions per capita in China is better than Canada, because thay have so many people with nothing. You cannot have our lifestyle and have low emissions. Perhaps in the future with technology that we do not have yet.

Dave


Robert White
said
0 0

Of course on a per capita basis Canada is going to rate poorly, even if we did have the best practises in the world. Unless we keep our homes at -5C in the winter and +25C in the summer. Geographical area and in particular protected parks, reforestation and erosion protection needs to be undertaken and accounted for in environmental resposibility rankings.

I feel the best approach for us is to establish and encourage best practises and challenge the rest of the world (developing or industrialized) to do the same.


Doug
said
0 0

"Meng" makes a point which illustrates that this debate is NOT about whether we should clean up the planet, but about a transfer of wealth.
We already know there are not enough resources on the planet to sustain a population at the standard of living enjoyed in the "developed" part of the world. So, the solution proposed by many is to lower the standard of living here to raise it in China. It kind of boils down to us giving up our cars, and maybe even buying one for someone in China.
I'm all for reducing both pollution and GHG's in Canada. If that will please the tree huggers, let's get on with what we can do. If you want me to start sending cheques to China you will have to find me, and confiscate my savings. At least, until you have the courage to be open and honest about what you are really planning.
That, my friends, is something that those promoting Kyoto simply refuse to do. Not the Liberals, the NDP, or the Al Gores and David Suzuki's of this world.
Mr. Harper needs to get moving on this, and bring about some tougher emission targets. But I will support his efforts to make sure we aren't simply sending tax dollars to big polluters.


George Lawrence
said
0 0

Canada 4th Largest CO2 emitter? @ 2.02% yes folks thats 2.02% Hardly a major emitter, China is building COAL GENERATED Plants at a One a month clip and the UN calls that proggress? Our PM is correct until such time as the US and China SIGN ON To BINDING TARGET COMI
MENTS. Canada says NO THANK YOU.


Billy
said
0 0

That is an excellent point Elizabeth.

China is making all of our products, supply and demand, we are so selfish and I didn't even look at it like that. Ya their emissions are high, ya they are building a power plant a week, but we are the ones forcing it. What country isn't going to keep selling us fat westerners the products we want?

If we were making our own products, damn right we'd be building more power plants.

Now we get to sit in our lazyboys and complain about emissions across the pond, when it's all being made for us.

We sound like a bunch of -------, in grade school, "I'll do it if bob does it." Give me a break. We have the ability to be the greatest country in the world, but we're too busy squabbling over who's going to do it first. I'm ashamed to call myself a Canadian for the first time.


Gary
said
0 0

Personally I am tired of all the rhetoric on here..and in government..lets just get on with making some progress...intensity based targets may be fine but only for a short short short while..we cannot just leave it as it is..we must implement reduction actions..and very soon..we should also be encouraging alternative energy development and/or cleaner conventional energy..today, we are protecting the oil industry..instead we should be ensuring they are working on producing cleaner energy and encouraging new technologies to enter the energy field. This current position of the government is hogwash. It is wayyyy short of what is needed. Give the emission contributing industries until 2012 to change their ways, incent new technologies today, and encourage more R & D investment for cleaner energy development. What Harper has proposed is extremely weak and ineffective. And thus Canada is a lagger. We need leadership on this issue not sleight of hand rhetoric.


James
said
0 0

The problem is that our government would rather complain that its not their fault, and they should not be accountable for doing nothing. (Or cutting a number of liberal initaives then say that its all the liberals fault). Or China should cut there emissons when Canadians have been polluting the environment, for much longer, and much more per capita. When did our country become a complainer and not a leader. Oh yeah, the last election.


K Joncas
said
0 0

Just where does the idea come from that the only "fair" way to consider emissions is on a per person basis. In reality it is likely the most "unfair" means of comparison. The only real factor to compare is how much is put in compared to how much is taken out. In this area Canada, because it is the world's largest carbon sink, is the world leader.
Interesting that a German group ranks Germany 2nd when is contributes 150 % more in total than Canada, and then ranks Canada 55.


Anna
said
0 0

If Canada follows China's prosperity gap and allow millions to live on rice fields with unreliable electricity, freezing homes in the winter, and animal-drawn carriages, I'm sure we can have a lower per capita emission rate.

But then the socialist UN would accuse Canada of not alleviating poverty. The UN slams Canada with a no-win situation!


Richard
said
0 0

Has anyone thought that maybe CO2 is NOT the cause of the current climate change? Maybe there are other reasons, reasons not related to what the human race does on this planet. Or are we so conceited that we believe we control everything regardless of nature?


MRM
said
0 0

This "ranking" is timed strategically by the tree huggers to embarrass Canada into knuckling under to Kyoto supporters who advocate a deal at any price. The concept that Canada is bad while China which has just moved into first place as the largest polluter in the world is good is so ridiculous that it doesn’t even merit serious discussion. If China were really serious about climate change they would take the billions of dollars that they currently invest in a massive military complex which includes nuclear and space based weaponry and channel some of it into reducing GHG. Instead they pull the “developing country” card to get a pass on Kyoto. While at the same time they run around the world buying up our resources and manufacturing ability at an astonishing rate. What a bunch of saps we are!


Warren
said
0 0

Common sense says that in order to reduce emissions the most effective action we can take is to tackle the largest sources of emissions first. Now as individuals we can do almost nothing because the largest sources of emissions are from the energy and commercial sectors. Sure we can effect change by voting with our "wallets" but for anything meaningful to change we need strong leadership from our government. Sadly we are severely lacking in this area!


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz