News Sections
Canada 4th-worst in climate change performance
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(58)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Fri. Dec. 7 2007 11:36 AM ET
Canada has ranked close to last on an annual index that evaluates and compares the climate protection performances of 56 industrialized and emerging countries.
The 56 countries are together responsible for more than 90 per cent of global energy-related CO2 emissions.
Canada placed 53rd on the index, down two spots from 2006.
The study, compiled by the environmental organization Germanwatch, compares the countries in three different ways, and then calculates a combined Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI).
Canada ranked 46th for its emissions levels, 43rd for its emission trends, and 55th for the effectiveness of its national government policies.
The report comes as officials from nearly 190 countries are in Bali for a massive UN conference on climate change. The focus of the conference is to begin negotiations on an international agreement to fight climate change after 2012 -- when the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol expires.
Matthew Bramley of the Pembina Institute, who contributed to the study, said Canada's credibility on the issue is being questioned.
"The government is still not making a serious effort to cut greenhouse gas pollution, and that leaves Canada at the back of the pack," Bramley said in a press release.
"The gap between the government's rhetoric and its action to date severely weakens Canada's credibility here in Bali."
China turnaround
The United States and Saudi Arabia ranked the worst on the list, at 55th and 56th.
Meanwhile, China was heralded as a leader on environmental initiatives even though it ranked in the 40th spot.
While still low on the list, the ranking is an improvement of four places from last year, mostly due to new policies to promote renewable energy use and slash industrial energy consumption.
"China's relatively positive political assessment gives hope that emission growth will slow down in the future," Germanwatch's Christoph Bals said in a press release.
Historically, China has maintained a defensive position over its environmental policies, but that seems to have given way recently to a more proactive stance at the Bali talks, according to delegates.
"China has made up its mind about a year ago that it was going to get serious," Hans Verolme, director of WWF International's Global Climate Change Program, told The Associated Press.
"They want to show to the world it understands and it wants to do what is necessary to stop dangerous climate change."
However there's little disagreement that China, which many believe has now surpassed the U.S. as the world's largest emitter of GHGs, still has a long way to go.
Sweden had the best record on the Germanwatch list but still only achieved two thirds of the total score.
According to reports from Bali, one of the major snags in the negotiations is over developing nations. Many nations, including Canada, have said they will only sign onto an emission reductions plan if developing countries such as China and India also take on binding targets.
But those countries say industrialized nations should take the lead since they are responsible for the majority of emissions.
UN climate chief Yvo de Boer said hope is ebbing away.
"Nothing has been ruled out," de Boer said. "Binding commitments from developing countries is not off the table, but is crawling toward the edge."
Environment Minister John Baird will attend the conference in Bali next week.
Index ranking of the 10 largest CO2 emitters:
| Country | Share of Global CO2 Emissions* | CCPI Rank 2008 | CCPI Rank 2007** |
|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 % | 2 | 4 |
| India | 4.23% | 5 | 9 |
| U.K. | 1.95% | 7 | 4 |
| China | 18.80% | 40 | 44 |
| Italy | 1.67% | 41 | 35 |
| Japan | 4.47% | 42 | 39 |
| Russia | 5.69% | 50 | 42 |
| Korea, Rep. | 1.65% | 51 | 48 |
| Canada | 2.02% | 53 | 51 |
| U.S. | 21.44% | 55 | 53 |
| * energy related | **Calculated with the most recent method |
With files from The Associated Press
User Tools
Related Stories
Related Websites
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(58)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Please Add Comments( )
Brian Champ
0
said
0
Canada only has 0.5% of the population of the world and we contribute 2% to 3% of GHGs - more than our "share"
We need less preaching to China and more action here, in the US and in the industrialized world, whose cumulative emissions over the past decades is the cause of the problem.
Brian Champ
Toronto Climate Campaign
Shamaro
0
said
0
Rupert Kautzky
0
said
0
Ken
0
said
0
Da Mai
0
said
0
Moe
0
said
0
Jason
0
said
0
Ashamed
0
said
0
Jeremy
0
said
0
Layton
0
said
0
Hai
0
said
0
Mark
0
said
0
This is a country that coats its toys in lead. Do you really think they care about the ozone layer?
The only reason they produce less pollution per capita, is that much of their suppressed population lives on small rice farms, own one cow, and have never seen a car. Once China begins to develop and the standard of living increases, they we be a pollution creating superpower.
meng
0
said
0
Canadian convenience vs fighting poverty, which is more important? That's the real debate.
Roger T
0
said
0
John
0
said
0
cantuc
0
said
0
Martin
0
said
0
Considering the breakneck speed at which it is growing, it has no choice but to consider the environment as essential to its political, economic and social survival.
Layton
0
said
0
DD
0
said
0
These are just some things we can do as individuals. My power bill is down $300 a year just from installing programmable Tstats. Installing CFLs has added another $100 or more in savings. I bought a car slightly smaller than the one I had and use 2 litres less per 100 km of gas.
No more excuses or blame. Don't depend on Harper to do anything...he won't. You have to do it!
Allan MacDougall
0
said
0
Per-capita emissions are irrelevant. Thick, choking, vision-blocking pollution can have no excuse anywhere. We have smog in some cities in Canada, but I am aware that you are correct to say sometimes you cannot see across the street for the smog. As long as major governments can swindle their way out of having a practical and positive impact on the environment, the situation will get worse. The trick for a lot of politicians is to look like you're tackling the problem while trying to remove obligation from the actual polluters (large companies, etc). More deceptions are being shown, just different deceptions as what happened in the 80's and 90's. But deception is what will lead to disaster.
Any plan that doesn't bind all major polluters, regardless of per-capita emissions, is bound to be a continuation of what already exists; the inevitability of a global catastrophe unlike anything mankind has ever seen. The 50 and 60 year old politicians at the top, though, are very unlikely to ever suffer the effects.
It's time for an environmental *revolution* !!
Rick
0
said
0
Sure, Canada has a high GHG per capita. But at least most people are trying to reduce their personal emmissions, and large emissions reductions at the industrial level are coming with CO2 sequestration projects and additional nuclear and renewables coming on stream over the next few decades. Unless people want to revert to cave man existance, significant GHG reductions will take time.
Also who says China has the right to produce 1.3 billion people ?. If you are going to over-populate the earth that way your GHG emissions BETTER be much lower per person.
Also read Da Mai's comments - he lives in China !
Don
0
said
0
Shamaro
0
said
0
JF
0
said
0
Hopefully this Bali meeting will at least establish a carbon credit system that will allow countries with any rainforests - a 'carbon sink' - to claim some compensation for preserving what’s left. Right now the existing forests and oceans are the most cost effective option we have and are the only things we have that sucks our CO2 out of the atmosphere.
Daryl H
0
said
0
Where did they end up on this list?
Mark.E
0
said
0
Hugh
0
said
0
T-Roy
0
said
0
Marc Kobayashi
0
said
0
This is NOT being "a leader".
Now China is taking steps that will make them even more competitive, and efficient while we get left behind with our heads in the (oil) sands.
GP
0
said
0
Canadians have done a bad job of telling their politicians that they want resources and political capital spent on solving or at least seriously addressing this issue in Canada. The only short term option is the Green Party, which is actually doing quite well at governing in Europe.
The other mainstream Parties just don’t get it. It’s all rhetoric and spin. If you really want to get something going in Canada you MUST DO IT WITH YOUR VOTES, which means the very scary proposition of voting for a party you would not normally vote for. It will take 10 or 15 Green Party seats for the government of the day to get the message. If you live in a riding where your Green Party candidate appears to be reasonable person that understands that the environment is not the only consideration then I say send the message and vote for him/her…otherwise live with the rhetoric and spin cause that’s all that’s going to happen.
elizabeth
0
said
0
Here in Canada the media isn't paying any attention to the Bali conference - they are obsessed with the Schreiber case, 15 year old news. What does that tell you?
Paul
0
said
0
As a former researcher in energy consumption, I always kept the following in mind.
1. Latitude: How close to a pole is a country and how many months below 15°C do people in that country live in?
2. Population growth: Does the country have an expanding population?
3. Industrial growth: Does the country have an expanding or shrinking economy?
4. Type of industrial growth: Does the country have a primary based resource economy. Does it have refineries? Manufacturing facilities?
5. Distances for Transportation: Within the country, how far do people and goods have to travel?
If you think about these five questions, you'll see that Canada has one of the coldest climates in the world. We are the second largest country, and because we have a east/west population base (along the US border) we have the furthest distance of any country to transport people and goods. We have expanding populations and economies (unlike most of Europe) and we have a resource based economy. In addition we are expanding that economy by increasing our oil and gas production to meet world demand.
Taking into account all these issues, it is obvious that Canada should be one of the highest producers of CO2 and other emmissions per capita in the world. And, because we are an expanding economy, we are going to get worse.
Until someone comes up with a safe and more efficient source of energy for daily use than hydrocarbons, Canada will always lead the world per capita.
As a country, all we can do is try to be as efficient as possible. But as we are growing, there is no chance or hope of going backwards or even staying still in terms of CO2 production. Unless we go to a completely nuclear economy.
Proud to be Canadian
0
said
0
Bill in Seattle
0
said
0
2) Some of Canada's high per capita is due to the energy sector requiring a lot of energy to produce energy. (oil sands uses about 30% of the energy they produce to process the oil)
3) Countries closer to the poles are going to use more energy.
critic
0
said
0
Keith
0
said
0
Roger T
0
said
0
Ooi
0
said
0
The Harper government is still trying to protect Alberta's fossil fuel industry at the cost of any other renewable alternatives. It is entirely feasible to move away from non-renewable energy industries and still be able to have a vibrant economy in Canada. We need leaders who can shift us away from high polluting industries and make us a world leader in the renewable resource industry.
GW
0
said
0
Regardless of the controversy surrounding Global Warming there is no reason why Canada can’t lead or at least do better in this effort and there are enough good reasons already in place why we should. Granted the Liberals are the ones who totally botched this and created this mess but we can pick up the pieces and move forward.
Lets work toward and talk about Canada being a alternative clean energy leader while developing and supplying oil in the oil sands that will indeed be needed, all of it. I would actually hope that we can find clean ways to use oil too and it would great is Canada was the ones to do this.
Come on Canada lets lead the way.
Ryan - Windsor, ON
0
said
0
Canada is cold most of the year, therefore our emmissions will be high. You don't need to be a biased, liberal scientist to figure that one out. I don't see all the UN delegates comming to spend winter here, do I?
The UN has no say in our own national policy or national soverigny. The UN is a joke and the sooner we all come to that understanding, the better we will be in this country.
UN, stay out of Canada's affairs, unless every delegate would like to spend a winter here!
Me
0
said
0
Population of China--1,235,260,000
Population of USA-- 300,000,000
population of Russia--141,377,252
Population of Canada--33,000,000.
Yes Canada has to clean up it's act but even if we cut back to the bare minimum the world will still be polluted unless these countries do more than they are doing. Asking Canada to do the lions share is like saying to a family with 1 child you are not allowed to put out any garbage bags but the family down the street who has 10 children can put out one for each child + 1 for yours. Yes we should help developing nations to find ways and technology to cut back but unless they and the biggest polluter the USA do something we are whistling in the wind
Moe
0
said
0
Layton
0
said
0
Sandra
0
said
0
What a waste of taxpayers money.
Give me a trip to Bali at this time of the year and I will say anything you want to hear.
Todd Young
0
said
0
Michel
0
said
0
1) the US government
2) the Alberta Oil Patch
As long as Harper's Conservatives are hostage to these two groups, Canada Federal Government actions on climate change will continue to be superficial, duplicitous and ineffective.
Dave
0
said
0
Dave
Robert White
0
said
0
I feel the best approach for us is to establish and encourage best practises and challenge the rest of the world (developing or industrialized) to do the same.
Doug
0
said
0
We already know there are not enough resources on the planet to sustain a population at the standard of living enjoyed in the "developed" part of the world. So, the solution proposed by many is to lower the standard of living here to raise it in China. It kind of boils down to us giving up our cars, and maybe even buying one for someone in China.
I'm all for reducing both pollution and GHG's in Canada. If that will please the tree huggers, let's get on with what we can do. If you want me to start sending cheques to China you will have to find me, and confiscate my savings. At least, until you have the courage to be open and honest about what you are really planning.
That, my friends, is something that those promoting Kyoto simply refuse to do. Not the Liberals, the NDP, or the Al Gores and David Suzuki's of this world.
Mr. Harper needs to get moving on this, and bring about some tougher emission targets. But I will support his efforts to make sure we aren't simply sending tax dollars to big polluters.
George Lawrence
0
said
0
MENTS. Canada says NO THANK YOU.
Billy
0
said
0
China is making all of our products, supply and demand, we are so selfish and I didn't even look at it like that. Ya their emissions are high, ya they are building a power plant a week, but we are the ones forcing it. What country isn't going to keep selling us fat westerners the products we want?
If we were making our own products, damn right we'd be building more power plants.
Now we get to sit in our lazyboys and complain about emissions across the pond, when it's all being made for us.
We sound like a bunch of -------, in grade school, "I'll do it if bob does it." Give me a break. We have the ability to be the greatest country in the world, but we're too busy squabbling over who's going to do it first. I'm ashamed to call myself a Canadian for the first time.
Gary
0
said
0
James
0
said
0
K Joncas
0
said
0
Interesting that a German group ranks Germany 2nd when is contributes 150 % more in total than Canada, and then ranks Canada 55.
Anna
0
said
0
But then the socialist UN would accuse Canada of not alleviating poverty. The UN slams Canada with a no-win situation!
Richard
0
said
0
MRM
0
said
0
Warren
0
said
0