CTV News | Mulroney didn't receive Airbus kickbacks: Schreiber

Top Stories -   

Mulroney didn't receive Airbus kickbacks: Schreiber

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife reports
CTV Newsnet: Jean Charest responds to Schreiber's claims
CTV Newsnet: Pat Martin, vice-chair of the ethic committee
CTV Newsnet: James Morton, Ontario Bar Association
CTV Newsnet: Mike Duffy on Schreiber's testimony
CTV Newsnet: Schreiber gives opening statement, part one
CTV Newsnet: Schreiber gives opening statement, part two
CTV Newsnet: Schreiber arrives on Parliament Hill

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(35)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Tue. Dec. 4 2007 6:06 PM ET

Karlheinz Schreiber told a parliamentary ethics committee on Tuesday that former prime minister Brian Mulroney did not receive any money in connection with the Airbus affair.

He said that allegations of Mulroney's involvement in securing an Air Canada contract for the purchase of planes from the European company were laughable.

But Schreiber also told the committee that Mulroney was still a Member of Parliament when he gave him the first of three $100,000 payments. Schreiber said Tuesday that the initial payment came after Mulroney had stepped down as prime minister, although the two discussed future lobbying activities by Mulroney months earlier before he stepped down as PM.

Schreiber, freed on bail by the Ontario Court of Appeal, told the Commons committee Tuesday that he made a deal on June 23, 1993, to work with then-prime minister Brian Mulroney on a future project -- but no financial compensation was discussed.

The ethics committee is probing Schreiber's past dealings with Mulroney -- including $300,000 in cash Mulroney received after leaving office.

Mulroney has never said why he received the money in cash. He did not declare the money in his tax returns the year he received the money, although he did do so several years later. Mulroney has denied all allegations of wrongdoing, and none of the accusations against the former prime minister has been proven in court.

Schreiber said he met with Mulroney at Harrington Lake, the prime minister's summer home, on June 23, 1993 -- two days before Mulroney left office.

He said Mulroney agreed at that meeting to work with him after leaving office.

Schreiber said he told Mulroney that he had funds available for the Bear Head project -- a plan to construct a factory to build light-armoured vehicles in Canada.

Mulroney was supposed to help Schreiber lobby to get the plant set up in Halifax, he said.

"It was a principle agreement that we work together but at that day it was completely unfair for me to say anything else -- we did not speak about money," Schreiber told the committee.

Schreiber started his testimony with a rambling statement that included details and letters pertaining to the deal to sell Airbus planes to Air Canada in the late 1980s.

Schreiber also set off another bombshell by dropping the name of another prominent politician. He said that he donated $30,000 to Jean Charest's Tory leadership campaign in 1993. The money was allegedly given in cash to Charest's brother.

Charest said that his brother recalls that the donation was only $10,000. He also said that it was perfectly legal. The Quebec premier also noted that although Schreiber claims the two have met in the past, such contact was minimal, if it occurred at all. 

"I have no recollection of ever meeting Mr. Schreiber," Charest said.

"I don't know him, and never did I act on any of the files that he was interested in."

Schreiber, who has a reputation for keeping meticulous records, provided the committee with binders filled with documents on Airbus, Mulroney, and his correspondence with Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Starting with apology

Ethics committee chairman Paul Szabo began proceedings Tuesday by apologizing to Schreiber because he was not provided with a belt when he was escorted home last week to look at documents.

As a result his pants fell down as he walked to his doorstep.

Last Thursday, in his first appearance before the committee, Schreiber said that he was not given enough time to prepare.

However, Schreiber surprised the committee by saying the $300,000 in cash payments was supposed to be $500,000, but the former prime minister didn't do the work that was expected of him.

Meanwhile, the Ontario Court of Appeal agreed Tuesday to release Schreiber on $1.31-million bail.

Schreiber is facing a variety of tax and fraud accusations in Germany and has been fighting an extradition order since 2004.

Last Friday, the Ontario Court of Appeal temporarily stayed the extradition order to Germany against Schreiber until the Supreme Court of Canada decides whether it will hear an appeal in the case.

His bail conditions require him to update authorities daily on his whereabouts. He must also surrender to a Toronto detention centre the day before the Supreme Court releases its decision on if it will hear the case.

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Patrick Ross
said

Someone please remind me why we're having this inquiry again?

Mulroney agreed to work with Schreiber after leaving office, and they didn't even talk about money at the time.

Nor did Mulroney recieve a kickback for Airbus.

Meanwhile, the Globe and Mail reports today that Andre Ouellet also had dealings with Schreiber, but also clearly did nothing wrong.

Why are we wasting time trying to incriminate (more or less) honest politicians, while apologizing to a known crook because he can't keep his own pants up?

Anyone?


Roger Roy
said

After watching the Committee chair appologize to this Karl guy I feel ashamed of the mockery Karl is making of us Canadians. We are spending millions on nothing and we the the tax payer is flipping the bill.
And NO THANKS TO THE NDP. How much are we going to have to pay when Brian sues us this time?


M-J
said

Patrick I agree with you, I wish I had the answer as to why we are having this inquiry.I know the Liberals desperately want to pin something on Harper.That isn't going to work and we all know that Karlheinz Schreiber is also desperate.He wants to finish his days in Canada, he doesn't want to face any music in Germany.
I would send him back home, I think if we all chipped in for his ticket, it would work out cheaper. Thank your opposition parties, just what we need. More tax paying dollars going to waste.


Marty
said

All I have to say is wow. The only scandal it seems right now is a Lieberal scam on the Canadian people. If Mulroney did not take kickback money from the whole Airbus affair, then I think the whole case is closed. The settlement that Mulroney was awarded should stand since the investigation was to see if Mulroney received money or kickbacks from the Airbus deal which it seems he did not. ....

stespr
said

I agree, don't we have more pressing issues for these people to deal with !!


Carly Rossini
said

Enough is enough. It's time to end this charade.


Roch
said

To answer Patrick Ross' question, the reason is singular - Liberals feel pursuing the matter is their single best chance to get elected.

Wasting tax payers money is not a Liberal concern, not losing even more seats is their only concern.

Unfortunately for them, this is not their golden goose, try as they might to implicate at the time Reform party member Stephen Harper into a Progressive Conservative leader's dealings after leaving office.




CWS
said

Looks and smells like witch hunt. Let those without sin cast the first stone. A waste of money.


FreakAlert
said

I think it was sinister that the RCMP let the media follow Schrieber going to his home and revealing his address. Security agencies know what that was all about.

Shameful.


Darren
said

This is a disaster. Are we that desperate for news in this country? Is there really nothing else going on? I thought this was touted as a "he said, he said" kind of affair? Both the "he's" are saying nothing happened. So, what exactly are we trying to find out...Nothing! We should be spending more time trying to find the rest of the Sponsorship money. Schreiber sent Harper a letter. How does that compare to Dion being a Minister in the goverment that lost millions under its nose.


JC
said

This is embarassing. Szabo speaks to Schreiber like they are best friends. Move over Cirque de Soleil, this is clearly far more entertaining.


howard
said

Can the Liberals and NDP back track from this one? Schreiber has blown their case. Now that he has spoken can we get him on the next flight to germany? ....

Bill
said

I think I am watching cartoons. is this real


Klotzy
said

Sorry guys, but where there is smoke there is usually a fire close by...

Glen
said

Regardless of what people might suspect, both of the men involved have agreed that the money was for consulting fees. It was paid in cash so there was no official receipt stating it's purpose. Thus, even if the investigation continues, it's sort of hard to prove anything in a "he said - he said" especially when both parties are essentially saying the same thing.


Sean
said

Many folks here are conveniently blaming the opposition parties for this committee (it isn't an inquiry yet), forgetting that it is the Conservatives that got this ball rolling.

Even Mr. Mulroney wants the inquiry.

No doubt none of you objected to the sponsorship inquiry...

Raymond
said

I have to chuckle. Not so very long ago, the Liberals and NDP were screaming how the Harper Conservatives '...aren't the PC party of yesterday....'.
For once they seem to have things right.

I'm going for lunch now.


Tim
said

This is a giant pathetic waste of time, we have no reason to believe Schreiber because Mulroney was already investigated over this and found innocent. Anyone can see Schreiber is only doing this because he knows once he get's extradited he'll go directly to a German prison for the rest of his life.


Brett
said

I can see the headlines tomorrow...
"Schreiber testifies that Bigfoot exists and donated rocks and twigs to Conservative Party in 1954".

Then the Liberals will want to know how many rocks and twigs, and point out that when Harper was a kid, he played with rocks and twigs. But first we will have to have an inquiry into if Bigfoot really exists. Thus guaranteeing Shreiber a stay of extradition indefinitely.

What a joke this all is. Can't believe the Liberals are falling for such transparent tactics by a criminal. Shows how desperate they really are.


Sheila
said

Klotzy is correct, however the only smoke is coming from Liberal and NDP camps, after realizing they are once again squandering Canadians money...



Dave in Victoria
said

Mr Schreiber needs an excuse to stay in Canada and stop/delay his waiting prison cell in Germany. Shameful that the Liberals and NDP are wasting more money on this non issue to the Canadian taxpayer. During Jean C's reign of power, Brian (a lawyer) sued us and won. Maybe the Liberal Party of Canada or Mr DeeYawn can pay this time.


Shawn
said

Well he did it. Shreiber has been able to once again delay his extradition to Germany...and all it took was desperate politicians willing to listen to anything if it somehow wins points with then to the electorate.



Chad Dakin
said

Does anyone not take issue with these political dealings? Do we Canadians not have a problem with lobiests paying government for favors? Legal or otherwise.


Pat
said

This is a farce, It is obviously not apparent to those in Ottawa that this man is only using all of us to delay his extradition. It is incredibly coincidental this surfaced again when the man was within weeks of being deported.


Charlie McKendy
said

A very wise (and now deceased) friend once told me that sometimes where there is smoke, there is just smoke. I feel that we know already what we know and that this is a waste of $$ (ours)


MRM
said

Last week Mr. Schreiber's lawyer, Ed Greenspan said that the Ethics Committee inquiry was a circus. He was right but what he neglected to mention was that Mr. Schreiber was the ring leader!


Jason Daniel Baker
said

Quite frankly this is a boring and irrelevant blind alley but smart politics by the Grits.

Anything they can do to distract people from what a complete putz Stephan Dion is for any length of time helps them.

As for the rest...Ancient history.

This guy was asked about Marc Lalonde for pete's sake. Lalonde has not been in cabinet since September 1984...

YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK!


Adam S., Ottawa
said

It continues to astonish me that there remains any interest in vilifying Brian Mulroney. Leave the man alone and let him enjoy his retirement with the dignity he and his office deserve. Dirty politics? I think not. The Liberal sponsorship scandal looms like a supernova compared to this one.


Anne
said

How many people here said that Mulroney should give back the settlement? What say you now? That investigation was all about Airbus, it was concluded that Mulroney was innocent, KHS even had to admit this today. Incidentally, Mulroney used that money to pay his legal defence and gave the rest to charity. Crickets chirping...


pissed
said

This a live soap opera on taxpayers dime.(LOL)


Robert Johnston
said

Government inquiries have a long track record of being irresolute except in their ability to generate more work for lawyers tied to the parties in question. Follow the "insider" money in play and as it would logically develop just as much as the related money trails of the past!!!!


LCH
said

To Chad Dakin,

Yes I am concerned, which is why I supported the Accountability Act which makes this illegal. Prior to 2006 this type of activity was acceptable.

To everyone else, it seems you are as outraged as I am regarding this farce using our $$$. Please write your MP and tell them so. It is amazing that they cannot see this for what is is a desperate man trying to stay out of jail. And he has succeeded since 2004 by the way.


OttRob
said

Curiously, CTV omits this important aspect of Schrieber's story as reported by CP:

"Former Liberal cabinet minister Marc Lalonde contributed $100,000 toward the bail..."


Rod
said

This is a Liberal/NDP tactic that they think by mud slinging they can get some of it to stick and they obviously don't care where. Very pathetic. Lets get on with the governing of this country and look to the future. Marc Lalonde is long gone and so is the collective wisdom of the opposition!


Sean
said

I know if I received $300,000 and didn't declare it to Revenue Canada for several years, I'd be in some pretty big trouble.

Guess there's a different set of laws for B.Mulroney.




Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

CTV Broadband Network

Speaking Out

Speaking Out

Thursday, Nov. 29, 2007: Karlheinz Schreiber speaks before the commons ethics committee.

Mike Duffy

Mike Duffy Live

Correspondents, legal experts and MPs debate the implications of Schreiber’s latest testimony.

CTV Broadband Network

The Verdict

The Verdict

A charmer or a con artist? Paula Todd speaks with lawyers to debate which side of Karlheinz Schreiber holds true.

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz