CTV News | Ottawa's wireless auction could cut cellphone rates

Top Stories -   

Ottawa's wireless auction could cut cellphone rates

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: John Vennavally-Rao on the new options
CTV Newsnet: Jim Prentice announces the changes
CTV Newsnet: Iain Grant, telecommunications analyst
Mike Duffy Live: Industry Minister Jim Prentice discusses the changes to the wireless market

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(34)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Wed. Nov. 28 2007 10:03 PM ET

Ottawa announced it will hold an auction of the wireless spectrum in May 2008, which could mean more competition and lower cellphone rates for Canadians next year.

Industry Minister Jim Prentice told a press conference in Toronto on Wednesday that about 105 megahertz of spectrum will be sold to bidders. Forty megahertz will be set aside for newcomers to the industry.

"The introduction of new service providers will help to make Canada's wireless market more dynamic, more competitive, and more innovative so as to meet the needs of Canadians," Prentice said.

Prentice said that Canadians are currently paying more for wireless service than other countries. Industry insiders say that's one reason there are fewer wireless users relative to the United States.

Companies who hold less than 10 per cent of revenues in Canada's wireless market will be allowed to bid for the 40 megahertz that will be set aside.

An Ottawa-based consumer group said cellphone users could be the big winners following next spring's auction. The Public Interest Advocacy Centre wrote in a media release that "the government has realized the public has an interest" in the issue beyond filling treasury coffers with fees collected from the auction.

The industry is currently dominated by three big players in Canada: Rogers Communication, Bell Mobility, and Telus. During a consultative process, larger companies came out against setting aside space in the wireless spectrum for smaller companies. Telus officials didn't mince words after Prentice's announcement, calling it "deeply disappointing news."

Telus executive vice-president Janet Yale said, "We thought this was a government that believed in market forces, that believed in not trying to create special concessions to help new entrants, and at the end of the day we believe this is not in the best interest of consumers or telecom industry overall.

Telus was all for the set-aside option this summer when it was bidding for BCE Inc., but it reverted to its original position of being against set-asides after it lost the bid. Rogers also criticized the announcement.

Prentice told CTV Newsnet's Mike Duffy Live that larger telecommunications companies in Canada benefited from set-asides during similar auctions in the 1980s and 1990s.

"But let us not forget that they already control the vast majority of spectrum for mobile services on the market in Canada. These same players will be able to bid for 65 of the 105 megahertz being put up for auction to augment their already substantial holdings."

Industry analysts say that the amount of spectrum made available is significant.

"More users require more spectrum and the new internet services, of course, will require broader spectrum," Iain Grant told CTV Newsnet immediately after Prentice's announcement.

Prentice also announced that the government will mandate cellphone tower sharing. This will force companies to allow other companies to use their towers at commercially negotiated rates.

"I think as a Canadian who doesn't necessarily want to see a forest of towers outside my house, I really appreciate it if we can have some sharing of existing resources," said Grant, who is managing director of the Montreal-based telecom consultancy The Seaboard Group.

Grant noted that Canadians will likely not see prices drop for about a year.

Prentice told Mike Duffy Live that he is not sure how much money the auction could raise.

With files from The Canadian Press.


Comments are now closed for this story

Chuck
said

It's about time, my cellphone bills are getting ridiculus!


Brian
said

Then perhaps Canadians will finally be able to get the iPhone (legally.)


mike
said

This is long overdue! Canada is on par with parts of Africa in terms of cell-phone service and fees. One of the many reasons Apple's I-phone is not available in Canada, so hopefully we see some quick action on this!


Vahan
said

Finally. Competition. It has been a long time coming. Hopefully we will see the benefits shortly.
Time to put the screw to the big three. Next step, true competition in the oil industry. Curious how they all jack up the prices to the same amount at the same time. Odd don't you think?


Darlene
said

This is a good move and one that is long overdue. The US has had such competion for many years, their rates are so much lower than Canada's it's outragous.


Jessie
said

It can't be considered true competition until the foreign ownership restrictions are lifted in Canada.

I don't see why firms in this sector and other protected industries in this country, such as banking, should be allowed to operate in other markets that have no restrictions until these anti-free market rules are lifted here.



Ibrahim
said

Something should be done about the system access fee, caller-id and voice mail fees as well. These fees should be included in the basic package, not on top of it.
I am paying $46 just for the basic package of $25.


Amardeep
said

Excellent move, we are way too behind compared to Asia. Market is too competitive there. Hopefully this will help our rates go lower and give more choice to everyone.


Sandor
said

It will be interesting to see which player finally abolishes the outdated concept of "long-distance" in Canada. Americans haven't had to worry about that with their cell phones for some time now. Between that and our high data rates, we're really getting the short-end of the deal!


Melvin
said

Actually Mike, large parts of Africa have better coverage and cheaper rates than Canada. That's how badly the near cartel of Rogers, Bell/Aliant and Telus have treated their customers, while raking in profits.

You can get full cellphone service in the Caribbean for around $15. The big companies here will tell you that's impossible.

Now, hopefully global players like Vodafone will want a piece of Canada's cellular market and give the other three companies some REAL competition.


Zsofia Zoltan
said

At last... a chance to catch up with Europe where there is no charge for incoming calls apart from international roaming charges, there are no lond distance charges either if you use a cell phone. Also free uprades are offered for existing customers for the letest edition of quality phones in order to keep them with the company and there are more generous inclusive packages. I was shocked by the charges and how mean cell phone companies wrere in Canada when I first arrived here from the UK 11 months ago. I have to tell you that I think twice (if not 3 times) before I use my cellphone here, whereas in the Uk it was my general mode of communication as i had a good price plan with lots of inclusive minutes + text messages. The competition between mobile phone companies is much stronger in the UK than it is here.


Tim
said

If anyone thinks that the rates will come down is living in la la land. We will be offered lower rates to entice us and then within a short period of time we will be nickeled & dimed to death and will pay more than now. Try reading the fine print! This has already happened to cable tv, internet,telephone land lines & satellite.

Marc
said

What compitition is going to try to move into a small already flooded market?


Kate
said

It's about time! Maybe e can finally have top of the line technology, without the $50, and $60 a month minimum phone bills.


Rob
said

Bring on the competiton. I agree with Ibrahim, my cell phone plan is $20.00 with fees and add ons is $53.00


Al
said

Finally!! 1 down, 1000 more industries to go... It's about time we make all our industries more competitive.


RJT
said

It's about time!

The unholy alliance between the cell phone companies in this country needs to be broken, their monopoly on the industry is unacceptable in a free market economy like ours.

No longer will the heads of these corporations agree to price fixing, service fees and ludicrously long term contracts.




O.J. Dimpson
said

So it will be easier yet for more idiots to yell at their ex spouses, on their cell phones, while they're driving!!!! Yaaaaaaaaaaa!


Mark
said

Great! For too long we've been getting screwed by the telecom companies, and whether it be internet or cell phone, the packages are bland, do not offer choice, and cost an arm and a leg. Enough is enough!


Ed
said

The gov't should also pass a law that allows us to get out of our contracts without penalty. The only way to get a deal from the big three is to sign a long term contract, I will never do that again, good to see some additional competition coming, good bye Telus.


alex
said

don't expect too much. with direct foreign competition still banned it will not get much better. both the us and europe allow foreign companies to freely operate, if canada is not yet allowing that then i am still disappointed with the crtc


Danny
said

I have long since decided that I would rather go without a cell phone when my contract expires then ever have to deal with any of the big three again. It's clear competition is needed. No competitive company could get away with treating their customers as badly as the big three do.


Liz
said

This is all well and good but my question to the wireless co's is this:
When are you going to stop charging that totally ridiculous 'system access fee'??? They don't pay this stupid fee in the US!! Just another money grabbing fee!!!! This is why I will never have another contract with a cell phone company....pay as you go all the way baby!!


eskiefan
said

I agree with those saying it's about time! I pay twice as much here in Canada than people I know in the US. But I think competition could be good for wireless companies in the long run if they take their head out of the ground. That's because if wireless rates were competitive lots of people, myself included, might be converting completely from land lines.


jk
said

Auctioning spectrum is idiotic... Look at the number of telco operators around the world that have collapsed as a result of national auctions. All this is, is another cash grab by the government which limits the players to the ones with the deepest pockets. There goes any idea of increased competition.


Buster B.Brown
said

What we really need is cheap, reliable satellite service. The reception in many parts of Canada, outside urban or heavily populated rural areas is poor or non-existent.


Budgie
said

I love how misinformed you people are. Reading these comments made me laugh. Try working for a cell phone company for a while and absorb a little knowledge before you guys pass judgement on something you dont understand.


Jake Newhouse
said

Way to go CRTC....!!! If you were not so stupid in the first place to allow the takeover of ClearNet and Microcell we would not have the unfair market domination which exists now.


Stephen Green
said

I am not yet convinced that this announcement will deal with the many of the high cost issues.

1. Will the cell phone companies unlock their phones?
2. What about all those add on costs?
3. How will the billing work? One bill or several?
4. What about rural areas?
5. What about feature charges that cost little for the company but who charge huge fees for their use making immense profits?

Time will tell, but I am not convinced at this point the plan will work.


Jeremy
said

If that is the case Budgie.. inform us.. what really happens???? I for one would love to know why some people have to pay more than $60 a month to talk on a phone....


Ken
said

As someone who works in the cell phone industry I can testify that changes are happening. Rates are going down and the packages are getting better. While I believe my employer is providing a great product, more competition means lower prices and better deals...


Joe
said

Agree with all the postings about high rates and poor service - everybody has a story. In my case I just wiggled out from Rogers because they don't provide coverage at my home; they offered a reduced penalty and I grabbed it. Let's have some new entrant fly the Verizon or ATT banner, and offer US pricing - that would be a real wake up call.


Pifs
said

The price to own a cell phone is ridiculous! Too high for Canada. Even in underdeveloped countries the rate is lower than Canada. At least something is done to break the monopoly.

Chris
said

I work in the industry also, and the one that I can't stand is being charged to check my voicemail, never leaving the internal network, and paying a high price for the honor of being able to have ten messages, and the length of the prompts to leave a mesage to hope that you get to 1:01 so you can be charged two minutes of air time. Bring back by-the-second billing.


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz

Most Talked about Stories

The chance of the destruction of our planet is very very small with this collider, but who are these people to decide what risks are acceptable for all of mankind? It puts me at unease and adds to my anxiety. CERN acknowledges that there are miniscule risks -- they admit to it so please spare the convoluted retorts.

kc-bby

Hadron Collider back in action after year of repairs