CTV News | Poor most 'vulnerable' to climate change: UN

Top Stories -   

Poor most 'vulnerable' to climate change: UN

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Newsnet: Papa Seck, contributing author,UNDP
Canada AM: Papa Seck, contributing author, UNDP

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(19)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Tue. Nov. 27 2007 10:17 AM ET

The poorest countries in the world face the most immediate consequences from climate change even though they have contributed the least to the problem, says the UN's Human Development Report 2007/2008.

If changes are not made, the world's poorest countries could see "hundreds of millions facing malnutrition, water scarcity, ecological threats, and a loss of livelihoods," says the report, 'Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world.'

United Nations Development Programme's (UNDP) Papa Seck, a contributing author to the report, told CTV's Canada AM on Tuesday that the effects of climate change are already in motion.

"If every person in the world was emitting like the average Canadian we'd need about nine planets to absorb the CO2 (carbon dioxide) that is emitted in order to avoid dangerous climate change," said Seck. "It is the same thing for the United States."

The findings come just one week ahead of a major climate-change conference in Bali where experts will meet to negotiate a successor climate treaty to the Kyoto Accord.

Seck said Tuesday's report offers countries like Canada climate-change solutions that are attainable.

"We advocate a path that is feasible, it won't cost the world to much to achieve... we just need the political will to do it," he said.

"The world's poor just cannot afford for us to renege on our responsibilities."

Key demands

The report calls for a "twin track" approach that combines "stringent mitigation to limit 21st Century warming to less than 2°C (3.6°F), with strengthened international cooperation on adaptation."

On mitigation, the authors want developed countries to cut greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80 per cent of 1990 levels by 2050.

The report also calls on rich countries to put climate-change adaptation at the centre of international partnerships on poverty reduction.

In total, the authors say $86 billion by 2015 is needed from rich countries to help the world's poor adapt to global warming.

"Increased exposure to drought, to more intense storms, to floods and environmental stress is holding back the efforts of the world's poor to build a better life for themselves and their children,'' says the report.

The report also calls for increased international support for the development of sub-Saharan Africa's capacity to monitor climate and improve public access to meteorological information.

"Ultimately, climate change is a threat to humanity as a whole. But it is the poor, a constituency with no responsibility for the ecological debt we are running up, who face the immediate and most severe human costs," UNDP Administrator Kemal Dervis said in the report.

Comments are now closed for this story

John
said

If you ask me, it's the poor in intelligence who are most affected by so-called anthropogenic global warming. It seems like tired old marxist theory is still alive and well in the global warming movement.


DD
said

Harper has to stop blaming Kyoto and do something substantive. "Aspirational" goals are useless, absolutely useless.

And he's pumping money into bio-fuels which will only make the situation in the third world that much worse. A single tank full of corn derived bio-fuel equals enough food to feed a child for a year!! Worse, it does little to combat GCC. Like so much of what Harper does, it's spin that in the end means nothing. It's too bad some people just can't see this.

And stop saying that China and India need to keep up with us in this fight. WE put the vast majority of carbon into the atmosphere and it is the western world that must LEAD the underdeveloped world in the fight. WE must develop the technologies necessary and make them cheap enough for us and them. Hybrid, hydrogen, wind, solar, hydro etc. We have the capability. Don't expect China and India to do it. Right now, this is, first and foremost, OUR responsibility.


Robert
said

Canada needs to start being a leader on the environmental front. Increasingly, our government has taken the stance that we should not invest in the environment, this being based on the idea that other countries are doing nothing therefore so should we. In the past being a leader is what had set Canada apart from other countries. History shows that Canada has aspired to lead, instead of standing idle watching time go by. This is contrary to what was always in the best financial interest of the country. As a Canadian I look back in pride at Canada's role, leading when other choose to follow. Increasingly, I am concerned that, our, Canadian Government isn't representing Canadian ideals, but Canadian business's pockets.
As for the issue of global warming it is no longer acceptable to respond to the problem by stating that our economy is more important then our future. This is not a solution. Yes, I agree the Canadian economy is important, but as Canadians we must realize that we live privileged lives. With this privilege we have responsibility, and that responsibility is to the people who do not live in a country as as wealthy or with as many resources as we have. We have a real chance NOW to make a difference and I think that Canadians and the Canadian Government need now to lead and not to find excuses to stand by, getting caught behind the eightball.
So please do not respond to this thread arguing that the economy should be protected at all costs, because I ask you this what's an economy without an environment.


Keith
said

Why do you think the Asian economy is booming. If the western world would stop buying products that can be made and shipped half way around the world cheaper than we can produce them where would there exports and economy be?
It is our greed that has spawned them into whatever and however they can proudce products the cheapest with no regard for the enviroment.


D.R. - Calgary
said

DD... WE are not the vast majority of carbon producers. In fact, Canada doesn't even come close to being a leading polluter. ... It is a simple fact that if the largest emitters (yes DD, China, India, the US), aren't a part of the sollution, they are the problem. Without them coming on board we might as well be banging our heads against the wall. That being said...global warming is coming no matter what anyone does. Most of this is natural. The earth has been changing temperature by degrees over and over throughout time. We just happen to be here this time. Look at a history book people instead of jumping on the insanity/panic train. It's coming, like it or not.


Mary E.
said

I am so ashamed of the Tory government's behaviour around everything to do with climate change. I want the world to know their behaviour does not represent the majority of Canadians. If the next election is fought on environment, this government is going down!


IAN
said

More ridiculous scare tactics. All nonsense. Furthermore for those who believe in this new cult of 'global warming' when did politics fix anything? Wait times at hospitals? NO. The number of poor and homeless, NO. etc etc.


sam chua
said

What REPORT? You don't need a freakin' report to know this matter, affecting poor countries. It's a COMMON SENSE...I bet it had cost millions of dollars to come up with this report, millions of dollars which UN could have used for something more important. OUT!


DID
said

Although I hate to say this, a global effort to end warming isn't going to happen until the major countries take big enough hits that their very survival is at stake.
However, in the meantime, the more vulnerable smaller countries will cease to exist.
It's just the way humanity seems to work--take it to the precipice and fight back like demons to survive.
Global warming is bigger than humanity.
We are definitely in trouble.



Jim McB
said

Papa Seck has unwittingly stated the real case for for the UN pursuing global warming fear mongering. It is the requirement to transfer wealth to so called developing countries.

These countries are poor because of geography; they do not have the resources like water and raw materials to support their populations. An injection of carbon tax money will not change that situation but will increase the affluence of the rulers and cause further instability. That is why sociallist plans like Kyoto do not work, they do not deal with the real issues but with the advertised issues. The real solution is to have the people move to where the environment will support them but politics and religion makes that an impossible task. Cash infusions make socialist so called thinkers feel good and that is the limit of their value.

Harper is right about Kyoto, all or nothing is the game. We could reduce our GHGs significantly by going nuclear, but the environmental lobby can't raise much cash with that solution so it has to be attacked. There is no winning solution when dealing with zealots of any type. It is hard to convince some that the natural order of things is a force unto its self and mans intervention has little effect.


gerry
said

When I read comments about how it would be useless for us to do anything about carbon emissions without the larger countries on board it makes me sick. I don't care if nobody else in the world is on board, i want our government to do something besides complaining about the financial losses that a clean up will cost. Big business has been screwing the world long enough. It's time to bite the bullet and to start repairing hundreds of years of damage done in the name of money.

Scott
said

All of you on the right can keep calling global warming a natural phenomena all you want. Nobody is arguing that. However, we are taking what is naturally happening and making it FAR worse. This is scientific fact, and has been agreed upon by people WAY more qualified than you, so your right wing arguments are almost as futile as Harper's "action" on climate change.

DJ
said

I have a hard time listening to anything the UN has to say. When it has shown it is useless in solving conflicts between countries, it has come up with the pet project of being the champion of climate change. When you combine this with the Al Gore association , it is beyond practical and does a disservice to being good stewards of our land


Ron Reynolds
said

RJ
The world is in peril with population growth alone. With world population going to double within our life time, the demand for water food and oxygen will soon out strip supply. Industrial pollution just adds to the problem. Population and pollution must be monitored to find a solution. Underdeveloped countries may not be industrial polluter but they do place a large burden on the world's resources with exponential population growth.


DD
said

DR -- I mean WE as in the western world (as was specifically pointed out in the following sentence). China hasn't been a big contributor until recently, yet they have better fuel emission standards for their cars than the US or Canada. On a per capita basis, the US is still a bigger contributor.

It's lazy to sit back and expect less developed nations to contribute at an equal pace. We (the western nations) have a duty to lead here. We have the capability and technology, but the problem is we don't want to spend the money. Instead, "leaders" like Harper will sit back blame others while doing nothing. That's what he's good at. I'm not going to be taken in by his lies a second time around.


Jeebus
said

I have to agree with D.R. All countries have to be involved including the developing countries. Kyoto is totaly unrealistic for Canada and Canadian need to wake up. Canada has vast distances to cover and a very cold winter climate. The biggest problem has to face in reducing CO2 emisions to 1990 levels is the increase in population. Canada has been allowing imagrants into the country unlike most other countries in the industrialized world.
Canada needs its own plan and not Kyoto. If the poorest nations will suffer the most from global warming then they also need to be part of the solution.


Kris
said

On a per capita basis Canadians are one of the worst emittors of GHGs in the world.

It's absolutely absurd for rich western countries who are responsible for creating this problem to demand that poor developing countries sacrifice just as much as us to solve it.

Almost 2 years and counting and this government has done NOTHING but block international progress.

It's a disgrace.


Justin
said

If our government votes against this, something is terribly wrong. These are completely attainable goals which the authors ask to be achieved in FORTY years. I understand that it will cost our country a hefty sum of money to adapt to lower target emissions, however it is a necessary investment for our future. I hope someone finally knocks some sense into Harper.


Albert
said

Whether you believe in Global Warming or not, we should all agree the planet is becoming increasingly polluted every day.

In Toronto, we have seen major highways expand from 2 lanes to 5, rush hour traffic to several hours of traffic, the sky has filled with an orange / brown cloud, and we have no solution to our garbage build-up.

Does this contribute to Global Warming ? Co2 gas emissions ?

If nothing else, our human stupidity, greed, and inconsiderate behavior or lack of concern for our children is the primary reason our planet is in such stage of mess. We have proof that “through – away societies” have failed.



Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz