Canada -
News Sections
Taser manufacturer wants role in review process
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(25)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Wed. Nov. 21 2007 8:39 AM ET
An executive with Taser International says his company wants to participate in any Canadian review of the stun gun and is confident the product would be found safe.
"We do need answers to what happened," Taser co-founder and chairman Tom Smith told CTV's Canada AM on Wednesday.
"Obviously we manufacture the device. We have a lot of knowledge that we can share, so we need to be part of this inquiry so we can try and provide some answers."
Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day announced Tuesday that he had asked Paul Kennedy, who heads the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP, to conduct the review.
"I have asked the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP to review all RCMP protocols on the use of CEDs (conducted electrical devices) and to assess the compliance of the RCMP with these protocols," the minister said in a news release.
"This builds on the work currently underway by the Commission on the use of CEDs, as referred in its June 2007 Annual Report."
The review comes following the Oct. 14 death of Robert Dziekanski, a Polish man, at Vancouver International Airport following a confrontation that ended with RCMP officers using a Taser on him.
Kennedy -- who will only look at the RCMP -- is to make an initial report by Dec. 12. His work is in addition to Day's earlier decision to have the RCMP conduct an internal review of its Taser procedures.
The Liberals have called for a broad national review that would include the RCMP, the Canada Border Services Agency, Immigration, Transport Canada and the Vancouver Airport Authority.
The NDP and Amnesty International want police to suspend Taser use, citing 17 deaths in Canada and more than 280 in the United States.
The B.C. government has also ordered a public inquiry into the Dziekanski case.
Meanwhile in Chilliwack, B.C., a man is in extremely critical condition in hospital following a Tuesday incident with police, who used pepper spray, batons and a Taser to subdue him.
Critic welcomes review
A critic -- and competitor -- of Tasers is welcoming the review of how RCMP officers use the stun guns.
"If you don't know what the threshold of safety and effectiveness is, then how do you prevent these devices from being abused in the field and in real world scenarios, when there's no supervision?" Ken Stethem asked in an interview with CTV British Columbia on Tuesday.
Stethem -- founder of Omega Science, a company that develops non-lethal security tools -- said part of the problem with Tasers is their design.
The North Vancouver businessman and former U.S. Navy Seal said Tasers rely on "spark gap technology." As with a car's spark plug, CEDs can wear out. When they do, the intended electrical wavelength can change and make the devices unsafe.
Officers using such a device might be tempted to use the device more than once, he said.
That raises the following questions for Stethem:
- How many stuns are too many?
- When is the duration of electrical contact too long?
- What science has been done by the manufacturer or law enforcement to support the use of CEDs?
"What science has been done to support unlimited stuns and unlimited exposure -- and the answer is none," Stethem said.
His company is developing a solid-state device that reportedly won't have any variations in electrical output.
But Taser International's position is that: "Specifically in Canada, while previous incidents were widely reported in the media as 'Taser deaths,' the role of the Taser device has been cleared in every case to date."
Smith told Canada AM, "I have been Tasered myself. I have Tasered my brother."
While admitting the device is "not risk-free," Smith said it's still the safest way to end a confrontation.
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(25)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
The chance of the destruction of our planet is very very small with this collider, but who are these people to decide what risks are acceptable for all of mankind? It puts me at unease and adds to my anxiety. CERN acknowledges that there are miniscule risks -- they admit to it so please spare the convoluted retorts.

Comments are now closed for this story
JTJ
said
A. Bica
said
Further, it should never be employed on unarmed people.
An impartial inquiry should examine use not get a sales pitch from the manufacturer or the cops
Pete
said
Lise
said
MH
said
Jeff T
said
Morrissey
said
KS
said
Does the electricity pass through the heart muscle as well or preferentially bypasses the heart?
I understand passing current through the skeletal muscles induces a tetanic contraction and severe pain.
MH
said
Sam J
said
We want the facts not the FUD.
MVAC
said
Bob
said
They should have NO part in this.
...When the results are known let them know so that they can either fix the problems or get rid of them from all Canadian police forces.
Michael
said
JDP
said
Bryan
said
Tasers are meant for an intermediate solution. If a suspect is armed, an officer will not pull out a taser to defend him/herself - he or she will put out their sidearm. Ask any officer about that. Not one will tell you that a taser is to be used against an armed suspect as they are not trained that way, nor should they be.
Why is all the blame being placed on officers? The man who is now in critical condition had a choice. He could have chosen to leave the premesis and not allow it to escalate. There was a situation in Winnipeg a couple years ago when an 18 year old charged at an officer with a screwdriver. The officer shot him, and I believe was completely justified in doing so.
Officers put their lives on the line during duty to enforce the law. They have every right to defend themselves if the situation warrants. Why place all the blame on officers? If suspects did not do stupid things in the first place, they would never find themselves in that situation.
Don
said
In reply to several of the other postings, I firmly believe that an unarmed person should not be Tasered unless there is a definite threat to the officers involved. ie the case that was described in which the person to be subdued could overpower the officers.
Marion Bialek
said
Raymond
said
KB
said
sean
said
Steve
said
From what we have seen and heard, it would appear that protocol was not followed in this case. Having the manufacturer involved in the review will allow the panel to compare what happened in real life with what the manufacturer's recommendations are.
MH
said
Zach R.
said
Gun manufacturers have been sued over gun-related deaths by municipalities, they've all been thrown out of court but just so ya know. I think taser international should have the opportunity to defend its product. If it was an investigation into a car the car manufacturer would be involved.
Kevin H. Goligher
said
barbara
said