CTV News | Musharraf invokes emergency rule, gunfire reported

Top Stories -   

Musharraf invokes emergency rule, gunfire reported

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: David Akin on the declaration's effects
CTV Newsnet: Asif Khan, League of Pakistanis
CTV Newsnet: Jamal Jeofry, Pakistan Assoc. of TO
CTV Toronto: Matet Nebres with the local reaction
CTV Newsnet: Sunil Ram, Military analyst

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(30)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Sat. Nov. 3 2007 11:31 PM ET

Gen. Pervez Musharraf sent troops into Pakistan's capital Saturday and suspended the country's constitution. He said he was forced to declare a state of emergency because Islamic extremists were threatening the government's authority.

"With all my conviction, and with all of the facts available to me, I consider that inaction at this moment is suicide for Pakistan," Musharraf said.

But his move has angered many in Pakistan and around the world.

Saturday night, there were reports of aerial gunfire in the city of Karachi. There were also reports that police were rounding up opposition leaders.

Earlier in the day, Musharraf's critics lashed out.

"What you're seeing is the act of a bold, but very desperate man," said Akbar Ahmed, the former Pakistani ambassador to the United Kingdom.

Canada's government also condemned the measures. A statement released by Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier called on Musharraf to "immediately" cancel the state of emergency and the new provisional constitutional order.

"These measures undermine democratic development, judicial independence and the possibility of free and fair elections to which the people of Pakistan are entitled," said Bernier.

"We urge the government of Pakistan to end emergency rule and call on the government to respect judicial processes and reinstate the judiciary, adhere to the rule of law, and allow free and fair parliamentary elections to proceed as planned."

Musharraf invoked the emergency measures on Saturday -- an action the United States called "very disappointing."

In a televised address to the nation, Musharraf said Pakistan was at a "dangerous" juncture due to the constant threat of Islamic extremists. He added that he hoped democracy could be returned to Pakistan after parliamentary elections.

"In my eyes, I say with sorrow that some elements are creating hurdles in the way of democracy," Musharraf said Saturday. "I think this chaos is being created for personal interests and to harm Pakistan."

The country's Supreme Court was to rule in the coming days on whether Musharraf was legally able to run as a presidential candidate in last month's elections, considering he still heads the army.

Musharraf -- who took power in a 1999 military coup -- presented the top court with the declaration of emergency. Seven judges refused to ratify it and ordered the prime minister and military officers not to comply.

"We feel that government has no ground/reason to take extra constitutional steps, particularly for the reasons being published in the newspapers that a high-profile case is pending and is not likely to be decided in favour of the government," the judges wrote in a two-page ruling.

Musharraf's government suspended the country's constitution. It told Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, that his services were no longer required after the judge refused to take an oath under the provisional constitutional order.

Witnesses say Chaudhry -- whom Musharraf had tried unsuccessfully to oust earlier this year -- and other top judges left the court buildings under police escort.

A new chief justice has been named -- Abdul Hameed Dogar.

Military troops are patrolling the capital of Islamabad and blocking roads. Phone lines are down in Islamabad and transmissions by private TV news channels there and in several other cities have been blocked.

Political, military turmoil

Government troops have been battling militants in the northern district of Swat in recent days. The militants there want Islamic Shariah law imposed -- a move that has local support.

In addition, there have been intense clashes in North and South Waziristan, which sits adjacent to Afghanistan.

The violence has significantly flared since government troops stormed the Red Mosque, an Islamist hotbed in Islamabad, in July. Since then, more than 800 people have died in suicide bombings.

In Istanbul, Turkey, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice criticized Musharraf.

"The U.S. has made clear it does not support extra-constitutional measures because those measures take Pakistan away from the path of democracy and civilian rule," she said.

The U.S. sees Musharraf as a key ally in the so-called war on terror.

India, which has fought three wars with Pakistan since 1947, urged a speedy return to "normalcy" and "democracy."

Parliamentary elections are scheduled for January in Pakistan, but it is still unclear how Saturday's development will affect that process.

Benazir Bhutto, a popular opposition leader and former prime minister, ended her eight-year, self-imposed exile and returned to Pakistan last month to take part in those elections after reaching a deal with Musharraf.

"We the political parties are calling for the restoration of the constitution, and for the holding of the elections under an independent election commission," she told the BBC.

The spokesperson for another former prime minister also blasted Musharraf.

"This is the most condemnable act," said Ahsan Iqbal, a spokesperson for the opposition PML-N party of former prime minister Nawaz Sharif. "The whole nation will resist this extra-constitutional measure."

Musharraf barred the exiled Sharif from returning to Pakistan in September to mount a campaign against military rule.

Defence and security analyst Sunil Ram told CTV Newsnet that Musharraf has triggered crises before to keep his grip on power.

"You'll notice that every time a key terrorist/martial law type situation occurs, it is generally right before a political decision is being made on his right to have the duality of being the head of the military as well has the head of the civilian government," he said.

"So this event isn't a surprise."

With files from The Associated Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Tom
said

"The country's constitution has been suspended"??? What does this mean in a country taken over my military coup and for a leader who is not willing to abide by shame elections???


Noa
said

But of course, this anti democraic despotic state of affairs will not make Bush and his buddies attack Pakistan, as it is its ally. Conclusion: Bush doesn't give a **** about promoting democracy. He does care about furthering US big business, always on the expense of the third world. He's ten times worse then Musharaf, Saddam Hussein and Ahmedinajad combined!


Sheeraz Awan
said

This general is power hungry. We have no implementation of law and order in the country. The constitution is a shame. It is extremely unfortunate that a country so well endowed with natural resources is so poor thanks to the inept leadership of the country.
It is a sad day for us Pakistanis to see our country sliding into chaos day by day.


Who cares
said

Please tell me who could ever understand the politics of this country and what they really want.
I think the rest of the world should just write them off.


Art Williams
said

I can only assume that George Bush will be soon be invading to restore democracy. No wait, this is a dictatorship Dubya likes. After all it's fine him to suspend the liberty of people if you're fighting the evil doers of Al Qaeda. Nevermind!


Cool Down!
said

Were there a democratically elected government in power in Pakistan, would Tom and Noa be so vociferous? Were there to be a similar crisis in Canada and the War Measures Act imposed, would they be so vociferous? I suspect the answer to both hypotheticals is a resounding "YES".

Let's see, the Taliban and Al Qaeda subscribe to a brand of Islam that requires, effectively, a return to the Tenth Century and all that implies. I assume from the comments of the above-mentioned posters that they support both of these groups - groups labelled as Terrorist Organizations by the Liberal government of Jean Chretien. Can it be further deduced, then, that they support an rebellious or terrorist group that is against any ruling group not of their political persuasion? Or are they simply the type who must be anti- everything>

While Musharraf's government is not the ideal, it is the government of a nuclear-armed country; be thankful he has held back and not nukes the rebels to paradise!


An Albertan
said

Okay, a simple question for those here more familiar with Pakistan: what do you recommend as a solution to the situation? Keep in mind that hosting extremists that destabilize neighbouring countries is not a long term option.


Jim
said

We all value democracy, and are happy we live in one. Yet our style of democracy has a hard time dealing with violent extremists like the Taliban (who do not want to install democracy in either Afghanistan or Pakistan). It is hard to judge Mushareff's actions objectively. I dislike anyone suspending their constitution, but I very much want him to curb the Taliban and other extremists who use Pakistan as a safe base from which to attack the vulnerable provinces and districts of Afghanistan (and our troops).


PT Konarski
said

Is Pakistan a shatter belt state? The existence of the state as a sovereign entity is on the line. If Pakistan becomes a failed state it will have an unforeseeable effect on the Canadian Mission in Afghanistan!


wayne
said

I guess he would get quite a bit of resistance from the Muslims majority as he is moving away from sharia law and the Muzlim majority may see him as diluting their religous and legal power.


Dani
said

"Emergency" state equals military/dictator state. How interesting that to fight "evil" the PM needs to overthrow the constitution and all forms of democracy that keeps him in check from being "evil" himself. So, by killing democracy and policing people this is how country leaders stop extremists who kill democracy and police people. Sounds like George and Mush have some things in common. I hope that Benazir Bhutto is not further harmed in this power mess.


Allan Eizinas
said

There is profit in chaos!

The Taliban understand this and with other Islamic fundamentalists will gain more power.

But do not fear – we have Canadian troops in Afghanistan on the border of nuclear Pakistan. When George Bush tells Harper to go, our troops as headed by General (kill those scumbags and murderers) Hillier, will go into Pakistan to “fight the fight”.

Good news – Canadian troops out of Afghanistan in 2009.

Bad news – Canadian troops into Pakistan in 2008.


Jon
said

Sure it is easy for many of us to think democracy this, constitution that....compare him to George Bush etc.

One problem this is not a democratic country like Canada and it has nuclear weapons! I don't think any of us now matter how brain washed want Muslim extremeists from any country with a free hand on the "bomb".

If he has to impose martial law to keep law and order, such is life, there isn't much law and order in the Middle East. Unfortunately many Canadians fail to see beyond their own borders.


sunny
said

After 60 years of existence..Pakistan is still struggling to exist.
Democracy is the only way for growth , prosperity and peace for the nation and people.I hope pak doesn't takes too long to understand this.Have a look at their neighbours. A lot to learn from them


Frederick
said

Simple solution: the west should get out and abandon the Middle East and Eastern Asia. Let them sort out their own battles. Our troops should only be employed to protect our direct national interests or to defend our country under direct attack or threat. None of these conditions exist in Afganistan or elsewhere.
Second: we need to get off OIL and develop truly viable alternatives like hydrogen powered systems to replace oil dependent systems. Then we can watch the Middle East count sand grains and begin to see them get serious about catching up to the developed world which means adopting democracy and true market economies becuase they can't depend on oil revenues anymore......
WE get off oil..and all these dictatorial undemocratic regimes lose all sources of revenue to finance and export violent or terroristic ventures elsewhere...


Rebecca
said

If it's worked before, they roll it out again. Same with religious evangelicles. If the people submit, it's just back to whatever works.


Democracy
said

What will happen when the country is by the People of Pakistan!


BOB
said

Musharraf had no other choice but to declare an emergency in Pakistan. I would rather have him in power to protect their nuclear arsenal from the Taliban and al Qaeda. It is time to purge Pakistan of those who would destroy democracy and terrorize the free world.


Jill
said

This country is a mess.Sadly, I don't think anyone , can do any good for them,
I still believe that OBL is hiding there, and has been for years.


Terry G
said

A setback for democracy, but does everyone understand what is at stake here, a nuclear Pakistan controlled by radical Islam.

Mush has no choice, for now.


Jim McB
said

When the Brits pulled out of the area they basically created the conditions for a "theocracy" by making Pakistan a Muslim country. Democracy is crumbling because of religious fundementalist extremism. That is a state of mind fostered by irrational fear and local violence. Politics as we know it cannot overcome these conditions because there is no logic to apply. Strict rule may be essential however unpalatable it may seem.

Trying to understand this situation by taking cheap shots at President Bush also seems to defy logic.

The government will have to be careful on this file, I am surprised that they acted so quickly.



Mark W....A proud Canadian
said

Better the devil you know. Gen. Pervez Musharraf will be kicked out of power or someone will kill him. Then what will happen? If the Islamic extremists get into power then you will have terrorist with nuclear bombs. India will attack. The US will send in more troops. Everything is going to hell. It is going to get a lot worse long before it’s gets better. This will last years. This will last decades. By the time this is over millions will die. Nobody wants to play nice anymore.


Farrukh Aziz
said

Let's not forget what produced Taliban... It was military dictatorship of Zia-Ul-Haq, previous military leader of pakistan who occupied government for 11 years...
If any one thinks that Musharraf can actually get rid of evil in Pakistan, it will stay a dream. Unfortunately, there is no true leader in Pakistan who really cares for the country, since only fudals and powerful people can withstand elections and weak candidates become victims of mysterious attrocities. Musharraf wants all the power in his hands and then be overthrown like Saddam leaving a nuclear state destabilized.


Ray Edmonton
said

I'll bet lots of money that the U.S. State Dept. (Condi Rice) will not condemn or criticize Musharaff for this one.


A Torontonian
said

I think that's the only option that Musharraf had to protect its citizens from Muslim extremists.


Terry G
said

Mark W, your concerns are valid.

Musharraf is the lesser of two evils, as distasteful that is to some.


Doug
said

The Western Governments have been hounding this President for years to get a grip on the Islamic extremists in his country. Those are the same guys who seem to be killing our troops in Afghanistan. Now here he starts doing something, maybe not what we are used to in our country and we condemn him. If you dont want him clamping down which may save western troops, then lets all get out of Afghanistan. If Canada and the US want to stay, then lets hope the President of Pakistan puts an end to all Islamic extremists in his country.


Peter
said

I've got to admit, I don't know what to think of this one. I know that democracy only works when you have an enlightened populace, which, I'm sorry to say, I don't think (for the most part) Pakistan has.

They're also battling al-Qaeda. They've also had security breaches to their nuclear faciltiies by radicals. In cases of extreme emergencies, national security often trumps civil rights (remember Abraham Lincoln's suspension of Habeum Corpus).

Is the general power hungry? I don't know... I will reserve judgement until more unfolds...


D.E. Culbert
said

Lol, Musharraf has fooled many world leaders for many years, especially US presidents. He isn't an ally in the international war on terrorism, he's impeding the process. He's a dangerous man and should be treated as such.

Personally, I think it's time Musharaff took his last breathe. The world nevermind Pakistan, would be a better place without him.

As for his stand on democracy, please, he's no more democratic than that clown in Iran is.


Arshad malik
said

musharaf every day is making a new story in the country for rule. musharaf failed. musharaf will be a very dangerous silent man in the world.

Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz

Most Talked about Stories

The chance of the destruction of our planet is very very small with this collider, but who are these people to decide what risks are acceptable for all of mankind? It puts me at unease and adds to my anxiety. CERN acknowledges that there are miniscule risks -- they admit to it so please spare the convoluted retorts.

kc-bby

Hadron Collider back in action after year of repairs