Politics -
News Sections
Crime bill being used as wedge, opposition says
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(15)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Sun. Oct. 21 2007 6:12 PM ET
Two senior opposition politicians say partisan politics are behind the Conservative government's aggressive pushing of its crime legislation.
The Tackling Violent Crime Act contains some bills that moved through the last session of Parliament. "Seventy-per cent of this omnibus bill ... we agreed to fast-track months ago," Liberal MP David McGuinty told CTV's Question Period.
He believes the Tories' approach is "be afraid. Make everybody afraid of crime, security and terror ... and deflect attention from other issues."
NDP House Leader Libby Davies said she saw the same pattern with the bills. "I feel like we're in some kind of weird 'Twilight Zone'."
Davies said four of the five bills had already passed the House of Commons before Prime Minister Stephen Harper prorogued Parliament.
"The Harper government is actually taking us back to square one," she said.
However, the government has declared the bill to be a matter of confidence, meaning an election would likely result if the bill is defeated.
"Those bills sat around ... without getting through," Conservative House Leader Peter Van Loan told Question Period.
"What we find is the opposition parties, particularly the Liberals, like to say they are tough on crime ... but when it comes time to actually deal with them, they tie them up in committee and then in the Senate and they never become law."
Van Loan said the government wanted to "shine a spotlight" on the crime issue with the omnibus bill.
The only bill the NDP thinks needs more work is one dealing with dangerous offenders, Davies said, but the others could have been reinstated as written.
Justice Minister Rob Nicholson said last week that if dangerous offenders are "the hill they want to die on ... that's their decision."
"We think the bills are fine just the way they are," the minister told Question Period. "We've indicated all along this is a priority for our government."
Van Loan "invited" the opposition parties to fast-track the bill and get it to the Senate as quickly as possible.
Security legislation
The Conservatives will be introducing bills in the coming days that will deal with national security certificates and will reintroduce an attempt to extend certain provisions of Canada's anti-terror laws.
Van Loan said the security certificate bill will be introduced in the House of Commons and the anti-terror legislation will be introduced through the Senate.
Nicholson said it would be up to the prime minister to decide if the anti-terror bills would be matters of confidence in the government.
"These are priorities of our government," he said, adding, "you can draw your own conclusions."
Davies said the Supreme Court ruled the certificates unconstitutional in a decision released last February.
The country's highest court didn't strike the legislation down immediately, but gave the government a year to fix the legislation.
"We'll be examining it very carefully from the point of view of protecting people's rights," she said.
On the anti-terror legislation, McGuinty said the Liberal government of the day "sunsetted" some clauses.
Provisions allowing for investigative hearings of material witnesses and giving police the power to detain people suspected of planning to carry out a terrorist attack for 72 hours.
Those two clauses expired on March 1 after Parliament voted in late February against extending them.
Some Liberals voted with the government for retaining the clauses.
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(15)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
Two questions:
1) What does Mr Colvin personally have to gain by what he is exposing ?
2) What has the Goverment gain or protect by discrediting Mr Colvin?

Comments are now closed for this story
jtk
said
If the Bill is not BAD for the people, then move on with it rather than waste time (and possibly money with another election). This is ludicrous.
jude
said
Bills should be debated. No single party (not CPC, Liberal, or NDP) should act like a majority when they are not, denying the majority of voters who did not support the minority the right to question and even oppose what is presented. It isn't obstructionism, it's democracy.
Sayno
said
Louise Fribance
said
Cliff
said
Now if the Liberals really supported it, it would have passed these stages already, but again the loonie left of the party hijacks the legislation. With the media and public now holding the spotlight on the legislation, lets see if it passes the committee and senate stages.
Lets see if the Liberals really believe what they are now preaching.
Christ
said
Peter
said
DP
said
Roch
said
Liberals like to SAY they are tough on crime ... but when it comes time to actually doing something about it besides talk, they tie crime bills up in committee and then in the Senate and they never become law.
Similiar to the Throne Speech, Liberals SAY they oppose it, but when it times come for action, Liberals disappear.
It is also very ironic that one of main locations affected by crime is the Liberal stronghold Toronto, where they obtain most of their votes.
Perhaps Torontonians actually like their high crime rate?
Jill
said
John
said
hollinm
said
Kathy Williams
said
Following the election, I was one of the voters who thought a minority Gov't would keep participants honest. I was wrong! After watching the political gymnastics in the House of Commons prior to Summer Recess by the Liberals, NDP, Bloc and Liberal Senators; with regard to passing of the Crime bills, I have concluded Canada needs a majority Conservative Gov't in order to get on with the country's business. I do not understand why Liberals, NDP, Bloc and Liberal Senators do not want tougher crime laws? They talk the talk in the House of Commons but do not walk the walk when bills come to be passed. I would like to see the names of the Liberal Senators who oppose the Crime bills printed for public view together with the reason each Liberal Senator is rejecting passage of the bill? Which Liberal Senators are against raising the age of consent for girls from age 14 to age 16 and why? Let's give the CPC the majority they have earned.
Andy L.
said
Jesse
said
Yes they did make such an offer but the NDP came out against it because it violated parliament's duty to study a bill.
Is it to much to expect from the Liberals that they would study a bill, make any suggestions, and then vote it up or down in a resaonable time period? I guess so.