CTV News | Greenpeace hammers Apple over iPhone chemicals

Sci-Tech -   

Greenpeace hammers Apple over iPhone chemicals

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Newsnet: Tech expert Kris Abel on the claims
CTV Newsnet: Zeina Alhajj from Greenpeace

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(6)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Tue. Oct. 16 2007 1:27 PM ET

Environmental watchdog group Greenpeace International has launched an aggressive campaign warning consumers of hazardous chemicals used in Apple's wildly popular iPhone.

Scientists at the Greenpeace Research Laboratories in Britain found iPhones analyzed in their labs tested positive for reactive brominated flame retardants and phthalates plasticisers.

Greenpeace says some of the chemicals are labeled in Europe as "toxic to reproduction" and interfere with sexual reproduction in mammals.

"Phthalate is a chemical that is hormone destructive, therefore it will affect the immune system and the reproductive system," Greenpeace International spokesperson Zeina Alhajj told CTV Newsnet on Tuesday from Amsterdam.

None of the four phthalates found in the study are permitted for use in components of toys or childcare articles sold in Europe.

While iPhones themselves are not harmful, Alhajj cautioned that PVC chemicals may become hazardous, depending on how consumers use the product.

"The headphone cables had 1.5 per cent by weight phthalate in it. People sometimes chew on these cables and this is the risk that we are raising," Alhajj said.

"High levels of phthalate in children's toys were banned because children suck on these toys, which is the reason why they were banned within countries in the EU and within certain states in the United States."

The Apple iPhone is not classified as a toy within the European Union.

Greenpeace is campaigning for the use of such chemicals to be barred from all electronics products, saying that people who handle electronic waste are adversely affected.

"What we have seen from the electronic devices, that when they end up becoming waste and they are trashed in countries like China, India or Africa, people who are trashing these devices are inhaling or are subject to these hazardous chemicals and therefore it is affecting them and the environment around them," Alhajj said.

Apple is refuting the claims, adding that the company is at the forefront of environmental practices to eliminate the use of potentially harmful chemicals.

A recent document entitled "A Greener Apple" from Apple co-founder Steve Job states:

"Apple has been criticized by some environmental organizations for not being a leader in removing toxic chemicals from its new products, and for not aggressively or properly recycling its old products. Upon investigating Apple's current practices and progress towards these goals, I was surprised to learn that in many cases Apple is ahead of, or will soon be ahead of, most of its competitors in these areas.

The document goes on to detail Apple's current environmental initiatives including its campaign to phase out the use of brominated flame retardants and PVC's.

"Apple began phasing out PVC twelve years ago and began restricting BFRs in 2001. For the past several years, we have been developing alternative materials that can replace these chemicals without compromising the safety or quality of our products. Today, we've successfully eliminated the largest applications of PVC and BFRs in our products, and we're close to eliminating these chemicals altogether."

Apple plans to completely eliminate the use of PVC and BFRs in its products by the end of 2008, but Greenpeace says this is not soon enough.

"We know that other companies have eliminated (PVCs). There are no PVCs used, for example, in mobile phones for Nokia. A leader of innovation like Apple should take leadership and not just in design but in the environment," Alhjj said.

Please Add Comments( )

Bob from Montreal
said
0 0

Instead of picking on one company and one product, if they want to do things properly they should do their studies on a number of different companies with similar products.

If they want to do a study on cellphones, fine but I am sure that they will find the same type of problems on a lot more than just APPLE.

Let's be fair or unfair to everyone equally.



Jeff Robillard
said
0 0

It is bad to only pick on one manufacturer for a product not intended for children. If Greenpeace wanted to be fair, they should have reported evenly on all the top cellphone manufacturers for units intended for children.

Sick of it
said
0 0

Great! Yet again an activist group sets out to protest something they feel is against the greater good. If we were to follow the advice of every activist group, we would live nude, existing on water and little else, and live in caves.

Rather than complain and protest against everything, perhaps these groups should invest their time and effort in something constructive - like finding an alternate material that could be used in the construction of i-phones etc, one that - to their standards - is no threatening to life in general.

Ken Boldt
said
0 0

For those attacking Greenpeace for only studying one company I urge you to read:

"We know that other companies have eliminated (PVCs). There are no PVCs used, for example, in mobile phones for Nokia. A leader of innovation like Apple should take leadership and not just in design but in the environment," Alhjj said.

Also, Apple is a highly recognizable name in electronics, and they pride themselves on innovation. I think that Greenpeace is trying to point out that they, probably more than most other companies, have an opportunity to lead by example.

Janus
said
0 0

Somehow this reflects more poorly on Greenpeace than on Apple.

The iPhone complies with Restriction of Hazardous Substances guidelines, so this isn't really about Apple.

Of course if you EAT the iPhone, it may be hazardous to your health.


Chris
said
0 0

I have been an environmentalist since the mid 70s and lost my respect for this group many years ago.


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz