News Sections
Manley to head Canada's Afghan mission review
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(25)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Fri. Oct. 12 2007 6:14 PM ET
Prime Minister Stephen Harper has officially named a five-member panel to advise on the future involvement of Canada in Afghanistan.
Harper said at a news conference in Ottawa on Friday that the group was non-partisan and will come up with recommendations on a course of action for when Canada's NATO commitment in Afghanistan expires in February 2009.
Former Liberal deputy prime minister John Manley will head the group, which includes:
- Derek Burney, Canada's former ambassador to Washington and former chief of staff to Brian Mulroney
- Respected broadcaster Pamela Wallin, who was Canadian consul general in New York
- Former Progressive Conservative cabinet minister Jake Epp
- Paul Tellier, former Clerk of the Privy Council and former president and CEO of Canadian National Railway and Bombardier
Harper said he has asked the panel to examine four main options for the future of the Afghanistan mission:
- Option One -- continue training the Afghan army and police with the goal of creating a self-sufficient indigenous security force in Kandahar province so that Canadian troops can withdraw in February 2009
- Option Two -- focus on reconstruction work in Kandahar, which would require other countries to take over security role
- Option Three -- shift Canadian security and reconstruction efforts to another region in Afghanistan
- Option Four -- withdraw all Canadian military forces after February 2009 except for small contingent to provide security for aid workers and diplomats
Harper said the panel is also free to consider other options but that in the end Parliament will ultimately decide which route to take.
Manley, who was alongside Harper for the announcement, said Afghanistan represents an enormous opportunity for Canada to play a meaningful role in a globally significant arena.
Still, he said Afghanistan also represents a massive challenge to Canada's resources and capabilities.
"In carrying out our work the panel will be cognizant of the sacrifice Canadians have already made in helping the Afghan people, as well as progress achieved and challenges remaining," said Manley.
He said the panel will also consider the overarching objectives of the United Nations and NATO missions in Afghanistan.
NATO wants Canada to keep combat troops in Afghanistan after February 2009 -- a course of action Harper supports.
Harper dismissed suggestions he's trying to avoid debate on Afghanistan.
"You know the government can't take the issue off the table,'' he told a news conference, with Manley by his side.
"Afghanistan is a major public policy issue and it will be addressed in (next week's) throne speech. What I've said the government wants to do . . . is make sure we have a rational and considered debate.''
Deciding Canada's role once the current mission expires in February 2009 promises to be the hottest issue in Parliament when it resumes sitting next week.
NDP Leader Jack Layton has already reacted to the proposal, saying elected officials should be directing policy on Afghanistan.
Germany
Germany's lower house of Parliament voted 454-79 on Friday to support the extension of that country's mission in Afghanistan for another year.
Chancellor Angela Merkel had argued strongly for keeping the troops there, saying Germany must not "leave Afghanistan in the hands of the terrorists."
Germany's 2,800 ground troops are in northern Afghanistan, where there is relatively little insurgent activity. Europe's largest nation has balked at the idea of having them take part in the heavy fighting in the south.
Canada's 2,500 troops are operating in Kandahar province, one of the most volatile in Afghanistan. Seventy-one Canadian soldiers and one diplomat have died in Afghanistan since 2002.
Meanwhile, Mullah Omar called Friday for Afghanistan's neighbours to help the Taliban topple the government of President Hamid Karzai and force foreign troops out of the country.
The fugitive leader's message was carried on a website known to be used by Islamist militant groups.
The message hasn't been confirmed yet, nor is it clear when it was posted. However, the message carried a greeting for the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Fitr, which is set for Saturday in Canada.
Karzai has made peace overtures to the insurgents. But the Taliban and warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, leader of the militant group Hezb-i-Islami, have said foreign troops must leave first.
Afghanistan is going through its most violent year since the Taliban were overthrown in 2001. An estimated 5,100 people have died so far this year in insurgency-related violence.
With files from The Associated Press
User Tools
Related Stories
CTV News
Canada in Afghanistan
The latest news, photos and interactives from Canada's mission in Afghanistan.
Bios and Pictures
Canadian Casualties
We remember those who lost their lives in Afghanistan since the mission began in 2002.
In Pictures
Hockey night in Kandahar
Hockey night in Kandahar? Soldiers let off steam playing desert ball hockey.
Corrections Canada
Corrections Canada and Canadian Forces reconstruct and train at an infamous Afghan prison.
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(25)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.








Please Add Comments( )
cadguy
0
said
0
Gary
0
said
0
allan
0
said
0
Judy
0
said
0
Young Vet
0
said
0
WHY is Canada taking on the lion's share of this??? We've close to twice the casualties of all other NATO countries combined this year. Ask yourself WHY???
Just Cynical
0
said
0
However, getting such a panel would be contrary to what the politicians want, so why even bother with the cost of a panel in the first place?
Ryan
0
said
0
Chris
0
said
0
Wes
0
said
0
Allan Eizinas
0
said
0
If/when Harper realizes that this is/was a mistake and a political millstone around his neck he will initiate a Canadian troop “extrication”. Then he will not have to admit to a mistake but instead take the credit for following an “impartial” panel’s advice.
This is good politics. He should have done this 2 years ago so we wouldn’t be stuck in there today.
GG
0
said
0
to redeploy our troops to other parts of Afghanistan (leave Kandahar )and continue to re-develop the country, support, lead diplomatically, provide aid, train Afghan troops or; leave altogether. The ONLY way we should stay in Kandahar is if the US leaves Iraq and redeploys in Kandahar and other parts of Afghanistan to assume the combat and we can stay there to assist the re-development and provide basic security for the region. In that way we will have honoured our fallen soldiers and completed our mission. The panel is NOT necessary. Get on with it Harper. The country is watching.
Paul Connolly
0
said
0
The Panel is just a way to masque Harper's true feelings about military activity - witness his close relationship with George W. Bush in the USA and the PM of Australia John Howard, all very Hawkish men.
Mark
0
said
0
GG
0
said
0
Graham
0
said
0
David
0
said
0
Doug
0
said
0
His work,though,could ultimately be in vain,since it is clear it will be parliament that has the final debate and decision.It is clear that the BLOC has no interest in keeping Canadian troops there.The NDP has been wanting immediate withdrawl for a long time.I suspect they are going to keep that position no matter what the report says.In fact,I would think that neither the NDP or the BLOC will allow any of their members to vote freely on the issue.
The up side is,that both of the major parties might be able to set aside the partisan nature of this decision.I think both Mr.Harper,and Mr.Dion would be more than happy to do that.
Jason
0
said
0
Roch
0
said
0
For political enthusiasts like myself, the strategic political brilliance being displayed by Canada's New Government has been wonderful to witness.
ance
0
said
0
This issue is too important and complicated to expect simple, politically driven solutions to be satifactory.
Put bluntly, I don't trust politicians to make the best choice.
My only question would be, why not include a retired military person such as Romeo Dallaire?
I'm thinking he'd definitely have something to offer beyond simplistic rhetoric about how best to really help in Afghanistan.
I will reiterate that part of any continued Canadian participation should include at least a request if not a demand that the Afghan Government implement a secular justice system that includes fair treatment for women and girls.
The Campbells
0
said
0
Matt
0
said
0
There is a valid debate to be had over what role Canada should be playing.
I think a capable panel of respected people can help make this a fact based debate of what is really best for Afghanistan and ourselves and not simply run according to the latest public opinion poll.
Todd
0
said
0
Jeremy
0
said
0
Pete
0
said
0
Putting together a diverse and non-partisan group such as this is the only logical way to assess a situation as serious as future commitment to Afganistan. One would hope that conclusions reached by this group will have clarity and no political bias.