CTV News | Tories get war room ready for possible election

Top Stories -   

Tories get war room ready for possible election

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife reports
Mike Duffy Live: Experts on the election possibility
CTV Newsnet: Bill Pristanski, Tory strategist
CTV Newsnet: Geoff Norquay, strategist for Tories

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(61)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Fri. Oct. 5 2007 8:55 PM ET

With reports today that Conservatives have told political operatives to get the campaign "war rooms" ready, all parties are getting ready to blame each other for the possiblity of triggering a fall election.

The Liberals say the Tories are trying to confuse Canadians about which party wants to trigger a federal election.

Liberal MP Ruby Dhalla told CTV's Mike Duffy Live Friday that "On one hand (the Conservatives) continue to say that we don't want to go into an election campaign. On the other hand they are doing everything to ensure they are ready, and I think that they should really start looking at the needs of Canadians."

Dhalla added that she doesn't believe Canadians want to go the polls any time soon.

"I've spoken to many Canadians on the ground and I don't think anyone at this point wants an election except for Stephen Harper and the Conservatives," she said.

Dhalla's comments came after a Tory strategist told CTV Newsnet that the Conservative government doesn't want an election but is trying to be prudent in preparing for one.

Geoff Norquay told CTV Newsnet on Friday that the opposition parties have been drawing lines in the sand about supporting the government's throne speech, scheduled to be delivered on Oct. 16.

"If we have one, it's really up to the opposition parties," he said.

The Globe and Mail reported that federal Tory organizers have been told to have their election campaign offices ready to go on Oct. 20. Meanwhile, candidates have been told to immediately start canvassing constituents.

Campaign chairman Doug Finley gave the directives during a conference call with candidates Thursday, it said.

Finley also reportedly said that there would be four or five items in the throne speech that the opposition parties would find absolutely unacceptable.

New Democrat MP Paul Dewar told Mike Duffy Live that his party will listen to the throne speech before making any decisions about whether the party will support it. He said the NDP wants to focus on Canada's mission in Afghanistan, the prosperity gap, and the environment.

"People know where we're at," Dewar said. "The question is: what are the other parties going to do?"

Sources confirmed that campaign workers have been told to be in place at the Ottawa war room on Oct. 18 -- the day the first throne speech vote could take place. Throne speech votes are confidence votes, so if the opposition parties vote down the speech, an election could be triggered.

Organizers also told the newspaper that Finley said three different election dates are currently being debated.

Two separate campaign lengths are being discussed, one of five weeks and another of six. A shorter campaign period is preferable to allow less time for errors, at least one senior official told The Globe.

"As far as Mr. Finley's comments, I think he was simply being prudent," Norquay said. "We'd look pretty stupid if there were an election and we weren't ready. So we'll be ready."

Harper: 'No intention'

Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Wednesday he has no intention of calling a fall election, but will not bow to pressure from opposition parties who have demanded changes to the government's agenda.

"The choice is not an election or obstruction, the choice is an election or give the government the mandate to govern," Harper said in his first news conference at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa since taking office.

Bloc Quebecois Leader Gilles Duceppe has outlined five "non-negotiable" conditions he wants the government to meet in its Oct. 16 throne speech, including an end to Canada's combat mission in Afghanistan by February 2009.

Liberal Leader Stephane Dion has also made demands, including clarification over the Afghanistan mission and the support of Bill C-30 on climate change.

"Obviously, if we don't get approval, the opposition will force an election. That's not my preferred course of action, but if they force that, we'll be ready for it," Harper said Wednesday.

Harper said if the opposition supports the throne speech it must also back subsequent legislation that flows from it -- which suggests Ottawa could designate a series of bills as confidence matters.

One Conservative insider said those bills would come quickly after the House reopens. The Globe reports they will include a fall economic update and legislation designed to toughen criminal-justice laws.

Harper said he believes that an election would likely result in another minority government. With four political parties securing a minimum of 20 seats each, it would be difficult for any side to win a majority of votes, he added.

A Harris-Decima Research poll for The Canadian Press released Wednesday gave the Tories 33 per cent support and the Liberals 31 per cent. That puts them in a statistical tie, given the margin of error of 3.1 percentage points. The NDP is at 16 per cent support, and the Green party at 10 per cent.

Please Add Comments( )

John Barzo
said
0 0

Mr. Dion should throw caution to the wind, and announce now that there is going to be a fall election. It would make it appear that he is calling the shots, and add some leadership cache that heretofore appears to be lacking. Make a big announcement now, in front of party faithful and the cameras with lots of "rah rah". Have some fun! Let's have an old fashion bare knuckles election. Go Now!!!


Ben
said
0 0

Good! it's time another 30 liberals lost their seats and some bloc, the conservatives are the one true federalist party in Quebec, if only the liberals didn't steal 100million of the taxpayers dollars, they might be too.

Brian A
said
0 0

As a Liberal, an election happening may be a blessing in disguise. Dion is having a lot of problems on a variety of fronts. Maybe an election is the kind of trial by fire that he needs to rise to the occasion.


Fitz
said
0 0

Great! Bring it on. Some of the opposition demands are clearly obstructionist, especially those of the separatists. As many of its members need to be re-elected in order to cash in on the Parliamentary "gravy train" of pension benefits, their action seems that of shooting one's self in the foot.

Mike
said
0 0

The opposition parties have nothing to offer.
Liberals are out to lunch and probably on my tax dollars, the NDP are socialists and only care if we are in a union (THANK GOD OUR MILITARY IS NOT UNIONIZED OR THEY WOULD HAVE THEM ON STRIKE) and the bloc want their own country.
Well I guess the only thing to do is vote for the Harper conservatives that are not afraid to speak out for the average Canadian.
Go Conservatives Go


Tom
said
0 0

The election outcome seems almost without question that we will have another conservative minority government. Makes me wonder if the election system itself is flawed in this regard. A lot of tax payers money, time, and effort to find out what we already know. We’re having elections based on no confidence votes and rejected throne speeches. Really not sure if anyone else out there could do a better job than the Harper gov't right now anyway. I would vote NDP if it didn't seem like such a wasted vote. The once great liberal party seems ......well.....I think I'll leave that alone!

shamaro
said
0 0

I am not very keen on having yet another Federal election, right after we have a provincial election here in Ontario. The opposition parties should sit up and take note that most Canadians don’t want another Federal Election, leave the current minority government in power and let Canada get on with business. I for one think the current government is doing a good job, at least decisions are being made and there is no dithering. Let's do what's best for Canada and not have an election.

Earl Robert
said
0 0

Each of the opposition parties made threats as if they have the right to determine when the next election will be held. The Bloc, the Liberals and the NDP have nothing to loose, or do they?



Norm
said
0 0

I am not surprised. Given the events of the last few days, unless the Opposition is bluffing, an election seems inevitable. Why not prepare? It makes sense and is better to have a plan in place rather than leave it to chance. Yet, leaving all of that aside, I am surprised the current government is not "flagging" the great economic news in Canada and at least taking some of the credit, since it is occuring on their watch. Just look at today's report on the CTV website: " Canada's unemployment rate dipped below six per cent for the first time in 33 years in September, falling to 5.9 per cent, as the economy continued to churn out jobs at an astonishing pace."

I for one, give some of the credit to Prime Minister Harper and the confidence people have in his strong leadership and sound approach to managing the affairs of our country. Keep up the good work.



Robert
said
0 0

"Finley also reportedly said that there would be four or five items in the Throne Speech, scheduled for Oct. 16, which the opposition parties would find absolutely unacceptable."

"Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Wednesday he has no intention of calling a fall election"

What? Obviously if he has 4 or 5 items that are unacceptable he's causing an election.



Greg from Kitchener
said
0 0

Bring on the election!
Give Harper the Majority!
I am such a proud Canadian now that we have a real leader and Government!
I am ready!



JTJ
said
0 0

Hey man!!! The best news I've heard since the birth of my second child. Bring it on and let's have a majority government so we can end this non sense of always talking elections. Let's see how the Liberals and Bloc Quebecois react once they have lost their seats and have no more power to call these stupid elections...


Frank
said
0 0

Harper is supposed to work with these Opposition Leaders to include their suggestions/demand that reflects Canadians needs. Instead, Harper wants his own way!

I will never vote for any Conservatives in the next election because the Liberal party is the best one to govern in the minority government because they did work with the Opposition Leaders to find a way to include their demands. It works. But Harper never used this kind of the model!

Michael (Ottawa)
said
0 0

Leave the government alone and let Canada get on with its business or you pay at the polls. That was essentially the Prime Ministers message to the obstructionist Liberals who have been holding up critical legislation and doing all they can to be a pain in the ... The Liberals would rather play politics than be a good opposition.


Frank
said
0 0

I am sorry to say that Harper is so bullying to these Opposition Parties because he wants his own ways!

For example, any bills that Conservatives bring into the Parliament- Harper wants this bill to be passed without any amendments comprise from each parties, and etc. Harper just wants his bill to be passed in his own ideas/ideology which he thinks that it is the BEST one for Canadians.

Hello! Harper is not in the majority government! He is acting like one! Stop it! Harper should act like minority government leader to work with these Opposition Parties to include some of his policies that reflects Canadians needs.

People who voted NDP, Liberal, and Bloc Quebecois- these parties are delivering their policies from the voters that would like to work with Harper. But Harper IGNORES it! That s not right!


Dennis LeDrew
said
0 0

This election needs to happen, more than ever. We have an extremely unstable Opposition that is too distracted with its own Party issues to help govern this minority or a potentially subsequent Parliament effectively. As such, after two minority Governments, it is time that we had the stability of a majority. The Liberals are too busy with constant internal Party squabbles to even function as an Opposition let alone challenging for Government. Well, that leaves only one real option for Government and one real alternative for a new Opposition. I don't think that needs to be spelled out who those should be.

peppy9
said
0 0

I'm liking the comments so far here...better than any poll...The Libs and Conservative tied in the polls? Ya, right...We'll see...Bring it on!
Harper deserves a majority. Best leader this country had in many, many decades.


AJW
said
0 0

Another election? Why? All the billions of dollars that is spent on an election campaign, which is not necessary at this time, could go towards social programs, transportation and infrastructure and the environment.

Hello.


Chris
said
0 0

This is great news. The country needs a Conservative majority. I am looking forward to the Liberals being wiped out for a generation. Bring it on.


Kyle
said
0 0

Why is the Bloc considered a Federal party in the first place? They don't represent national interest and only screws up election results. If they weren't recognized as a federal party, I don't think we would see the Minority government as often as we have recently. We need a Conservative majority in order to get things back on track in this country.



D.R. - Calgary
said
0 0

Frank. The Conservatives were the ones who made the minority Liberal government work. They supported more than one of the Liberal bills. Dion supports nothing. Who exactly is not making it work there, Frank?

noel
said
0 0

I hope PM Harper and the Conservatives get a majority. I for one am very proud of all the progress they have made in such a short time. My God the Liberals ruled for 13 years and all we received was lip service, and a lighter wallet. 100 Million stolen from hard working Canadians. Keep up the great job PM Harper you have made me proud to be Conservative and Canadian!

Dave
said
0 0

So once again the school yard bully says everything my way or else. Of course it will be everyone else who is to blame if an election is called. Great leaders are not dictators.

JSmith
said
0 0

The hypocrisy of Harper is reaching new height when he says that opposition parties are obstructionists, when in fact he authored a 100 pages manual on how to stall the parliament. Newsflash Harper, you have a minority government and I'm not sure you have the modicum of maturity required for the job.


Peter
said
0 0

I was always under the impression that a minority Government might be the best Government for the people, but in this case I have been proven wrong. Instead of the four major parties coming together to make things better for the Canadian people, it just seems that they have lost interest in us all. I realize it is the opposition’s job to oppose what the party in power and in this case the Conservatives party has offer, if they don’t think it is good for Canadians. But this time around all three of the opposition parties the Bloc, NDP and the Liberals have slammed the Harper Conservative Government on ever-single issue. I don’t think that Prime Minister Harper could bend over to tie his shoes, but to have these three opposition parties say that he is doing it wrong. I for one think that Prime Minister Harper is doing a good job considering the lack of help he is getting from the other three major parties.



ET
said
0 0

Harper, after talking about consensus for the last year, all of a sudden laying out a throne speech in a minority parliament, with no consensus from the other parties is BEGGING for an election. And if he doesn't get one on the throne speech, he'll get one from a series of confidence votes. Sniff, sniff! He smells power...here he goes trippin'! Maybe people will finally see almost some of the right-wing agenda the guy's got. His priorities are extremely misplaced and nobody has seen his true agenda yet.

johnn
said
0 0

Frank said
"Harper is supposed to work with these Opposition Leaders to include their suggestions/demand that reflects Canadians needs. Instead, Harper wants his own way!"

Frank, do you mean to say that our government is to set aside its own priorities, and to implement the oppositions' leftist and socialists programs?
We democratically, and according to the rules, elected a Conservative government.
Let them govern, and if the opposition parties can't go along with that, let THEM vote down the current government, and cause an election.


Steve B
said
0 0

Harper must be laughing all the way to the ballot box. He can't lose. The Liberals are are in full-scale internal revolt, have no organization worth speaking of, and no money. The Bloc are sagging, the NDP are, well, the NDP.

Harper has tried to work with the opposition, but they're trying to force him to take Canada in a direction that would be ethically and morally incorrect.

Before Harper, I was embarrassed to call myself Canadian. Now, things are getting better.


Max
said
0 0

It's funny the number of people that think that a minority gov't automatically makes the gov't a servant and order taker to the opposition.

This isn't the case. Harper, for better or worse is running things as he see's fit - and largely as advertised.

The gov't isn't kowtowing to the opposition because they are in a weak position.

If they weren't, they'd pull the trigger on an election regardless of the throne speech, so let's not pretend otherwise.

The "engineering their own defeat" noise from the opposition is just sour grapes from those that want to make a decision without having to wear it.




Jake
said
0 0

Stephen Harper's leadership and vision of lower taxation and reduced national debt, among other things, has made me optimistic and hopeful for Canada's future economic strength and global competitiveness.

I am an under-30 Ontario voter and very optimistic for the first time to have federal leadership that is strenghthening Canada's potential domestically and internationally!

It is up to the Ontario populace to wake-up and stop perpetuating the socialism and pessimism that the previous Liberals have instilled on Canada. This Ontario voter will proudly support PM Harper during the next election!





Alan
said
0 0

Frank,

Why is the government SUPPOSED to work that way?

The government is SUPPOSED to govern. The Opposition is supposed to oppose. The government is NOT supposed to simply manage a cacophony of often-contradictory demands from the opposition parties.

The many people who voted for Conservatives MPs actually wanted the kind of country the Conservatives were talking about. That’s why we voted for them. People vote for who they want ‘in government’ not who they think will lead the best compromise.

I suspect some may NOT have voted for the Conservatives BECAUSE of the Liberal/NDP perennially fear-mongering spin. Most people likely realize that for what it was and still is… nonsense!

According to the Liberals/NDP, Harper is simultaneously smart AND stupid. He’s masterfully manipulates and conceals a ‘secret agenda’ (while he supposedly ignores a media who can uncover dirt almost anyone anywhere) BUT he apparently doesn’t have a clue how to fix a messed up, over-taxed, ideologically drifting country with no international identity beyond being tepid soup!

Flat out – Harper is smart. There is nothing scary about Harper’s leadership or intelligent, informed action or the platform of his party. The Conservatives know the way to build a better Canada is to govern. You govern by making decision when IN GOVERNMENT, not by bowing to demands of those who are not in government.

Nice argument Frank… but that’s why the Conservatives are called (and I expect will be) “the Government”… a.k.a. the ‘governing party’.

If you want ‘compromise specialists’ who talk and smile while no one is winning… join a union. But please… keep them out of government.


Brian
said
0 0

The mood in Canada has shifted in the last 5 years politically. I think we'll be seeing a Conservative majority. Why not?! Harper is doing excellent, and Canada finally has a real leader who understands the average Canadian problems.


Ray Jacques
said
0 0

Johnn,
Canadian politics 101:
The result of our vote was a minority government. The ONLY way Harper can govern is to work with and gain the support of at least some of the Opposition Parties in order to secure their support for the majoruty votes needed to enact any laws or else the government falls or alternately can do nothing.
Harper also does NOT understand this principle (of course he does - he just playing politics again and treating Candians as the ibbeciles he truly thinks we are)



Canadian
said
0 0

We could not possibly have a more embarassing party running this country.

Nearly 70% of Canadians oppose the banal morality of this regime and their support of the US war of Terror.

Yes, mini-Bush be another Joe Clark...be just another embarrassment to Canada and this party's naive supporters.


LH
said
0 0

The Conservatives need to get going and the Liberals need to come back into power. $64 Million for drug addiction? Yet he just goes and gives everyone with a child under the age of 6 $100.00 a month instead of opening up more daycare subsidy spaces like the Liberals were going to do? Go to Nova Scotia (I moved to Ontario in 2003) and as a single parent try to find a good job and afford child care. $100.00 is a slap in the face especially if your kid is in school and you work 3-11:30 nights. You don't get anything that way. All I see is people on welfare sitting at home with their kids in daycare on a "therapeutic refefral" and the get the $100.00. I am a single mom working full time with a 7 year old. I don't get anything.... that's really fare. Here in Ontario you can get subsidy, which I have thankfully. Nova Scotia you can't. A lady on CH news last night said it perfectly... A parent needs to be just that.... a parent instead of a best friend. There is a huge difference between disipline and abuse and growing up if I deserved a good crack on my behind with a wooden spoon, I got it. I turned out just fine. I am a single parent, working full time and contributing to society instead of sitting my rear on welfare. We need daycare subsidy not tougher drug inforcement. Come into the 21st century and leagalize weed and no I don't smoke it.


Marcos
said
0 0

The current governing party is slowly destroying Canada. Go ahead keep them there, and a few years no one will recognize this country for its greatness.


Matt from out West
said
0 0

It's interesting that the anti-Liberals keep bringing up 100 million dollars being stolen from tax-payers. Well, at least that money stayed in Canada. I seem to recall Harper allowing 1 billion dollars in illegal tariffs to remain in the US.

Or if you want to keep dragging out old history, let's crucify the Diefenbaker Conservatives for axing the Avro Arrow project. How many billions of dollars did that decision remove from our once powerful aerospace industry. Yes, that's right, I'm going to hold a grudge against the Conservatives for that.

I'd rather lose another $3.30 to a Liberal boondoggle than be governed by Conservatives any longer.


MarkW
said
0 0

Like our premier, Danny Williams, said: Just vote ABC. "Anything But Conservative"


MM
said
0 0

The fact that PM Harper is considering that he might have to go into an election shows that he is a true leader. At least he is not foolish enough to assume that he cannot lose. All the opposition parties are bullying that they would topple his government if he does not play nicely. Why shouldn't he be prepared? Real leaders don't cower; they get ready for a fight. I think the opposition should be doing the same if they are serious about bringing him down. The question is – who is going to benefit? Reading the comments above, it seems to me that Canada has warmed up to Steven and does not see him that “scary” anymore. So bring it on – let’s elect him again and let him govern! He is doing an excellent job!
Go Conservatives Go!



Rob Z
said
0 0

Come on, Harper! Canadians do not want another election! But if there does happen to be one, I hope Canadians wake up and vote in an NDP government for a change. At least they stick to their principles and have helped provide Canadians with results!


Terry N
said
0 0

The kind of Reform we can look forward to?
1) elimination of publicly-funded healthcare (and without the opportunity to plan for this reality from the time when we were young).
2) diversion of all major Canadian rivers south (and just a few people profit from it).
3) working harder to export oil and taking only a miniscule cut of revenue to invest back into Canada.
4) mass importing of radioactive nuclear waste.
5) inviting terrorism via our deteriorating foreign policy.
6) labeling people as criminals because their values don't match those of the religious right.

A little further down the road?
7) being in-league with a wild-west-style international cowboy-crusader-gang that wages war on religious & economic grounds?
8) amendment of the constitution to make sure the right party is always in power to serve cons at home & abroad?
9) the engineered break up of Canada? Looking back, recounting: "It all started in Calgary, my grandchildren. There was a disgruntled extremist group bent on Reform. They were clever enough to capitalize on the errors of political opponents and then to buy & exploit Quebec, but the purchase & political exploitation of Quebec was, of course, unsustainable and eventually ... and this gave Alberta an opportunity to appear reasonable in deciding to ..."
10) Perhaps quasi-military rule? Jail media dissidents and the like to 'clean up' society? Maybe they won't go that far, but it sure feels like they might wish this would be acceptable to the mainstream. I feel threatened expressing my opinion for the first time in my life.

Rule by threat? "If we don't get what we want, you're going to live with an election-gun trained on your head. We will not accept that you did not give us a majority -- we will advance our agenda by any means necessary."

That's what I'm hearing.

Mr. Dion: You *may* have to sacrifice face in the short term in order to save Canada for the long term. Save your strength -- we are counting on you. You may need to appear to give in to threats in the short term, but we are counting on you to subvert your aggressors in the long run and regain the mainstream for moderates. We must not allow the Reform agenda to succeed.

I call on fellow Canadians to join me in throwing our collective weight behind Mr. Dion.


Brent
said
0 0

I think that the government should pass a bill that says in order to be declared an official party that you must run candidates in all ridings. This would stop the Bloc from all there grandstanding


Ryan
said
0 0

The opposition said it will not compromise on there values and neither will the government. With all the threats being thrown around by the opposition of course the governement has to prepare for an election. The NDP has been prepared for months, so has the Bloc.
It does not mean the Conservatives want an election. There is still a chance the government will continue but what Harper is doing is saying the ball is in the opposition's court.
If I were Harper I would have a couple of my MPs out of town so that more then one opposition party has to vote in favour, see if Jack Layton is really dedicated to making Parliament work.


Still a Reformer
said
0 0

I decided about 12 years ago that Politics was about what I wanted to get done. At that time the "Conservative" Party was far too Liberal and so I switched over to the Reform Party. I am going to switch again if Harper & Company refuse to offend certain parties enough!


Linda
said
0 0

Well,I'd rather have an election on an bill before parliament than the rather general nature of a throne speech.
Secondly, yes, it is up to a minority government to work with the opposition. However, it is also up to the opposition parties to realize who the government is. Both sides of the house need to find realistic middle ground on may issues. I think the NDP is the most ideological party in the house. When have they ever debated anything with the idea of compromising. I have to agree that Mr.Harper is equally guilty, and the Liberals don't know from one day to the next. All parties have to be willing to accomodate. If they did, they could all have something to give back to their supporters.
I voted for Mr.Harper in the last election,and have liked most of what he has done. I think he is right on Afganistan,on the general economy,on the direction we should go to cut pollution,and a host of crome bills.
However,I will vote for someone else the next time. Primarily because his so called "new drug strategy" is a bust. I agree there are some elements that could be useful. But his decision to go on criminalizing people in possession, or using small amounts of marijuana is totally out of touch.
He did leave himself a bit of "wiggle room" by referencing "serious drug crimes". But I doubt he will move an inch.
I think he will keep his base support,but lose most of the more moderates who voted for him the last time.His heavy handed approach will cause many to believe that perhaps the accusations of neo-cons,or religious right, or hidden agenda may actually have some truth to them.
I can hold my nose and vote for one of the lefties. With some regret, I must admit.


johnn
said
0 0

Ray Jacques said:
"Canadian politics 101:
The result of our vote was a minority government. The ONLY way Harper can govern is to work with and gain the support of at least some of the Opposition Parties in order to secure their support .....
Harper also does NOT understand this principle".

I think that Prime Minister Harper understands politics better that a hundred of you, me and Stéphane Dion put together.
If I follow your reasoning correctly, we should elect a minority Liberal government, who would then, according to your "Canadian politics 101" implement the Conservative policies.
PROBLEM: To elect a Liberal government, there has to be a viable Liberal party.
Perhaps in ten years? Hope springs eternal . . .




Jeff S.
said
0 0

Harper couldn't ask for a better time to orchestrate an election. The Liberals are in free fall, the Bloc are has-beens and the NDP are a glorified fringe party.

When the opposition parties forced the election in 2005, the Conservatives were 7 or 8 points behind the Liberals in the polls. Once an election is called in 2007, the Conservatives will gain the additional 7 or 8 points they need to secure a majority.

Once the public focuses on what the leaders have to offer, there will be no other rational choice. Can you imagine Harper vs. Dion in a televised debate? Dion's inability to speak fluent English will surely seal his fate.


Eric Mailloux
said
0 0

Considering the vast majority of comments are in support of the Conservatives, I can only assume they have already unleashed their election machine to go forth and spread the warped facts the conservatives use to manipulate the public. Go ahead and have your majority Tory government and five years from now you'll come to your senses and bring the Libs back to clean it all up again.


noel
said
0 0

LH where have you been? The Liberals had promised daycare subsidy spaces and a national daycare program every election since well forever it seems, yet after 13 years of Liberal rule nothing ever came of it as is the usual pattern with the liberals, all mouth but no action Liberals. This money to fight drug dealers is a waste you think? Well if the Liberals get back into power you may just see dealers outside your dreamt up daycare spaces these Liberals provide to you.But in the case of daycare spaces from the party you so long for, I wouldn't hold your breath!


ian
said
0 0

It's obvious from reading Frank's comments that he believes that the role of a minority government is to allow the opposition to have all its demands met, while not requiring the opposition to compromise at all. The bills that have been sent back for Harper to amend, have been changed to the point that they are unrecognizable from where they started. The Bills that have been passed by PARLIAMENT are being stalled by the Liberal dominated Senate. How about that Frank! If parliament has agreed to pass a Bill, who is the UNELECTED Senate to disagree. When the Liberals lost the Election in January 06, they openly claimed that they "needed" to regain the reins of power. Well here's their chance now. Someone the other day actually blamed Harper for all of the Liberal infighting. And I thought I had heard it all.


Wayne
said
0 0

What, another federal election, at a cost of some $300M. This is the 6th election in some 17 years. The first 3 called prematurely by the majority Liberals, the last 3 by the opposition Liberals. Surely, we have more important things to be doing with our time and money.

What a waste!


Alistair McLaughlin
said
0 0

Since the Liberals are busy jumping on their own grenades right now, there couldn't possibly be a BETTER time for Harper to orchestrate his downfall in the House, and thus precipitate an election. The Tories are tied with the Liberals in the polls, as opposed to trailing by 5 or 6 points as they did in the last election, and they're the only ones with the money to fight a campaign right now. Harper would be an idiot if he didn't want an election right now. All politicians say, "I don't want an election now." The fact is, sometimes they do. They just aren't allowed to say it. For some reason that's considered taboo. Harper doesn't make the rules, but he's learned to play by them rather well.


Mark H.
said
0 0

Hey Mr. Harper, you are running our country like you have a majority government. Might I remind you that you only have the support of a minority and you should be willing to compromise with the other parties to govern Canada, not run it how YOU want since this is not a dictatorship. If you actually think the Conservatives are going to get a majority, you would have to be crazy. We would be killing everything that we have to call ourselves Canada - Universal Health Care, our Education, and the Canada Health and Social Tranfers would be cut to finance his US type military. He needs to get out of power and let someone else in, either Dion or Layton.


Mark
said
0 0

Terry N: That has to be the funniest post I think I have read on this website. To be clear, Harper is not on the side of the religious right. The religious right tolerates him as the lesser of 3 socialist evils. Calling Harper right-wing, is like calling Layton a Communist. Hmmm, I may have something there.


Keith P
said
0 0

For those who lament a possible election being a result of the conservatives unwillingness to compromise, think about the other parties who will not be compromising on the day the throne speech is read.

Last time I checked a throne speech did not bring any actual legislation out merely stated an agenda that the government wanted to accomplish.

So in reality the NDP, Liberals and Bloc will be voting down a mission statement!

And really, can most people say that Harper has accomplished nothing? At least on an issue like the environment his party has introduced legislation with defined targets unlike the Liberal plan which for years was to say that we were proudly part of Kyoto while not actually doing anything!


Sheldon in NS
said
0 0

If there is an election call, it won't be because of the opposition parties despite what the Conservatives are saying. The government will be responsible because they want one. They have there operations up and running, of course they want an election. The opposition will not be able to support the throne speech because the government will engineer it that way...

DJ
said
0 0

It does make sense to be prepared for whatever may come, instead of trying to play catch up afterwards. I like a party that is this organized, I think I am glad that they are in power. Wouldn't you want a party that is organized and has things in control governing our country?


Jim
said
0 0

The government is correct in calling on the opposition to either allow the government to govern and avoid an election or obstruct government and force an election. The opposition cannot play obstructionist at every step and also avoid an election (ie the opposition cannot have it both ways). Fair is fair.


John
said
0 0

The Liberals are great at saying, "if we were given more time we would have gotten things done" Geez how much more than 13 years do you need! It's true, there is definitely a culture of entitlement within the Liberal party and its supporters. Listen, democracy means that we are given the opportunity to decide whether or not we are satisfied with our government. If we are not, we can tell them so. It seems that finally the Canadian public did just that in January 2006, and that has bugged the heck out of the Liberals. If you want to keep the same party in power ad nauseum then move to Cuba.


murdoch1
said
0 0

Give us an election so that we can have something, anything, better than this "do nothing", "blaming everyone else" PM that has no leading abilities.

He had his chance and blew it!


mike Potter
said
0 0

"A shorter campaign period is preferable to allow less time for errors, at least one senior official told The Globe."

Is this the same as saying if the campaign is too long the voters might accendtially find out what the politicians are really intending to do


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz