CTV News | Men more likely to click on online sex content

Sci-Tech -   

Men more likely to click on online sex content

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(13)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Thursday Sep. 20, 2007 5:08 PM ET

A new study in the Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality finds that men who spend a lot of time on the Internet are much more likely to click on sexually explicit spam, unsolicited email, and pop-ups advertising sex sites.

Psychologists at Wilfrid Laurier University and the University of Guelph in Ontario used a sample of 482 Canadian male and female university students, exploring their reactions to sexually explicit Internet material.

Overall, the men had more positive attitudes towards online sexual content than women, and were more likely to explore unsolicited emails and pop-ups. In fact, the results "suggest that males were very receptive to receiving this kind of material," the authors say.

The researchers not only probed the study subjects' attitudes to sexually explicit material online; they also asked them about their Internet-use behaviour.

Those who used their computers for a variety of purposes, such as writing email, using the Internet, or downloading music or other files, were more likely to have positive attitudes towards unsolicited sexual pop-ups and junk male messages.

They also found that men were more likely than females to actively search for sexually explicit materials online.

"In both attitudes and behaviour, then, males were more likely than females to endorse sexually explicit materials encountered online," the authors write.

But the biggest predictor of those who were most likely to look at online sexual content was not their reported attitudes towards it or even their gender, but the actual number of hours spent online, the researchers found. Those who spent the most time surfing were also most likely to seek out this material.

"This result may be a function of greater opportunity," the authors write. "Specifically, the more time users spend online, the greater the opportunity to encounter sexually explicit either accidentally or intentionally."

Computer experience was also an important predictor of positive attitudes toward sexually explicit material.

Specifically, more experienced computer users, those who more frequently use their computers for lots of different applications, rather than just, for example, to write email, were more receptive towards the sexually explicit material and more likely to seek it out.

The authors speculate that those who spend a lot of time online or have a lot of computer experience are more likely to have repeated exposure to sexually explicit material. Over time, they may become desensitized to the content. This, in turn, may make them curious enough to explore the sites further, the authors suggest.

Study authors Amanda Nosko and Eileen Wood say the most interesting finding from the study was that women showed little interest in online sexual content.

They had been eager to determine whether women, who traditionally have been reticent to access sexual content in XXX video stores or theatres would access it online, where their privacy was better assured. But they found that wasn't the case.

"We found that having access to this material online is not really changing the picture," Wood told CTV.ca.

"Women just don't like it. It doesn't matter what the medium is. And it's not because it's not there for them. They can have a look if they choose to, but they don't want to. And that's very interesting."

The authors didn't investigate why women were less likely to surf online sex sites, but the researchers believe they have a theory.

"Based on past literature on this topic, in general, women tend to find this material quite degrading and offensive. So we think that might still be the issue," Wood says.

Comments are now closed for this story

Steve
said

I would like to know how much public money was spent funding this study, whose conclusions are something any 14-year-old in puberty could have told you.
Next, we'll be told that an exhaustive 3-year study has shown that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west.


JD
said

Good God, and you needed a study to come to that conclusion....?


Chris Hutton
said

Who would have guessed that? That's just about as crazy as the story earlier in the week that women are more likely to wash their hands after using the washroom.

Are studies seriously required for things that are this obvious? And if they are done, are they really newsworthy?


C.F.
said

Where would we be without these deeply insightful surveys?

They say men are more likely to have a positive response, but do they supply ANY numbers? No. Since when does anyone enjoy spam and pop-ups?

Anyway, my hats off to these fine psychologists for their immense contribution to society with yet another brilliant case of STATING THE OBVIOUS.

I look forward to their next research project, where we learn that men are more likely to leave the toilet seat up.


nancy
said

Like everyone else said, what a waste of time study. Regardless, just to be objective, I would like to suggest that maybe women are less likely to admit to peeping at sex spam, more worried about being tracked to it, and also bored by it because it is sexually geared towards men.

Jeff Crawford
said

Duh!


RICHIE
said

I think we as Canadian taxpayers really owe it to ourselves to find out how much (if any) of our money was wasted on this useless study and several others like it.


Josh Rachlis
said

LOL. Well, the other comments say it all. Men click on internet porn more than women?? Shocking!

JohnP
said

Where can I get funding to conduct such a study?


Dave B.
said

Here we have more evidence, as if it's needed, that we have far too many psychologists with far too little to do...except avail themselves of the public teat.


bailey
said

I think I need to become a bevioural scientist and get tons of government money to prove obvious things, like women are more likely to wash their hands after using the bathroom, that men are more influenced by looks when chosing a mate, and that women are less likely to surf sex sites. How about next that women tend to use more shampoo than men?
What a ridiculous waste of money and time.


G
said

It seems that the reporting of this study is very subjective.

"Women just don't like it. It doesn't matter what the medium is. And it's not because it's not there for them. They can have a look if they choose to, but they don't want to. And that's very interesting."

Well, I happen to know quite a few women who look at pornography all the time, more than most males I know.



Alex McKay
said

Have a closer look at the study folks. It does not appear that the research was funded by a government grant. Besides it does not cost very much money to have university students fill-out questionnaires and then tabulate the results. Studies like these are conducted all the time at very little or no cost to the taxpayer.


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz