CTV News | 'Supersport' motorcyclists have highest death rate

Top Stories -   

'Supersport' motorcyclists have highest death rate

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: John Vennavally-Rao looks at the trend

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(21)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Tue. Sep. 11 2007 12:10 PM ET

Drivers who use high-performance racing motorcycles are being killed at a rate nearly four times higher than those who navigate all other types of bikes, finds a U.S. study.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), which conducted the research, also found that the popular "supersport" motorcycles had the worst overall insurance losses.

"Supersport motorcycles are indeed nimble and quick, but they also can be deadly," Anne McCartt, senior vice-president for research at IIHS, said in a press release.

"These bikes made up less than 10 per cent of registered motorcycles in 2005 but accounted for over 25 per cent of rider deaths. Their insurance losses were elevated, too."

The bikes are built on racing platforms and then modified for the highway before being sold to consumers.

They boast a light weight, powerful engine and are meant to be all about speed. IIHS says the bike is especially popular among riders younger than 30.

In the U.S., motorcyclist fatalities have more than doubled in the last decade, reaching 4,810 in 2006. The figure accounts for 11 per cent of total highway fatalities.

Here's a breakdown of deaths per 10,000 registered motorcycles in 2005:

  • Supersport drivers: 22.5 per 10,000
  • Sport and unclad sport bikes: 10.7 per 10,000
  • Cruisers and standard motorcycles: 5.7 per 10,000
  • Touring motorcycles: 6.5 per 10,000
  • Other/unknown: 4.3 per 10,000
  • Total: 7.5 per 10,000

Between 2000 and 2005, overall motorcycle driver deaths rose 59 per cent in the U.S. Meanwhile, the overall death rate climbed to 7.5 driver deaths per 10,000 from 7.1.

Only 51 per cent of drivers wear helmets certified by the U.S. Department of Transportation, compared to 71 per cent in 2000.

Motorcycle popularity

As motorcyclist deaths rise, so does the popularity of the vehicles. Between 2000 and 2005, total registrations in the U.S. climbed by 51 per cent. In the supersport category, registrations were up 83 per cent during the same time period.

Still, cruisers and standard motorcycles made up the bulk of registrations.

The IIHS found speeding and driver error to be the biggest factors in fatal crashes of supersport and sport and unclad sport bikes.

Speed was cited in 57 per cent of supersport fatal crashes in 2005. It was cited in 46 per cent of fatal sport and unclad sport motorcycle crashes.

"Supersport motorcycles have such elevated crash death rates and insurance losses because many people ride them as if they were on a racetrack," said McCartt.

"Motorcyclists presumably buy supersports and sport bikes because they want to go fast, and manufacturers are happy to oblige."

McCartt suggests capping the speed of the street-legal racing machines at the factory as a way to reduce their risk.

The supersport bikes also have the highest overall collision coverage losses among 2002 to 2006 model bikes. The figure is almost four times higher than touring motorcycles and six times higher than cruisers.

The bikes are also popular targets among thieves, stolen at a rate seven times higher than the average for all 2002 to 2006 motorcycles.

"These bikes own the field when it comes to elevated death rates and collision losses. They also hold the distinction of being the most frequently stolen motorcycle," says Kim Hazelbaker, senior vice president at the Highway Loss Data Institute.

"We found a strong correlation between motorcycle class and insurance losses, with supersports showing up time and again as having far higher losses than other types of motorcycles."

Please Add Comments( )

Raymond
said
0 0

These motorcycles are the overwhelming favorite with young, inexperienced riders. Rather than imply that the bikes are to blame, one might consider the driver. I have owned several of these machines, and true; they are very fast, and can be lethal in the hands of a novice driver. I would suggest placing an age restriction on certain classes of motorcycles, much as the industry has done with ATVs.


the one reading over your shoulder
said
0 0

They cite speed as a leading factor.I assume that that is also a leading factor in all vehicle type crashes. Also motorcycles fall over and the insurance agency gets a call to pay for the repairs. A motorcycle falling over on its side in a strong wing or a person kicking it over on a street feeling cool is about the same cost as a car rolling on its side and damaging all the body work. NOT CHEAP!


Blair
said
0 0

Perhaps the insurance companies could better reflect their rates so we who own touring bikes aren't penalized for others' choices.


Damian
said
0 0

Clearly they need to be banned, then. What does anyone "need" to own something so dangerous is beyond me. If this saves just one life, it will be worth it - think of the innocents who get caught up in these crashes, they would be alive if only people weren't able to own these street racing death machines.
Hey, if people embrace this nonsense when trying to take my target pistol away, why shouldn't it make sense here?


Al
said
0 0

I still don't understand why we need bikes and cars that are designed to break the law. TV ads for cars are all about speed and taking chances, while the government spends millions trying to stop agressive driving. I'm no rocket scientist, but it seems to me that all other forms of advertising that point to dangerous behavior is being controlled ie: cigarettes, alcohol! We are trying to regulate people from using their cel phones while driving, but we're building vehicles that can cause death with only a second of distraction. Guess I'm getting old.


Robin
said
0 0

"Only 51 per cent of drivers wear helmets certified by the U.S. Department of Transportation, compared to 71 per cent in 2000."

I am not a statistician, but maybe this has something to do with the increase in rider deaths?? Not wearing a helmet may be an option in some U.S. states, but it is a sure-fire way of getting killed or suffering a serious head injury if you or another road user make an error of judgement.


Mistress K - 1st Offficer, SCRC 501 Cambridge
said
0 0

Raymond, you make a good point with age restrictions, but a 40 year old person with no riding experience is no better qualified to ride a race-bred sportbike than a 16 year old. While Ontario already has graduated motorcycle licensing, there is no RWHP (rear wheel horsepower) or displacement graduation, like they use in Britain. This allows an M1 rider (who has only passed a written test) to walk into a dealership and purchase a 1300cc Suzuki GSX-R Hayabusa, arguably the fastest production motorcycle in the world with 158RWHP @ 9,750rpm. I would like to see new riders restricted to 45RWHP or less - which is more than enough. My 2005 Suzuki Boulevard C50 (cruiser) pushes about 42RWHP, and can comfortably be ridden 2-up through mountain roads - certainly not lacking in power. The 1979 Honda CB400T I learned to ride on runs about 28RWHP, and is just fine for cruising back roads solo. Either one of these would be a much better choice than the sudden death available to the uninitiated who decides to grip and rip on even a 600cc middleweight sportbike, typically pushing between 100-120RWHP. Unfamiliarity with the controls and physics of riding, as well as the aforementioned lack of maturity, are likely the biggest causes of super sport bike fatalities.


Michael Day
said
0 0

The most chilling statistic was the one which stated that only 51 percent of riders (in the US) wear certified helmets. Make helmet use mandatory, before taking "our" bikes away!

And, as Raymond stated, the supersport bikes are mainly ridden by young, inexperienced riders. However, the appalling accident statistics are not the fault of the bike, but rather the rider. If touring bikes were "cool", then these riders would gravitate towards them, skewing the accident statistics for touring bikes. SO, keep the more inexperienced riders on small, low-powered bikes (regardless of the style), and for God's sakes, PUT A HELMET ON!!


Robert
said
0 0

You have to love statistics, just what do they mean? In this case it involves over 45 separate state licensing authorities, no comments or data pertaining to graduated motorcycle licensing or other practices we see in Canada, nor does it reflect potential impact of different riding geography, longer seasons etc.


Gummiente
said
0 0

You might want to read the article again. We who ride touring motorcycles apparently have a greater risk than those on cruisers/standards.

I'd rather see insurance companies base their premiums on facts and studies from the Canadian motorcycling scene rather than the US, for starters. I'd also like to see more emphasis placed on rider training and rewarding good riding records with reduced premiums, but that would cut into insurance company profits. And we can't have that.


DW
said
0 0

I have seen many of these bikes out on the road. But as it was said before it is not the bike it is the driver. Maybe we should have a graduated learning curve for motorcycles as is done in Europe. If you are a new rider you have a small bike and as your experience goes up so can the size of your bike. Something to think about.


JTJ
said
0 0

More stats for the insurances to come and get us in the wallet for those who enjoy a simple motorcycle ride on a Sunday morning...


Wes-
said
0 0

Please refrain from drawing conclusions as they pertain to Canada and Canadians drawn from statistics compiled from a different population, in a different country, with a different culture.

Pat S.
said
0 0

More often than none I see these bikes leave a trail of dust on the highway. People use these "crotch-rockets" and just speed through and cut people off left, right and centre and race each other. If you buy one of these bikes solely for the speed, then you deserve what you get if you lose control and crash at high speed.


Eric
said
0 0

"Only 51 per cent of drivers wear helmets certified by the U.S. Department of Transportation, compared to 71 per cent in 2000." I wonder how much that is a factor. And why doesn't this report dig into that. Did the insurance co.'s publish this report? Sounds very skewed. No to mention these are American statistics. I hope this report does not give the insurance co.'s an excuse to jack rates..again. I'm 28, just started riding this summer, bought a 1990 EX 500. A responsible choice if you ask me.

bigvl800rider
said
0 0

Ban them I say. Why should i pay more for insurance due to iresponsible people that have to go fast? I also run a vl800 with 40 rwhp and it has enuff to get me to 110 mph on the interstate. Most bike wrecks that I have been to are crotch rocket, drivers were dead.

Bonnie
said
0 0

I am rider with over 40 yrs experience (I learned on a KZ400, a great learners bike). I wish we had graduated licensing here in Canada. These stats make it look bad for regular riders. I wouldn't let my kids learn on my FJR1300 but it's not "cool" to learn on a small bike.


Mike
said
0 0

Crotch rockets as they are sometimes called are dangerous in that the combination of power and ability are usually too much for most who buy them and the stats back it up. A hefty surcharge may cause some second thought to purchasing these road rockets.


Stef
said
0 0

Unfortunately, most fatalities/collisions on streetbikes/sportbikes are of rookie mistakes, plain and simple. It doesn't help the situation where in Ontario after completing a written test, you're able to get on any kind of sportbike without having any riding experience. (Mind you, only 1/4 of the M1 written test has anything to do with Motorcycles.)
Having a GSX-R 600 and being 20, the odds are not in my favour, however, I did ride dirtbikes as young as 9 years old and continued from there, I have a lot more experience at my age then that of a 40 year old who has never been on any type of motorcycle.
Also having a brother involved in a near-fatal collision 4 years ago and a friend killed during the labour day long weekend from sportbikes, I am extremely cautious and although the speed is easily available to me, I know not to abuse it.
Laws should be changed to at least 20 to obtain a motorcycle license, and restricted to 'beginner bikes' until necessary experience is gained to move up to a bigger bike... if desired.


Doc J
said
0 0

Trauma is the top cause for death in individuals under the age of 30. There is no useful reason to have a machine with the speed capabilities of these bikes - period. I don't care if you are an experienced driver or not, the machine should have a speed limiter - as should all street vehicles. If you can't control the behaviour of the driver, control the capabilities of the vehicle. Then, I won't have to inform families that their loved one has been killed on one of these bikes with the frequency that I do now.


Ed
said
0 0

Interesting discussions about licencing requirements, Graduated licences etc. In my case I have never (except around the back yard once) driven a motorcycle of any kind, never attempted nor passed any motorcycle test. The last time my driver's licence was renewed it showed up with....VOILA.... a motorcyle endorsement! I didn't ask for it, it's just there. Will I ever use it? Not on your life. Just goes to show what can slip through the cracks.

The way some of these people use the racing bikes I think I'd prefer that they don't wear a helmet: that way the health care system won't have to look after their carcasses for months or years.


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz