CTV News | PM blasts Elections Canada ruling on veiled voting

Top Stories -   

PM blasts Elections Canada ruling on veiled voting

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: David Akin on Harper's strong response
CTV Montreal: Anne Lewis on the veiled vote
PM Stephen Harper comments on the ruling
CTV's Question Period: Party strategists on election issues
Canada AM: Sarah Elgazzaer discusses the issue

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(17)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Sun. Sep. 9 2007 11:27 PM ET

Prime Minister Stephen Harper blasted Elections Canada Sunday for going against a parliamentary ruling by allowing Muslim women to wear veils and burkas while voting.

The move goes directly against a unanimous vote in the House of Commons this past spring to make visual identification mandatory when casting a ballot.

"I profoundly disagree with the decision," Harper told reporters in Sydney, Australia where he is attending the APEC conference. "We just adopted this past sitting, in the spring, Bill C-31, a law designed to have the visual identification of voters. That's the purpose of the law.

"That was the law voted virtually unanimously by Parliament and I think that this decision goes in an entirely different direction," he continued.

The Elections Canada ruling was prompted by three upcoming byelections in Quebec on Sept. 17 in ridings that are significantly multi-cultural. The arms-length elections agency has scheduled a news conference on Monday to discuss their decision.

On their website, Elections Canada reiterated their policies on wearing religious face coverings while voting.

It states that if an elector produces an original government-issued photo identification that contains her name and home address then she has the following options:

  • She may choose to unveil to identify herself
  • She may produce a second original piece of identification from Chief Electoral Officer of Canada's authorized list of identification
  • She may come with another elector who is registered in the same polling division and who can provide adequate proof of their own identification to vouch for her identity. They would both need to make a sworn statement under oath.

Harper said Parliament will have to find a way to make sure the House's ruling takes effect.

"The role of Elections Canada is not to make its own laws, it's to put into place the laws that Parliament has passed," he said.

Liberal Opposition Leader Stephane Dion agreed with Harper when speaking with reporters in Vancouver on Sunday.

"We disagree with the Elections Canada decision and we ask them to revisit their decision," he said.

He said female officials with Elections Canada could be on hand at polling stations, to identify women behind their veils.

"It's important to identify the person," he said. "It may be done in a very respectful way, but it must be done."

Speaking on CTV's Question Period Sunday morning, a panel of political strategists agreed a compromise has to be made on the issue.

However, NDP President Anne McGrath said Elections Canada is an agency that "knows what it is doing."

"Elections Canada goes around the world helping other countries with their elections," she said. "I think the officials at Elections Canada know how to make sure that the voting is accurate."

Ruling would 'stigmatize' Muslim women

A spokesperson with the Canadian Council on American-Islamic Relations in Montreal said Muslim women were never consulted on whether they even wanted the exception.

"My jaw dropped. I was very surprised. Muslim women wearing the Niqab, which is the face veil, never made the request to have to keep it on while they vote," said spokeswoman Sarah Elgazzar, speaking to CTV Montreal.

Elgazzar said Elections Canada might have had good intentions but the ruling was "unnecessary."

"It's absolutely unnecessary. Those women wearing a niqab always identify themselves when they need to identify themselves. The photo I.D. they show to people at the ballot box is a photo without a face veil. So people will clearly be seeing their faces," she said.

"This will only stigmatize the women and embroil this debate," she continued. "I think perhaps at Elections Canada there were good intentions but it will certainly not have good consequences."

Even Pierre Cote, who was Quebec's chief electoral officer for 19 years before retiring, told CTV Montreal the ruling is a dangerous one.

"When one is in a polling station, they must be clearly identified or else you run the risk of fraud," he said.

With a report from CTV Montreal

Please Add Comments( )

Mark P
said
0 0

Voting is a secular process. Everyone should have to show their face. Anyone showing up with their face covered should have to show their face to the election officer on duty...man or woman.


john
said
0 0

Do you people who are against this "veiled voting" understand what you are complaining about. There are currently two ways to identify yourself to vote, one is to confirm your identity with photo ID, the other is to have your identity verified by a separate panel, and present yourself to the polling station using this form of verification. This is now the law under Elections Canada. Muslims who refuse to show their face, and who cannot therefore verify their identity, do not get to vote. If they remove their veil and confirm their identity by photo ID they do get to vote.(Check the Elections Canada website) Furthermore a spokeswoman for a Muslim womens group said on CBC radio that VERY FEW women would refuse to show their faces when asked. Considering all of this, I think the whole controversy is not so much about voting as about Islamophobia.

Robert McClelland
said
0 0

Harper doesn't even understand his own legislation. Bill C-31 doesn't make a visual identification mandatory. It only makes identification mandatory.

Since one of the options is to simply show two pieces of identification that contain nothing more than a name and address, it becomes a moot point whether or not an electoral officer actually sees the face of the voter since they won't have an image to compare it to.


The one reading over your shoulder
said
0 0

I think this line says the most about all Canadian bureaucrats.

"The role of Elections Canada is not to make its own laws, it's to put into place the laws that Parliament has passed..."


Raymond
said
0 0

Bill C-31 is flawed in that there is no specific provision to determine what constitutes 'satisfactory proof of identity and residence'. Perhaps the act needs to be re-written stating specifically that 'visual comparison' or 'biometric confirmation' be used to positively identify voters.


Riley W
said
0 0

Good for Harper taking a stand!

It doesn't matter if you have 2 forms of I.D., if you can't see the face it doesn't matter anyways.

I am not willing to give them special privileges by letting them take off the burka in front of female Elections Canada workers.

If Elections Canada doesn't reverse this they will have a big problem on their hands on election day with thousands wearing masks in protest.

I can say I will be wearing a mask if this happens in the next federal election.


D.D.
said
0 0

Again with the political correctness, wouldn't want to offend anybody.


RJT
said
0 0

We're literally talking about a few hundred women here, let them identify themselves to Elections Canada, I'm okay with that, its called compassion and understanding.


Mark
said
0 0

What a good idea on the part of Elections Canada!!! In this day and age, let's violate the decision of Parliament (you know, the place where democracy lives?) and let some bunch of bureaucrats make a decision whereby an individual, cloaked in the secrecy of a religion, can deny proof of a: citizenship, b: identity, c: rule of law.
What a great idea.

Bully for Mr. Harper. This idiotic bungling is an example of all the rot that has seeped into this country's (once fine) core.


V. Joe
said
0 0

What kind of nonsense is this?! Until we use bio-metrics for identification (fingerprints, voice identification, retinal scans, etc.) everyone should show THEIR FACE to vote! Any religious issues can easily be resolved by providing strict Muslim women with a private area run by an all-female eletoral staff.


F.Moris
said
0 0

If this isn't sorted out before the election I will wear a pillowcase over my head with two cut outs for my eyes and I dare any election polling station official to tell me I have to take it off!!


John Scott
said
0 0

Let's see. Only 60% of we Canadians even bother to vote. We let convicted felons vote. And now we get upset by a few veiled voters.

Must be the same crowd that sings their name with their "mark", an X usually complaining.

Guess we could all go the purple thumb route if that makes you feel better.

farooq
said
0 0

This is a non issue. As pointed out by V. Joe below any concerns can be handled by the women electoral staff.

I suggest that we all calm down.


Raymond
said
0 0

RJT says:"We're literally talking about a few hundred women here, let them identify themselves to Elections Canada, I'm okay with that, its called compassion and understanding". That isn't the point, RJT. What is the point is that EC is ignoring the desire of Parliament, therefore ignoring the express will of Canadians. Again; political correctness out of control. The burka has no place in a modern, democratic, pluralistic society. It is an affront to women.

Dave
said
0 0

I seems that every ruling such as this leads to other more serious issues.
What will be the next ruling approved due to this? Will it be ruled that pictures on drivers licenses and passports will simply be of "someone" fully veiled, with police officers having to waive visual identification due to political correctness or airport authorities having to allow people wearing full veils on aircraft because it is illegal to demand visual proof of identity.
Is it just me that thinks this is yet another slippery slope....

Milllie
said
0 0

If Elections Canada is going to permit this, then they will need ID verifiers for the masked individuals. As a suggestion, perhaps another woman who could quietly verify the individual at a side station?

Mike Devlin
said
0 0

People talking about how you can show photo ID instead are completely missing the point of photo ID. If you can't see any identifiable features, then you can't confirm it's actually the person on the ID and may as well not show ID at all.

Furthermore, this is a secular country and making exceptions for some religions to avoid rules that everyone else has to follow is unacceptable and unfair.

On top of that, face coverings aren't even rooted in Islam. They are a Saudi-Arabian cultural tradition and have nothing to do with the religion itself other than being common amongst practitioners of that religion.

Rules should apply to everyone or no one at all; it's the only way to be equitable and fair.

Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz