News Sections
Quebec police defend officers' actions at summit
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(38)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Fri. Aug. 24 2007 8:06 PM ET
Quebec provincial police on Friday defended the actions of three officers who posed as protesters during the North American Leaders' summit earlier this week in Montebello, but added there will be an internal investigation into their conduct.
Authorities initially denied claims from protesters that officers had infiltrated their ranks but later acknowledged the three men were police officers.
They admitted the officers were undercover after footage of a confrontation between the men and Montebello demonstrators surfaced on the popular video sharing website YouTube.
Insp. Marcel Savard defended the three agents Friday at a news conference in Montreal, and insisted they were not there to provoke demonstrators.
"At no time did the officers in question engage in provocation or incite anyone to commit violent acts," said Savard.
He also said one of the officers was given a rock by protesters but the officer had no intention of using it.
"One of the extremists gave the rock to one of our police officers and he had a choice to make," Savard said.
"He was asked by extremists to throw the rock at the police, but never had any intention of using it."
The SQ did not answer questions on whether the RCMP was involved in the summit incident or whether the Quebec police received political orders to infiltrate the protesters. But the police force did say it will conduct its own internal investigation of the incident.
"If there are methods or procedures that need to be changed or adjusted, you can be reassured that will be done," said Savard.
Calls for inquiry
The Canadian Union of Public Employees is demanding an independent, public inquiry into police actions at the summit.
CUPE said Canadians have a right to ask whether their governments recognize and protect the right to demonstrate peacefully. The union said the provincial police's waffling on the issue has only further damaged its credibility to answer questions surrounding the incident.
Public Security Minister Stockwell Day, meanwhile, continued to brush of questions about a call for a public inquiry.
"The thing that was interesting in this particular incident, three people in question were spotted by protesters because were not engaging in violence," Day said Friday in Vancouver.
"They were being encouraged to throw rocks and they were not throwing rocks, it was the protesters who were throwing the rocks. That's the irony of this," said Day, adding the actions were substantiated by the video that he has seen of the protests.
"Because they were not engaging in violence, it was noted that they were probably not protesters. I think that's a bit of an indictment against the violent protesters."
A distraction
Earlier Friday, the union president who exposed undercover cops posing as protesters at the summit said the controversy is distracting the public from the real issue.
Dave Coles, president of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, told CTV's Canada AM he's disappointed the controversy is shifting attention from the discussions that took place at the summit.
"One of the problems we're having here is it's taking away from the issue, why we were there," he said. "We were there to demonstrate that we are opposed to the (Security and Prosperity Partnership). This covers it all up."
Coles is shown in the YouTube video shot Monday from protests in Montebello accusing three masked protesters of being police.
At first he confronted the men because they were holding rocks and the line they were in was meant for peaceful protests.
"When I saw these three burly guys coming towards the line armed with rocks, I confronted them like I had others and immediately became apparent that these weren't protesters," he said. "They looked like police, they acted like police. I accused them of being police. You could see by their reaction in their eyes that they were caught with their hand in the cookie jar."
In the video, Coles can be heard shouting and seen trying to pull down the masks from the men.
"Put down the rock, cop!" Coles is heard shouting in the video.
The men push towards the police line in the video and they are immediately pushed to the ground, arrested and taken away. Photographs taken by another protester shows the men on the ground wearing boots with the same emblem as the officers who are arresting them.
The police say their men were just trying to pinpoint the real troublemakers in Montebello.
After viewing the YouTube footage, security expert Martin Courcy told CTV Montreal he thought the Quebec police force was at best sloppy, and at worst dangerous, in their conduct.
"The masked officers are adding fuel to the fire instead of defusing the situation," said Courcy, who trains police forces on security issues.
But others, like retired Montreal police investigator Steve Roberts, told CTV the SQ did the right thing.
"They can't be burned on a job. So if they're with a group that's throwing rocks, they'll throw the rocks, too."
The two-day summit drew hundreds of protesters demonstrating against a number of issues.
Their main focus, however, was the Security and Prosperity Partnership agreement that was set to be discussed by North American leaders, Prime Minister Stephen Harper, U.S. President George Bush and Mexico's President Felipe Calderon. The partnership would deeply integrate trade and security across the continent.
Critics argued the partnership would force Canada to relax its high standards for worker and food safety in the interest of securing a deal with the U.S. and Mexico where standards are often lower.
With a report from CTV Montreal's Stephane Giroux and files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(38)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Please Add Comments( )
Timothy
0
said
0
DERON
0
said
0
Deny
0
said
0
And after all the Harper-faithful blasted people on this very website for being left-wing nuts. You can't defend cops in plain clothes provoking violence.
Dan
0
said
0
RICK
0
said
0
Christopher
0
said
0
Robert
0
said
0
Maurice
0
said
0
sherry
0
said
0
paul malouf
0
said
0
As I was walking westward on 148 through the town of Montebello these 3 individuals were moving up route 148, going towards the main confrontation at the gates of the Chateau Montebello. They were confronted initially be the rouge/noir before the Crevier Gas Station on 148. The rouge/noir told them to backtrack, to go away, to get lost. The 3 individuals seemed perplexed at being outed. The 3 individuals veered off to the right, off of route 148, to the quiet 2nd line of police on route 323. They were then 100% outed by the union leaders & Council of Canadians.
Second: Thus the QPP statement today "The police officers were identified by demonstrators when they refused to throw projectiles" is 100% false.
Why you ask: because they were initially caught before the Crevier gas station by the rouge/noir. They were still over 1000 feet away from their primary target, 400 feet before the traffic lights. It would have been pointless to throw a rock towards the main police line - it would have fallen short! Otherwise they should be playing outfield for the Yankees. And if they were aiming for the 323 line, that would make them the best curve ball pitcher ever. 90 degrees.
Eric
0
said
0
Matt
0
said
0
Darren
0
said
0
Joe
0
said
0
There are plenty of examples of REAL anarchists, socialists etc. who go to these demonstrations to incite riots. Might as well try and identify them sooner rather than later.
The crowd wasn't exactly all that respecting of those three officers' space in the first place.
Ray
0
said
0
Fabio
0
said
0
Dozens of protesters died at the funeral of assassinated Monsignor Romero when police planted armed agents who posed as protesters and started shooting their guns and so give the police an excuse to fire into the crowd to “defend themselves”.
Whose brilliant idea was to copy this old fascist tactics of controlling people’s dissent? We are going backwards by imitating third world puppet repressive governments.
Josh Pankhurst
0
said
0
The less we know the better. If we knew that their intentions are completely disjointed with the reasons they were elected, there would be answers demanded. Unfortunately, the most common avenues for the public to demand the truth are also undermined by the same system.
Craig
0
said
0
Coles is just using this story to get free advertising for himself. This would have been a non-issue if he would have just ignored the undercover cop and continued with his "peaceful" protest. But no, Coles had to ham it up for the camera, shouting and waving his arms so he could be on tv.
Po
0
said
0
As much as everyone would want it to be different, protests are ruled by mob mentality.
JR
0
said
0
Louis Subirana
0
said
0
How can anyone trust a word coming out of the mouths of the RCMP or the SQ? A situation like this, where they flat out lie for 2 days and then finally tell the "truth"? Is it the truth? Half-truth? Whatever it is, it cannot be trusted. My first reaction upon hearing that they lied: FIRE THEM. It's unacceptable that they can lie to the citizenry and get away with it.
Michael Le Couteru
0
said
0
TJ
0
said
0
Why were the police there and undercover? Don't know, but we should automatically assume that it was devious and underhanded, because the other civilians there with rocks in their hands were only carrying them for souvenirs?
If the tactic was to dissuade attention from the summit - it worked, mostly thanks to Mr. Coles, remember he's the one that outed them, which could have created a situation that would have made other officers react to protect the undercover officers.
Dean
0
said
0
Jon
0
said
0
ChristinaBCCLA
0
said
0
John Haber
0
said
0
Michael
0
said
0
UNACCEPTABLE - no ifs ands or buts!!
Now how about laying a few charges to those who ordered this deception and attempt to cause disorder among peaceful protestors?
Jordan
0
said
0
Andy
0
said
0
That being said, I have NO idea why one of them would be carrying a rock. Was that suppose to enhance credibility? And to the undercover police who was wearing his hat crooked, where did he think he was, in the Bronx? Man, when your 6 feet tall and in shape and you wear your hat like that, you stick out like a sore thumb!
Angus Kelton
0
said
0
Barry
0
said
0
Richard
0
said
0
WB
0
said
0
I'm glad these fraudsters were exposed.
W. Wheeler
0
said
0
Ian
0
said
0
-The police will often use undercover cops dressed like protesters in order to gather intelligence. They need to look the part even if that means grabbing a rock like the other protesters.
-Protesters who are about to throw a rock at police, don't go up to the front of the line. They stay way back in order to make an easy getaway.
-Things only got heated up when David Coles started telling everyone that they were cops, and tried to pull down their bandanas. Who was provoking whom?
-The police would not purposefully start a riot at the risk of injuring the public, not to mention their own people. Besides the police always get villified at these things, so why would they want the negative press.
-The only person who was trying to start a riot was David Coles by yelling that the 3 protesters were cops. He's lucky the anarchist types didn't turn on them.
-The police actually denied that they had placed "provocateurs" in the crowd, which was true. The 3 weren't "provocateurs" since their goal was not to provoke anything, but to watch.
-David Coles gave several interviews where he totally blamed the police for their actions, but now he says that he doesn't blame the police, but feels that the focus should have been on the reason for the protests.
-The police were being evasive because they are not in the business of divulging the undercover tactics that they use, for obvious reasons.
Instead of always being so anti-police and anti-authority, why not open your eyes and your minds and you'll see this for what it really was. An excercise in self serving fame seeking orchestrated by David Coles.
Cindy Loo Who
0
said
0
Jason
0
said
0
The SPP is all about absorbing Canada into the US and apparently we're already becoming a police state like our "friends" to the south.
The opposition should be demanding that the SPP be scrapped or at the very least debated and the details available to the public.
Harper said he was for "Open and Accountable" government when he was running, yet he's the most secretive and controlling PM.
Everyone write your MP's and demand democracy be restored in our nation before it's too late!