News Sections
SCC won't review Ontario's anti-squeegee law
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(13)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Thu. Aug. 23 2007 11:43 AM ET
The Supreme Court of Canada won't review an Ontario anti-squeegee law meant to prevent aggressive panhandling.
In a decision released Thursday without comment, the SCC denied leave to appeal to 11 homeless men convicted for offering to wash car windshields for money under the Safe Streets Act.
Lawyers for the men had claimed that the legislation violated their clients' rights to freedom of expression, fundamental justice and equal treatment before the law.
In previous rulings, a trial judge and the provincial appeal court agreed that the law did infringe on individual liberties.
However, both rulings said the infringement was justified because it was in the interests of public safety.
The SCC's decision now means that the legislation, brought in by Mike Harris' former Conservative government, will stand.
At the time, the legislation was sponsored by Jim Flaherty, then Harris' attorney general. Flaherty now serves as finance minister in the federal Conservative government.
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(13)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Please Add Comments( )
AB
0
said
0
John Carter
0
said
0
Doug
0
said
0
Bob
0
said
0
Paul
0
said
0
Daniel Little
0
said
0
Dave
0
said
0
G
0
said
0
Gregory Boudreau
0
said
0
KDC
0
said
0
Greg
0
said
0
David
0
said
0
Craig harris
0
said
0