CTV News | MacKay takes over defence in cabinet shuffle

Canada -   

MacKay takes over defence in cabinet shuffle

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Graham Richardson on the strategic shift
CTV Toronto: John Vennavally-Rao on the shake up
CTV Newsnet: Harper comments on cabinet shuffle
CTV Newsnet: Harper takes questions from the media
CTV Newsnet: A recap of all the new cabinet positions
CTV Newsnet: David Akin with who's in and who's out
CTV Newsnet: Liberal Leader Stephane Dion reacts to cabinet shuffle
CTV Newsnet: Bloc Quebecois Leader Gilles Duceppe comments on shuffle
CTV Newsnet: NDP Leader Jack Layton discusses the shuffle
CTV Newsnet: Defence critics discuss the shuffle
CTV Newsnet: Green Party Leader Elizabeth May reacts to the changes
CTV Newsnet: Panel of experts discuss the changes
CTV Newsnet: Calgary panel discusses the changes
CTV Newsnet: Experts discuss what the shuffle means for Quebec
CTV Newsnet: Media panel discuss Bernier's new post
CTV Newsnet: Maj. Gen. (Ret'd) Lewis MacKenzie on MacKay's new position
CTV Newsnet: Michael Behiels, University of Ottawa
CTV Newsnet: New cabinet ministers are sworn-in
CTV Newsnet: New cabinet ministers arrive at Rideau Hall, part one
CTV Newsnet: New cabinet ministers arrive at Rideau Hall, part two
CTV Newsnet: Nick Nanos from SES Research with new poll numbers
CTV Newsnet: Panel of national reporters explain why this shuffle is happening
CTV Newsnet: Strategists discuss the Afghan mission

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(51)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Tue. Aug. 14 2007 9:10 PM ET

Peter MacKay has replaced Gordon O'Connor as the new minister of defence, while Maxime Bernier and Jim Prentice have emerged as big winners in Prime Minister Stephen Harper's cabinet shuffle.

O'Connor, the retired general and Ontario MP, was criticized as a poor communicator on the government's crucial Afghanistan agenda.

"The Afghan mission remains Canada's most important military and foreign affairs commitment in the world," Harper told reporters.

"We know there are challenges there. At the same time, the United Nations wants us there and we made a commitment to our allies and the Afghan people."

Bernier, a Quebec MP first elected in 2006, has moved from industry to foreign affairs, replacing MacKay.

"He's a young minister and he has a very strong point of view on economic situations, and also for the development of the government," said Harper.

"He has earned a new challenge, and I hope and I believe he will represent Canada in a very efficient way on the world scene."

Bernier will also be tasked with drumming up support for the Afghanistan mission in Quebec, where polls show little enthusiasm for Canada's military efforts in the war-torn country.

Prentice, an Alberta MP who is considered one of Harper's most able ministers, has been moved to the industry portfolio from Indian affairs.

The Conservative minority government is expected to shift to a "second phase" with Wednesday's shuffle held at Rideau Hall in Ottawa.

The prime minister is expected to prorogue Parliament, deliver a throne speech and move to a new agenda beyond the five priorities it touted in the 2006 election campaign.

Modernizing Canada's economy is going to be a key part of that agenda, which will make industry a key portfolio.

Some other cabinet moves:

  • Saskatchewan MP Gerry Ritz becomes agriculture minister, having been a secretary of state for tourism. He replaces fellow Saskatchewan MP and Revenue Minister Carol Skelton, who has announced she won't run again.
  • O'Connor becomes revenue minister.
  • Another new face in cabinet is Alberta MP Diane Ablonczy, who replaces Ritz.
  • Current Agriculture Minister Chuck Strahl, a B.C. MP, becomes Indian Affairs minister.
  • Quebec MP Josee Verner becomes heritage minister, swapping jobs with Ontario's Bev Oda, who becomes international development minister.

Harper's new cabinet has 26 full ministers and only seven are women -- the same number as the previous cabinet.

"The real problem facing the prime minister is he doesn't have a lot of women in caucus from which to select cabinet ministers," political scientist Barry Kay told CTV Newsnet.

"As we lead up to the next election, I think it very much behooves the Conservatives to think about not just getting more women candidates, but getting them nominated in ridings they can win."

Liberal Leader Stephane Dion said the number of high-profile moves in Tuesday's shuffle highlighted problems within Harper's cabinet.

"Mr. Harper is persisting to call his government the 'new' government, but now he has his third cabinet. So maybe it's time for him to stop blaming Liberals for everything, and start blaming his previous two cabinets," he said.

Dion added that while Harper has put better spokespeople in place, "it will change nothing regarding policies."

NDP Leader Jack Layton, who had repeatedly called for O'Connor's removal, said MacKay's appointment would make little difference in policy.

"Now we have Mr. MacKay, who has also defended the war in Afghanistan very strongly, so we're clearly not seeing any change in direction," he told CTV Newsnet.

Retired Maj.-Gen. Lewis MacKenzie said MacKay will have to do far more than explain the Afghanistan mission to the public. He said there are growing issues within the military that need attention.

"The military is in crisis on spending, it's in crisis on having enough instructors to train new recruits," said MacKenzie.

"The military has some serious issues that have to be dealt with. Gordon O'Connor was attacking those, and I'm sure Peter MacKay will continue the offensive."

Canada's economy

Jim Flaherty had kept his post as finance minister, despite enduring a backlash for the government's decision to tax income trusts -- essentially breaking an earlier campaign promise.

But Flaherty will no longer chair the cabinet committee on economic affairs, and has lost his position as vice chair of the treasury board. Insiders said that move signals displeasure with his political handling of the income trust issue.

Flaherty also came under fire for the government's new equalization formula, which Nova Scotia Premier Rodney MacDonald argued will hurt the province's Atlantic Accord offshore deal.

MacDonald had earlier told The Canadian Press that change at the ministry "wouldn't be such a bad thing."

But Flaherty is expected to be crucial in enacting the government's long-term economic agenda, which is expected to focus on the Finance Department's Advantage Canada blueprint.

The 2006 document proposes eliminating Canada's net debt within a generation, cutting taxes, investing in education and infrastructure, and de-regulating industry.

Please Add Comments( )

Graham
said
0 0

A cabinet shuffle is all about an agenda...either to address political problems with existing ministries or to prepare for a new campaign...in this case it looks like a bit of both...clearly Harper cannot connect to Canadians...and he also has a problem in that he has a weak MP team to work with. Too many neo cons and not enough women, urban or centrists MPS. All this shuffle will do is....shuffle. It probably wont help his cause/agenda.


Corey
said
0 0

Cabinet shuffle is a good thing. Obviously the Conservatives had not been in office for many years, and are feeling their way through some of these files. It is better to evaluate your strengths and weaknesses and acknowledge where you have succeeded, and where you can do better, rather than to let problems linger. This is not a sign of incompetence, but rather a sign of growing maturity as a government. The more they focus on long term strategies, and governing with vision, rather then on polls, the better. You cannot constantly govern with one eye on polls....it leads to nothing....Just ask Paul Martin..


Robert
said
0 0

It is a pity that Harper has all of his cabinet and MP's swing on a short leash. When will we ever here anyone speak their mind without first getting permission from the head honcho.


Naomi Cornelius
said
0 0

I see very little change with the cabinet shuffle. Why not deal with issues such as the Afghanistan war, women's issues such as abuse, and equal rights (women still do not have these; stronger laws for parole violators; gun control; same sex marriages (should be legal in all provinces); gas prices...all these things need to be addressed not hidden under the carpet until someone has a majority government and then not dealt with...


Kirk
said
0 0

A shuffle is always a good thing as it shows that the PM is looking at his team and is willing to admit that mistakes were made when he placed people in their jobs, remember the PM was new to the job and didn't know those he was placing in jobs all that well and so was bound to make some mistakes and now after 2 years he now knows where people would better fit and lets face it what arears need to be changed to make voters happy because lets face it......this is politics and the PMs job is to lead this country and to get his party re-elected. Good move and great timing PM Harper


Katia
said
0 0

Peter McKay - you look so spiffy in that suit... I will support you no matter when you go


Fraser S
said
0 0

I continue to support our Prime Minister but I feel strongly that O`Connor should not be taken off the Defense portfolio.

Gordon O`Connor has an extensive background in the military and it would be wrong to replace him with someone who has no background in the military simply to appeal to the opposition who make a huge deal over the slightest thing they can pounce on. In a time when our troops are on hostile soil carrying out a UN sanctioned mission - its important to have the right man for the job at the top of our armed forces...in this case Gordon O`Connor, he has my full support.


Catherine
said
0 0

Making MacKay the Defence Minister is one way to ensure that we will be integrated with the US .... bad move.


rene s
said
0 0

The Conservatives work with what they have. If the inept public would elect more Conservatives then the whole make up of parliament would improve. It's been proven that more Liberals means less quality.


Joe Green
said
0 0

Peter the Pancake flipper is a good knick name for someone that constantly flips positions. This government is an embarrassment to Canada. It was bad enough that under MacKay's leadership funding for Palestinians preschools was cut, making hard times for them nearly impossible, but the hypocrisy is nearly unbearable. Remember that when a Canadian Soldier was killed by Israel in the illegal Israeli war against Lebanon, Harper and the whole government said that his death was part of an acceptable "measured response". REMEMBER THAT!

The last thing Canada needs is a flip flopper sending mixed messages to soldiers in the field. It's that simple. For as bad as O'Connor was, at least he had experience.



W.R.
said
0 0

If the PM is shuffling the Cabinet in advance of a "new agenda" (an agenda on which his government was not elected) then perhaps he should have the fortitude to go back to the polls and procure a new mandate.


Andrew
said
0 0

No matter what this government does. I want them out!!!


F.C.
said
0 0

I think rotating cabinet posts somewhat is usually a good idea- it brings in new blood, and keeps the ministers accountable as they won't feel too comfortable and complacent in their current ministries. I'm just happy to see Mrs. Ablonczy in the ministry. She has been a long-standing MP, and I think her post is well-earned.


Jill
said
0 0

Love the new cabinet.Well done, well thought out as well!

I always though Chretien was bully of a man, it is nice to see a gentleman with knowldege leading this country.


Dan M.
said
0 0

It's been noted; they shuffled the order of the deck chairs on the Titanic...obviously, the result was still the same!

Kayne
said
0 0

Some people will never be satisfied. Part of the reason Harper needs to shuffle his cabinet is that he has fulfilled his ENTIRE election agenda and needs to refresh. He nixed the weakest member of his cabinet and replaced him with the strongest in the most sensitive portfolio(defence). But of course, some who could never bring themselves to acknowledge any successes by "conservatives" will stick their head in the sand and use words like "neocons" and "hidden agenda" no matter what Harper does. Wake up, we finally have effective government!


Catherine
said
0 0

Replacing Gordon O'Connor was a good idea. Being ex-military, he is too close to certain issues and cares little for others. He previous agenda and priority, as Conservative Critic to DND when the Liberal were in power, was the Agent Orange scandal in Gagetown. This is still his main priority. Knowing his record before he retired from military service, he was a poor choice then and a poor choice now for DND. MacKay... I see him building a smaller version of the Pentagon south of Cold Lake.


Baylis
said
0 0

Diane Ablonczy should've got something better, but I still can't Harper and his government.



Hugh
said
0 0

Peter MacKay is an excellent choice for Defense Minister. He truely "Supports Our Troops" in all their duties. Thank you PM Harper for your continuing support to our military. Now let's hear from Taliban Jack.


perry
said
0 0

A new Ag minister maybe now we will get a push on the BSE crisis,or maybe a little more support for farmers.I guess thats more wishful thinking


Brad L
said
0 0

Gordon O'Connor, although a retired general, was an ineffective Minister of National Defence due to his poor communication skills and his political inexperience. This might not be to fair to O'Connor, since his portfolio has been a hot potato since the early 1990's with very few Ministers coming out unscathed.

Peter MacKay being appointed as his successor may be a mixed blessing. It does signal from the Harper Government their priorities with appointing MacKay, Harper's de facto deputy, to the position. However, it could signal a change in the Government's policies on Afghanistan and elsewhere.

Clearly the best thing is to wait and see how the dice roll.


Roger T
said
0 0

When's the next shuffle?


johnn
said
0 0

I just heard Jack Layton pooh-poohing the Prime Minister's choices for cabinet ministers.
If nothing else, that indicates Mr. Harper is moving in the right direction.


DM
said
0 0

Great move - politics trumps the military. While the general had complete understanding of the military he couldn't get the support from the real powers to be - the people.

Peter will do a much better job. This shows how important this is to Harper by putting his best person on the job.


Jill
said
0 0

I have..they are no left leaning enough I guess!


Sandy
said
0 0

Once again, Stephen Harper has shown tremendous leardership. Canada's government under the leadership of Stephen Harper ensures Canada's growth...and safety. I hope they will be here for a long time to come.


Sean Calder
said
0 0

There are a number of good things about this shuffle. A lot of the posts here make a big deal about nothing. The problems the government has had have been related to communication. The current hot-topic portfolios have suffered because the Ministers leading them haven't been the best communicators. We've seen that fixed now.

Ms. Oda doesn't speak French, so Quebec wasn't being well served by a Minister representing a file that is very important to them. Ms. Verner can do that. It's a fix.

Mr. O'Connor, as knowledgeable and experienced as he is with the subject material, wasn't able to effectively communicate/represent his file. Mr. MacKay has proven himself emminently capable of communicating no matter where he is, and a very fast study, therefore capable of handling whatever file he's given. It's a fix.

As for Mr. Layton, what was he expecting? It's been this governments position to support the NATO mission in Afghanistan. No new Minister in the Defense portfolio is going to break with that. No matter what Jack Layton and the NDP think.


Katie
said
0 0

I am happy to see that Mackay has replaced O'Connor...I'm a bit surprised, but quite happy with the change. O'Connor had to go, and MacKay is a great fit for the Defence Portfolio. They need a strong voice in the Federal Political Jungle.


Ken
said
0 0

Wake up, Harper did not fulfill his election promises, he reneged on them and put false, empty legislation in place of his other priorities in order to fool Canadians into thinking his government did something effective.

Stephen
said
0 0

I am so tired of hearing people bitch and complain about this government. Harper has done what he said he would do. Liberals need to get over the fact they lost, and that they are still not all that popular with the Canadian public. The past two Liberal governments got greedy and got caught. As for the Liberals' approval rating near the Conservatives', this shows that a percentage of the Canadian public is either too stupid to remember what the past two Liberal governments did and believes that we would be better off with yet another corrupt government.

So to the Liberal supporters, I would like to say "get off your soap boxes" This government has been one of the better ones in years.

No one will agree with everything that each government does, but I believe most would think we are better off with this government than a NDP or Liberal one. As all we see from the NPD's is a man who will never be the PM, and from the Liberals a very broken party, who does nothing but criticize this government for problems that they inherited from them, I.E Afghanistan


Dave
said
0 0

Well done, Mr. Harper! He delivered on his promises, kept the government focused on the priorities, shepherded a party and a cabinet new to the exercise of power, and has now showed us he is willing to take a fresh look at old problems. I see McKay as a great choice for defence, and I'm pleased to see Flaherty retains his position in finance. We need a steady hand and clear direction in both of these critically important areas, given global realitites.

paul
said
0 0

Harper has shown to ALL Canadians more leadership than any Liberal in the last 12 yrs, I'm proud of him, the way he has done business, especially abroad. He has his own beat to the drum, and its proving to be VERY successful, as we will soon see, when we go to the polls shortly. Nice to see things finally happening in Ottawa, especially to see it done in a different way as well, and to think, with a MINORITY govnt to boot. Go ahead opposition, force his hand, I can't wait to see the results, and they know it too, that's why they wont dare......


David Broughall
said
0 0

Old wine in new bottles.

With Harper as Prime Minister, cabinet shuffles are irrelevant because Cabinet is irrelevant. Harper's style of governing reminds me of an old political cartoon of Prime Minister R.B. Bennett holding a Cabinet meeting. Every face at the table was Bennett's.


Andrew
said
0 0

Too bad we can't shuffle the PM. I am counting the days until the next election...


Sherry
said
0 0

No matter who received the Defence portfolio they are doomed to failure... a few more of our young soldiers dying for this worthless cause and Peter will be out with the bath water and then no longer a threat to Harper's security as leader of the party!


David
said
0 0

Yahoo, Harper! Great big raspberry, Layton! Every one of these cabinet appointments makes sense. Keep up the good work, Conservatives!


John Smith
said
0 0

It shows that even after so many shuffles, Harper still hasn't realized that he is the only consistent dysfunctional feature in all this.


Barb
said
0 0

The majority of us complained about O'Connor, but what do we have now? A boy who cries on TV when his girlfriend dumps him. Is casting away a former Brigadier General with 30 years in the military in favour of Peter MacKay in the best interest of MY Canada????


JC
said
0 0

Canada's worst finance minister has ever had is still allowed to make decisions on the business of Canada.
I really felt that
PM Harper would of put
Hon.Mr Bernier as the finance minister.
Keeping Mr Flaherty was a very big surprise with his very poor management of his file.




Sean Cummings
said
0 0

Paul Wells summed it best on his blog today:

"The prime minister unveils his new team and none of them get to speak. But I'm sure nobody noticed that."

Nuff said...


Moe
said
0 0

I truly believe that time will tell the truth in this government. Years from now we will look back and see that Mr. Harper was one of the best Prime Ministers we ever had. If this country has the guts to give him a majority we will see this to be true. I have complete faith in the man.


George
said
0 0

The good thing is that with an election in 18 months or so, these new people won't have time to even learn the job. Of course, that hasn't stopped them from messing up before.
What makes this government different than past ones is the ministers really don't make any decisions. The elected 'King' and his unelected advisors form the policy and the ministers give the carefully scripted speeches.
You can be certain, none of that will change.


mhz
said
0 0

Now if only Harper would shuffle himself out and take MacKay and Flaherty with him!


Zach
said
0 0

Moving Mr. Prentice is the best move thus far. He's easily one of the best Conservative MP's. Overall though, there's little to nothing exciting, because the problems with the party originate with the image Mr Harper projects for the Conservatives - a cold, arrogant Western bully. And Mr Dion is right - attempting to blame a Liberal government that is now long-gone is ridiculous.


Ken Lawson
said
0 0

I very disappointed that David Emerson was retained as Trade Minister, this means more crap, junk and garbarge will flow in from China. Gordon Campbell is also to blame, this what these Team Canada trips did for Canada...


Christina Noble
said
0 0

The single most annoying and offensive part of this article is the fact that we "HAVE" to have more female cabinet ministers. For your information, I'm a woman who believes that the best, brightest, and most able candidate should fill a position... not get selected merely on the sex they were born into. Sad sad sad.




Greg
said
0 0

Ever heard the saying, "The buck stops here?" Cabinet shuffles (another card game term) just obscure the fact that the dealer is the one who delivers the cards (or not). Wait a second, I think I got shortchanged...


Ian
said
0 0

Steven Harper could find the cure for cancer and the Liberals and their "people" would find some fault in it. For all of you who keep saying that Mr. Harper keeps his MPs on a short leash, I seem to remember Johnny Crouton being much worse.


Mike
said
0 0

I think that the cabinet shuffle is a great thing. I know that no one in the military has faith in O'Connor whatsoever. Maybe now military members will finally have a Minister that can relate to the public instead of a washed up Brigadier General. Now maybe the military will finally have someone who will actually listen to the soldiers ...


Pat S.
said
0 0

MacKay as Defense Minister??? What a joke. Funniest one yet! Just like this Government. further proof that Harper has no idea how to run this country. I guess he will follow whatever the US says, and next thing we will have the weapons in space...


Marcus
said
0 0

Did anyone hear the "golf ball" comment that the Prime Minister slipped into his speech? Just priceless. Damn, the guy is sharp.


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

CTV.ca Interactive

Stephen Harper

Cabinet Shuffle

Who's in, who's out? Keep track of Stephen Harper's cabinet: mini-profiles and photos.

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz