CTV News | Marijuana may increase psychosis risk

Top Stories -   

Marijuana may increase psychosis risk

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Newsnet: Study links pot to mental problems
Canada AM: British study looks at marijuana risks

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(39)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Fri. Jul. 27 2007 10:14 AM ET

Smoking marijuana can increase your risk of developing a psychotic illness by more than 40 per cent, authors conclude in a controversial study in this week's edition of The Lancet.

The study suggests that even occasional pot use could raise the risk of psychosis, a category of mental disorders that includes schizophrenia. The authors say the findings underline the need to remind marijuana users of the long-term risks.

Dr. Theresa Moore, University of Bristol, and Dr. Stanley Zammit, Cardiff University, and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis of 35 studies, dated up to 2006, to see whether there was evidence to connect cannabis use to mental health disorders.

They found that those who smoked pot were 41 per cent more likely to develop a psychotic illness than those who had never used the drug.

The most frequent pot smokers were more than twice as likely to develop a psychotic illness than non-smokers -- a 50 to 200 per cent higher chance.

Nevertheless, the overall risk for all marijuana smokers remains very low, the authors note.

The researchers say governments should now work to dispel the misconception that marijuana is a benign drug.

"We have described a consistent association between cannabis use and psychotic symptoms, including disabling psychotic disorders," the authors say.

"We believe that there is now enough evidence to inform people that using cannabis could increase their risk of developing a psychotic illness later in life."

The 2007 World Drug Report issued by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime found that 16.8 per cent of Canadians between the ages of 15 and 64 reported using marijuana at least once in the past year -- four times more than the global average of 3.8 per cent.

Previous research has highlighted the link between marijuana and the risk of schizophrenia-like symptoms, such as paranoia and hallucinations. Some scientists have speculated that cannabis could cause psychosis because it interrupts important neurotransmitters, such as dopamine. That can interfere with the brain's communication systems.

The researchers on this latest study concede that they can't prove that marijuana itself increases the risk of psychosis, or whether those who choose to smoke marijuana have certain personality traits the pre-dispose them to developing psychosis.

It's also possible that pre-existing mental conditions lead many to both marijuana use and psychoses.

The Associated Press reports that two of the authors of this study were invited to sit as experts on the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Cannabis Review in 2005. Several authors reported being paid to attend drug company-sponsored meetings related to marijuana, and one received consulting fees from companies that make antipsychotic medications.

Please Add Comments( )

Art
said
0 0

I know people that have smoked it for years. They're actualy the most grounded people I know. One has to wonder who is paying for these studies.


dawn
said
0 0

Another reefer madness story. These kinda stories have been out since the beginning of Prohibition. Millions world wide for decades, so if this study is true then 40% of those millions would be in hospital by now "Where are they????"


mike
said
0 0

How can they come to that kinda conclusion in just one year of study.

"meta-analysis of 35 studies, dated up to 2006"

It takes years just to diagnose some patients.


Don J
said
0 0

These studies are frustrating. Besides it sounding a lot like the old "reefer madness" propaganda, how do they know that the pot smokers with "psychosis" (which in itself is not really a thing) developed it BECAUSE of pot, and would not have otherwise? Do they have a magic time machine to go back and test the other way? Are they doing these tests on perfectly equal clones or something? This, like most studies, is misleading and pure sensationalism.


Kevin Gerard
said
0 0

The last paragraph contains the relevant information. Unlike this one, actual scientific studies follow the evidence rather than forcing the data to fit a preconceived conclusion. This study is the product of the pharmaceutical industry which is unable to profit from medical marijuana.


Jesse
said
0 0

People used to think smoking was harmless and now we know that's not the case - we're finding out the same thing about pot as time goes by. However, pot should be legal because its not the governments job to be people's parents


Layton Bennett
said
0 0

I have been a marijuana user for roughly half my life, and had mental illness before I started smoking pot. I suffered from severe depression and anxiety, but have been on pharmaceutical treatment for several years now. If I attempt to go off my medication (Paxil), the anxiety and depression are FAR worse than they ever were before treatment, from a severe case of the blues to suicidal tendencies (I have had a suicide attempt when trying to wean myself off the pharmaceuticals), quitting marijuana does not give me the same effect, just a little cranky for a day or so. Which one of these drugs I am TRULY dependent on? Besides if Pfizer or Glaxo Smith Kline had the patent on pot, it wouldn't be called self medicating now would it
? This study seems to me to be well...fertilizer.


Don Morton
said
0 0

Is it that pot smokers have a higher risk of developing psychosis OR are people with psychosis more prone to self medicating with marijuana?


Craig
said
0 0

Marijuana is a drug, simple as that.

It affects your mind, your body and your actions and should (in no way) be condoned by the government.


Nick J Davis
said
0 0

They are getting closer and closer every time NEW research is done; even if there is no association of pot with psychosis and it is the person with a disorder, this begs the question, should we be allowing places to sell it on our streets of Canada, for a price, not just for the owner, but suggestively for Dr.'s who take a cut, for a profit?

This issue will sooner or later kill the whole movement, and those who wish to keep a dead issue alive, well, they're just, what do they call it?

Oh ya, "BURNT"~!


Art
said
0 0

I would like to reply to "Craig" you say it a drug... Well so is coffee, beer, wine, thoes power drinks (Red Bull), tabaco. All of these effect the body and mind, but they're all legal.


Evan Koronewski
said
0 0

So if marijuana is a drug that affects your body, mind, and actions, and should be kept illegal by the government...how does this compare to alcohol and tobacco?

They both are far more lethal then pot, and many more deaths are attributed to alcohol-related driving or addiction, as well as tobacco, each and every year.

Maybe they should be illegal too and we can live in a sheltered right-wing world. On no wait..our government profits way too much off of taxing alcohol, and tobacco.


Don J
said
0 0

Layton Bennett: Paxil is the worst withdrawal out there - if anyone's seen Trainspotting's heroin withdrawal scene they'd start to have a BIT of an idea how bad Paxil withdrawal is: 5-30 days of PURE HELL. Try KavaKava tea for the head zaps and ginger for the nausea and take some time off work... you'll get through it.


John A
said
0 0

To Craig,

Alcohol affects your mind, body, and actions also, however the government has no problem with it, and profits greatly from it. Ask yourself, how many people have died from smoking marijuana? You'll be hard pressed to find anybody. Now, research how many people have died from alcohol, or related deaths such as drunk driving. The numbers grow exponentially.

As for this story, the last paragraph says it all.


Mark
said
0 0

Art obviously believes anecdotal evidence in the gold standard in scientific research and mike has no clue what a meta-analysis of 35 studies is. You are both criticizing sound scientific approaches with flawed logic.


jon
said
0 0

I am always amused by the delusional hard core potheads that believe that cigarettes are more of a health hazard than their joints. Smoke another reefer it'll help maintain your fantasy world... ever wonder why you cough your lungs up all the time? Hmmmm...


M.M.
said
0 0

As usual, the closest thing to the truth is revealed near the end of the article:

"It's also possible that pre-existing mental conditions lead many to both marijuana use and psychoses."

So it might be a *PRE-EXISTING* mental condition that slightly increases your chances of using marijuana and not the other way around - and that's *IF* this study's numbers are even accurate.

As well, would alcohol, ecstasy, cocaine, heroin, prescription/over-the-counter drugs, etc, have produced similar or even much higher numbers if studied in this way?

Considering the scientists' own admission that "the overall risk for all marijuana smokers remains very low", I'd say there's not much to worry about here. Just more weak fodder for misguided prohibitionists.


Jesse
said
0 0

@ Evan Koronewski

You mention alcohol related car crashes but nobody thinks about drug driving. People under the influence of drugs/certain medications should NOT be driving. And children/teenagers should not be using drugs. All this talk about how harmless marijuana is sends the wrong message to teens.


brian
said
0 0

Simply put, the government cannot control and tax the growing and use of weed, so therefore it is illegal. Anyone can grow this stuff for personal use - quick and out of site, all natural. Government does not like this, because they cannot have their share - pathetic. Guess who funded the study? Alcohol, coffee, pharmeceuticals, etc; the government gets their cut. Nuff said.


ilea
said
0 0

I agree with Don J , most of these studies are inconclusive, the effects of pot vary from person to person. It isn't just pot that we have to make legal it should be the whole plant. The governement can tax the production of hemp products and for sure make a profit. When the production of ASA was introduced to the population, that is when they started on about making it illegal and harmful to take in.


dave
said
0 0

This has nothing to do with Reefer Madness.
It's a simple, sober report saying some people who smoke pot are more susceptable to having disruptions in their neurotransmitters.
So you pot heads don't have to be bothered getting your shorts tied in knot and go on like this is some big conspiracy perpetrated by the Man.
I've known many people over the years who chose not to smoke pot because it makes them feel paranoid.
If you've ever read any Jim Morrison biographies you'd find he never touched pot for the same reason.
Not everyone is the same and a small minority of people do experience very negative effects, including psychosis.
So take a chill pill, or better yet, smoke a joint.




Paul
said
0 0

Consuming too much sugar can cause diabetes, which can result in blindness, amputation, and death. But sugar is not illegal. Too much alcohol can result in cirrhosis of the liver, which can also result in death. But alcohol is not illegal. Marijuana should not be illegal either. It may harm the health, but only with the full consent of the person using it.

By making marijuana illegal, we have only fed organized crime and violence. We have given criminal records to countless individuals who are otherwise law-abiding citizens. And we have not decreased marijuana use. The solution? Legalize marijuana and tax it. Use the profits for education.

And let’s stop blaming the dealers. They are in business only because our kids want to smoke marijuana. To change that, we need to take better care of our kids. Let’s start spending billions on the arts, science, sports, and counseling for young people, instead of on our hopeless war on drugs.




Shannon
said
0 0

I think that the key phrase in this thing is "It's also possible that pre-existing mental conditions lead many to both marijuana and psychoses". My mom had a psychotic break and was a heavy pot smoker. But she has a weakened brain from a long term chronic illness and stopped her ativan cold turkey. So technically she'd have contributed to that forty percent; but there were OTHER issues that led to it. I personally think it was the ativan withrawl and not the marijuana that caused it since when they started giving her ativan again she went back to normal.


Joe
said
0 0

"The researchers on this latest study concede that they can't prove that marijuana itself increases the risk of psychosis, or whether those who choose to smoke marijuana have certain personality traits the pre-dispose them to developing psychosis.


It's also possible that pre-existing mental conditions lead many to both marijuana use and psychoses.


The Associated Press reports that two of the authors of this study were invited to sit as experts on the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Cannabis Review in 2005. Several authors reported being paid to attend drug company-sponsored meetings related to marijuana, and one received consulting fees from companies that make antipsychotic medications."

JUNK SCIENCE


Monica V.
said
0 0

What really kills me is that the same studies are made on things like OxyContin (which by the way my husband was on and almost killed himself and turned into some sort of maniac until he got off of it) but if they sell it as a "prescription" its ok. They can't make any money on pot yet so they say it's a bad drug. Frankly, a drug is a drug and the side effects from oxy or morphine or any other prescription drug is more mind and body altering than a joint. They're just pissed because they can't make any money on it yet... but when they can it will be deemed a "miracle drug"!! Smoke some pot one day and then take oxycontin the next. You'll see that you'd way rather have the pot. What a bunch of hypocrites.


Ed
said
0 0

Same old, same old:



"......There was only one catch and that was Catch-22, which specified that a concern for one's safety in the face of dangers that were real and immediate was the process of a rational mind. (Lt.) Orr was crazy and could be grounded. All he had to do was ask; and as soon as he did, he would no longer be crazy and would have to fly more missions. Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, but if he was sane he had to fly them. If he flew them he was crazy and didn't have to; but if he didn't want to he was sane and had to. Yossarian was moved very deeply by the absolute simplicity of this clause of Catch-22 and let out a respectful whistle.

"That's some catch, that Catch-22," he [Yossarian] observed.
"It's the best there is," Doc Daneeka agreed........"

How can a person cope in some sectors of society and still be sane?

One has to have a "brain"(intellect) to suffer brain damage. Only the pimps and dealers will argue (to their clients) that one can "use" or be "used"- and only those of superior intellect will cope.

The new clergy of the secular world - Phd's et. al. are considered infallable. Perhaps some day they will study those who traffick but don't use. Such coping skills!

Louis-Paul
said
0 0

Any recreational use of drugs should be banned and prosecuted with utmost prejudice.

If marijuana is as beneficial as it's supporters claim, then it should be made into a pill/syrup etc for it's medical use and dispensed at pharmacies just all other legal drugs. Any other method (ie smoked) leaves it open to abuse too easily.

If you need mind and/or mood altering drugs, you have bigger problems to deal with. Go see a psychiatrist!


steve
said
0 0

This an old story that seems to be making a second appearance in the news in only a few months.
It's strange that when you talk about guns, the advocates say its not guns that are dangerous it's people usiing them. Yet with marijuana its the substance that's dangerous not the user, and seems like the user could be saved if marijuana was not in there hands.
If a person is going to go psycho, than that's going to happen with or without marijuana. Just like a criminal is going to commit a crime with or without a gun. Conservatives need to get a grip on reality.


Joel Pelletier
said
0 0

Firstly, we should all be wary of a study when the study uses a meta-analysis. A Meta-Analysis does not use any new data to make its conclusion. The researchers took 35 different studies and then tried to find an average effect based on these studies. The results of such a study is very much dictated by the intentions of the authors, they decide which data to include and much of the time the individual studies they use can suffer from a range of problems that the original researchers did not account for. Essentially, we can say, yes there may be an effect, however they still have too little data to say for sure. A reasoned and skeptical position is to accept that there may be an effect (it sounds like the effect only affects those with a specific genetic marker that makes them succeptible to specific psychosis), and that the data is still very early and should not be taken too seriously until a larger, better controlled study happens. As it stands a meta-analysis poses no new data and is only meant to show the average effect of these 35 studies.


Dave
said
0 0

Louis Paul said
"If marijuana is as beneficial as it's supporters claim, then it should be made into a pill/syrup etc for it's medical use and dispensed at pharmacies just all other legal drug"

It is.. It's called Marinol and is a wonderful saviour for cancer patients. Unfortunately you have pharmaceutical companies artificially fabricating it, rather than consuming the pure plant.

Show us stats of weed related deaths. Thought so.

rog
said
0 0

So it increaes your 0.5-1% chance of developing psychosis in the general population to 0.7-1.4% real scary... Clever of them to spin it the other way though and give the big scary 41% increase


Baker
said
0 0

I would sooner work with someone who smoked a few joints the night before than someone who drank a bottle of whiskey. This is all about money. Drinking and smoking is no damn good for you but it's legal because the government can tax the hell out of it. I have a theory that when technology comes up with a pot-breathalizer for police cruzers and they start doing road side checks we will find out that there are many good,decent, other wise lawbidding white and blue collar workers who use pot. At this point pot will be at least be decrimialized and down the road legalized and taxed like booze and cigs. If you drink and smoke don't point your righteous finger at me and say I am a pot head. Has anyone seen how disfunctional a alcoholic is. You can't get hooked on pot like you can on booze.


JK
said
0 0

I am high strung and anxious, always have been. I'm obsessive compulsive and an absolute perfectionist. If I didn't smoke pot I'd never calm down.

I did try Celexa for anxiety for a year and I'll tell you - it was awful. Being on it was like living in a haze - it was affecting my work - it affected everything I did. When I went off it I had dizzy spells for about 2 months - kind of light headed moments every 10 minutes constantly.

When I go on vacation outside of Canada I never take any pot and never smoke any pot and am absolutely fine - this has been up to 3 weeks. No cravings, no nothing. I can function as the professional that I am at work and when I finally do get home at 8:00 at night, instead of cleaning/organizing my "imperfect house" (it's spotless) incessantly I relax. I use pot to self-medicate - it is the perfect alternative (for me) to living a life of constant anxiety and obsessive compulsive behaviour.


Funny Thing
said
0 0

I just find it funny that a story regarding pot can cause (in such a short time) more comments and discussion then the one regarding Afghanistan that was taking place the other day. Nice to see what’s important to people.


Marcus
said
0 0

Marijuana is a drug. Countless studies have been conducted against marijuana--why not learn about a drug apriori to legalizing it unlike cigarettes??? Why do people discuss about legalizing a drug anyway? Haven't we already legalized enough drugs (alcohol, cigarettes) with too many problems? Leave marijuana illegal. If people think they need it so bad and need to fill their day with a "suck on a Mary-J", then they can continue to do whatever they do to fill their "need". The government should not waste their time & our money on legalizing people's perceived needs (wants).


Mary J
said
0 0

As a weed smoker, I may be the only one in agreeance that there is no doubt it is harmful. I feel the effects from it's use when I'm running or biking, my brain is groggy when I'm working, so I keep it to weekend use hanging out around a campfire or so. I think "abuse" is the issue here, and anything heavily abused will cause health problems. If pot smokers would keep off the road and maybe ease off a bit on the amount they use, things like, not smoking it in front of their kids, maybe the opposition would take them a little more seriously. I live a very healthy life and hate to see anyone profit off of something I could grow in my greenhouse.

Joe
said
0 0

Just because some drugs are legal (alcohol, coffee) doesn't mean we should legalize other drugs...that argument is so pathetic - by the same logic we should legalize a whole shwack of other drugs too eh? Look, ALL drugs are unhealthy for the system...ALL OF THEM! Coffee (caffeine) is bad for you, alcohol is bad for you, tobacco (nicotine), and even the common pharmaceuticals. If you live a poor lifestyle where you need stimulation from ANY of these drugs (and that is everyone in Canada, since everyone drinks coffee) , then I can understand the desire to legalize more of them - just imagine, people drinking coffee by the pot to bring them up, smoking a joint to bring them down - it happens all too often already! People are so addicted to stimulation. If you want to do this to your body, fine. But there is a better way: eat a diet based on fruits and veggies and consume meat once or twice a week instead of everyday, and you will regain youthful health and vitality, and even mental tranquility, and you will also look and smell great to boot.

Jill
said
0 0

Economics 101 - our society runs by supply and demand, with prices changing to reflect both. If there is a demand for marijuana there will be a supply - someone is going to make money from it. If it were legal the prices would be lower and the attraction for organized crime would be gone. If it were legal, otherwise law-abiding pot-smoking citizens could admit to its use without legal reprisal, and tests like this would contain data that people might actually be impressed with.


W.Williams
said
0 0

It may not affect everyone the same way. I know that after many years of using it, my ex became a totally different person, showing all signs of psychosis.

The whole family did not need any study to confirm it. Just observation.





Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz