Sci-Tech -
News Sections
Scientists find evidence SARS came from animals
Font-size:
Share
Print
Associated Press
Date: Friday Sep. 5, 2003 8:17 AM ET
WASHINGTON A virus found in wild animals captured and sold for food in China is genetically similar to the virus that infects humans with SARS, suggesting the disease jumped from animals to humans and could do so again, a study says.
Chinese scientists report this week in the journal Science that they compared the genetic makeup of a virus isolated from human SARS patients with a virus found in animals that had been captured and then held in a retail food market.
Tests showed that the animals had a coronavirus that was 99.8 per cent genetically identical to a virus that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, in humans.
"Our findings suggest that the markets provide a venue for the animal (coronavirus) viruses to amplify and transmit to new hosts, including humans and this is critically important from the point of view of public health," the Chinese researchers reported.
The researchers found the virus in civets, raccoon-dogs and ferret badgers that were offered for sale as food in a market in Shenzhen, but said it is not clear if these animals were the natural source of the virus.
"It is conceivable that (the market animals) were all infected from another, as yet unknown animal source which is in fact the true reservoir in nature," the researchers said.
They also tested merchants in the market and found that eight of 20, or 40 per cent, of wild animal traders, and three of 15, or 20 per cent, of the workers who slaughter the animals had antibodies to the virus. Only five per cent of the vegetable traders in the same market had the viral antibodies. None of those tested reported symptoms of SARS in the past six months.
The study was conducted by 18 researchers from the University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital in Hong Kong and two Chinese government health agencies. The first author is Yi Guan of the University of Hong Kong.
SARS was first recognized in the Guangdong Province in China in November. It spread to Hong Kong in February and eventually to more than 30 other countries, including Canada. More than 7,900 people worldwide developed SARS and more than 800 died.
The disease subsided in June. Health experts fear it could re-emerge this fall as the weather turns colder.
A SARS infection can cause flu-like symptoms, including a high fever and head and body aches. Some patients develop congestion and have trouble breathing. It is spread through person-to-person contact and by inhaling droplets from coughs and sneezes of people who are infected. Severe cases can be deadly, particularly for the elderly and very young.
Researchers early on suspected that the virus was spread to humans from wild animals captured and sold for food. Chinese officials for a time banned the sale of civet cats, but that ban was lifted last month.
Henry Niman, a Harvard University professor and SARS researcher, said the new study is important because it moves researchers closer to finding the original source of the virus.
He said the study also suggests that Chinese officials should not allow selling of civet cats and similar animals for food without first checking them for the presence of the coronavirus.
"It is not a good idea to sell these animals without testing them," said Niman. Without such testing, he said, officials "are really playing roulette."
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
The chance of the destruction of our planet is very very small with this collider, but who are these people to decide what risks are acceptable for all of mankind? It puts me at unease and adds to my anxiety. CERN acknowledges that there are miniscule risks -- they admit to it so please spare the convoluted retorts.
