Boyer, Marc

British Columbia, Vancouver Quadra, Marijuana Party

My style of electioneering has nothing to do with getting elected. It’s about benefiting from Democracy, by running for Office. I can’t hide, so I got to get the message out.

For example: Individuals in an officially recognized party, under the Elections Act, have Constitutionally Expressed Guarantees to Freedom of Association, and Expression, which means:

We can form an association that attracts social/political participation by protecting beliefs that the majority considers wrong or false.

This means that, under our Constitutional law, the "Authorities" cannot challenge the legality of my Marijuana Party Compassion Club’s beliefs, unless they can refute the validity of my beliefs, through my interpretation of my activity:

Genesis-12 says: We can seek benefit from the fruit of a seed bearing plant.

Cannabis is a seed bearing plant.

The Bible must be proven wrong before calling my beliefs criminal.

The rule of law is Supreme over all statutes, laws, rules and regulations, and is enforced with all Oaths of allegiance.

Medical access to cannabis is a Supreme Court recognized Charter right that is being denied by Orders in Council, which are a clear encroachment of Canada’s Constitutional rule of law:

RULE OF LAW: A Fundamental principle of our Constitution must mean some basic things:

First, that the law is Supreme over officials of the government as well as private individuals, and thereby preclusive of the influence of arbitrary power.

Second, the rule of law requires creation and maintenance of an actual order of positive laws, which preserves and embodies the more general principle of normative order.

Third, Law and Order are indispensable elements of civilized life.

P.S.: Under a set of unique definitions to ‘key’ words in the Elections Act: A ‘private individual’, under our Constitutional rule of law, is any Official of any officially recognized party.

This gives me the express right to challenge Orders in Council. The defense for my politics may be bullet proof, but, I am not.

Democracy works: Because ‘Orders in Council’ so directly effect the Charter rights of those who vote for us, then under the rule of law, we have a Constitutional guarantee to protect our beliefs, and seek remedy by forming an Association, in order to create & maintain an actual set of positive laws, Therefore, we can operate compassion clubs inside any party headquarters, in order to ‘protect’ our members, by operating an alternate MMAR program that services the medical needs our members, under a Freedom of Contract guarantee, in ORDER to protect this private club’s private individuals from ongoing trespass/abuse of our Charter rights.

In the event that you find this belief as way too far out there, then you are not in agreement with a judgment that graced me with a suspended sentence, for trafficking in medical marijuana to people in need.

Now don’t get too excited: the Judge also made a ruling that sends this issue to the Supreme Court and/or the Appeals Court for final judgment. These court dates will deal with the whole issue that was raised in this case.

In the event that you think the bigger issues do not shatter your PUBLIC TRUST, then you are a victim of media propaganda:

In 1998, The BC Police Act was enacted by Legislation, (with a caveat to authorize implementation of an alternate unlegislated Part-9 (namely): The BC Police Act Reform White Paper & Draft Police Complaints Act. Since the 2003 Report, the Commissioner calls for urgent reform of ‘what’s now called Part-9’ of the Police Act. …(P.S.: they’re enforcing it.)

The urgent reform is to pass the Legislation to make it legal because this re’form’ paper was only an experiment with a life of 3 years, and yet, the necessary legislation has never been passed.

P.S.: The reason the order died on the table is because of a clear ruling by Judge Oppal, who before the ‘Special Committee’ May 10, 2002 stated: “The Officer of Legislature status was necessary given the nature of his Office.” P.S.: BC law states THAT: An officer of the legislature cannot be removed, from liability of his Oath to the Sovereign’s interest, except by a public process, through a public vote within the Legislative Assembly.

P.S.: (to quote the Commissioner) “Even the best administration cannot transcend the problems of inadequate Legislation” - “What is at fault is the legislation itself. It’s unclear, ambiguous and does not provide adequate remedies to the Office of the Police Complaint Commission to ensure effective ‘civilian oversight.’

(P.S.: This has nothing to do with civilians overseeing police)

Note: The first fundamental principle is Civilian Oversight:

Police must be authorized to do things that would be illegal for ordinary citizens, & “Police must not be unduly fettered in the exercise of those powers.”

Police can (under strict regulations) break some laws.

The difference between must and can is the difference between us living in a ‘police state’ or living in a ‘civilized society.’

P.S.: Without legislation, after 2002, the legislature is not ‘accountable’ for the Police Commissioner’s mandate, and every time any police officer commits ‘doing things that would be illegal’, then they’re committing political crimes. When a Judge finds that the criminal police behavior in my case does not put the system of Justice in disrepute, then this Judge is upholding a ‘state sponsored criminal society’!

Let it be known to any and all that:

From the onset of my legal troubles that I setup the police to ‘bust me’; because when ‘police must be able to break laws’, then by definition everyone suffers from these criminals in our lawless society.

Can anyone explain how we the people can ‘protect ourselves’ from living in a police imposed criminal society, When there’s no one in Authority to defend us?

Not one legislature is doing anything about this police state.

No Judges, no prosecutors or not even one defense council is publicly raising any objections to this illegal police state.

No press is printing anything on this, to defend our rights.

In fact, I’ve been under a publication ban for years now.

I’m defending everyone’s right to live in a ‘civilized society.’

Our police are criminally usurping powers that literally wipe out sec. 8(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada (CCC), which is where ‘every defense and excuse of common law is protected’, and this criminal power-grab, is being encouraged by the press.

The Sun bashes my political activity as “the federal Marijuana Party‘s radical anti-establishment agenda!”

If disrupting this criminal police state means being anti-establishment then so be it. This totally unconstitutional criminal police state is now just 3-4 years old, & if it was such a good idea, then why is this reality not public knowledge?

The press has abandoned its trust of protecting the people ... And if you think this is bad; it gets horrifically worse.

FACT: The Archives will show that the only time in Vancouver’s history, when an Oath of allegiance was taken was in 1941 in World War II, when Chief Constable MacKay: (Quote) Swore to serve our Sovereign Lord the King, cause the peace to be kept and preserved, prevent all offences against the persons and properties of His Majesty’s Subjects and others, according to Law.

P.S.: The Police Chiefs of every municipality took this Oath after declaring war as an automatic Constitutional necessity. This was done in order (1) To limit the arbitrary use of power that is inherent during wartime, and (2) To prevent using built-in war-rule inequities to wage war on the people.

Why was it not done when we entered this World War?

P.S.: Our Canadian Parliament, as well as the rest of the ‘free world’ since September 2001 is subscribed and engaged in what George Bush now calls World War III, Lest we not forget ‘War is hell’, especially when these Americans want to wage this war on your front door through deceit, smoke and mirrors.

Take my word for it: since the onset of our NAFTA agreement

They are illegally upholding ‘by the people for the Economy’.

P.S.: The Economy has always been a ‘weapon of warfare’ to control the wealth of other nations.

The reason this Oath of allegiance was not automatically enacted during this World War is because this war is to force every government to turn against its own people, by serving the economy before the people.

The USA wants the world to join a war with no objective other than civil war on its own minorities to benefit the economy. P.S.: This war on terror and drugs simply has nobody to negotiate peace with; It’s ‘forever war’ on the poor and sick, who are the most downtrodden, for the benefit of proliferating lots of jobs in a ‘police state.’

All of this criminal activity by authority MUST stop by demanding Police Chiefs to take an Oath of allegiance.

It’s a Constitutional protection that was deliberately overlooked

The Police have in effect done a coup d‘Etat, to rule like criminals, just in case we the people don’t want the rule of law of NAFTA to override all our rights.

In the event that you wonder why this is happening, it’s because the BAR of The Upper Canada Law Society screwed everyone in 1993 by abandoning their OATH OF ALLEGIANCE:

P.S.: This was done 2-years after NAFTA was implemented

For centuries the Oath of everyone on the BAR was:

Do you sincerely promise/swear that you will diligently, faithfully and to the best of your ability execute the offices of Barrister and Solicitor, that you will not promote suits upon frivolous pretences, that you will not pervert the law to favour or prejudice anyone, but in all things conduct yourself truly and with integrity, that you will uphold the Sovereign’s interest and that of your fellow citizens according to the laws of Canada and this Province?

The new BARRISTERS’ AND SOLICITORS’ OATH reads as follows:

Do you sincerely promise/swear that you will diligently, faithfully and to the best of your ability execute the offices of Barrister and Solicitor, that you will not promote suits upon frivolous pretences, that you will not pervert the law to favour or prejudice anyone, but in all things conduct yourself truly and with integrity; and that you will uphold the rule of law and the rights and freedoms of all persons according to the laws of Canada, and of this Province?

P.S.: it’s not even called an Oath of allegiance.

They literally committed treason by removing ‘upholding the Sovereign’s interest’ because there’s a lot more to this principle than serving the superficial entity called the ‘Queen’; it’s removing a Magna Carta maxim. No lawyer on either side of the bench, has to uphold Canada’s best interest.

It nullifies the last vestige of "by the people for the people."

Before continuing, I need to point out that nothing had to change, with the new definition. The crime of the Millennium is the extent of the changes that have been enacted by this new definition. The changing of ‘citizens’ to ‘persons’ is pure perversion. It literally opens the door to the return of slavery.

Let’s face the facts: Everyone who works in the judicial system is on the BAR; 90% of all politicians, & most big businesses are run by lawyers from the BAR, and they all collectively, behind closed doors, fraudulently converted the PUBLIC TRUST of upholding the rule of law of Canada, by enforcing the rule of law of NAFTA.

To quote Shakespeare: "First, we kill all the lawyers" ...

Let’s face it, society has taken a hard turn to the right in the last decade, and it’s not going to get better, because the rule of law of NAFTA is controlled by perverts, who override our Charter of Rights whenever our freedoms interfere with big money & the economy. The rule of law of commerce, & government administration has always been ‘respondit superior’, and Constitutionally this rule of law cannot govern the people, because it must treat people like property, not like humans, which historically leads to civil unrest, & a police state, which really benefits their economy.

This rule of law of NAFTA is in full force and is destroying the social fabric of both the United States and Canada. Those who are orchestrating these events are perverts, who are addicted to power, & there is no sanity to the psychopathic intent of this policy. It can only lead to war and political unrest.

This NAFTA rule of law will inevitably override every one of our rights of every Canadian & American, because our freedom interferes with making money. Historically, the rule of law of commerce has destroyed every society that forced it on the people.

In commerce, if you don’t like your boss, you quit and go get another job. In society it’s not that simple. Discontent and turmoil created by police who enforce the economy’s best interests will only lead to major civil unrest and ‘force’ the USA to protect it’s economic interests by taking over our Country, and as far as they are concerned this is a win-win scenario of these perverts.

As I said from the start: My electioneering has nothing to do with getting elected. It’s all about benefiting from Democracy, by running for Office. I can’t hide so I got to get the message out

I’m doing everything I can to protect our Nation from perverts who want us to become Americans, for their own personal profit, by doing my level best to expose a corrupt society of governance, for the love of my Canada. I’m in court and in the polls to get my message out. I got this far without lawyers, and I’m fighting for my country on fundamentally solid Constitution ground.

The publication ban is still in full force and I truly can’t think of one good reason other than TREASON by the press for me still being under one. This media ban of my court actions is not going to make this mess go away, it will only make it worse.

Raising public awareness before proceeding with my Court of Appeals motions is imperative, unless you think that a banker has a heart, or a Judge has a conscience, because I’m attacking the BAR, and NAFTA and these Entities have no ethics, especially when they are covering up their collective criminality

I’m defending the freedom to be a free Canadian. Democracy is a platform where it only takes one citizen to stand up for our Canada. I honestly can’t see me getting elected, but I can’t think of another way to get the story out. There are powerful perverts who want this story quashed. I come with a powerful message of hope to fix this mess.

majority seats = 155