Janis Mackey Frayer

Libya's Loose Weapons: Part One

User Tools: A A |  Email ThisEmail  | Print   Facebook   

  

2
Janis Mackey Frayer

At one of Gadhafi's former main bases in Tripoli, where his forces were hiding most of its armou.

Piled behind an abandoned gas station near Misrata is one of the bigger concerns facing Libya's new rulers: Crates of anti-tank shells, rocket-propelled grenades, mortars and other heavy ammunition are stacked high and many of the boxes are smashed open, their contents scattered.

"Everything… we found everything!" chortled the man who appointed himself our guide. A closer look reveals they indeed found a lot in their looting of Moammar Gadhafi's warehouses, bunkers and bases.

For months I have documented several piles like it -- the disparate parts of Gadhafi's (former) arsenal -- from the early days before NATO air power joined the fray to most recently during the fall of Tripoli. I will share some of these findings in a series of posts to The Desk.

A disclaimer though: This ‘project' was never intended as the catalogue of a weapons expert but rather a reporter's record of observations about what Gadhafi had and where it came from.

Mainly, it offers a glimpse at the firepower now in the hands of rebels and that, if uncontrolled, risks seeping through Libya's borders and into the black market.

At that gas station, the heavy ammunition and the rest of the spoils just sit there uncovered and unguarded. Of particular concern in this inventory: shoulder-to-air missiles, as shown in this photo.

These are of Russian provenance like much of the arsenal Gadhafi had collected. The crates are marked with ‘9M32M'. This variety of missile -- known also by the names Strela or SA-7 -- has a range of about 5.5 kilometers and its portability makes it a worry.

"This is a fairly simple weapon to use," according to Fred Abrahams of Human Rights Watch, who is collecting information on Libya's loose weapons, "It can be fired against a civilian aircraft."

(Before NATO planes joined the revolution I saw a man near Ajdabiya aim an SA-7 at the sky thinking he heard one of Gadhafi's jets and finding no target instead fired it toward the town).

The proliferation of weapons and heavy ammunition is a serious concern for rebel leaders, NATO and the United Nations. Every rebel victory 'liberated' arms from Gadhafi's domain. Rifles and pistols flood a country now acquainted with using them, especially the young men who gained a sense of purpose from the revolution.

The heavier stuff is more than a headache if it ends up in the hands of so-called ‘bad actors'. Many of Libya's African neighbours have fought grinding civil wars. Portable missiles like the ones we saw at the gas station could find their way to militant groups like al Qaeda.

In Tripoli, we visited a row of warehouses packed to the rafters with virtually every type of war material including 'poison gas,' according to rebels tossing crates of ammunition onto their trucks.

The date stamps on the crates show a lot of it was old -- some of it manufactured in the 1970s. When arms embargos were lifted in 2004, Libya went on a buying spree and countries like Russia, Romania and Italy were more than happy to comply.

Many nations it seems were represented in the great arms bazaar that is Libya. In the bunker of Gadhafi's son, Muatessem, his national security advisor, I found a 1999 purchase offer from a Swiss arms dealer for anti-tank systems manufactured in the United States.

A confidential report by a UK firm even recommended Canadian-made surveillance technology to detect sniper and small- arms fire. This type of military vehicle might look familiar:

Gadhafi's army hid stockpiles of weapons, ammunition and supplies in unmarked buildings or bunkers as a means of concealing them. At one, in Tripoli's Ain Zara neighbourhood, residents I talked with claimed they ‘didn't know' what was stored in the leafy grove near their homes until it was razed by a NATO air strike in July.

What was there? Surface-to-air missiles. Nearly a hundred of them by my count, plus launchers and propellant (and who knows what else was underground).

Remarkably this site with the surface-to-air missiles -- most still in protective steel casings -- was deserted and completely unsecured.We easily stepped over the concertina wire ringing the perimeter and spent two hours walking, taking pictures.

Could anybody help themselves? Would anybody notice?

The European Union's counterterrorism coordinator, Gilles de Kerchove, said members of al Qaeda have capitalized on Libya's turmoil and "gained access to weapons, either small arms or machine-guns, or certain surface-to-air missiles which are extremely dangerous because they pose a risk to flights over the territory."

The de facto government says it will create a weapons registration system, yet weeks after the collapse of Gadhafi's regime there is still the danger of loose arms in many hands.

Back at the gas station, the security advisor travelling with us pointed to at least two damaged anti-tank shells and a mortar that were technically 'live.' We figured it was good time to leave, as rebels there wished us a safe trip in 'free Libya.'

User Tools: A A |  Email ThisEmail  | Print   Facebook   

  

Comments are now closed for this story

Adrian from Hamilton
said

"This type of military vehicle might look familiar:" Yikes. Does that mean the RCAF had been bombing Canadian built LAV IIIs?


Rose
said

The terroists now run the country those Rebels were in fact Al Qiada and the the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), whose leader is Abdelhakim Belhadj, as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO)They just changed their name. This war is for OIL and GOLD both which Libya has a lot of. This had nothing to do with helping the citizens of Libya other wise they would not have destroyed their infrastructure, hospitals, food, water, schools, media outlets etc. They killed reporters and innocent civilians. War crimes galore and then of course there is all the DU/radiation left behind from all the bombs. Yes this war was really to help the people of Libya right???? Not in your wildest dreams. The topics no one should talk about it might make NATO look bad.


Bullied Bounty
said

It is a funny situation; we send our soldiers overseas to defend the freedom and democracy and at the same time we are intimidating whoever oppose wrong doings of our leaders. There is nothing in my comments suggesting that I'm against the removal of Ghaddafi as Marc suggesting in his threatening comment. On the other hand I have not seen any document confirming that Libyan population has asked NATO to bomb Libya. UN has no word to say about these interventions because by its nature UN is not a democratic entity. Power of veto of 5 is not a democratic concept when the world includes more than 150 countries. Finally no one could guaranty that these rebels would not return their gun to our faces. I could give you the example of Afghan Mudjahedeen assisted by Americans in 80s who became their enemies in 2000s. Marc: Your comment is intimidating and threatening. Your personal attack to my opinions and your suggestion to leave my country, Canada, is disgraceful. No one has to be subject of threats for expressing opinions. What is the difference between you and your leader with Colonel Ghadaffi and his soldiers? These illegal interventions make more enemies to our freedom. I'm against every illegal military action and I'm not scared of expressing my discontentment


Marc B
said

Well said JB, I concur. The entire situation is very sad but it is a reality and must be dealt with. I'd rather NATO and related governments continue to join these little fights around the globe now than sit back and let them all figure it out on their own. If NATO and the UN did that, we would almost certainly be heading towards a global conflict rather quickly IMHO.I'm curious why Bounty feels the need to talk down to those that support the "assistance" provided by NATO to get rid of Qaddafi. The Libyan people asked for help, and received it. This was not some illegal occupation silly..get your facts straight because some of us will hold you accountable for your comments!Bounty, you do have a choice. You can remain a citizen of whatever freedom loving society you live in, it's obvious to me you are not from N Africa or SW Asia. Or, since you are so politically motivated and think NATO (or someone else) is wrong for going in and preventing COL Q from destroying entire cities in his effort to quell his masses. Buy a one way ticket and go! Don't sit there in the air conditioner drinking a soda and relaxing while the people you are defending via your internet comments are starving to death. To you, that must be a better solution than the alleged illegal occupation (as you put it).


Canadian
said

Be careful Janis, they may be booby-trapped. Piles of weapons to lure in unsuspecting rebels. Keep up the good work.


Bounties
said

Here is a profitable idea; Sarkozy, Harper, Berlusconi and Cameron could confiscate these arms and re-sell them to their new appointed Libyan colonel. That would be a dirty but profitable business. They don't even need to wait for the payment. They can deduct the cost from the Libyan money in western banks. That’s why they sent their forces there. War bounties belong to conquistadors. – The idea sounds very archaic but concepts of hypocrisy and profit does not understand fairness toward conquered. Shame on supporters of this illegal occupation.


Carl
said

The new government in Libya will turn out to be about the same as the Taliban. Invading other countries and forcing democracy has turned out the same every time.


eddy
said

As long as they are registered they can never be used by terrorists. That piece of paper to go with the SAM will make it miss airplanes everytime.


JB in Ontario
said

We need to help the Rebels set up a legitimate government in Libya. Support the Canadian Forces with their extension in Libya and if possible set up a registry for abandoned weapons that could fall into the hands of Al Qaeda.


Advertisement

Latest Tweets

Loading..