World -   

1
Japanese Economy, Trade and Industry Ministry's official Hidehiko Nishiyama speaks at a press conference at the ministry in Tokyo Monday, March 14, 2011 after the second hydrogen explosion in three days rocked Japan's stricken Fukushima Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. (Kyodo News) Filipino scientists at the Philippine Nuclear Research Institute use a SAM portable Gamma Spectrometer to measure the gamma radiation levels in the atmosphere at their facility in suburban Quezon city northeast of Manila, Philippines Monday, March 14, 2011. The Government increased the frequency of monitoring radiation levels to four times daily from the routine once-a-week Monday following the threat of multiple nuclear reactor meltdowns at the quake and tsunami-savaged northeastern coast of Japan where fears spread over possible radioactive contamination. (AP / Bullit Marquez) An elderly man is helped into a wheelchair to be scanned for levels of radiation in Koriyama, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, Sunday, March 13, 2011. (AP / Mark Baker) A second explosion in three days rocks Japan's stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant Monday morning, March 14, 2011. An official scans a man and a child for radiation at an emergency center in Koriyama, Japan, on Monday, March 14, 2011.

Radiation leak not expected to pose risk to Canada

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Lisa LaFlamme in Narita
Fears and concerns grow over the possibility a reactor could have damaged the containment units, which keeps radiation from leaking out in large amounts.
Extended: Explosion at Fukushima nuclear plant
Monday: A second explosion in three days rocked Japan's stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant Monday morning, sending a massive column of smoke into the air.
CTV National News: Avis Favaro on radiation
CTV's medical specialist explains the effects high level of radiation could have on our bodies.
CTV British Columbia: Lisa Rossington reports
The radiation that's leaked from the disabled reactors at Japan's earthquake-damaged nuclear power stations does not pose a health risk to Canadians on the Pacific coast, officials say.
CTV Toronto: Japan struggles for control of plants
Paul Bliss takes a look at Japan's nuclear situation as the country struggles to avoid a devastating outcome.
CTV News Channel: Dan Ayotte, technician
A Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant employee who returned home to Youngs Point, Ont., Sunday, says he was working when the quake hit. He says they thought nothing of it at first but quickly realized it was serious. Ayotte says he was evacuated on Saturday.
CTV News Channel: Mycle Schneider, analyst
A nuclear analyst explains how nuclear officials in Japan are working to contain radiation, including purposely releasing radioactivity to relieve pressure.
CTV News Channel: Norm Rubin, director
The director of nuclear research with the Energy Probe Research Foundation weighs in on whether the nuclear rector was unprepared to handle a tsunami and what implications the explosion will have on the industry.
CTV Toronto: Worst disaster since Chernobyl
A third reactor is now overheating and technicians are frantically working to prevent another explosion in what is being called the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl. Zuraidah Alman and Lisa LaFlamme report.
CTV News Channel: Avis Favaro on the dangers
CTV's medical specialist says it is unknown what levels of radiation people in Japan have been exposed to and how widespread the dangers are. She says there is concern over what the effects of the exposure will do down the road.
CTV News Channel: Tom Walters in Tokyo
A CTV News correspondent says the aftermath of the quake is not getting any easier to deal with, as there is a major concern over the operating unit at a power plant.
CTV Montreal: Dominic Ryan, McGill physicist
McGill University physicist Dominic Ryan speaks with Todd van der Heyden on the threat of a nuclear disaster in Japan.
CTV News Channel: Gordon Edwards, president
The president of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility says there is a worry there can be an all-out meltdown if the core of the plant cannot be cooled.
Canada AM: Christian Cote in Fukushima
A Canadian working as a teacher in Japan explains how he and others in his school are coping with the threat of a nuclear meltdown.
CTV National News: Omar Sachedina reports
Sunday: The Japanese government admitted Sunday that radiation levels outside the damaged power plant have exceeded the legal limit. Officials still insist there's no need to be alarmed, but many more outside of Japan are saying they should be.
Extended: Explosion at a nuclear power station
Saturday: An explosion at a nuclear plant north of Tokyo raises fears of a meltdown. The plant was damaged during Friday's 8.9 magnitude earthquake.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (34) Facebook   

Japanese Economy, Trade and Industry Ministry's official Hidehiko Nishiyama speaks at a press conference at the ministry in Tokyo Monday, March 14, 2011 after the second hydrogen explosion in three days rocked Japan's stricken Fukushima Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. (Kyodo News) Filipino scientists at the Philippine Nuclear Research Institute use a SAM portable Gamma Spectrometer to measure the gamma radiation levels in the atmosphere at their facility in suburban Quezon city northeast of Manila, Philippines Monday, March 14, 2011. The Government increased the frequency of monitoring radiation levels to four times daily from the routine once-a-week Monday following the threat of multiple nuclear reactor meltdowns at the quake and tsunami-savaged northeastern coast of Japan where fears spread over possible radioactive contamination. (AP / Bullit Marquez) An elderly man is helped into a wheelchair to be scanned for levels of radiation in Koriyama, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, Sunday, March 13, 2011. (AP / Mark Baker) A second explosion in three days rocks Japan's stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant Monday morning, March 14, 2011. An official scans a man and a child for radiation at an emergency center in Koriyama, Japan, on Monday, March 14, 2011.

Photos

Japanese Economy, Trade and Industry Ministry's official Hidehiko Nishiyama speaks at a press conference at the ministry in Tokyo Monday, March 14, 2011 after the second hydrogen explosion in three days rocked Japan's stricken Fukushima Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. (Kyodo News)

View Larger Image

Date: Mon. Mar. 14 2011 6:55 PM ET

The radiation that's leaked from the disabled reactors at Japan's earthquake-damaged nuclear power stations does not pose a health risk to Canadians on the Pacific coast, officials say.

"Health Canada has advised us that at the present time the current radiological activity at a facility in Japan is expected to pose no health risk to British Columbians," British Columbia's safety minister Rich Coleman said in a statement released Sunday.

Nevertheless, the federal government is warning Canadians not to travel within 20 kilometres of the Fukushima facility, as well as to avoid non-essential travel in areas hit by the tsunami.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission also said Sunday it did not expect to experience "any harmful levels" of radiation in Hawaii, Alaska or its Pacific coast.

The World Health Organization says it believes that global health risks from the troubled reactors seem fairly low for now, and that winds are likely to carry any radioactive contamination out to the Pacific Ocean.

WHO spokeswoman Christy Feig said there was no request to mobilize radiation experts known as REMPAN (Radiation Emergency Medical Preparedness and Assistance Network) set up after the Chernobyl meltdown.

Japanese officials say while workers are still struggling to cool down three reactors at the Fukushima plant that no longer have cooling systems, the radiation threat is low.

Nevertheless, they have ordered anyone living within 20 kilometres of the Fukushima nuclear power plant to evacuate the area as a precaution. That order is thought to affect around 140,000 people.

Though most of the general Japanese population should be spared significant health problems from any partial meltdowns at the reactors, there have been two hydrogen gas explosions at two reactors, which have released small amounts of radioactive particles in the atmosphere.

Those explosions appear to have exposed some workers at the plant to dangerous amounts of radiation. Three workers have now come down with radiation sickness, with symptoms including nausea, fatigue, vomiting, and diarrhea.

Their prognosis is uncertain since it's unclear how much radioactive material they were exposed to and for how long. If they develop more serious symptoms in the next few weeks, it could be a sign they experienced potentially fatal damage to their internal organs.

Japan has rated the Fukushima accident as a 4 on the seven-point International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale, meaning it's an accident with "local consequences."

Chernobyl, the worst nuclear disaster to date, was rated a 7. The partial core meltdown at Three Mile Island in 1979 was rated a 5. The radiation release from the Chernobyl disaster was about a million times the amount released from Three Mile Island.

Comments are now closed for this story

chrisinOntariariari-Oh!
said

It makes you wonder though as radioactive dust will travel on the winds as was the case with the Chernobyl disaster.There was dust found throughout North America and Europe.Would the dust travel on the trade winds to the west coast?


pg
said

My take on this.. Keep it simple stupid (KISS).. Why use complicated nuclear technogy to generate power when there are other safer and less complicated and renewable alternatives like water power,wind power, solar power etc..IMHO , the risks of using nuclear power far outweigh its benefits


Lee
said

I am embarrassed to be Canadian right now.... Where do all these fear mongering, sky is falling, self centered panick posters coming from?? Go get properly read/educated on the subject before you post. Geesh.


Holly Brown
said

Well..it dosent take a genius or a scientist to understand that radiation of any kind..even of very little exposure can cause health risks. When you go get an x-ray the tech asks you to hold your breath! You are only exposed to very little amount of radiation. People recieve radiation every day to treat cancers..and what happens to them? They lose there hair, get skin lesions and become very ill..again this is from VERY LITTLE exposure.The government should be preparing its Canadian citizens for the chances of fallout exposure instead of trying to keep the public calm.


Amar
said

If the media says Canada's west coast is OK, then I believe them because they have lots of credibility.


NS
said

God be with them.


Vickie
said

There are a few dreaming that a disaster such as this could not happen in Canada. We may have well built infastructure but Japan had all of their buildings etc designed to swing and sway with an earthquake. If you think the city of Toronto or any other could withstand a 9.0 earthquake without damage you need to shake your head, The devistation in Japan is more from the result of the tsunami than the earthquake. The disaster of the waves rushing over land, lifting houses off of their foundation, sweeping away cars and lives is devistating. Vancouver Island, the coast of BC and coastal Maritimes will always be at risk of a tsunami. Look at California, the waves were 8 feet higher than normal, one man lost his life and millions in damages. I do hope BC learns from Japan's experience. Sees the weaknesses in their preparedness missions and fixes them to ensure less loss of life. You cannot stop a tsunami nor an earthquake but you sure can be prepared for them. Just as with the oncoming of Srping and Summer Canadians need to begin to prepare for tornados, hurricanes and hot hot weather. Stay safe everyone


mbowoade
said

I would like to ask someone who knows more about nuclear energy than I do--is it really worth the risks? Is it really necessary?


Growberry
said

While I am seeing concern here about Port Hope's exposure risk and a lack of evacuation plan, be assured there are plans in place and these are usually quite available to those that will co-ordinate the responses. with regards the risk to Canada, if there is a significant explosion that propells particlaes into the mid level air flow then there is a risk that it will firstly be carried by curent wind patterns toward Alaska at which point it can hitr the jet stream and be carried SSE along the BC coast line.While many media is confined to report based on the requirment to avoid panic, look up things like wind patterns and draw your own conclusions.Low risk for now, the next little while will tell.


JB in Ontario
said

Say "no" to nuclear energy. No more!


Brent
said

but what about when the reactor melts down and causes a problem with the plutonium reactor right beside it ... i mean seriously this is going to make Hiroshima look like a drop of water in a bucket.then you have fallout. wind currents .. infected sealife. at that point your ***ing w/ the food chain i hate to tell you we get allot of our food from the ocean / crab / tuna / salmon /hallabut etc. and yea there going to be effected.


Leon
said

It is really sad to see what is happening in the world.My brothers and sisters in Japan,Libya we are praying for you.


shane
said

To all those who comment and spread fear and panicon this nuclear subject.I highly think you should maybe get of the couch and think positive and read up on nuclear energy.Me You and every one around you has already had a dose of radiation in some form or another.Think of all the nuclear testing done after ww2 ,cold war,ect ect Think of the radiation that fell on canada after chernoble were still here.Very little from japan will reach canada with no ill effects .Nuclear energy is here to stay.Better to update yourself on it and learn.


Not Fear-mongering...
said

For those saying oh please media is fear-mongering on radiation leak pose risks to FAR-AWAY Canada mainland..... Please be aware of Chernobyl meltdown caused massive radiation cloud that actually did spread all across half of the world include Canada... Radiation is not good thing period..... Thank god this will be nothing lie Chernobyl but so much still remains to see.....


Danielle
said

Ever see how close citzens live next to Port Hope CAMECO Uranium processing and refining Facility? 100's of meters away -thats all...Theres is NO EVACUATION PLAN, the Town would have to rely on Toronto Fire to help? Thats the plan! RUN!!! No exposure is safe! Dr. Helen Caldicott is right - "Never mind Chernobyl." According to Dr. Caldicott, "I can't think of any place more dangerous than Port Hope."Sure monitor it all you want - Japan did....Thats all worth nothing when natural disasters hit. Oh and Cameco is on a FLOOD PLAIN!....and they have good floods there....Nuclear is NOT SAFE, its NOT CLEAN, Its not worth the lives its about to take, maybe not instantly...just wait for the cancers to grow...God be with them all.


Kim
said

It does not pose any health risks at this time but what if a meltdown occurs? They are not wanting to cause panic!

Because we are not being helped by our government to learn how to prepare we are on our own.

Any suggestions?


B in Ottawa
said

Canadians can be thankful that our infrastructure is sound enough to hold up to an earthquake such as the one in Japan the other day. The government of Canada, as well as all Canadians, stand by Japan and will provide much needed help to them in their time of trouble.


Bill Lee
said

There's never any danger from nuke disasters.There's no danger, dammit. Buy the lie, suckers. Obey, you slaves.


Dave in Courtenay
said

And to think that I lived during the period of time when hundreds of nuclear weapons were tested in the atmosphere, each releasing hundreds of millions as much radioactive material as from all nuclear power accidents of all time. Can we learn from this one and get closer to the desired but unreachable zero risk?


Sherry
said

It's embarassing to read many of the posts with the "Oh my the sky is falling" mentality of those Canadians. I hope that the outside world does not see them as representing the majority of the people. The majority will pay attention to the reports but will learn/educate themselves as to Radiation and what can happen. Read what it says in the article people and how this is not chernobyl. Stop crying and sobbing and saying "the world is ending" - even the Japanese understand Radiation - you know - the experience they had in WW2...It's not as if they are not checking with the REAL experts - from around the world and getting help on this matter - and doing the best that they can do - and yes things can get worse but they are working hard to do what they can to stop this. Life is too short to begin with to always sit around wringing your hands saying oh woe-is-me. Right now the important thing is how we can help the Japanese people and in time ourselves by working with them and doing all we can - NOT by always saying - "but what about me?"


Deborah
said

What about the poor people in Japan, do we only think of ourselves in this world? We need to pray for the people are being affected by this disaster, let's forget about ourselves for a change.


URU
said

Not yet until it affects the entire world with Japan's failed technology to contain the Nuclear explosions. The Gov't is trying to calm fears to contain any protest around the world.


Lorne
said

" Not expected to pose a risk", but not DEFINITE.Time will tell just how severe the damage to the reactors was. They are still trying to control the damage effect.There will surely be some fallout from the reactor damage. Will it reach Canada? Who knows.The so-called experts can't even provide that answer.


Ty
said

I think the operative words here are 'right now'. As of now, there is no immediate risk to Canada's pacific coast, but please understand that this situation is fluid and precise information regarding the radioactive contamination radius is likely to change significantly as we go forward.Also, be aware, this article states that the Canadian gov't has advised not travelling within 20km of the nuke plants, yet the U.S. has now moved a military carrier vessel which was sitting 100 km offshore from Japan further away because of potential radiation exposure.Governments will always be publicly behind the curve. If the calculus doesn't change from its present course, Japan will be facing multiple meltdowns and in time, this will inevitably cause widespread global radiation concerns. Do some research of your own on tradewinds patterns as that will tell you pretty clearly whether you will eventually find yourself in harms way.In my opinion, anyone living on the Pacific coast of Canada and the U.S. should be making preparations for a potential radioactive exposure event.


Paul ~ Kitchener
said

This is one situation that the " NEWS MEDIA " needs to NOT play with and submitted reports that are borderline "FEAR MONGORING" ! It is to easy to publish inuendos, or heresay, that is "DEVOID of FACT". If there is to be articles published on the this area of disaster ~ PLEASE" quote, "EXPERTS in Nucular Science". As the world look s to relief lets get the news media on board of reporting "TRUTH" ~ I know this is a huge task, but, there needs to be calm, cool, intelligent assistance, & "REPORTING".


Wise old sage
said

FEAR FEAR FEAR !!! Oh my what shall I do?? Relax folks you have been watching too many Hollywood disaster movies. While very serious this problem will get contained, it is NOT the end of the world yet just the beginning of the end based on all the quakes and hurricanes and socialists in power so you have time to get it right.


Intelligent Liberal
said

This is going to impact the value of houses in Vancouver. The other problem is BC is on a fault line and can suffer a massive eathquake any time, so they better shut down their nuclear reactors before it's too late. Death by radiation isn't very pleasant, I have seen movies where the skin starts peeling off, so if I was in BC would strongly consider moving.


Karl
said

The experts say this disaster is a 4 out of 7. 3 mile island was listed at a 5, Chernobyl a 7. Hard to believe this nuclear disaster is below 3 mile island when they are having multiple reactors with meltdowns at 2 different sites. . . .


Geri
said

Sending love and light to Japan and all of Asia Pacific


River
said

This disaster is far from being under control.


Joe
said

You are kidding aren't you. Do you not have access to any science in Canada or are you just trying to frighten people unnecessarily to sell your silly news.You will pick up more radiation flying from Canada to Japan, than the local residents in the affected area.You really do not do the good name of Canada well by quoting scare-mongering stories that children know are rubbish.


David Ridsdale Fujisawa Japan
said

I think it poses a serious health risk to Canadians (and everyone else) on the Japanese Pacific coast.


John
said

I hope this isn't PR.


Syl
said

If the experts say we will not be affected, then I think that there is a good chance we will be.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Earthquake in Japan

Courtesy of DigitalGlobe

Fukushima Timeline

What happened to set off the nuclear crisis underway at Fukushima.

Canine Comfort in Crisis

Canine Comfort in Crisis

In Pictures: Four-legged friends offer comfort for Japanese quake victims.

Shelter Life

Shelter Life

50 Pictures: Quake victims and evacuees cope with living in shelters.

Mass Exodus

Mass Exodus

25 Pictures: Residents and foreigners use any means available to flee Japan.

The Nuclear Crisis

The Nuclear Crisis

A reactor-by-reactor breakdown of the troubled Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station.

How Canadians Can Help

How Canadians Can Help

Government of Canada advice on helping Japan, with tips on what's needed, list of aid groups.

Radiation Levels

Radiation Levels

Worried about radiation spreading to your part of the world? Don't be.

Radiation Sickness

Radiation Sickness

Exposure to radiation can lead to thyroid cancer, among other illnesses.

Infographic

Infographic

A map showing location of reactors involved in Japan's nuclear crisis

The 8.9-magnitude quake moved Japan's main island by more than two metres, in addition to shifting Earth on its axis and briefly speeding up its rotation.

Seismic Shift

Quake shifted Japan's main island and sped up the Earth's rotation.

Quake Storified

Quake Storified

Online reaction in the wake of the 8.9 magnitude earthquake.

Tsunami Speed

Tsunami Speed

The tsunami roared through the Pacific at speeds comparable to a jumbo jet.

Today's World Stories

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor waits for the start of his sentencing judgement in the courtroom of the Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam, near The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday May 30, 2012.  (AP / Toussaint Kluiters)

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for 'brutal' crimes

More   5 Comments 5    2 Video(s) 2

This frame grab made from an amateur video provided by Syrian activists on Monday, May 28, 2012, purports to show the massacre in Houla on May 25 that killed more than 100 people, many of them children. (AP / Amateur Video via AP video)

UN observers in Syria discover 13 bound corpses

More

Pakistani doctor Shakil Afridi taken in Pakistani tribal area of Jamrud in Khyber region, July 9, 2010. (AP / Qazi Rauf)

Pakistan doctor guilty of militancy, not CIA links

More

Most Talked about Stories

While Branson's comments (and activities) are arrogant in a million different ways, Clark's response was admirable. She kept her sense of humour with her joke about Branson's brand-name and his bad pick-up line, showing why humour is often the best response to arrogance.

D Austin (Fredericton)

B.C. premier rebuffs Branson's naked kitesurfing invite