World -
News Sections
Partial meltdown likely underway at reactor in Japan
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Selected Comment
CE, you have subscribed to the great green myth about the dangers of nuclear power. In fact there have been far fewer accidents, injuries or deaths in all history involving nuclear power than in one year of ANY other means of power generation. A nuclear power plant is not a bomb.
Physicist
Reactor not damaged in Japan nuclear plant explosion
talking about
Partial meltdown likely underway at reactor in Japan
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Sat. Mar. 12 2011 11:57 PM ET
As the cooling systems fail at three reactors within the same nuclear power complex, a top Japanese official is saying that one of those reactors could be in the midst of a partial meltdown.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano told reporters Sunday that operators at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant have been trying to reduce pressure and heat inside Unit 3, but a partial meltdown in the unit is "highly possible."
"Because it's inside the reactor, we cannot directly check it, but we are taking measures on the assumption of the possible partial meltdown," he said.
Officials haven't said how high the temperature has risen inside the troubled reactor. If it reaches 4,000 degrees, the uranium fuel pellets inside the reactor's fuel rods will start to dissolve, the beginning of a meltdown.
A complete meltdown would release uranium and other toxic nuclear byproducts into the environment.
As work continues too cool down Unit 3, authorities are also trying to stop a meltdown that began a day earlier in another reactor that was the site of an explosion on Saturday. The blast destroyed the building housing the reactor, but not the actual steel envelope encasing the reactor.
Meanwhile, the cooling system at a third reactor within Fukushima Dai-ichi has also failed – raising the possibility that reactor could begin to overheat too. Three other reactors at the facility are in a safe, shut-down state.
Evacuation zone grows
Until now, Japanese officials had been downplaying the danger at Fukushima, even while they spent Saturday increasing the size of the evacuation zone around the facility.
Nearly 170,000 people within a 20-kilometre radius around Dai-ichi have been evacuated, the International Atomic Energy Agency reports. As well, another 30,000 have also been evacuated near the Fukushima Daini (or Second) plant, 11 kilometres to the south, which has also lost its cooling functions.
The IAEA reports that three reactors at that plant are experiencing increased pressure.
"Evacuations around both affected nuclear plants have begun," the atomic watchdog said in a statement. "Full evacuation measures have not been completed."
Japanese authorities say they are making preparations to distribute iodine pills to residents in the area of both plants. The pills can help protect against thyroid cancer, since they inhibit the thyroid's absorption of radioactive iodine from the atmosphere.
Damon Moglen, the Climate and Energy Project director at Friends of the Earth -- a group that opposes the use of nuclear power -- worries that the IAEA is not being fully transparent about the scope of the threat.
"Given that we are now talking about a potential meltdown, given that we've had an explosion at this reactor, given that there are real indications that there is a problem with containment, I think the IAEA is really downplaying this incident and it's far more serious than they are saying," he told CTV National News Saturday night.
'Nobody knows how to shut off radioactivity'
Gordon Edwards, with the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility, says a meltdown is always possible when a nuclear reactor loses its cooling system.
"You cannot shut a nuclear reactor completely off. Because even when it's shut down totally, there's still 200 megawatts of heat being generated just by the radioactivity alone, and nobody knows how to shut off radioactivity," he explained to CTV News Channel Saturday evening.
"So unless you cool the core of the reactor for days after it's shut down, it's going to suffer an increase of temperature, which will cause a melting of the fuel rods at 5,000 degree Fahrenheit, which is more than twice the melting point of steel."
According to the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale, the incident underway at Fukushima is classified as a 4 on its 1 to 7 scale. The Chernobyl disaster was rated 7, while Three Mile Island was rated a 5.
The 4 rating means it's an accident that has "local consequences," such as severe health problems for workers.
With files from Associated Press
User Tools
Related Stories
Earthquake in Japan
How Canadians Can Help
Government of Canada advice on helping Japan, with tips on what's needed, list of aid groups.
Related Websites
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
While Branson's comments (and activities) are arrogant in a million different ways, Clark's response was admirable. She kept her sense of humour with her joke about Branson's brand-name and his bad pick-up line, showing why humour is often the best response to arrogance.
Email











Comments are now closed for this story
RR
said
Reactor Maintenance
said
Johan31
said
zap
said
viral venus
said
alexander
said
Earthwatcher
said
eddytoronto
said
quantum physics
said
Will
said
air whateva
said
Michael S in Halifax
said
MiggsVer2.0
said
Stan
said
Thank goodness for CTV telling the news like it is.
I was almost thinking this was approaching the catastrophic event Status.
But thanks to CTV for helping down play this event.
please lets not rely on this bunch for reliable honest news.
MCW
said
Mr John.
said
I know we have a lot of nuts out there....but WOW...does something like this bring even more out of the woodwork !!!!
Fear mongering personifed. YIKES!!!!
Gary Mcc
said
I found a TEPCO (Tokyo Electric Power Company) website that shows monitoring stations around the plant.
http://www.tepco.co.jp/kk-np/monitoring/mp-j.html
There are two Fukushima stations I and II. I has 6 operating units and 2 more nearing completion. II has 4 operating units. The monitoring site is in Japanese, but has some readable information. It shows 7 stacks and 9 monitoring points. Dose rates are between 31 and 37 nGy/hr. That would be up to 3700 nR/hr, 3.7 uR/hr, or 0.003 mR/hr.
That is a bit lower than normal background in Connecticut. You would find that level in areas with deep soil and no underlying bedrock. Again I am not sure this is the affected station. Maybe someone who reads Japanese could check this out and report back?
omg
said
Audra Splepper
said
Lorna in Ontario
said
Joe Spumolio
said
Mining guy Jim
said
WestofTheRockies
said
physicist
said
Priyadarsanan KM
said
Sharon B.
said
K. Sawada
said
Yes, there are technical difficulties, and yes, the idea of cooling a reactor with seawater is unusual. But as far as I can see, it's not proof of a major catastrophy, but rather an attempt to avoid that.
Incindetaly, Chrenobyl - I lived in Europe when that happened - didn't affect much either, aside from hunting for restaurant (dear etc) was prohibited for a year or two or three.
peter
said
Michael Jones
said
That is addition to all the ash, mercury, arsenic, slush pools, and massive carbon?
Can't wait for "clean" coal to come on line!
md raihan
said
Tau_Cety
said
The decay heat quickly decrease, within 24 hours it will be 6% of the original value,and within a week it will be a fraction of that.
So,if it the core not melted in the first hour,then the chance is small in the next 24 hours,and not possible after that time period (it still need same cooling,but it will be minimal)
SO IT IS JUST SCAREMONGERING !!!!!
Are we here yet ?
said
Nuclear meltdowns and in-disposable waste, mountain ranges with all the tops blown off sending sludge into all surrounding waterways, global mercury contamination,creeks and household water taps catching on fire from fracking in radius of miles. I know I'm leaving dozens of things out about our amazing human innovations that power our buildings and transport systems while building whole economies (at least for some people). Please help me continue this list as I feel nauseous and dizzy . . .
fish
said
I work for the nuclear industry. A lot of safety has been built to this plant, and plants in Ontario. The plants have a seismic threshold in which they are designed to (that's why you don't see the reactor got destroy by the quake). Plants in different regions have different threshold, obviously.
The problem here is loss of grid and loss of standby generators (SG) therefore no cooling. This should be designed for quake and tsunami (note: there are now 3 different sets of SG per reactor here in Ontario, thanks to lessons from 2003 blackout). Also the plant should have hydrogen igniators to prevent hydrogen explosion (note: which we have, thanks to lessons from 3-mile island). Through the World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO) I am sure we in the industry will hear all about it and Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) will force us to do more. This is the nuclear culture that we hold to protect the public, and safety is #1 for us.
That being said, for Japan I suspect that the end scenerio will be like 3 mile island - radioactive gas leaks, but the fuel will stay in the core likely in molten state. This cannot be a Chernobyl because that was a "real" nuclear explosion where here the worst case is total meltdown steam explosion (less explosive). Nevertheless I brought a DRSB-01 Geiger Counter and will be sending this my brother-in-law in Tokyo. For situation like these best to get lots of bottle water and stay inside.
Salt and Vinegar
said
Mark
said
Ryan Montgomery
said
tamachan
said
U 2 is ignant
said
Rachel
said
Skip an Cindi Ruetter
said
God Bless All Of You
The Ruetters
Jon
said
shizz
said
Terry
said
AvolonKnight
said
Mark
said
Cleaverville
said
Darryl McC
said
quantum physics
said
Old Ted
said
wiseguy111
said
ron von
said
Daniel
said
Physicist
said
Pat
said
Nav M
said
Sam in AB
said
CE
said