World -   

1
In this combination of photos, the No. 1 reactor of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, is seen before, left, and after an explosion that blew out the walls of the unit, in Okumamachi, Fukushima Prefecture in Japan.  The photo at left was taken Oct. 3, 2008, and the photo at right was released by the Tokyo Power Electric Co. March 12, 2011, following the explosion. (AP Photo/ Kyodo News and Tokyo Power Electric Co.) In this photo released by Tokyo Power Electric Co., the Fukushima Daiichi power plant's Unit 1 is seen after an explosion in Okumamachi, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, Saturday, March 12, 2011. (AP / Tokyo Power Electric Co.) Smoke billows from a nuclear power station Saturday following a blast that destroyed a building housing the reactor amid fears that it was close to a disastrous meltdown. Smoke ascends over an industrial area as flames are seen in Sendai, northern Japan, Saturday, March 12, 2011. Japan launched a massive military rescue operation Saturday after a giant, quake-fed tsunami killed hundreds of people and turned the northeastern coast into a swampy wasteland, while authorities braced for a possible meltdown at a nuclear reactor. (AP / Itsuo Inouye) In this image made from Japan's NHK television, an aerial view shows the Fukushima Daiichi power plant's Unit 1, only frames are seen at left, in Okumamachi, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, Saturday, March 12, 2011. The walls of the building at the nuclear power station crumbled Saturday as smoke poured out. (AP Photo/NHK TV) An aerial image of a damaged nuclear plant in Japan is shown on Friday, March 11, 2011. Smoke billows from a nuclear power station Saturday following a blast that destroyed a building housing the reactor amid fears that it was close to a disastrous meltdown.

Partial meltdown likely underway at reactor in Japan

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Paul Workman on the plants
Saturday: Adding to the horror in Japan is the growing fear of a nuclear nightmare. Japanese officials are downplaying the danger, but continue to increase the evacuation zone.
CTV National News: Damon Moglen, nuclear expert
Saturday: A director with Friends of the Earth says if attempts at cooling the nuclear reactor fail we could be facing a massive release of radioactive material which could cause terrible radiation problems for people in the area and possibly across the country.
Extended: Explosion at a nuclear power station
Saturday: An explosion at a nuclear plant north of Tokyo raises fears of a meltdown. The plant was damaged during Friday's 8.9 magnitude earthquake.
Extended: Nuclear plant vicinity evacuated
Saturday: The areas surrounding a nuclear power facility in Japan is evacuated following reports of a radiation leak. Meanwhile, fire continues to burn after an explosion Saturday.
CTV News Channel: Gordon Edwards, CCNR
Saturday: The Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility's Gordon Edwards explains what happens during a nuclear meltdown, and explains what officials in Japan are doing to try to prevent one from happening.
CTV News Channel: Nicolas Moyer, coordinator
Saturday: A coordinator for the Humanitarian Coalition in Canada discusses how relief groups in Japan mobilize around danger such as radiation and after shocks to aid people in need.
CTV News Channel: Shawn-Patrick Sensil, Greenpeace
Saturday: A representative from Greenpeace discusses his concern about the amount of radiation that has seeped out into the atmosphere due to the recent nuclear meltdown in Japan.
CTV News Channel: Jan Beranek, Greenpeace
Saturday: A Greenpeace spokesperson says he believes there is lack of transparency on the radiation risk and the potential health threat to area residents.
CTV News Channel: Janie Eudy, worried wife
The wife of a man who was evacuated from a nuclear plant is now on his way to Tokyo, but getting there is proving to be a major challenge. Eudy is worried about possible radiation exposure.
CTV News Channel: Mycle Schneider, consultant
Saturday: A nuclear consultant in Paris says officials are possibly downplaying the seriousness of the nuclear reactor explosion and radiation.
CTV News Channel: Ian Hore-Lacy, director
A spokesperson from World Nuclear Association says the situation at the Fukushima nuclear plant is improving, but the challenge is keeping the fuel cool.
CTV News Channel: Chris Johnson, journalist
A freelance reporter in Tokyo says the evacuation radius around the nuclear plant has been extended to 20 kilometres. Meanwhile, the explosion has added to the fear and anxiety some feel towards nuclear plants.
CTV News Channel: Philip White, expert
Saturday: A spokesperson with Citizen's Nuclear Information Center in Tokyo says it's unclear what the outcome of the nuclear plant explosion will be, but the centre is very worried. White also says an evacuation radius should be extended to 100 kilometres.
CTV News Channel: Kei Okamura, Reuters
Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan tells media the nuclear situation is serious, but an explosion earlier was not in the reactor, and the radiation leak is not a large one.
CTV News Channel: Eric Due, Japan Times
A journalist in Tokyo says there are four other problematic reactors at the nuclear plant. Meanwhile, the evacuation zone has been widened and tens of thousands of Japanese soldiers aid recovery efforts.
CTV National News: Jill Macyshon with concerns
The quake caused one of the worst fears of the modern age, a nuclear meltdown. The Japanese government declared an atomic state of emergency around two disabled plants. Both are leaking radiation and one reactor is in danger of melting down.
CTV News Channel: Joseph Yeremian, expert
Friday: A nuclear safety expert explains how dangerous radioactive steam is and if we are on the verge of a nuclear disaster.
CTV News Channel: David Albright, expert
Friday: A nuclear expert explains what will occur if there is a radiation leak in Japan.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (57) Facebook   

In this combination of photos, the No. 1 reactor of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, is seen before, left, and after an explosion that blew out the walls of the unit, in Okumamachi, Fukushima Prefecture in Japan.  The photo at left was taken Oct. 3, 2008, and the photo at right was released by the Tokyo Power Electric Co. March 12, 2011, following the explosion. (AP Photo/ Kyodo News and Tokyo Power Electric Co.) In this photo released by Tokyo Power Electric Co., the Fukushima Daiichi power plant's Unit 1 is seen after an explosion in Okumamachi, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, Saturday, March 12, 2011. (AP / Tokyo Power Electric Co.) Smoke billows from a nuclear power station Saturday following a blast that destroyed a building housing the reactor amid fears that it was close to a disastrous meltdown. Smoke ascends over an industrial area as flames are seen in Sendai, northern Japan, Saturday, March 12, 2011. Japan launched a massive military rescue operation Saturday after a giant, quake-fed tsunami killed hundreds of people and turned the northeastern coast into a swampy wasteland, while authorities braced for a possible meltdown at a nuclear reactor. (AP / Itsuo Inouye) In this image made from Japan's NHK television, an aerial view shows the Fukushima Daiichi power plant's Unit 1, only frames are seen at left, in Okumamachi, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, Saturday, March 12, 2011. The walls of the building at the nuclear power station crumbled Saturday as smoke poured out. (AP Photo/NHK TV) An aerial image of a damaged nuclear plant in Japan is shown on Friday, March 11, 2011. Smoke billows from a nuclear power station Saturday following a blast that destroyed a building housing the reactor amid fears that it was close to a disastrous meltdown.

Photos

In this combination of photos, the No. 1 reactor of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, is seen before, left, and after an explosion that blew out the walls of the unit, in Okumamachi, Fukushima Prefecture in Japan.  The photo at left was taken Oct. 3, 2008, and the photo at right was released by the Tokyo Power Electric Co. March 12, 2011, following the explosion. (AP Photo/ Kyodo News and Tokyo Power Electric Co.)

View Larger Image

Selected Comment

CE, you have subscribed to the great green myth about the dangers of nuclear power. In fact there have been far fewer accidents, injuries or deaths in all history involving nuclear power than in one year of ANY other means of power generation. A nuclear power plant is not a bomb.

Physicist

Reactor not damaged in Japan nuclear plant explosion

talking about
Partial meltdown likely underway at reactor in Japan

Date: Sat. Mar. 12 2011 11:57 PM ET

As the cooling systems fail at three reactors within the same nuclear power complex, a top Japanese official is saying that one of those reactors could be in the midst of a partial meltdown.

Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano told reporters Sunday that operators at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant have been trying to reduce pressure and heat inside Unit 3, but a partial meltdown in the unit is "highly possible."

"Because it's inside the reactor, we cannot directly check it, but we are taking measures on the assumption of the possible partial meltdown," he said.

Officials haven't said how high the temperature has risen inside the troubled reactor. If it reaches 4,000 degrees, the uranium fuel pellets inside the reactor's fuel rods will start to dissolve, the beginning of a meltdown.

A complete meltdown would release uranium and other toxic nuclear byproducts into the environment.

As work continues too cool down Unit 3, authorities are also trying to stop a meltdown that began a day earlier in another reactor that was the site of an explosion on Saturday. The blast destroyed the building housing the reactor, but not the actual steel envelope encasing the reactor.

Meanwhile, the cooling system at a third reactor within Fukushima Dai-ichi has also failed – raising the possibility that reactor could begin to overheat too. Three other reactors at the facility are in a safe, shut-down state.

Evacuation zone grows

Until now, Japanese officials had been downplaying the danger at Fukushima, even while they spent Saturday increasing the size of the evacuation zone around the facility.

Nearly 170,000 people within a 20-kilometre radius around Dai-ichi have been evacuated, the International Atomic Energy Agency reports. As well, another 30,000 have also been evacuated near the Fukushima Daini (or Second) plant, 11 kilometres to the south, which has also lost its cooling functions.

The IAEA reports that three reactors at that plant are experiencing increased pressure.

"Evacuations around both affected nuclear plants have begun," the atomic watchdog said in a statement. "Full evacuation measures have not been completed."

Japanese authorities say they are making preparations to distribute iodine pills to residents in the area of both plants. The pills can help protect against thyroid cancer, since they inhibit the thyroid's absorption of radioactive iodine from the atmosphere.

Damon Moglen, the Climate and Energy Project director at Friends of the Earth -- a group that opposes the use of nuclear power -- worries that the IAEA is not being fully transparent about the scope of the threat.

"Given that we are now talking about a potential meltdown, given that we've had an explosion at this reactor, given that there are real indications that there is a problem with containment, I think the IAEA is really downplaying this incident and it's far more serious than they are saying," he told CTV National News Saturday night.

'Nobody knows how to shut off radioactivity'

Gordon Edwards, with the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility, says a meltdown is always possible when a nuclear reactor loses its cooling system.

"You cannot shut a nuclear reactor completely off. Because even when it's shut down totally, there's still 200 megawatts of heat being generated just by the radioactivity alone, and nobody knows how to shut off radioactivity," he explained to CTV News Channel Saturday evening.

"So unless you cool the core of the reactor for days after it's shut down, it's going to suffer an increase of temperature, which will cause a melting of the fuel rods at 5,000 degree Fahrenheit, which is more than twice the melting point of steel."

According to the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale, the incident underway at Fukushima is classified as a 4 on its 1 to 7 scale. The Chernobyl disaster was rated 7, while Three Mile Island was rated a 5.

The 4 rating means it's an accident that has "local consequences," such as severe health problems for workers.

With files from Associated Press

Comments are now closed for this story

RR
said

I would rather take my chances with a publicly owned transparent nuclear energy program than the stock market or the capitalist economy that is for sure. They want you to risk and gamble your economic security away but wouldn't want an august body of scientific democratic people who believe in human rationality rather than the myth hysteria false information techniques that corporations are running on us today. Their charters should be pulled when they act against the public interest and go to jail when they knowing cause harm to society just like everybody else. Young people better start reading the Communist Manifesto and take it from there about what they want to do with the hidden so called "free market" ponzi schemes have people so disorientated little wonder they are betting on the rapture.


Reactor Maintenance
said

I work inside a reactor when it's running well and good doing day-to-day maintenance when it's shut down. I hope they can get the fuel out and into their spent fuel bay. If this can still happen there it will decrease the likelihood of a incore meltdown from decay heat. I'm just not sure if they have as many lines of defence as we do in Ontario as their designs are a fair bit different than our candu's. I'd volunteer to help them in a second.


Johan31
said

If we were intelligent we would be using Teslas technology with pretty much infinite energy and almost zero pollution. Instead we are still using destructive archaic energy sources all in the name of capitalism!


zap
said

building nuke plants near common fault lines reminds me of how the buliders of the world trade centre showed how the tower could sustain a hit from a jumbo jet and still remain standing. truth is nothing can withstand the power of natural force if it unleashes as devastating a blow as it did in Japan. But like the rest of us what choice do we have? we either accept nuclear power to generate power or go back to living by candlelight.

viral venus
said

Trying to compare this to Chernobyl ignores the facts. Japan is not a closed society with a culture of secrecy and fear of outsiders as was the Soviet Union at the time of their disaster. Japan has state-of-the-art nuclear facilities unlike the aging cold war designed reactors of Chernobyl. There is no whiff of scandal or operational failure in what has happened at these facilities - forces of nature simply overwhelmed some structures' ability to handle a disaster of this proportion. Thanks to better monitoring it is now very easy for the international community to check on radiation levels from this plant so even if they tried they would not be able to significantly obscure the magnitude of the disaster from outside observers. It is far more likely that Japan is telling us the truth because they have no credible reasons to be dishonest. I sincerely hope that the scientists and engineers working to contain this emergency are able to avert additional horrendous destruction.


alexander
said

hope they can plug up this reactor, this sad day for japan. i really hope that the japanese can bounce back. with it being winter there the homeless will really suffer lets get these poor souls out of there and set up in temporary lodgings. my prayers go the those who lost their lives


Earthwatcher
said

this is what the nuclear industry calls "bad"...bound to happen sooner or later, hopefully it can be contained and no one will come to harm. Will that area become another Chernobyl style dead zone?


eddytoronto
said

When the earthquake struck . . . three of the reactors that were operating were disenabled. The Japanese situation appears to be roughly analogous to the Three Mile Island incident in the United States, where authorities struggled for days to contain an improperly cooled reactor core but were able to avert a widespread release of nuclear material. Unfotunately, Japan does not have much time....They have 24 hours or so to avoid a core meltdown starting 7am countdown..The Japanese authorities and the government and all the agencies that they can muster are working overtime to get cooling systems on that site powered and working... Quake moved Japan coast 8 feet; shifted Earths axis. The Financial Crisis continues..


quantum physics
said

@physicist-Your reply responded to nothing I wrote except to utter a bunch of childish cat calls. Done with you flat earther your a waste of energy.


Will
said

Mining Guy Jim, thanks again for speaking up. I truly wish the public media would talk to professionals like you and Physicist instead of pandering to the doom & gloom crowd all the time. I appreciate hearing from the technical experts once in a while instead of the luddites. But then, as a History Prof. i also cringe when I see & hear how they distort fact to fit thier warped views.


air whateva
said

Well Mr Montgomery I just spent about 10 mins re-reading about Cherynobyl and you were wrong right from the get go. Over 57 workers died immediately in the inital accident. So there ya go maybe youre the one that needs more schooling. This isnt the time or place to play who's smarter than you. It's time to pray for the evacuees and survivers. Hope that one day mankind will learn from our lessons of creating mass destruction but I doubt it..


Michael S in Halifax
said

Hey wiseguy111, if you were watching CNN you know that in this case the fuel rods are all down and in no danger of a melt down. If you were following the story over the past hours you would have heard about 1 1/2 hours ago that the radiation levels are starting to drop and that sea water is now being used to cool these plants. When Chernobyl blew up the rods were not down and they could not get them to go down and that is why there was such a large amount of radiation leakage. Two different situations. Please people stop jump to conclusions and wait to see how this will play out. Yes there is a problem but I feel it is being handled by experts who know a whole lot more about what is happening then we do. Stop the fear mongering!


MiggsVer2.0
said

They're lying about what happened to that reactor. The cement building surrounding a reactor doesn't just explode. It's just cement with steel rebarr in it for reinforcment. Is cement and steel a new type of explosion hazard? No it isn't.. In all likelihood that reactor has already blown up and they're lying about it.


Stan
said

Holy Crow. Gee Whiz . WOWeeee
Thank goodness for CTV telling the news like it is.
I was almost thinking this was approaching the catastrophic event Status.
But thanks to CTV for helping down play this event.
please lets not rely on this bunch for reliable honest news.


MCW
said

Wake up people our elites/government is LYING to all of us!!! Do you think they would risk telling us the truth for fear of wide-spread PANIC? Get yourselves prepared for world-wide CHAOS!


Mr John.
said

WHEW...!!!!!!!!!
I know we have a lot of nuts out there....but WOW...does something like this bring even more out of the woodwork !!!!
Fear mongering personifed. YIKES!!!!



Gary Mcc
said

The affected units are boiling water reactors. Units One and Two are General Electric Boiling Water Reactors (GE BWR model 3’s). Like Monticello in the USA it has a Drywell shaped like an upsidown lightbulb, set on a doughnut. The drywell encloses the reactor. The doughnut is called the torus and is normally half full of water. It is used to quench steam like the suppression pools in newer GE BWR’s. The Reactor building encloses both, and may be what blew up. This type of reactor uses normal water (Light water) and needs water to moderate neutrons, as water gets hotter it becomes less dense and moderates fewer neutrons, the reaction slows. Once the reaction stops, the main source of heat is “decay heat”. The fissioned atoms are radioactive and give off heat as they decay. If this heat is not removed, it is sufficient to cause fuel damage. Decay heat cause the meltdown at TMI. Damaged fuel, in some cases, can produce hydrogen. A hydrogen explosion did not damage TMI’s containment, and would probably not damage TPC’s BWR3’s combination of drywell and torus. But a hydrogen explosion could easily destroy the reactor building enclosing the drywell/torus and spent fuel pool, since that is pretty much a regular commercial steel building.


I found a TEPCO (Tokyo Electric Power Company) website that shows monitoring stations around the plant.
http://www.tepco.co.jp/kk-np/monitoring/mp-j.html
There are two Fukushima stations I and II. I has 6 operating units and 2 more nearing completion. II has 4 operating units. The monitoring site is in Japanese, but has some readable information. It shows 7 stacks and 9 monitoring points. Dose rates are between 31 and 37 nGy/hr. That would be up to 3700 nR/hr, 3.7 uR/hr, or 0.003 mR/hr.
That is a bit lower than normal background in Connecticut. You would find that level in areas with deep soil and no underlying bedrock. Again I am not sure this is the affected station. Maybe someone who reads Japanese could check this out and report back?


omg
said

uh oh. I love you mama


Audra Splepper
said

Oh my Gawd! We're all doomed! What else "more" are they NOT telling us the truth about???? Should we start stocking up on can goods?


Lorna in Ontario
said

For those of you that say green energy" is the only way to go, I have to disagree with you. Yes there is danger with nuclear reactor plants but lets face it there is danger with windmills catching fire and blowing apart like one did in the UK a couple of years ago and coal burning power plants, well enough said about what they pump into the air. Now, going back to the question of windmills and solar look at the fighting that is happening in south eastern Ontario about the wind farm there. People living in the area don't want the windfarms in their back yard. We could not build enough wind farms and solar arays to match the amount of power one nuke plant puts out. Is there a danger with nuke power, YES but there is a risk to everything that produces power.


Joe Spumolio
said

Without nuclear power the people posting here decrying it would be sitting in a cold dark cave jotting down their thoughts on a piece of paper by flickering candle light. Wind and PV's simply can't produce the required energy, are a blight to the landscape and cause enormous destruction of the environment to produce. The area of PV's to replace one reactor in Pickering is approximately 3,500 square kilometers. The batteries required to store the energy for night time consumption would fill a lake with lead that was 2 kilometers by 2 kilometers by 1 meter deep and an equal amount of sulfuric acid. The inverters would cost $50billion dollars. Wind...what a folly that will turn out to be. Please, please, please! Einstein worked this out a century ago. The power of the photon pales in comparison to the neutron. Unless you want to go back to cooking with wood and going to bed at sun down, nuclear is here to stay and must be expanded and developed further. As for this disaster in Japan, I think the Japanese authorities are all over it and probably don't need any "expertise" from the peanut gallery.


Mining guy Jim
said

@Michael Jones, yes it's true. When coal is mined from deposits which have Granitic rock units around the edges of the basin there is a very high chance that the coal will contain uranium and other daughter elements. The groundwater dissolves the uranium from the granites (uranium is quite soluble) and passes down into the basin. When the uranium atom comes into contact with the carbon atom in the coal, they have an affinity and the U drops out of solution and sticks to the C. Gold mills use a similar method for recovering gold by passing the pregnant solution through carbon filters.I have actually looked at State run coal-fired electrical plants in several countries to reprocess their ash to recover uranium. The reality is that the bulk of it goes up the stack and spreads over the city. That does not happen in your standard Candu setup.


WestofTheRockies
said

Well, nice to see the whole Chicken Little crowd out in force, along with their pals the NIMBY’s. The sky is falling I told you so. Anti everything .....well almost. Had this been a dam burst from an earthquake they would be on here ragging on about how harmful dams are, they're unsafe and they knew it, they kill fish, alter the ecological balance and they collapse, etc.etc. Coal is bad, gas fired is bad also, run of the river is a sell-out by the government to big business. But wait a minute Wind Power that's the ticket. Of course GE & all the other multi-nationals in that “green business” are now not big business. The fact wind is a poor way to generate power and it kills millions of birds, bats & every other kind of flying thing and affects migratory patterns, that’s not a concern because they thought of it. So while you're consuming power there in your electrically powered everything abode, spouting off, bad mouthing nuclear power and everything else with little knowledge about anything; please, unless you are generating your own power, either turn it off and/or shut-up. There is no better prepared country for this kind of disaster than Japan. The fact they get to work fixing things and say little does not mean they are incompetent or a corrupt western government. No, that is who they are. That is how, quietly they worked themselves from complete destruction into the most technologically advanced nation in the world in just a few short decades after WW ll.


physicist
said

Dear quantum physics, nice to know that you have attended a couple of the first year physics lectures of an undergraduate degree, but you really should study more. I will trust my own judgement as a professional in nuclear safety than your misinformed, myth based rant. But thanks for coming out, i really did need the laugh. BTW, i have collegues on site dealign with the issue right now and I am not worried about it, or for their safety, so that should speak louder than any protesters shreiks.


Priyadarsanan KM
said

We should learn from history and decide not to open any more of these nuclear power plants. Renewable sources of energy -Solar,Wind Tidal..-beckon us. Let us move from errors of policy to better judgements!


Sharon B.
said

Nuclear power is like oil...it helps make the rich get richer. Its obvious when you have governments putting more money into nuclear power rather than SAFE alternative energy. So I disagree that nuclear power is "viable" solution. It just takes ONCE and this reactor is already doing things that it wasn't supposed to, even AFTER doing all of the engineering for it to supposedly sustain an earthquake. This devastating loss clearly shows that its all guess work at best because time and time again nuclear power has devasted land, people and air for DECADES...not months and years....DECADESThe Japanese people are in all of our thoughts....


K. Sawada
said

As someone living in Japan, and with friends in the area who can more or less see what's going on, and aren't overly worried, I just so wish overseas media would STOP painting worst case pictures.

Yes, there are technical difficulties, and yes, the idea of cooling a reactor with seawater is unusual. But as far as I can see, it's not proof of a major catastrophy, but rather an attempt to avoid that.

Incindetaly, Chrenobyl - I lived in Europe when that happened - didn't affect much either, aside from hunting for restaurant (dear etc) was prohibited for a year or two or three.


peter
said

Chernobyl how long now years but in Wales UK we still cant eat sheep in a few places in Gwynedd, i hope we learn from all of this.Japan is strong there people are strong i hope you all stay well and know the world is with you


Michael Jones
said

Coal emits MORE radiation?
That is addition to all the ash, mercury, arsenic, slush pools, and massive carbon?
Can't wait for "clean" coal to come on line!


md raihan
said

we are with you who have suffered in this earth quake and we pray Allah (SWAT) to improve the situations of people of Japan as soon as possible


Tau_Cety
said

It will not melt!

The decay heat quickly decrease, within 24 hours it will be 6% of the original value,and within a week it will be a fraction of that.


So,if it the core not melted in the first hour,then the chance is small in the next 24 hours,and not possible after that time period (it still need same cooling,but it will be minimal)


SO IT IS JUST SCAREMONGERING !!!!!



Are we here yet ?
said


Nuclear meltdowns and in-disposable waste, mountain ranges with all the tops blown off sending sludge into all surrounding waterways, global mercury contamination,creeks and household water taps catching on fire from fracking in radius of miles. I know I'm leaving dozens of things out about our amazing human innovations that power our buildings and transport systems while building whole economies (at least for some people). Please help me continue this list as I feel nauseous and dizzy . . .


fish
said

Building Nuclear plant in earthquake zone is certainly not a good idea. However, considering that Japan have no natural resource they don't have a choice.

I work for the nuclear industry. A lot of safety has been built to this plant, and plants in Ontario. The plants have a seismic threshold in which they are designed to (that's why you don't see the reactor got destroy by the quake). Plants in different regions have different threshold, obviously.

The problem here is loss of grid and loss of standby generators (SG) therefore no cooling. This should be designed for quake and tsunami (note: there are now 3 different sets of SG per reactor here in Ontario, thanks to lessons from 2003 blackout). Also the plant should have hydrogen igniators to prevent hydrogen explosion (note: which we have, thanks to lessons from 3-mile island). Through the World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO) I am sure we in the industry will hear all about it and Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) will force us to do more. This is the nuclear culture that we hold to protect the public, and safety is #1 for us.

That being said, for Japan I suspect that the end scenerio will be like 3 mile island - radioactive gas leaks, but the fuel will stay in the core likely in molten state. This cannot be a Chernobyl because that was a "real" nuclear explosion where here the worst case is total meltdown steam explosion (less explosive). Nevertheless I brought a DRSB-01 Geiger Counter and will be sending this my brother-in-law in Tokyo. For situation like these best to get lots of bottle water and stay inside.


Salt and Vinegar
said

The cooling system blew up. I don't think having the cooling system blow up on a nuclear reactor is a minor issue. What is cooling the rods now, stopping them from overheating and melting down? Unless they have some kind of backup cooling system, things are going to heat up over there.


Mark
said

Nuclear Power is very clean and safe, but not on a site like this. Even if there isn't a melt down will we take any lessons learned from this or will we just go "whew, that was close" and carry on the same way we did before? I certainly hope not.


Ryan Montgomery
said

honestly, read the article closely. "At one plant, radiation inside one reactor jumped to 1,000 times the normal level, but officials stressed there was no 'immediate health hazard'" Inside the reactor means inside of the containment walls. There is no danger, and for the idiots comparing this to Chernobyl, you have a lot to learn. Not only is t here no danger, there won't be any danger. The fact that the facility survived the 8.9 earthquake is astonishing. And the idiot who wrote this article should take the picture with a grain of salt. Nuclear reactors don't produce that kind of smoke when opened up, it was an explosion. Coal plants produce more radioactive material than nuclear. Solar plants produce large amounts of toxic waste. Wind turbines barely produce energy at all. Gasoline, oil and other fossil fuel power plants plants produce some of the most unhealthy and toxic materials known to man. Tell me again, why is nuclear power bad? Oh, and Ce, the only nuclear disaster has been Chernobyl. 30 people died immediately and 2,500 people were affected by radiation. No one died or were affected by three mile island since radioactive levels didn't even rise over 1 percent after the "scare" of three mile island. No recorded deaths from that. and, from this "disaster" we have 4 people who have fractures and bruises. I've seen more damage done by a car accident. Good to know that stupidity is still alive and well in society.


tamachan
said

It is so hard for a japanese person, such as myself, living outside of Japan to hear such devastating news. My thoughts are with my family in Japan and all others that have been so fiercely affected by this disaster. Be strong, don't give up!!!


U 2 is ignant
said

Nuclear is still the only option for our energy needs. Anyone who thinks windmills and solar panels will run heavy industry is simply uneducated. Behind all the speculation and dire predictions of what might/could happen sits a person devoid of any knowledge of the subject matter of which they preach. There won't be a melt down. There won't be a nuclear kill zone made uninhabitable for centuries. Seriously, with the information available at your fingertips these days, there's absolutely no reason for making such outrageous statements. My thoughts and prayers for the ppl in The Land Of The Rising Sun. They'll bounce back from this. They've come back from far worse.


Rachel
said

Yet another example of why we all need to look into "green energy". It's time to throw up some of those wind turbines. Those don't cause massive human deaths/deformaties if they break.


Skip an Cindi Ruetter
said

Our hearts and prayers go out to everyone in Japan... Be stong....And know we praying for each and everyone of you......
God Bless All Of You
The Ruetters


Jon
said

The sad part is all the radiation is coming to the Canada, US, and Mexico.

shizz
said

If there is a meltdown then I will agree that nuclear power may not be the safest option in all areas. However, if a nuclear meltdown does not occur after "a triple threat" of one of the largest earthquakes in history, a nuclear plant built in that zone, and a tsunami damaging the cooling system, then you all might have to shut the hell up. Basically it will be proof that a nuclear plant can survive the worst possible conditions.


Terry
said

Canadians send our prayers to the people of Japan...God Bless You All!!


AvolonKnight
said

be strong japan, our thoughts and prayers are with you


Mark
said

There you have it, a triple threat. A nuclear power station on one of the worlds most dangerous and active earthquake zones, right on the ocean that could be damaged by a Tsunami. Earthquake, Tsunami, Damaged Nuclear power station. This does not bode well and from we are hearing this morning, a nuclear melt down at this plant could happen within hours. I'm not trying to sensationalize anything but this does not bode well for anybody living in that region, when massive amounts of radiation escape into the atmosphere, the contamination of the surrounding area will make it uninhabitable. Pray, pray that this is brought under control and the people of this area of Japan can begin to heal and rebuild. Devestating, this is just devestating!


Cleaverville
said

The roof blows off a nuclear power plant but government declares all is well in Cleaverville.There is a reason nobody believes anything that comes from any western governmental who in the last few decades have morphed into corporate pimps.Their declarations are getting so progressively ludicrous even the sheep are waking and starting to bah.


Darryl McC
said

Thanks to the physicist for the comment. I would also like to add, Coal Fired Power Plants emit far greater amounts of radio active material into the atmosphere than nuclear power plants. This is due to the naturally occuring radioactive material present in coal.


quantum physics
said

@Physicist:"you have you have subscribed to the great green myth about the dangers of nuclear power to the great green myth about the dangers of nuclear power"-Talk about subscribing to propaganda you are a regular fountain!If you had any idea of quantum physics you would know nothing is solid it only appears that way to us and our current crude way of measuring.A bucket still fills from dripping tap just takes longer.That means that all these containers that store hazardous materials { gas pipe.oil containers.hydro lines,NUCLEAR REACTORS......} all leak it is just a mater of degree. The truth is nobody knows the damage of low levels of radiations unless as you do you buy into the nuclear industry ad campaign.If you have any doubt that you are being bombarded with chemicals go to the backwoods miles from any utility without the cell phone propped to your head for a few weeks and you will find you feel reborn.


Old Ted
said

Nuclear power plants aren't bombs.....at least in the kaboom sense. The people of Chernobyl will agree that a meltdown is just as devastating. Has anyone tallied up how many died as a result of the Chernobyl meltdown, either directly or long term from radiation overdose. Three Mile Island wasn't very assuring either. Let's see, store the waste for 10-20,000 years along with the decommisioned nuclear power plants. Viable power source? Not remotely when you add in these costs. It's more likely to bankrupt Ontario Hydro and the province too. Paranoid? Yes, especially with nuclear power plants in earthquake areas.


wiseguy111
said

I think if we believe that these reactors are not in danger of melt down we are all fooling ourselves. When chernobyl went the radiation levels around the globe were eventually effected as stated in some of the papers I read about the disaster. What would happen if more than one of these reactors melted down? This reactor blew up and all is ok and the situation is improving that is very hard to believe. Deny all you want I am not fear mongering just being realistic this type of energy production comes with risks.


ron von
said

Nuclear power is bascially a nuclear bomb in slow motion, using heavy water to slow the process and capture the heat to create electrical power. Failures with the heavy water cooling system can result in catestrophic failures. The long term pain that comes with nuclear is just not worth it. If goverments around the world focused on hydro, solar, and wind energy, and energy conservation, we could do without fossil fuels and nuclear.We need a miracle for Japan now, pray folks.


Daniel
said

It's funny how all the anti-nuclear nuts come out of the closet, hay guys think of the situation/people not your politics.


Physicist
said

CE, you have subscribed to the great green myth about the dangers of nuclear power. In fact there have been far fewer accidents, injuries or deaths in all history involving nuclear power than in one year of ANY other means of power generation. A nuclear power plant is not a bomb.


Pat
said

Sounds like "China Syndrome" in the making. No matter what happens, will we learn the truth?


Nav M
said

What a horrible thing to happen to all those people; i cant even fathom how they will start to recover from all this damage! But we need to also learn from this and take a closer look at home -- for example the Pickering Nuclear Generating Station in Ontario is built DIRECTLY over an ACTIVE fault line as well (Rouge river valley)!!!! Scary!!


Sam in AB
said

This is worrisome, but it won't be a Chernobyl-type situation. I think we've learned a lot since then?


CE
said

If you believe climate change is caused by man made activities like burning fossil fuels, the only viable alternative is nuclear power plant. The effects of climate change span over decades. The effect of a nuclear disaster is instantaneous and much deadlier.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Earthquake in Japan

Courtesy of DigitalGlobe

Fukushima Timeline

What happened to set off the nuclear crisis underway at Fukushima.

Canine Comfort in Crisis

Canine Comfort in Crisis

In Pictures: Four-legged friends offer comfort for Japanese quake victims.

Shelter Life

Shelter Life

50 Pictures: Quake victims and evacuees cope with living in shelters.

Mass Exodus

Mass Exodus

25 Pictures: Residents and foreigners use any means available to flee Japan.

The Nuclear Crisis

The Nuclear Crisis

A reactor-by-reactor breakdown of the troubled Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station.

How Canadians Can Help

How Canadians Can Help

Government of Canada advice on helping Japan, with tips on what's needed, list of aid groups.

Radiation Levels

Radiation Levels

Worried about radiation spreading to your part of the world? Don't be.

Radiation Sickness

Radiation Sickness

Exposure to radiation can lead to thyroid cancer, among other illnesses.

Infographic

Infographic

A map showing location of reactors involved in Japan's nuclear crisis

The 8.9-magnitude quake moved Japan's main island by more than two metres, in addition to shifting Earth on its axis and briefly speeding up its rotation.

Seismic Shift

Quake shifted Japan's main island and sped up the Earth's rotation.

Quake Storified

Quake Storified

Online reaction in the wake of the 8.9 magnitude earthquake.

Tsunami Speed

Tsunami Speed

The tsunami roared through the Pacific at speeds comparable to a jumbo jet.

Today's World Stories

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor waits for the start of his sentencing judgement in the courtroom of the Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam, near The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday May 30, 2012.  (AP / Toussaint Kluiters)

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for 'brutal' crimes

More   5 Comments 5    2 Video(s) 2

This frame grab made from an amateur video provided by Syrian activists on Monday, May 28, 2012, purports to show the massacre in Houla on May 25 that killed more than 100 people, many of them children. (AP / Amateur Video via AP video)

UN observers in Syria discover 13 bound corpses

More

Pakistani doctor Shakil Afridi taken in Pakistani tribal area of Jamrud in Khyber region, July 9, 2010. (AP / Qazi Rauf)

Pakistan doctor guilty of militancy, not CIA links

More

Most Talked about Stories

While Branson's comments (and activities) are arrogant in a million different ways, Clark's response was admirable. She kept her sense of humour with her joke about Branson's brand-name and his bad pick-up line, showing why humour is often the best response to arrogance.

D Austin (Fredericton)

B.C. premier rebuffs Branson's naked kitesurfing invite