World -   

1
A boy walks past a brick factory on the outskirts of Jammu, India, Saturday, Dec. 11, 2010. After two decades of unbridled development, India is now the world's third-largest greenhouse gas emitter. (AP / Channi Anand) People walk past a sand sculpture made by activists of Oxfam, a group of non-governmental organizations, during the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Cancun, Mexico, Friday, Dec. 10, 2010. (AP Photo/Israel Leal) Environment ministers around the world say they have reached an agreement to fight climate change.

UN climate change summit agrees to green fund

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Richard Madan on the deal
International delegates at the UN climate-change summit in Cancun, Mexico have come up with a deal that will offer dozens of countries incentives to start taking major steps to fight global warming.
CTV Edmonton: Marni Kuhlmann reports
Alberta's Environment Minister Rob Renner says world leaders made positive steps towards addressing global warming during a world conference in Cancun, Mexico.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (34) Facebook   

A boy walks past a brick factory on the outskirts of Jammu, India, Saturday, Dec. 11, 2010. After two decades of unbridled development, India is now the world's third-largest greenhouse gas emitter. (AP / Channi Anand) People walk past a sand sculpture made by activists of Oxfam, a group of non-governmental organizations, during the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Cancun, Mexico, Friday, Dec. 10, 2010. (AP Photo/Israel Leal) Environment ministers around the world say they have reached an agreement to fight climate change.

Photos

A boy walks past a brick factory on the outskirts of Jammu, India, Saturday, Dec. 11, 2010. After two decades of unbridled development, India is now the world's third-largest greenhouse gas emitter. (AP / Channi Anand)

View Larger Image

Date: Sat. Dec. 11 2010 9:03 PM ET

Delegates to a UN climate-change conference in Cancun overrode objections from Bolivia and agreed to a framework for cutting greenhouse gas emissions, in addition to establishing a new fund to help developing nations combat global warming.

While the agreements are small in scope, they mark a breakthrough in co-operation among the 193 signatories, who last year made little headway at another UN climate-change summit at Copenhagen.

The Cancun Agreements establish the Green Climate Fund, a framework for providing billions of dollars in funding and technology to poor nations to stave off the threats posed by climate change.

The fund will manage the annual $100 billion pledged to developing countries at the Copenhagen summit, money that is to be handed out beginning in 2020.

The agreements also call for further efforts to cut greenhouse gas emissions, but contain no new hard targets for industrialized nations to meet. The deals "recognized" targets recommended by scientists that call for industrialized countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 25 to 40 per cent of 1990 levels by 2020. Current agreements call for 16 per cent reductions.

Delegates hammered out the agreements into the early hours of Saturday morning, with Mexican President Felipe Calderon emerging at 4 a.m. local time to declare the summit "a thoroughgoing success."

The deals broke "the inertia of mistrust" that had permeated the global efforts to reach climate change agreements, Calderon said.

Environment Minister John Baird hailed the Cancun summit as a "success."

But for the third year in a row, activists bestowed Canada with the Colossal Fossil Award for environmental inaction. They say Ottawa abandoned its own commitments to cut greenhouse gasses under the Kyoto protocol.

"Countries know Canada is the only country in the world to take the Kyoto target and walk away from it, and our emissions have just continued to grow," said Clare Demerese, with the Pembina Institute. "So that creates a real credibility gap."

The agreements were approved despite objections from Bolivia, which argued they didn't go far enough to help stave off disaster as a result of climate change.

Bolivian delegate Pablo Solon said the deals should go further to curb emissions, as current targets will lead to temperature increases of up to 4 Celsius, which he said would lead to "ecocide" with the loss of millions of lives worldwide.

Solon also objected to the agreements' adoption in the face of his country's protest.

Although UN climate change agreements are supposed to be embraced unanimously, Foreign Secretary Patricia Espinoza said that does not "mean that one country has the right to veto" deals that all other countries support.

Environmentalists react

Despite Bolivia's protest, environmentalists were cautiously optimistic about the agreements.

It "wasn't enough to save the climate," said Alden Meyer of the Washington-based Union of Concerned Scientists. "But it did restore the credibility of the United Nations as a forum where progress can be made."

Delegates also hailed the work in Cancun for laying the groundwork for future negotiations.

"The two weeks in Cancun have shown once again how slow and difficult the process is," said Connie Hedegaard, the European Union's top climate official. "Everyone needs to be aware that we still have a long and challenging journey ahead of us to reach the goal of a legally binding global climate framework."

Espinoza garnered praise from delegates and media alike for managing the egos of countries such as Japan and Russia, who resisted calls to agree to further emissions cuts after targets agreed to under the Kyoto Protocol expire in 2012.

Japanese delegates argued that China, which is now the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and emerging economies such as India and Brazil, must agree to dramatic cuts because the 37 signatories to the Kyoto agreement now only account for 27 per cent of global emissions.

With a report from CTV's Richard Madan and files from The Associated Press

Comments are now closed for this story

sarah
said

This whole situation worries me, honestly what’s it going to take. Will we finally except the reality of climate change when we have millions of climate change refugees crying at our doorstep. Every country has a climate model although they differ slightly the outcome remains the same. THE EARTH IS GETTING WARMER!!. We are beginning to move into unknown territory, living in a climate that we have never experienced before. You think that a bit of snow and some heavy rainfall means there’s no problem, weather patterns WILL become more erratic, half of Australia is suffering record floods while the other extreme drought. Our government invests 70 billion plus on military and approximately 3.5 billion on renewable energy. Our intelligence sets us apart from anything else on earth, maybe we should start using it.


DM Ontario
said

When will the people of our country realize that our so called greed is actually the success resulting from 200 years of hard work and progress as a people and a union. When will we fight for eachother instead of funding reckless and corrupt societies, they shall fight for themselves or fail as a whole. We need to keep our money within our borders where it belongs and where it can help our own environment as well as our sick and unfortunate. No man should ever attempt to wage war on mother nature and he who tries will fail miserably at the cost of the people. This country is ours and should not be dictated by others. Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot?


Real Canadian Conservative
said

What a HUGE load of poo this all is. Canada should be OUT of the UN and I will be very very ticked off if one cent of my tax dollars continues to go to this corrupt, liberty stealing organization; especially for a 'climate change' policy that has been soundly rebuffed and exposed as being a fraud!!The climate changes 4 times a year. Got it?


obsserverman
said

FEWER PEOPLE MEANS LESS PRESSURE ON THE PLANET Developing countries and developed countries both share the planet. The Green Fund set up in Cancun is a good beginning to help developing countries stem their population growth, a major cause of environmental degradation, as well as limiting greenhouse gas emissions.


Not for my grand kinds
said

How much “global warming” the Ministry of Pointless Extravagance will forestall with its – well, with its pointless extravagance. We begin with two very generous assumptions: first, that the IPCC’s estimates of how much “global warming” CO2 causes are not absurd exaggerations; secondly, that the Ministry of Misplaced Munificence has not flagrantly underestimated the cost of shutting down 80% of the World carbon economy by 2050.Once again, then, hold on to your sombreros, amigos. Using the same analysis as before, there will be 506 ppmv CO2 by 2050, or just 5 ppmv less if the Ministry of Mumbo-Jumbo gets its way. “Global warming” forestalled will be just 0.03 Celsius, or around a twentieth of a Fahrenheit degree. And the cost per Celsius degree of warming prevented? A mere $34 trillion, or seven years’ total worldwide gross domestic product.Lord M


Tomas
said

Any Canadian representative, at any level of government, who puts his/her signature to this scam MUST be charged with criminal malfeasance. Absolutely NO, to the fraud.


Jim McB
said

A Trillion dollars to be paid by the few and distributed through an organization where a landmass the size of Ontario could have ten jurisdictions each with a vote while Canada and the US (much larger than Europe) has two votes.This is all about world governement and the transfer of wealth where the UN finances itself by taking a cut. It is time to get out of that organization: if we spend what we send to the UN on producing renewable energy we would be further ahead of the game and a world leader in technology. This is the world's most expensive and extensive scam!


K.Munagama
said

we Are environment Organization,
Climate change is the biggest problem in the world. Human and other organism. But unfortunately our main leader countries deviate from there responsible. So we would like to invite from their for make a dissisons for kindly request for world Leaders
Thank you
best regards
k.Munaganma
president of Mihithala Mithuro


Bill in Calgary
said

Is this the same “climate change” that we studied in history classes back in the 1940s and 1950s? You know, where Eric the Red, Leif the Lucky and others like them crossed the Atlantic to establish settlements in Iceland, Greenland, Newfoundland, Labrador and Nova Scotia etc. Where due to the moderate climate, they established bountiful agriculture, including of all things vineyards. Or, where those grape vines naturally occurring to these areas? A transfer of wealth to the panhandlers and political depots of the world will not have one iota of effect in the curtailment of climate change. Weather is chaotic, and climate change is as certain as sunrise and sunset. It is time Canada walked away from this BS. I don’t appreciate addle brained politicians picking my pocket to finance their pet projects on the world stage.


brownplanet
said

To all those of you putting the blame on India, China and the United States, please verify what you're saying before posting on blogs and misleading everyone. Canada has one of the highest emissions per capita, way above China and India, and above the United States. It's time we assume our responsibilities and not only help out developing countries, but reduce our emissions. This agreement is BS, you're right on that one. It's BS because it's not enough. In a few months (or even weeks), everyone will have forgotten about the agreement, just like we forgot about every promise made by our government about the environment and climate change. So this fund won't really happen. We need better emissions reduction targets, and a clear plan to achieve them.


G. Reaper
said

This is everything I could have hoped for.


Bob,Calgary,Alberta
said

Imagine a world where $100B/annum is given to the United Nations, one of the most corrupt organizations that ever existed, to distribute to the so-called third world. This unproven climate change problem gives carte blanche to tree huggers, enviro terrorists, Al Gore, Elizabeth May, David Suzuki and their gang of social engineers to take money from people who have worked hard to earn it and recklessly spew cash to who knows where all in the name of saving the world. The hidden agenda of these crooks is world government and the ultimate loss of the right of all countries to determine their own destiny. This is a massive fraud that makes the Bernie Madoff affair pale in comparison.


BC in BC
said

Every time Canada gives money to UN causes, it is never spent for intended purposes. If Canada is to spend billions of tax dollars, spend it here at home. Do not give any funds to third world countries. This will create jobs, new enterprises and creativity for Canadians and we will enjoy cleaner air, less polluted waters and better environment for all. It's time to take care of our own backyard, our grass will be greener. The UN should go after the big polluters (China,India) where most of the pollution is created. Leave us alone UN, we will do great without you.


Ray, Mississauga
said

The agreement was to have another meeting. That's what these people do.


J.C,
said

Whether there is proof of climate change happening or not matters little to me. however all the crap going into the air from places like India and China does matter to me as obviously it contributes to the air we breath. the atmosphere has got to stop being polluted so much.


Jamie, Ottawa
said

I believe it was on Frontline a little while ago I saw that in the US, 3 lobbyist organizations had been formed and funded by the petroleum industry. They'd been tasked with confusing the public about climate change and convince them the science is shaky and needs more research - even though they know it's sound. Based on the comments I see here, the lobbyists earned every dollar shovelled at them.


Trevor in the Hat
said

The only place global warming exists is in the computer models of the IPCC climate scientists. These models have never matched reality as the true temperatures have always been lower than these models. As the climate summit was happening areas of Ontario were getting over a meter or snow. the UK and other parts of the EU were getting record snowfalls and record low temperatures. Even in Cancun where the summit was happening they had 6 days in a row of record low temperatures. Global warming is a fraud and they know it which is why they now call it "climate change". The climate has ALWAYS changed, long before humans came around and will continue to change long after humans are gone.


Doug # BC
said

I think "Point Break" makes a valid point when saying that the tough decisions have been put off for future meetings.But I also think it's important that these meeting be held.The pace of progress is too slow,but without these small,incremental steps,there will be no progress at all. I do not like this funding.But I concede that I may have to know more about it.If all those nations agreed to it,there must be some good in the program.But I do worry that it will be used to extort more money from developed nations so it can be squandered in third world nations.It's a valid concern. The positive note is that now there are 193 nations meeting.Many of them don't like each other very much.And few of them trust anyone else at the meeting.That makes big steps hard to implement.Especially when the world's biggest emitters (India,China,and the USA) are finding their people more worried about their economies than the environment.Without them being on board,there may be a transfer of wealth by some nations,to other nations,but there will be no real reductions in global green house gases or pollutants. The steps are small.But we can't abaondon the efforts."A journery of 1000 miles begins with one small step".


Cynical
said

No cash from Canada without accountability! Wikileaks should be stealing documents from the organizations that distribute this money so taxpayers know how it is being spent . . . but no, this is just the kind of left-wing nonsense Assange would approve of.


Concerned in the B.C. Rockies
said

It gets harder and harder for the climate change denial crowd to argue. Most of the world gets it. The Earth is NOT flat!


West Newf
said

I wish our government would grow a pair! No to Kyoto, this global warming BS and the climate fund. A clear and un-obfuscated NO! Stop obfuscating and giving the impression we are serious about this BS. When you are out of government some lame Liberal government will use your pseudo support as a basis for ruining this country. No to GW BS in toto!


Jim Cripwell
said

The good ship CAGW is sinking rapidly. Hopefully, our politicians will start to realize that there is no scientific basis for the idea that adding CO2 to the atmosphere will cause global temperatures to rise. Once this happens, this CAGW scam will diappear rapidly, and we can bask in the benefits of more CO2 in the air with a significant rise in the amount of food we can grow. And, hopefully, Ontario will not destroy our coal fired electricity generating stations, but will eliminate true pollution from the gases produced.


Eyes Closed
said

Why would any fund be given to anybody when greenhouse gas 1,2,3,4 is water vapour, CO2 is a distant 5th and necessary for life on earth. It is clear that the UN and Al Gore will continue for decades because of political policy. I thought humans were smarter than chimps, I guess not! It is such a shame these elected people are so abstinent. They either choose to be that way or they are "on the take" like most everyone else in power. Any concerned reader will watch the video on the world wide web friendsofscience dot org.


Merlin
said

Climate change & Green house gases.I do not agree this should be funded as there are two reasons for climate change.1) Climate change caused by man, this could be addressed in some way.2) Climate change cause by world evolution and nature, this can not be changed and it doesnt matter how much money you throw at it will never change and keep on evolving. Now how do you separate the difference between the two. So until you can figure that out the only thing you could even consider spending money on is human made green house gases.I think the UN is out to lunch on this issue.


Will
said

This has NOTHING to do with science and everything to do with a poltical scam to fleece countries with better economies. Is it time for Canada and other responsible states to withdraw from the UN (which WE helped found!)? Not yet, but maybe soon..........we a group of self appointed idiots start planning how to pillage economies, modify weather patterns with deliberate airborne pollution, and impose their plans on the rest of the world despite the findings of responsible science --- Hell, the James Bond movie writers couldn't come up with a plot THIS twisted!


Henry Wysmulek
said

So how exactly does taxing developed countries and giving the money to third world dictators and despots, STOP global warming? Sorry the new catchy phrase is climate change, now that the scam is out of the bag.


David in TO
said

I don't even want one penny going to this farce. We should not even be wasting our money sending delegations to these summits. What a joke.


George V.
said

Where does the money go paid to developing nations, who is going to monitor it, is there going to be transparent accountability? I have great misgivings and doubts about the whole process. We only have the signatures of nations that produce 27% of the greenhouse gas emissions that leaves 73% unsigned for. This whole conference is a total failure from the get go. It is going to cost us billions of tax dollars to support this total farce.


Point Break
said

This agreement won't stop TEMPS from rising by 4C and we know that 4C is unsustainable! The deal has been hailed as restoring faith in the multilateral UN process but it pushes many of the most important decisions to future negotiations.


Nancy
said

TWO WEEKS IN CANCUN??? How did they manage? Poor souls!Green fund? Yea, out of our pockets!


Nancy
said

Billions from..... ME AND YOU!!!!!Carbon tax, etc, etc.... bend me over and pull my hair!!


Shempatolla in the Hammer
said

Oh great. This is where the UN fleeces wealthy nations to give the thugs and despots from the third world who run that country club their play money all under the guise of fighting climate change. What a croc of you know what. $100 billion a year and who wants to bet absolutely nothing gets done in any of these so called nations while we pay for it?


TEA in Sask
said

NO!! No more of my tax dollars going to the corrupt, inept UN...


Chris
said

And the scam continues....


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's World Stories

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor waits for the start of his sentencing judgement in the courtroom of the Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam, near The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday May 30, 2012.  (AP / Toussaint Kluiters)

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for 'brutal' crimes

More   5 Comments 5    2 Video(s) 2

This frame grab made from an amateur video provided by Syrian activists on Monday, May 28, 2012, purports to show the massacre in Houla on May 25 that killed more than 100 people, many of them children. (AP / Amateur Video via AP video)

UN observers in Syria discover 13 bound corpses

More

Pakistani doctor Shakil Afridi taken in Pakistani tribal area of Jamrud in Khyber region, July 9, 2010. (AP / Qazi Rauf)

Pakistan doctor guilty of militancy, not CIA links

More

Most Talked about Stories

While Branson's comments (and activities) are arrogant in a million different ways, Clark's response was admirable. She kept her sense of humour with her joke about Branson's brand-name and his bad pick-up line, showing why humour is often the best response to arrogance.

D Austin (Fredericton)

B.C. premier rebuffs Branson's naked kitesurfing invite