World -   

1

Texting and driving: U.S. official calls it 'epidemic'

The U.S. government held a national summit in Washington, focused on families and their losses from accidents while texting and driving. (Brad Fulton/CTV News) Russell Hurd's daughter was killed when a distracted driver missed a stop. 'How could a professional not notice nine cars stopped at a traffic signal?' he wondered. (Brad Fulton/CTV News) Amos Johnson, father of 16-year-old Ashley Johnson, appeared at the national Distracted Driving Summit, earlier this month in Washington, D.C. (Brad Fulton/CTV News) The U.S. government held a national summit in Washington, focused on families and their losses from accidents while texting and driving. (Brad Fulton/CTV News)
The U.S. government held a national summit in Washington, focused on families and their losses from accidents while texting and driving. (Brad Fulton/CTV News)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (30) Facebook   

Date: Sunday Sep. 26, 2010 11:18 PM ET

Amos Johnson comes from North Carolina and finds it very painful to talk about his 16-year-old daughter Ashley. Police records show that two minutes before the crash that killed her, Ashley retrieved a text message. Her car swerved left and slammed head-on into a truck. It happened in May 2010 and left her father devastated.

"I was in denial," he says. "Not my kid, she wouldn't do that. But she did."

Heather Hurd was 26 when she was killed on a highway in Florida. It was a day filled with anticipation and excitement. She was on her way to meet her family and talk over wedding plans. A tractor trailer doing 65 miles an hour slammed into nine cars stopped at an intersection killing Heather and a young nurse in another vehicle. The driver never even applied his brakes.

"How could a professional not notice nine cars stopped at a traffic signal?" says Russell Hurd, not so much in anger, but genuine bewilderment.

"The driver was engaged in an act that has become more prevalent on our highways. He was text-messaging while driving an 80,000-pound tractor trailer."

Another devastated father.

The U.S. Secretary of Transportation, Ray Lahood, calls it an "epidemic" and has made "distracted driving" almost a personal crusade. He is a hard talker, direct, and for the second year, opened a national summit in Washington, focused on families and their losses. The Johnsons from North Carolina; the Hurds from Maryland; the Davis children from Minnesota.

"The biggest distraction in America today," says Lahood "is people thinking they can drive safely, with a cell phone in their hand, or texting." He could have substituted the word "Canada" for "America" or any other nation. All those cars and trucks and buses, he says, have become "unguided missiles" in the hands of talking or texting drivers.

And we've all done it, or still do it.

Russell Hurd's story might change your mind.

"Because of distracted driving, I will never get to walk a daughter down the aisle in her wedding dress. I will never get to hold a grandchild born to my daughter."

"I will never get to hear her wonderful giggle ever again."

He is an extraordinary advocate for a problem that ravages the roads of America and so many other countries. Canada is perhaps ahead of the United States, in that most provinces have adopted no texting and driving laws, but those who have lost family members say there is a lot of work to be done yet. Remember the controversy over seat belts. Well, in some ways it's happening again.

Just listen to Laurie Hevier's story. Her mother was 58, hiking alongside a highway in Minnesota. You know what happened next. The driver of the car was 19 years old. A young woman.

"There wasn't any attempt to brake," says Hevier. "There were no skid marks. She hit my mom at full speed."

The police estimated the driver was distracted for more than eight seconds. She was given a ticket for "inattentive driving" and fined $175.

"To me this was not a fluke accident," says Laurie, "it was a preventable one."

She paused to hold back tears, even though she's told this story many times now.

"I know this young driver did not intend to kill my mom, but then her choice to not pay attention while driving, cost our family dearly."

Thirty American states now have laws to ban texting and driving, or talking and driving, but the problem is often enforcement. Not enough police giving out tickets, says the Transportation Secretary. "We're back where we were when we started going after drunk drivers." By example, on the day the summit started in a Washington hotel, police were outside on the street stopping and ticketing drivers. And they caught a lot. Point taken.

Amos Johnson's story was among the most poignant. He and his daughter had talked often about not texting and driving, and yet, that's what she was doing when she lost control of her car.

"Ashley, she died on the highway that we live on," he says, "so I have to go by that scene every day, and every time I go there I'm more and more determined to get the word out. Not texting and driving, it can wait."

"At times," he says, "I just wonder how I can get through the day."

Comments are now closed for this story

Erik Wood
said

Business people need to 'hit the ball over the net'. Teens consider it rude not to reply immediately to texts. Home schedules would grind to a halt without immediate communication. We are conditioned to pursue this level of efficiency but we are all supposed cease this behavior once we sit in our respective 5,000 pound pieces of steel and glass. Anyone can win an argument in a forum like this by saying "Just put the phone away" - but we can see its just not happening.

I just read that 72% of teens text daily - many text more 3000 times a month. New college students no longer have email addresses! They use texting and Facebook - even with their professors. This text and drive issue is in its infancy and its not going away.

I decided to do something about it after my three year old daughter was nearly run down right in front of me by a texting driver . Instead of a shackle that locks down phones and alienates the user (especially teens) I built a tool called OTTER that is a simple app for smartphones. I think if we can empower the individual then change will come to our highways now and not just our laws.

Erik Wood, owner
OTTER LLC
OTTER app


Pagan
said

There should be filters installed in all motor vehicles that prevent the reception of all cell phone transmissions so people are less distracted.What is going on now is criminal. Who benfits from all the extra crap in the vehicles.Tv is not for the road.


Simple solution
said

The answer is simple really. Make it manditory that all cel phones come with GPS (Most do already). When the device is active and the GPS detects you are moving faster than walking speed, the phone automatically disables features like email, phone and texting.


ChrisC
said

Make it a crime to engage in ANY electronic device usage that is not the originally equipped with the vehicle. Make the punishment the same as drunk-driving and if the driver commits the crime more than 3 times, revoke their license. I've been hit by two cars while crossing a marked intersection and have had several other close calls. I rarely even carry my cell while driving and if I do, I will not even look at it.


CommonSense
said

Not sure what people think doing this. You're driving several hundred pounds (or kilos, or tons) and think not paying attention the road is intelligent.What is so important?I understand what it's emergency response (cops, fire, ambulance), but really - why can't you wait to pull over or *gasp* wait until you get where you're going? Being out of touch for a short time isn't going to have the same possilbe effects.


Garrett
said

Yes, please get rid of texting and driving, and cell phone talking and driving....Guess we should also get rid of radios in the car since people sometimes like to change the station as they drive.... we should also put a sheet of metal between passenger and driver seats to ensure that any passengers cannot distract a driver.Its the 21st century.... we live in a world of multitasking... where people are required to multitask.... Im not saying its 100% safe... its just the fact of life. For me personally its hard to focus on one thing, especially when in so many areas of Victoria driving speed is ridicolously slow.... your mind begins to wonder...Im 100% for banning texting and driving, thats a bit much... but cell phone talking is hardly anything, for most people.


jane
said

Don't forget that you can take down the perpetraitors license plate number, time and location, and call into the police once you are in a safe place to do so. Usually the police will follow up as they do with drunk drivers. Have they been using their cells or drinking and therefore swerving? Police can only tell by matching the time frames with the cell use, if no use then it could be drunk driving. Either way the driver needs to then be held accountable for unsafe driving.


KC-Bby
said

Studies have shown that talking to a passenger while driving has a measureable impact on one´s driving compared to people who drive alone focused only on the road.Ummm....when are we going to issue tickets to people who talk to their passenger? If we could save one life would it be worth it? I continue to text drive, and I have my glass of wine at a restraunt and drive. I talk to my passengers, i change radios stations, the only thing missing is a toaster oven to heat my breakfast. I can more than afford a simple ticket....$250?? Hmmm....yeah, that´s gonna really discourage me to do all the things I do every day of the week.


Kathrine
said

Well as one previous poster put it, it's a lack of respect of all drivers driving on the road for one thing.Although the numbers have gone for drinking and driving (which has taken 10-15 years to get this far) it still happens all too oftern. People think for whatever "makes no sense" reason, that they are different, that they are invincible. If it has taken this long about dui, then it will take at least that long, likely, about this too. Terrible, but true. I don't think hands free cell use is any different than talking to someone in ur vehicle, but once it starts to distract u, u put it to an end. If people in my vehicle cause me distraction I either ask them to stop or I pull over, until they realize the seriousness of my need to focus on driving, same with my calls, if it doesn't distract and its short, fine, if not either voicemail, or i'll call u back later, i'm driving. When i call someone's cell annd they're r dringing, I tell'em to call me back later.


Mike
said

I wont be the first to admit i dislike the new rules, but i have no problem abiding by them. SO LONG AS THEY APPLY TO EVERYONE.I think a big problem in BC and likely across the country, is people have no respect for this law because it is not applied to every individual.Alice touched on it when listing all the distracting equipment inside a police car that is used while driving. Ive seen RCMP driving while holding a cell phone to the ear with a shoulder and accessing a laptop...while driving. If there is some special training course that emergency personnel take to become safe driving multi-taskers, then any one that wants to should be able to take the same approved course and become licensed. Many of us have to be available at all times on the road in order to perform our job duties just like them.There should be a mass protest day where everyone holds something to their ear while driving. Your wallet would be ideal, but a banana would be hilarious too lol.


robin hood
said

How much balls do you have ctv? I double dare ya to post this. I do not own a cell phone and you couldn’t pay me to carry one! It’s the reason I have voice mail on my land phone. (I don’t like those either) I’ll get back to you at my earliest convenience and if I miss out on an opportunity oh well that’s life! I will not take a phone in my car or walk around the streets with a phone attached to my ear for anyone! Do you have any clue as to how stupid you look, I’m guessing no! I guess I don’t place that much importance on myself; it’s either that or I don’t want to talk to that many people in one day or the same person several times in a short span. Absents makes the heart grow fonder!You see I think this type of technology subtracts from our natural ability of perception there’s nothing like face to face! Not to mention the way business conducts itself these days in the new era of 24-7, no time for family no time for self, no time… hang on I’ve got to take this, right! I have to say that I don’t like the Idea that our government backs these companies and their advertising for a buck and the control of its citizen’s behavior. Then turning around inserting new laws to ban what they’ve pushed on us in the first place due to lack of foresight and to feed us our perception in thinking they’re doing something to correct the problem. It’s the reason I go with out a lot of things. Actually I’m leaning more toward the “on purpose scenario”, waiting and testing to ensure safety is hardly cost effective and just can’t be compare with the revenue generated through ill health and accidents.See latest scam on breast cancer procedure, not really new just buried and has since resurfaced! I think you’ll find a lot of things will be resurfacing in the coming days When- if ever the medical research is finally allowed to inform us of the devastating technology we have in use and the common people realize that we have allowed those in control to hand out death sentences to our young knowing that their brains are not fully developed or that they do not have the density of gray matter that protects their developing minds. We won’t mention that kids naturally do the opposite of what they’re told! If they can’t have that instant gratification they’ll seek other ways of getting it, you won’t like it! Radiation to the head is not a good thing, over time it’s down right nasty. A lot of us have been on this planet long enough to see the changes and I hope recognize when we are being duped at the cost of our children, our health and our pocket books. I have four kids; I did not nor will I provide them with a cell phone, I detest they’re texting, set a group of them up in a room, give each of them a phone and they’ll be texting others rather then converse with those sitting in the room right in front of them. Scary because it’s deliberate! My concerns fall on deaf ears and not just with my kids. 3 out of the 4 have a cell phone! This leads me to believe that someone is working awfully hard to take away the influence of a parent’s guardianship over their child. I’m surprised that instead of building new prisons our government hasn’t come out with their own reality tv show in which the supposedly guilty are giving a head start then pursued and butchered to satisfy the blood lust of the many sick individuals living amongst us… where are they rights? If it takes my last breathe I will seek you out! I don’t appreciate the decline of my eyesight through my computer use either! Your lack of ethics in managing our contributions as a nation coupled with your lack of care to provide in the best interest of those who have placed you in authority is shinning through. Run! Power to the people!


GC in Ont
said

The posts that advocate a self-policing option are bang on. We can't expect the police to monitor everything on the road but there are enough of us on the road to do so.Don't forget to record the time of the incident as this can be matched against the timestamp of the text message.


pedestrian
said

a lot of people here who want to do some social engineering. Ever consider that we all do something that someone else doesn't like? Maybe before you carry on screaming about the other guy, you take a look at your own bad habits. I don't drive, don't want a cell, and don't care.


Frank D.
said

I have never seen more people texting, using a cell, etc, since the driving ban went into effect. I don't know how many times I have waited at stop signs for the person in front to go, or at left turn signals lains,.....it getting pathetic! What the cities have to do is have plain clothes officers spot their vehicles,....call it in to officers down the road,....pull them over,....give them a thousand dollar ticket,.....then take their picture, and have it posted in the local newspaper. Lets keep in mind, that there are babies and children in these vehicles where the driver is using these devices and not paying attention to the traffic.


Terry from Pickering
said

People just don't understand the law, here in Ontario even those people don't understand, it's the law under the Highway traffic Act section 78, 78.1, 78.2 and a $155 fine to go with it if seen using a hand held communication device or visible device. I have seen many and I write down the plate number the time of the incident, location and description of driver and vehicle, in case you don't know what that is, it means Road Watch and it's not hard to do, let us all look out for each other and get with the program, you can very easy stop at any police station in the GTA, Peel, Durham and York to put through a complaint.


Howard in Brampton
said

I believe that it's there's a whole lot more than just talking or texting on a cell phone while driving that's become more problematic these days. A lack of consideration of other drivers is the root cause of most driving problems. This neccessarily includes talking or texting on a cell phone. I find very few non-profession drivers actually think about what their doing or want to do, and don't pre-plan on what to do or how to do it safely without disprupting traffic flow. The best driving advice I've ever heard is "Driving is a full time activity that requires ALL of your attention!"


iP
said

The picture needs to be updated..... people text more today with iPhone's.


Dave
said

I agree with what they have done in Sherwood Park, make it illegal to text and drive. I remember back in the 70's when the CB radio turned into a big hit all over, the same arguments were talked about then but nothing became of it. One is only talking, same as if another person was in the vehicle. Texting totally distracts the drivers. I tried to do it too, but I realized what could happen & haven't done it since. This should be illegal in North America, period!


CMQ in NB
said

As far as I am concerned the penalty for texting while driving should be equal to driving impaired because the person is impairing their ability to drive while doing this. All it takes is a momentary distraction to create or be involved in an accident. If the penalty was that serious then people might take time to pull over and think twice. Being maimed for life or killed is serious. THINK about what you are doing because you are endangering the lives of others just as much as if you were DUI!!!!!


CraigW
said

I've heard that texting impairs your ability to drive as much as or worse than drinking. If so, why aren't the penalties for texting and driving as bad as or worse than for drinking and driving?


stevo
said

There is one serious error in the article. It states about texting and drivig "And we've all done it, or still do it."I never have and never will. I don't own a cell phone and see no logical use in texting. I prefer the old fashion way of communicating, talking face to face.The penalty for texting and driving should be harsher than drinking and driving. At a minimum it should be a lifetime ban on driving for just getting caught.


Norm
said

I spend my time between Ontario and Sask, where cell phone use is restricted in a automobile. It has made very little difference, people talk and text just the same, the police really can't catch all the offenders. People are not able to even walk down a street with out texting. I find myself having to get out of the way of some lamebrain many times a day. The cell phone manufacturers should be forced to built in safeguards. Surely they can come up with some unique method, after all they are coming up with some amazing technoligy every day.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

Preventing stupid people from doing stupid things that defy common sense is often a lost cause (ie. driving without a seatbelt); however, greater public awareness of the growing problem may be achieved through advertising that clearly characterizes and stigmatizes distractive cellphone use (texting or talking) while driving as entirely idiotic, reckless, and potentially lethal behavior conducted solely by STUPID people. Mock the dangerous behavior in ads, and hit people (especially moronic habitual offenders) between the eyes with a no-mercy message. Even stupid people don't like being labeled "stupid." Any effort short of this will likely remain ignored by a significant segment of drivers. ("I'll never get into an accident or kill anybody.")


Alice
said

Have you looked inside a police car lately? 3 radio systems, two cell phones, a satellite phone, and a computer system; plus dashcam and radar speedometer. If they can manage to drive safely AND carry out their duties, what's the problem with the general public? If you can't multi task, just pull over.


Al in Orillia
said

People are still doing it, total disregard for the law and the safety of others. Hopefully the police will lay charges until people start getting the real message.Took a while with seatbelts too I guess, but it angers me when I see people driving in the city with pedestrians everywhere, and they're staring at their stupid phone instead of the road.


Will
said

There is no need for new laws, just enforce the ones already on the books. i.e. "Driving without due care & attention for the safety of others". BC brought in anti cell phone laws, hasn't changed anything, lots of people driving with the phone at their ears. Enforcement of existing laws, including at the court level, is all that is needed.


Someone Who CARES
said

Nine times out of 10 when you drive by a car and you see swerving on the road they are texting or reading a text on their phone. What the heck is soooooo important? Twenty years ago people waited to get information, it's like the borgs from Star Trek. No one wants to be out of the loop even for a few minutes. Listen, driving a car is a priviliege not a RIGHT. I think people should lose POINTS not just a fine for this behaviour. Then maybe things will change. Three points and a $350 fine!!! And if you hit something and cause an accident and it is proven you were texting and driving, well then automatic suspension.

Ian in Oshawa
said

I don't think we have enough commercials that seriously underscore the true horror of a crash while texting and driving. We need to take a page from Australian distracted drving ads. Those are some scary ads, I know I'll never touch alcohol before driving thanks to those ads.


Pearly
said

Just install cellphone signal scramblers in cars. Problem solved.


Sam C
said

This just underscores the notion that "Just because you CAN does not mean you SHOULD." Hang up and DRIVE!


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's World Stories

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor waits for the start of his sentencing judgement in the courtroom of the Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam, near The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday May 30, 2012.  (AP / Toussaint Kluiters)

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for 'brutal' crimes

More   5 Comments 5    2 Video(s) 2

This frame grab made from an amateur video provided by Syrian activists on Monday, May 28, 2012, purports to show the massacre in Houla on May 25 that killed more than 100 people, many of them children. (AP / Amateur Video via AP video)

UN observers in Syria discover 13 bound corpses

More

Pakistani doctor Shakil Afridi taken in Pakistani tribal area of Jamrud in Khyber region, July 9, 2010. (AP / Qazi Rauf)

Pakistan doctor guilty of militancy, not CIA links

More

Most Talked about Stories

While Branson's comments (and activities) are arrogant in a million different ways, Clark's response was admirable. She kept her sense of humour with her joke about Branson's brand-name and his bad pick-up line, showing why humour is often the best response to arrogance.

D Austin (Fredericton)

B.C. premier rebuffs Branson's naked kitesurfing invite