World -   

1
Harper adopts 'quiet diplomacy' tactic in China Prime Minister Stephen Harper makes a speech at the Canada-China Business Council and the Canadian Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai, China on Friday, December 4, 2009. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Prime Minister Stephen Harper visits the Yu Garden market in Shanghai, China on Saturday, December 5, 2009. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Prime Minister Stephen Harper shakes hands with Wu Bangguo, chairman of China's Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, before a meeting at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing Friday, Dec. 4, 2009. (AP / Liu Jin) Prime Minister Stephen Harper and wife Laureen visit the Canadian International School in Beijing, China on Friday, Dec. 4, 2009. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS) A youngster plays around with a Canada and Chinese flag as he watches Prime Minister Stephen Harper and wife Laureen visit the Canadian International School in Beijing, China on Friday, Dec. 4, 2009. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Prime Minister Stephen Harper and wife Laureen visit The Forbidden City in Beijing, China on Friday, Dec. 4, 2009. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

PM doesn't shy away from human rights in China

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Robert Fife from Shanghai
Prime Minister Stephen Harper spent his first day in Shanghai promoting the 2010 Olympics to a Canadian-run school in the city. Meanwhile, officials are hoping the visit will help thaw icy relations between the two countries.
Power Play: Warren Kinsella and Tim Powers
A Liberal strategist says Harper's trip to China is not going very well because Canada has had China in the 'deep freeze' over the last four years, while a Conservative strategist says Harper has not shied away from human rights talks.
Canada AM: Elliot Tepper, Carleton University
A politics professor explains why with diplomatic scolding behind them, China's leaders are sending signals it now considers perceived slights by Canada a thing of the past with the hope the two countries can re-establish mutual trust.
Power Play: PM scolded by Chinese officials
Former Conservative foreign affairs minister David Emerson and former Canadian ambassador to the EU Jeremy Kinsman discuss the importance of Canadian-Chinese relations.
Power Play: MPs discuss Harper's visit
NDP MP Paul Dewar, Conservative MP Diane Ablonczy and Liberal MP Scott Brison talk about whether or not Prime Minister Stephen Harper's trip to China has been a success so far.
CTV News Channel: Paul Evans, University of B.C.
The director of UBC's Institute of Asian Research explains why the chiding of Prime Minister Stephen Harper by Chinese officials was to be expected.
CTV News Channel: Pierre Pettigrew
A former foreign affairs minister reacts to Harper being publically shamed for waiting too long to make his high-profile trip to China.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (65) Facebook   

Harper adopts 'quiet diplomacy' tactic in China Prime Minister Stephen Harper makes a speech at the Canada-China Business Council and the Canadian Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai, China on Friday, December 4, 2009. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Prime Minister Stephen Harper visits the Yu Garden market in Shanghai, China on Saturday, December 5, 2009. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Prime Minister Stephen Harper shakes hands with Wu Bangguo, chairman of China's Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, before a meeting at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing Friday, Dec. 4, 2009. (AP / Liu Jin) Prime Minister Stephen Harper and wife Laureen visit the Canadian International School in Beijing, China on Friday, Dec. 4, 2009. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS) A youngster plays around with a Canada and Chinese flag as he watches Prime Minister Stephen Harper and wife Laureen visit the Canadian International School in Beijing, China on Friday, Dec. 4, 2009. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Prime Minister Stephen Harper and wife Laureen visit The Forbidden City in Beijing, China on Friday, Dec. 4, 2009. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Photos

Prime Minister Stephen Harper makes a speech at the Canada-China Business Council and the Canadian Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai, China on Friday, December 4, 2009. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

More on this topic

Date: Fri. Dec. 4 2009 7:11 PM ET

Prime Minister Stephen Harper received silence from Chinese business leaders when he told them Canada would continue to bring up human rights issues and not stay quiet in exchange for stronger economic ties between the two countries.

"In relations between China and Canada, we will continue to raise issues of freedom and human rights," he in a speech in Shanghai Friday.

"Our government believes and has always believed that a mutually-beneficial economic relationship is not incompatible with a good and frank dialogue on fundamental values like freedom, human rights and the rule of law," Harper said.

This part of the speech, part of Harper's first-ever visit to China, was greeted with silence from the businessmen, who had applauded his earlier focus on trade progress and an announcement Canada would open up four new trade consulates.

Former Conservative MP John Reynolds, now a businessman who spends three months a year in China, told The Canadian Press that the Chinese would not be put off by the comments.

"They understand Canada is a friend, they understand we have resources they need and that we can do business both ways," he said.

"Every country says that (about human rights). Fact is, trade has not suffered and this visit will be like a rocket shot to everybody."

NDP leader Jack Layton said Harper should not lecture China on its human rights record, considering the questions raised over whether Canada transferred prisoners to Afghan authorities where they were tortured.

"I think you always have to be careful when you live in a glass house when it comes to throwing stones," Layton told reporters in Winnipeg Friday.

Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff said Harper should have visited China earlier, saying the prime minister has a lot of "repair work" to do on Canada's relationship with China.

"We've all had a wake up call in Canada about how important China is and Mr. Harper has taken a very long time to wake up," Ignatieff said.

In the rest of his speech, Harper said Canada and China both have much to gain from a stronger economic partnership, especially in the energy business.

He told the business leaders that Canada is rich in oil, natural gas and uranium that China can use to fuel its own economic growth.

He also said Canadian businesses can help China shift toward green energy.

He told the leaders that investing in Canada is good business, because of falling taxes and low government debt.

Earlier in the day, Harper met with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao on Thursday and trumpeted several diplomatic victories, despite a couple of awkward moments.

Harper, who is travelling with his with Laureen, was scolded by Wen for the fact that five years have passed since a Canadian prime minister has visited China.

Wen later gave Chinese media and a TV station interviews where he blamed the Harper government for the damaged relations.

"We are reluctant to see Canada alienate us in recent years," Wen was quoted as saying by the official China Daily. "That has hampered our trade and personal exchanges."

"I hope the visit can solve the problem of mutual trust."

In return, Harper noted that no Chinese leader had visited Canada over the same period of time.

Despite Wen's upbraiding, Harper managed to achieve Canada's longstanding desire for approved destination status from Beijing -- a shift that is expected to substantially boost Chinese tourism to Canada. He also achieved several other small victories, such as the lifting of the Chinese ban on Canadian pork products.

Canada-China relations have been tense in recent years. Beijing has also been frustrated by Ottawa's complaints about the treatment of Uygher-Canadian dissident Huseyin Celil.

Official newspapers say Harper slighted the Chinese government by refusing to attend the 2008 Beijing Olympics, in addition to embracing the Dalai Lama's criticism of the treatment of people in Tibet.

The China Daily did acknowledge that Harper was making headway in trying to "warm up cool to icy ties."


Comments are now closed for this story

Derek
said
0 0

Ignatiaff claims that he's well schooled in international affairs yet he chooses to ignore the fact that US-CAN are joined at the hip. Does he not think its a coincidence that Obama and Harper scheduled visits withing 60 days of eachother???


Jerry in Calgary
said
0 0

It would appear that the Chinese are certainly not concerned about any potential embarrassments to our PM Stephen Harper in making mention of the long overdue visit owed to China.As a reciprication of that conduct, so too should our prime minister return the favour by continuing to push forward our concerns for human rights in that country.These concerns by Canada ought not to be something that the Chinese can use against any trade expansions between the 2 countries.On the contrary, China should and must be respectful of Canada's respect for human rights and freedoms of which Canada as a world leader stands tall and proud of its accomplishments in those areas.


Jim K from Ottawa
said
0 0

Prime Minister Harper has once again made me proud to be Canadian.God Bless Stephen Harper.


Drew in NS
said
0 0

Excellent job to Mr. Harper for keeping human rights before the almighty dollar.Of course we all remember "Mean Jean Cretian"and "Paul wait a minute I'll change my mind Martin" They went to China to talk about the almighty dollar. The Liberals and Wal Mart love the SLAVE LABOR mentality, pulls in billions of dollars to both economies. At least Harper wants to push Human Rights for the thousands of Chinease murdered this year alone, Tibet, lead paint in our kids toys, tainted pet food. In Canada the Executive of these companies would be fired, In China they were fired upon. Oh and the lefties still want to do business with these murders Carte Blanc.Shame on you


Ray
said
0 0

I don't believe anyone needs or wants China to trade their junk goods with us. I'm happy to sell them raw resources but I do not want to buy anything they have to sell and I do not want any of their investments in our Country. The Chinese now own a large share of the Fort McMurray tar sands development and I don't agree they should be allowed to any any of it. Neither them, the American's, Saudia Arabia or anyone else but Canadians should be permited to own part of Canada or it's business. Neither should we as Canadians be allowed to own another Countries assets.


simon
said
0 0

Abroad he talks boldly about Human Rights. At home it is Hush Hush !! Or a Cover Up regarding Torture. Afghanistan is an example. Harper's LEFT Hand does not know what his RIGHT Hand is doing !


CMQ in NB
said
0 0

Iggy and Jack.... how about giving us some ideas of what would be important elements to build relations with China instead of constantly criticizing Harper. I find all these two do is play "wait and see" politics and then try to pounce. Give us an original thought or idea about what can make a difference. You two are acting like movie critics who constantly give a thumbs down. Layton, the detainee issue has been dealt with so stop beating a dead horse and Iggy, you need to wake up, you are sliding in the polls and yet you strut around like you have something credible to say. Maybe do something credible other than whine and complain because you are not PM. Read the news, China sees our not being there before now as a dead issue, the past.... Maybe if you would get your head out of the Liberal self righteous past you might be forward thinking like the Chinese are in wanting to look ahead. If Iggy and Jack are only going to go around and beat a drum, please go somewhere so we don't have to listen to your rhetoric.


Alan ZIMMER
said
0 0

So let me get this straight, LAYTON is comparing Canada's civil rights record to China's??? basically he's saying that Canada can't say anything because it's no better. Get real, we are constantly analyzing problems and adapting, and apologizing. There is no comparison!!Then Iggy says HARPER should have visited China earlier, this is laughable. #1 Why? China needs to be put in timeout and Canada does not need to crawl to them, and why would you even think of taking China's side. So if North Korea, Iran or Pakistan say something next is Iggy going to come to their defense too?2 HARPER has barely had time to do anything over the last couple years other then try and survive and take care of issues in CANADA (our own country!!) Between the Liberals, NDP and Bloc's consistant craving for power there is no time for world politics. I can't believe the NDP is actually starting to be the lesser of two evils. Comments like this from Iggy make my stomach turn!az


John from Saskatoon
said
0 0

on Power Play Warrne Kinsela brought up this topic of China and human rights saying Harper basically has no right to say anything to the Chinese because Harper is involved in a torture cover-up in Afghanistan along with his govt. Does the fact that he is on a news media show protect him from a slander suite because it sure seemed to me that he is blatantly accusing Harper of something quite serious. The Liberals need a time out to think of a new stratagy because what they have done for the last 4 years is truely amature. The look like grade 6 students runnig for class president. Sorry to grade 6 students for the comparison.


Xavier
said
0 0

All of you who think that we should bow to China should move there asap. then you will love the freedom to have an opinion like we enjoy in Canada. too bad you are eroding it.


kaberle
said
0 0

To Prime Minister Harper.... Hear Hear !!To Iggy and Laydown ...... Shut Up !!


Robert J in Calgary
said
0 0

Canada needs to negotiate with China independently of the US. Dealing with China holds many positive implications, but Canada must never forget that China has a dictatorial, not a communist leadership and China has experienced many persistent harsh "quality of life" backslides because of dictatorial leaderships, going back to Mao and since. Canada's energy is in the cross-hairs of many interests. Negotiate very carefully.


John from Saskatoon
said
0 0

Did Layton really say Harper shouldn't lecture China on human rights because of Afghanistan. Is he saying that Canadians have trampled on human rights over there. You can't win with this guy. If he says something to them he's bad. If he doesn't then he's condoning human rights abuses. Make up your mind. As for Iggy, he could care less about bringing up human rights and showing Canada's displeasure over China's record. He thinks we should gloss it over so we can sell them copper or copies of his books. Yet surprisingly he has a problem with the detainee issue in Afghanistan. I guess when there is no financial cost then it's okay with Iggy to bring up human rights.


Pink33
said
0 0

Isn't bowing down to the Chinese a lot like bowing down to Walmart for better sales?I'm very disappointed in Harper for this. I voted for him in the last election too, as I have no love for the Liberals and cannot stomach a socialist government under the NDP.Between this and the HST, you've lost my vote Steve.


JB in Ontario
said
0 0

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has stood up for Canadian values in that he brought up the topic of Human Rights with China. We all know China has had a dismal record for Human Rights.Energy and trade should be important between Canada and China in the future and "green" energy in particular should be high priority.


D J in Manitoba
said
0 0

While we should say something they know how we feel and to are going to do what they want anyways. They are no different that us. They run their country how they want. It does no good to say anything. Sad but true!!!!


Herbert
said
0 0

It's surprising how many people in the forum are still thinking about China in terms of five to ten-year -old anti-communist propaganda. See the truth for yourself rather than reciting the right-wing "official line". There's an element of insecurity and fear that blows the faults of China out of proportion and ignores any good altogether. Talk to a Chinese Canadian once or twice to get a better idea of whether people are "shot every day" or if there are "organ harvesting rings".


PW - Brant
said
0 0

both governments are at fault here. harper was wrong to go forth and publicly humiliate china by raising human rights issues, boycotting the olympics and being so open to the dali lama, but china could have very easily arranged an official visit here. we are after all their main supplier for raw materials.


my take on this
said
0 0

DGL said, I don't think that there is another leader in Canada to-day who could do a better job. Leader aside, there are lots of people (including some in the conservative party) who would be a better leader. Here we have a man with a masters degree in economics who lowers the GST by two points and ignores or doesn't see the economic crisis that was or was about to become world wide. Yes indeed, the world needs more leaders like Stephen Harper.


Rob NS
said
0 0

Excellent work PM, much better than Jean C. Almost a shame to compare the two, I understood very little what that man said, and disaggreed with the little I could make out...except grabbing the pie protestor by the throat...that was cool...


reece
said
0 0

He get's a back-handed greeting by the Chinese. Vows to continue fighting for human rights yet he signs on to all sorts of deals with the Chinese. If you are a man of conviction you don't do business. Lip service doesn't cut it when your actions contradict your words. Even Obama refused to greet him when he arrived - sending Harper a low-level staffer to greet him at the door and cutting the meeting to a couple of hours. Harper, you are not important.


Scott/Hfx
said
0 0

I'd just like to remind everyone, that it was the Liberal's and NDP's idea to slant China for their human rights behaviour, and now the left, as usual, is double tongueing Harper. Typical left wing hypocrasy at it's best. In reality, Harper will repair the damage you've all done. He is the best PM Canada has ever had!


Mna QC
said
0 0

Response to Larry: Why you feel bad when china sent 5 Uygur's to death? Did you see the videos in July 5 that these 5 guys killed other people brutally and bloody. Death penalty is not just in China, and many other places in the world, even in US. If you feel mercy to these 5 guys, I will think you are cold-blooded. That's what I think about your post.


N.D.Peer
said
0 0

Oh how I long for the heady days of P.E.T. when we could be proud to send our message to the world that Canada is a free socialist democracy. Granted Jean was good but Pierre was the best,, but I always wondered what Ed Broadbent could have if given the chance......Good to see Harpy is finally listening.


dingdang
said
0 0

Don't be so sensitive when China leader said too late for the visit. If you feel this is criticism£¬ then you did not know chinese humor or thoughts. It some kind of implying"oh, my friend, why you come so late? I miss you." That's the real meaning of the words from Chinese leaders.Second, why not forming Chinada in economy later to strength mutual interests. China is always be friendly to Canada.


the other lowell in BC
said
0 0

The so called harper haters (libs) are doing their role as the "OPPOSITION". The job of the opposition part y is to criticize and not always side with the government. Liberals have a different set of values from the conservatives. That is pretty plain. However we are all Canadians and want what is best for Canada. It is all a matter of perception of how best to do that. The conservatives ridicule Ignatieff, call him names, put up attack ads. Is that the Canadian way.


Bill in BC
said
0 0

Good Job PM! The success he's having on this trip simply underscores the fact that the chinese aren't as offended as the Lib-NDP twits woudl have us believe. They're hearing the cash register go ka-ching, so feelings are set aside.And even if they weren't - who cares. This trip is about trade not beign best buds. Countries have interests NOT friends.


Larry
said
0 0

China was so impressed with Harpy's talk on human rights, they sentenced 5 Uygur's to death yesterday! What an impact talking down to and avoiding diplomatic relations with China for 5 years has!The Canadian prime minister, who had once irritated China by openly embracing the Dalai Lama, promised yesterday to "stick to the One-China policy, respect China's sovereignty and territorial integrity and properly handle discrepancies in a friendly, candid and respectful way", according to a press release issued by the Foreign Ministry.

PracticalWay
said
0 0

Canada, and any other countries in the world, should do business, meanwhile maintain the dialogs with China. Do not mix these things. Chinese government has zero interests in talking about the nonsenses such as human rights. Every country has distinct view of such ideologies. Do not assume the western way is the best way, and even try to ask others follow the same approach.


Citizen
said
0 0

For all his talk of Change, President Obama has continued to same tired line with China, tip toeing around issues like Tibet and human rights, while trying to get as much money as they can. There is no leader on the World Stage, still pushing China on human rights, tibet or any other major issue. Except Prime Minister Harper, and for that Canadians should be proud, he has stepped into a leadership vacuum that badly needed to be filled. Now trade is important, but all the focus on a couple of negative comments from a pissed of Chinese official, drowns out the fact that Harper got increase Chinese tourism and the removal of restrictions on Canadian pork. Harper is balancing both initiatives, he is standing up for Canadian values and human rights and still getting Canadians improved trade. That shows real leadership.


Art Jury
said
0 0

Something that wasn't reported was the PM's visit to the Canadian International School of Beijing. My daughter works there and was looking forward to his visit. He visited the school after the Forbidden City and missed a major opportunity to show Canada's current cooperation with China on education. This school is staffed with New Brunswick teachers and teaches the New Brunswick curriculum. But when he visited the school he said only five words, didn't say anything about the school or its role, and as far as my daughter was concerned, looked like he didn't even want to be there. As such the news reports didn't even cover the visit. What a lost opportunity to show a positive relationship with China.


Citizen
said
0 0

So, since Canada remembered who it was, and our views on the world. We received a wise, scholarly man, and China throws a fit. We defend the rights of our citizens, and they get angry. Canada, one of the architects of the responsibility to protect, questions China's human rights record. All of these are cornerstone of who we are as global citizens. How can we sacrifice who we are to please China. To hell with the business aspect in this case, Harper is acting the way a Canadian Prime Minister should, this idea of quiet diplomacy lets China nod its head in private, and face no public criticism. We should continue the public criticism and show those in China who or growing more angry with this fascist regime that there are nations who desire change in China and won't simply bow down for the sake of some poorly made cheap products.


Doug @ BC
said
0 0

Lots of partisanship and political bias on here this AM.The Harper Haters,once again speak out of both sides of their mouths.On one hand,Harper gets pilloried if he doesn not take the issue of human rights seriously.On the other hand they suggest he should cowtow to the Chinese leadership so we can all make more money.GO FIGURE.I would suggest tht those on the political left make up their minds befoer they put their mouths in motion.One little fact is missing from the posts I've read so far.On the domestic side of our politics.it Harper does use the quiet,behind close doors method of addressing human rights,the boneheads on the left will they accuse him of not addressing those issues at all. ROCK------HARPER-------HARD PLACE And finally,as passionate as any of us are about any of the issues on the agenda,it is important to realize just how little impact Canada can have if it comes to actually flexing some muscle in a place like China.The truth is that our economy and our sparse population make us more irrelevant than so many Canadians think we are.We may be able to puch above our weight at times,but really,our clout in global affairs is mostly symbolic.The philosophical points we make are accepted.But when it comes to the reality of trade,we don't buy enough to have any clout,and our products are so expensive that very few people in China can afford to buy them. I love this country with a passion.But Canadians have got to stop thinking the rest of the world is holding it's breath and waiting for us to act on much of anything.If Canada evaporated tomorrow,it would take a week for the rest of the world to even notice.We have a lot of growing up tio do.


R. Nixon
said
0 0

It's nice to see the Chinese state-media is doing what our media refuses to do: scrutinize Mr. Harper for his transgressions.What a spectacle this small-minded little man is for our otherwise great nation.


Ki-Som Victoria BC
said
0 0

Will the Tory's, who are clearly filling these comments, stop it. Getting sick and tired hearing what a saint Mr. Harper is. He is a bully, and he has finally met a bigger bully, with a bigger stick. I am most certainly not saying that the Liberals would do any better, but Harper isn't that great, and has hurt Canada's international reputation.


Martin
said
0 0

I like how the term "quiet diplomacy" implies a strong silent type (nice guy). That clearly does not describe Harper, although peddling that image is probably desirable to the conservatives. It is not mentioned much that China is one of the world's economic superpowers, and as such it is a faux pas not to visit as well as to publicly criticize. A leader would be a fool to do both.


Alex
said
0 0

As Canadians, do we really want our government to be "value free, get along and go along" with China like the former Liberals?Shame!Whatever the premier was saying is actually a welcoming... usually chinese always welcome VIP guests by saying... we are expecting you for so long... long time not come, please come more often... Medias, please learn some Chinese culture before report it differently. You twisted the meaning of the message.


Mean Old Cat
said
0 0

So many people feel western leaders should press Chinese leadership on human rights. hmmm, do any of these western leaders have any clue at all about how difficult it must be to manage 1.6 billion people? All in a land mass roughly the size of western Canada. I don't think so.There is a big difference between engaging a culture and insulting them.


Danny Dinosaur
said
0 0

It is good to see that Harper is taking steps to correct previous critical errors in judgment. I wish he would also learn from it, but I am not optimistic. he is a person who is unable to listen to views that are opposed to his own and we can not afford a Prime Minister in this category. It is not a sign of a leader but rather of someone who scared of everything. Mixed with that is a man with morals that are all superseded by a desire for power. It would be so nice to have at least one leadership hopeful who is not a liar and a coward.


Dave
said
0 0

Harper should tell the Chinese to take a long walk off a short pier. And we don't want their shoddy merchandise in Canada, thank you very much. They need us more than we need them. We don't have a quarter of the worlds's population to feed.


bruce in london
said
0 0

This is a hugely successful trip for our PM!Not only has he opened new trade opportunities,he has stayed true to our values.We want a trade relationship with Chine.nothing more,nothing less.We are not trying to be buddies with this communist regime.PM Harper is striking the right balance.Iggy and his lot are flailing around again on the wrong issue!We are not trying to "save face"with this regime.It,s about trade and Mr.Harper has accomplished much.


Ken from Edmonton
said
0 0

This trip is to strengthen the relationship with China not alienate. Human rights issue better leave at home where it belong.


Adele: Embarssed by Liberals Reaction
said
0 0

It is a giant embarassment for Canada to see the Liberal opposition so obviously jealous of another successful trip with thier constant attacking and twisting of everything. This is great trip with China making us a Canadian economic announcement in China. No matter where he is he communications with Canadians. Adding 79,000. last month is also very good for Canada.As a former Liberal now independent I think my choice is becoming obvious.


JB in Ontario
said
0 0

I don't see why Ottawa does not visit China more often. It has been 5 years and that is too long. Promoting more tourism to China is good for China and many other countries.


ADM Saskatchewan
said
0 0

While human rights is probably on his mind Mr. Harper has made the decision to build an economic relationship with China. This is good for Canada and our economy. while some might diasagree with this, I like what our Prime Minister is doing.


Tim
said
0 0

Harper's approach is 100X better than Martin's and Chretien's "No Comment" on China's human rights abuse. I guess the fact that they are involved in PowerCorp have something to do with them kowtowing to the Chinese.


Anne
said
0 0

I don't think that Canada, or our Prime Minister, should tread so softly around Chinese sensibilities where the issue of human rights is concerned. Their arrogance in 'scolding' our PM is ridiculous, and disrespectful. But, not unexpected - after all, they are a country where profit reigns over integrity, until you get caught.


Nancy
said
0 0

@DGL Most Canadians do not underestitmate I think we have grown to appreciate his love of Canada his constant dedication to the country and always doing the right thing for the country even if it not over reacting to a smaller even. His handling of the Chinese file shows a balanced approach and we will not be pushed around we need agreements that benefit Canada too.


KGC
said
0 0

I am truly amazed with the comments of Canadians that core values are shelved when it comes to trade. For years the LIBS sold out Canadian values to further their own interest. I prefer a leader who stands up rather than always have hat in hand.Mr. Harper is a leader that the Chinese might not like today as he does not bow immediately but will be respected more as a good adversary.We need to take the long term view with China. Unfortunately in North America we look for immediate gratification which the Chinese use against us.Everything is a negotiation. Hold the course.


Wade Enns
said
0 0

Scolding? If the same liberal media reporters where there and it was a liberal meeting it would been reported as the 2 two were relaxed and joking about not getting together sooner and promised to do it more often, a truly warm personal relationship is evident. Prime Minister Harper is doing a great job statesman like and bringing up the issuses important to Canada and making obvious progress.


Ian Ottawa
said
0 0

Liberal staffers working overtime to cloud the truth. Prime Minister Harper is doing great or Iggy's staff wouldn't be pressing thumbs down on alll the articles sheading good items.


Ray - In ottawa
said
0 0

Actually, I could do a better job while taking a nap. What this boils down to is MONEY. The chinese knows it and so does the west. Regardless of how much we try to put up a strong front against violations of human rights, eventually the economy will end up the top priority. If the chinese also knows this, why would they care to improve their human rights record. To give you an idea of what they think of Harper and basically Canada, look at who they sent to meet him at the air port.Simply put, I believe Harper has sold out Canada.


Allan Eizinas
said
0 0

When the leader of a major nation publicly reprimands the leader of another nation then that is the equivalent of a slap on the side of the head. Harper made a major foreign policy mistake in trying to initially tell China how to act with its citizens. Now, he got his slap on the head.It is unfortunate that all of Canada had to suffer the consequences of Harper’s mistakes. Perhaps Harper has now gotten the message.


allan
said
0 0

Mr. Harper should be commended and not condemned on this visit. It is disgusting to see Liberals bad-mouthing our own P.M. in front of the world. They have so much blind hatred for Mr. Harper they cannot even be mature enough to show some respect when we present ourselves on the world stage. Well done Mr. Harper.


Eric Hill
said
0 0

I live in China and I don't know why every country in the world cow-tow's to the Chinese government. This government is nothing more than a bunch of brutal thugs out for nothing more than their own gain all the while pulling the wool over the rest of the world's eyes. Unfortunately, the entire mainland China population has been brainwashed the same fashion as North Korea to think that it is for the greater good. It was never for the greater good, its for the greater buck.I was happy when I thought Canada was going to speak up for human rights. If we don't, who will? ...anyways, we have a trade deficit with them, why do we need them anyways? They should be cow-towing to us.


Mark
said
0 0

I am awaiting the massive' 'thumbs-down' campaign by Chinese propagandists against anti-communist or pro-canada postings...looks like it has started already...why doesn't CTV moderrate this?


Red X
said
0 0

By 2012, there will be new leadership in both countries...


Mark
said
0 0

Dealing with China requires a certain balance.On the one hand, the Chinese have lots of money.On the other hand, the Chinese government routinely represses people's rights, shoots and kills its own citizens, imprisons those that disagree and well generally does lots of things we find abhorent.So, what's more important?


Mathieu
said
0 0

Nobody is underestimating him. He's a fool who spreads around lies as if it was the truth. The worst thing to have happened to the conservative party was merging with the Reform Party.Harper can't retire soon enough


Chris in Ontariariari-Oh!
said
0 0

In all fairness to the prime minister in the short period of time he has been in office he has had the Afghan war and all the issue's related to it,B.S.E.,H5N1.,economic meltdown,constant threat's from the opposition to topple the government,the grand coalition,H1N1.,climate change and not to mention provincial and territorial issue's.....For a new government to walk into these kind's of issue's without having little governing experience I think they have done pretty well.They have had enough to deal with on their home turf without traipsing all over the world kissing China's butt.All I hear is that it's all about trade and job's,all I have seen is a lot of job's lost to China.They have but one interest in Canada and that is the tar sand's and the oil patch as it is a secure source for oil.I hear the liberal's going on about how much they accomplished in trade with China during their tenure and all I saw were Canadian firm's packing up and moving to China for the cheap labour and low operating cost's.We ship them the steel and they ship us back the finished good's at a cost of Canadian job's.The only one's who see this China visit as an issue are the liberal's and the media who seem to take the easy route rather than dig into the real story's that affect Canadian's like say the $1 billion dollar's Mcguinty p--sed away on E-health while our health care system is already struggling to provide for Canadian's.


JP in North Saanich
said
0 0

Mr Harper- you finally getting the picture-"Quite " is the key word.When you are on the world stage- youbeing QUITE is helping use regain our position on the World Stage.As wehn you oepn your mouth your foot makes it way there. You cannot tell other governmnets how to run thier country wehn you have made a mess of yoru own country - Canada.As you may have seen China has done and is doing very good under their system. Clean your own house before you go to others


Allan Eizinas
said
0 0

When the leader of a major nation publicly reprimands the leader of another nation then that is the equivalent of a slap on the side of the head. Harper made a major foreign policy mistake in trying to initially tell China how to act with its citizens. Now, he got his slap on the head.It is unfortunate that all of Canada had to suffer the consequences of Harper’s mistakes. Perhaps Harper has now gotten the message.


Tenzin Sonam
said
0 0

PM Harper should raise the matter of Human Rights, Dalai Lama and the suffering of people in Tibet. Otherwise, with the US President being reluctant to raise these issues seriously with the Chinese leadership, who is going to speak out? What is happening? - No one seems to cares any more about the suffering of people in Tibet, who are slaughtered and killed in thousands every day! A lost of Canadian busniess opportunity in China is such an insignificant matter comparing with the daily slaughting of Tibetan people.


montrealer
said
0 0

I like how the article states that Mr.Harper is taking an old strategy from Jean Chretien!!! Someone is desperate to do everything to get that majority, even contradict his own principales. Harpocrasy at it's best!!!!!


DGL
said
0 0

I think that some people are still underestimating our Prime Minister. He has accomplished a lot, from the melding of two parties into one, to successfully negotiating the rocky shoals of minority government. Here, he is demonstrating statesmanship and skilled international relationship building. I don't think that there is another leader in Canada to-day who could do a better job.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's World Stories

This combo made with undated photos made available by the Miami-Dade Police Dept. shows Rudy Eugene, 31, left, who police shot and killed as he ate the face of Ronald Poppo, 65, right, during a horrific attack in the shadow of the Miami Herald's headquarters

Face-chewing victim has months of treatment ahead

More

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor waits for the start of his sentencing judgement in the courtroom of the Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam, near The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday May 30, 2012.  (AP / Toussaint Kluiters)

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for 'brutal' crimes

More   5 Comments 5    2 Video(s) 2

Most Talked about Stories

While Branson's comments (and activities) are arrogant in a million different ways, Clark's response was admirable. She kept her sense of humour with her joke about Branson's brand-name and his bad pick-up line, showing why humour is often the best response to arrogance.

D Austin (Fredericton)

B.C. premier rebuffs Branson's naked kitesurfing invite