World -
News Sections
Obama 'deeply humbled, surprised' by peace prize
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Selected Comment
I just started a new job - perhaps my employer can give me a performance bonus up front. It seems that "accomplishments" are now less important than "expectations" - lets see how far that will fly in the real world. After Al Gore won for his climate change rants (took a private jet to the ceremony, I hear) I guess that anything is fair game. So much for the integrity of the process - so much for the credibilty of the Nobel committee - this is just plain stupid.Obama may ultimately warrant the prize - but let's see him earn it before he picks up the prize.
charlie
Obama 'deeply humbled, surprised' by peace prize
talking about
Obama 'deeply humbled, surprised' by peace prize
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Fri. Oct. 9 2009 3:34 PM ET
U.S. President Barack Obama was "surprised and deeply humbled" when he found out that he had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize Friday.
He told reporters at a news conference Friday that his young daughters bounced into his room early this morning to tell him the good news -- but in the same breath reminded him it was their dog's birthday and that they had a three-day weekend coming up.
"It's good to have kids around to keep things in perspective," he said.
Obama was given the prestigious recognition to encourage his goals of international diplomacy rather than unilateralism, reducing the nuclear threat and easing tensions with the Muslim world.
The move shocked pundits who noted that Obama was only in office for about two weeks before the Feb. 1 nomination deadline for the Peace Prize.
"This is as far as I know the first Nobel Peace Prize awarded on spec, basically awarded for promise rather than accomplishment," said American presidential historian Allen Lichtman in an interview with CTV's Canada AM.
"Awarded for changing the tone and direction of American diplomacy rather than a particular grand achievement," he said.
Obama said he felt he didn't deserve to be in the company of the people before him who have previously received the honour.
"I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who have won this prize before me," he said. "The men and women who have inspired me and have encouraged the entire world with their pursuits for peace."
He said that he would however accept the prize as an affirmation of the aspirations that people have of American leadership.
"I will accept this award as a call for action," he said but noted that peace can not be accomplished by one nation alone. "(This is) a call for all nations to accept the challenges of the 21st century."
A new style of diplomacy
Norweigian Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland said Obama's ability to capture the public's attention and engage them in a new type of diplomacy makes him deserving of the honour.
He said Obama's calls and initiatives towards international peace and cooperation had shifted the global mood of politics.
"Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future," Jagland said.
"You have to remember that the world has been in a pretty dangerous phase," he continued. "And anybody who can contribute to getting the world out of this situation deserves a Nobel Peace Prize."
He said Obama had returned multilateral diplomacy and institutions like the UN to the forefront of the world stage. However, the Nobel committee also said that many of Obama's goals had yet to be realized including reducing the world stock of nuclear arms, strengthening the combat against climate change and easing American tensions with Muslim nations.
The U.S. administration was not informed of their decision before it was made public, said Jagland.
"Waking up a president in the middle of the night, this isn't really something you do," he said in an interview with The Associated Press.
Mixed reaction
Obama's election into presidency was seen as a positive turning point for the U.S. on both the international stage and on the domestic front.
In July, a 25-nation poll of 27,000 people found double-digit boosts to the number of people who viewed the U.S. favourably. That number was drastically lower under former president George W. Bush
Jagland said the decision to give Obama the prize was unanimous among the five-member committee panel.
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper offered his congratulations to Obama Friday morning.
"President Obama's efforts and vision to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between people are applauded by all Canadians," he said in a prepared statement.
Obama's award shows great things are expected from him in coming years, said Archbishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa, who won the prize in 1984.
"It's an award coming near the beginning of the first term of office of a relatively young president that anticipates an even greater contribution towards making our world a safer place for all," Tutu said. "It is an award that speaks to the promise of President Obama's message of hope."
However, others suggested that awarding a new president with such an esteemed award was premature and unjustified.
After all, the U.S. still has troops in combat in both Iraq and Afghanistan and Congress still has not passed a law reducing carbon emissions. There has also been little progress in Obama's efforts to reduce the global nuclear stockpile.
"So soon? Too early. He has no contribution so far. He is still at an early stage. He is only beginning to act," said former Polish President Lech Walesa, a 1983 Nobel Peace laureate, upon hearing the news.
"This is probably an encouragement for him to act. Let's see if he perseveres. Let's give him time to act," Walesa said.
Mohamed ElBaradei, a former Peace Prize winner and director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, said Obama has already provided outstanding leadership in the effort to reduce the nuclear threat.
"In less than a year in office, he has transformed the way we look at ourselves and the world we live in and rekindled hope for a world at peace with itself," ElBaradei said. "He has shown an unshakeable commitment to diplomacy, mutual respect and dialogue as the best means of resolving conflicts."
Lichtman said he was shocked by the announcement.
"My first reaction was clearly this is compensation for Chicago not getting the Olympics!" he joked.
Lichtman noted Obama's strides in his efforts to stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons with a recent resolution that called for a new limit on warheads.
"In terms of a work in progress there is a lot of work going on," he said.
He said he had no doubt Obama would accept the honour but that the president would be quick to accept it on behalf of all the American people who share his goals of peaceful diplomacy.
Critical timing
Obama is only the third president to receive the Nobel Prize while in office. President Theodore Roosevelt won the award back in 1906 and President Woodrow Wilson was awarded the prize in 1919.
The Nobel committee received a record 205 nominations for the Peace Prize though the panel wouldn't disclose who nominated the president.
Among the candidates were Zimbabwe's Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai, a Colombian senator, a Chinese dissident and an Afghan woman's rights activist.
The move to give Obama the award is seen as the latest stab by the committee against Bush and his administration.
In 2002 former U.S. President Jimmy Carter received the Peace Prize for his efforts to mediate in international conflicts. Five years later, the committee honoured Bush's political adversary Al Gore for his campaign to raise awareness about global warming.
Alfred Nobel outlined in his will in 1895 that the prize should go "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations and the abolition or reduction of standing armies and the formation and spreading of peace congresses."
Since then, the committee has often used a wide interpretation of Nobel's guidelines and have looked for nominees who have gone beyond peace mediation to include those who have worked against combating poverty, disease and climate change.
The prize puts renewed emphasis on Obama's campaign goals boost international diplomacy and comes at a time when the president has some critical decisions to make.
The president is expected to meet with his top advisors on Friday to discuss Afghanistan and the number of troops currently deployed in the war-stricken region. Obama is considering a request to send 40,000 more troops to Afghanistan as the war enters its ninth year.
Earlier this year, Obama sent in 21,000 additional troops to the region and has continued to use unmanned drones on attacks on militants though the battle strategy has often killed or injured civilians in the area.
Obama also continues to encourage talks between the Israelis and Palestinians after negotiations between the dueling neighbours stalled.
However, just a day after the president hosted the Israeli and Palestinian leader in New York late last month, Israeli officials said they had fended off U.S. pressure to halt settlement expansions in the disputed territories.
Moderate Palestinians complained they felt undermined by Obama's failure to back up his demand for a freeze on settlements.
User Tools
Related Stories
Analysis
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
While Branson's comments (and activities) are arrogant in a million different ways, Clark's response was admirable. She kept her sense of humour with her joke about Branson's brand-name and his bad pick-up line, showing why humour is often the best response to arrogance.
Email

Comments are now closed for this story
Dawna
0
said
0
Dr Barr-Graff
0
said
0
Do I nominate myself, or does someone do it for me? Perhaps my fellow academic Prof. Chartt would do the honours?
Rocky
0
said
0
Peter 1951
0
said
0
Marcel from Northern Ontario
0
said
0
Cafer in Edmonton
0
said
0
Prof. Pye Chartt
0
said
0
Furthermore, the notion that he has "done a lot" in the past 10 months is more than a stretch. Even liberal-loving Saturday Night Live (SNL) ripped him this past week for failing to deliver on his widely-broadcast political goals and campaign promises. It must be scorching in Florida today.
Kevin
0
said
0
I like Obama, and think he will accomplish great things, especially given the widespread hatred of him in America.
But this award is premature. The Nobel prizes in other disciplines are for work that has long since been accomplished and recognized by dozens of other worthy organizations.
Becoming the first black man to be elected president of the United States is an incredible accomplishment. But alone, it's not worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize.
Isn't it obvious?
0
said
0
Addison
0
said
0
Samual
0
said
0
Bob S. Florida, U.S.A.
0
said
0
Tom More
0
said
0
keith
0
said
0
Raj
0
said
0
Kris Widla
0
said
0
pdm39
0
said
0
Lu Lin
0
said
0
darren
0
said
0
happy
0
said
0
simon in Montreal
0
said
0
Kadjere
0
said
0
PB_Toronto
0
said
0
However to award someone this prestigious prize based on starry eyes and charisma in hopes one day he may actually obtain his ideals is misguided. For those who gave a thumbs down to what would appear a blantant rushed decision maybe the Toronto Maple leafs should get the Stanley Cup this week on the basis they may actually win it one day. I suppose he is the greatest president of all time now too.
AWinnipeg
0
said
0
Norma Jenkins
0
said
0
GTA
0
said
0
Noble
0
said
0
Anne M
0
said
0
Syl S
0
said
0
Wendy
0
said
0
syko
0
said
0
Mark Maxwell In Calgary
0
said
0
RVH
0
said
0
speechless
0
said
0
Canadian in Netherlands
0
said
0
Lz in Edmonton
0
said
0
M. Gouin
0
said
0
Colin from Ottawa
0
said
0
charlie
0
said
0
Dean in YYZ
0
said
0
As others have said here,he has accomplished nothing on the world wide stage.Yes he is the first half black american to become president. That's great,but what does that have to do with winning the nobel peace prize?
Milner
0
said
0
Norman
0
said
0
rob
0
said
0
Maureen
0
said
0
Alberta Redneck
0
said
0
Prof. Pye Chartt
0
said
0
Ryan
0
said
0
Naoko
0
said
0
The View From Niagara
0
said
0
Mark in TO
0
said
0
Al from Toronto
0
said
0
Rick
0
said
0
opinion
0
said
0
Tom in Winnipeg
0
said
0
R.E.Lee, Cold Lake, AB
0
said
0
Lou
0
said
0
Dave Dumas from Ottawa
0
said
0
ADM Saskatchewan
0
said
0
Phil in London
0
said
0
Where exactly has peace advanced under Obama's very short and so far relatively untested watch?I must have missed the news story about the Taliban laying down arms and working hand in hand to rebuild Afghanistan. I must have misread Iranian comments toward Isreal because I surely took them in a very non-peace promoting way.This man was obviously the greatest president the US ever had and now we find the world also feels that way even though his actions as commander in chief were limited to two weeks of service last January before nominations closed for this year's award.
It's too bad that his expectations are so high given his past track record of accomplishing nearly nothing. While I wish him well because he is the great defender of the free world by virtue of his presidency too much is being credited to a man who has done very little. (he hasn't even had the chance to do anything yet).A great leader would decline this honour and ask the committee to pass the award on to some one more worthy but I suspect this man is more like Al Gore. Ready to jump at any opportunity while also having done absolutely nothing to promote peace.Nobel must be rolling in his grave.
Mark M
0
said
0
Rick in NB, Ste Marie
0
said
0
Marc J Ouellette
0
said
0
Mark in NB
0
said
0
KOOL MAN
0
said
0
Yes, most of you readers here were victims of the MSM artificial love-in for Obama....And now that the Nobel Peace Prize is part of The Obama Show, a backlash. Goes to show that public opinion and marketing firms have the public-sheeps eating in their hands, no?
Y. Cranddent
0
said
0
We all want the "Peaceful Planet" every elected leader should ALWAYS REMEMBER to strive not just to keep their country in great shape, economy, health, wealth and its citizens well being but the goes beyond in the making of the "A Great Leader" it comes from within and looking out for others... being self centre or selfish is not the way to go!
You came from the bottom of the poorest country and you showed the "World" that you are just a human as they are and can DO MUCH BETTER than the rest of us. . . I salute you SIR. Just to let know that I came from also the same ethnic background as your half-sister (Living in Brampton, ON)and your step father. I know what it feels like . . . BUT Canada is ALSO a great country to live in....
"KEEP UP THE GOOD JOB" Mr. President.
Anthony
0
said
0
They really must be running out of eligible candidates. Is there a shortage ? I guess I've just been too busy to notice.
Oh PU-LEASE!!!!
0
said
0
JKay
0
said
0
Craig from NS
0
said
0
Obama has taken that to a whole new level. He's acting more like a celebrity doing interviews, photo shoots and "dropping by" Olympic bid's than he is acting like a President.I never thought I'd see the day that the U.S. would vote in a black President. Unfortunately, he's been all flash and no substance in my opinion. Unfortunately people are going to jump all over that unless something drastically changes in his leadership abilities in the next three years.
Catwoman 37
0
said
0
cam
0
said
0
Steve from Toronto
0
said
0
Scott
0
said
0
Mark Giguere
0
said
0
Just look at how the US's allies have become more agreeable with him at the helm. Bush was a disaster, both at home and abroad. Obama has at least tried to follow the laws of his own country and respect that idea that the US doen not have the right to do whatever it wants. Sadly though, he has received the prize for what he isn't (a saber-rattling war-criminal) instead of anything that he is since he has yet had enough time to show us what he is.
T.I., Ontario
0
said
0
CYL
0
said
0
Sarah613
0
said
0
I guess the prize was given to him for the "effort" of trying to establish peace and relations across the globe. Sounds kinda cheesy, but can't we be sort of satisfied with that. We weren't happy when Bush was in power with his "everyone's evil except the U.S." crap, and now it seems like we're not happy that Obama's in power with his "Let's all get along" motto.
Irritable Canadian
0
said
0
This proves what a joke this award is when an empty suit like Barack Obama can win a prize like this. For the record, other notable "winners"- Arafat- Gorbachev- El Baradei (head of the IAEA) who says Israel is a bigger threat to peace than IranIndividuals who didn't get it:- Ghandi- Thatcher- Reagan- George H.W. Bush(So much for the fall of the Wall)What's even more telling is the deadline to submit the nomination was February 1 -- less than 2 weeks after he took office so he had done even LESS than nothing at that point. Except talk. Which he's still doing. Results? Nah. But wow, the boy can TALK!What. A. Joke.
Will
0
said
0
Tim
0
said
0
Mark in Fort Erie
0
said
0
Prof. Pye Chartt
0
said
0
Mike Potter
0
said
0
Gary
0
said
0
Dave in West
0
said
0
Frank in NS
0
said
0
Oussama
0
said
0
Steve in Ottawa
0
said
0
Slavko Miladinovic
0
said
0
Lee Szigety
0
said
0
Jake in Florida
0
said
0
Canadian in the US
0
said
0
Reener
0
said
0
David In west
0
said
0
B. Kelley, Ontario
0
said
0