World -
News Sections
Canadian soldier charged in Afghan's death
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Fri. Jan. 2 2009 10:15 PM ET
A Canadian soldier in Afghanistan is facing a second-degree murder charge in connection with the death of a suspected Taliban militant in Helmand province.
Capt. Robert Semrau is accused of shooting, "with intent to kill," an unarmed male civilian during an October battle in which Afghan, Canadian and British soldiers defended the capital of Helmand province, Lashkar Gah, from an insurgent attack.
Semrau, who is from Pembroke, Ont., was charged Dec. 31, the same day the Canadian military announced that the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service was investigating a death that took place "on or about" Oct. 19 in Helmand province. The siege in Lashkar Gah ended Oct. 18.
Semrau is being held in military custody and will be transported back to Canada to face the charge.
Officials at Kandahar Airfield did not offer further comment on the case Friday.
Questions swirling around timing
Col. Jamie Cade, acting commander of Task Force Afghanistan, said he only learned of the death on Dec. 27.
Michel Drapeau, a retired Canadian colonel who practises law in Ottawa, questioned how much the military knew, and when they knew it.
"I can't believe that you'd be able to suffocate this kind of report for two-and-a-half months . . . unless you wanted to," he told CTV News.
"Was there a conspiracy along the way? Did everybody agree not to talk about it, not to report it? Everybody under the National Defence Act has a positive duty to report a crime when they see it."
Amir Attaran, a law professor with the University of Ottawa, told CTV News the timing of the charge "doesn't pass the smell test."
He questioned how quickly the military went from launching the investigation to laying a charge, suggesting that they already knew "who their man was."
The murder charge stirs up unpleasant memories of the Canadian Forces mission in Somalia.
There was a similar reporting delay in the 1993 beating death of a Somalia teenager by members of the Canadian Airborne Regiment. The affair hurt the reputation of the Canadian military and a public inquiry was launched, leading to the disbanding of the Airborne Regiment.
Retired Col. Mike Capstick emphasized the need not to rush to judgment in the Afghanistan case.
"The Canadian Forces doesn't want to be covering stuff up . . . they learned the lessons in the post-Somalia period very, very well," he said on CTV Newsnet Friday.
Soldier a mentor
Semrau is part of the Operational Mentor and Liaison Team (OMLT), the unit of the Canadian military that trains members of the Afghan National Army (ANA).
During the siege in Helmand province, the OMLT was mentoring Afghan soldiers participating in the attack.
After the three-day battle, Afghan and foreign troops managed to gain control of the Nad Ali district, which had been under insurgent control.
Both Afghan and NATO officials said at least 100 Taliban militants were killed in the fighting.
In a news release issued by NATO on Oct. 19, 2008, the date of the shooting, Semrau is quoted discussing his work training Afghan soldiers.
"Working with the ANA presents some challenges; you have to be very patient, but when you get down to the bottom of it, they are just like us and like to kid around and joke," Semrau, who is identified as an OMLT "commanding mentor," is quoted as saying.
"They're just like soldiers all around the world and are good guys."
CTV News correspondent Steve Chao said the fact that a Canadian soldier is facing charges in connection with the death of an Afghan civilian will not reflect well on NATO forces, which have faced criticism for conducting air strikes that have killed civilians.
"I think the Canadian forces here are trying to show, by announcing this very publicly, that they are taking a very hard stance against any inappropriate misconduct," Chao said Friday during an interview on CTV Newsnet. "They want the world, and especially Afghans, to know that this is not acceptable and they will come down hard on any soldiers that step out of line."
On Thursday, an Afghan army general who was present during the battle said he had not heard of any soldier engaging in "inappropriate conduct" in connection with death of the suspected insurgent.
According to Gen. Sher Muhammad Zazai, so many Taliban militants were killed that it would be hard to say how each of them died.
With a report from CTV's Graham Richardson
User Tools
Related Stories
CTV News
Canada in Afghanistan
The latest news, photos and interactives from Canada's mission in Afghanistan.
Soldiers Overcome Injuries
Wounded soldiers use sports to overcome injuries, adjust to their new reality.
Interactive
Lessons Learned
A number of the medical innovations that we now take for granted were conceived and tested during wartime.
Bios and Pictures
Canadian Casualties
We remember those who lost their lives in Afghanistan since the mission began in 2002.
In Pictures
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
Please let's not even entertain any protectionist responses to this issue. Canadian consumers go south to shop because of the cheaper prices. How about resorting to competitive pricing as a solution...that will keep Canadian shoppers at home.
Email








Comments are now closed for this story
Sherry in Ottawa
said
Rob in Ottawa
said
Allan Kuan, Vancouver, BC, Canada
said
Think before you comment
said
Just Me
said
Capt. Semrau is very well trained - and obviously trusted - to be in the position he was in.
I have to wonder *if* the suspected insurgent was in fact armed and had killed Capt. Semrau would he have been carried on our Highway of Heroes in October with the respect and prayers of our country...instead of being put through this ordeal now?
By all means, let the process the Military has deemed necessary proceed, but Canadians are watching for a fair, impartial hearing.
My best wishes to Capt. Semrau and his family.
mike tyrrell
said
All the best to our Canadian Troops.
mike RAF Vet
George Poole in Lunenburg
said
Wow. This is the part of being "at war" in Afganistan that most Canadians have not considered...and won't like. Peacekeeping was so much easier!"
^The new Canadian way, always looking for the cakewalk and deriding those who want to contribute honestly instead of take take take.
Aaron
said
Fed Up
said
A fellow Soldier
said
Mo
said
The court will decide weather he killed that civilian intentionally or accidentally. It's not for you people to decide. And yes no one deserves to die even the extremists and terrorists because even though they are our enemy, they are people and they have their own beliefs. That man didn't have a gun and it is a crime to shoot an unarmed man. Good start military to stop these war crimes before they become like the last war Canada was involved in.
Gary
said
The problem is where his boots are: stomping on a country possessing resources that the US imperialist war criminals want to grab."
Heh heh heh heh heh .... This comment would be disturbing were it not so darned funny! :D
Tell me, my not-so-learned left-wing loon, which Afghani resources are the "US imperialist war criminals" (and, one assumes, we Canadians, other allies, the Hitler Youth, and everybody else over there) trying to grab?
Have you ever seen that place? There is only one resource in that whole darned cesspool of a country: DIRT. (And yet people have been fighting over it since the dawn of time. Boggles my mind, it does....)
Gary in Ottawa
Greg from Kitchener
said
Would we be charging our boys and girls if a German soldier died in WW1 or 2?
Tony Dubois
said
CFSpouse
said
Turn it into a political game Edward
said
What the hell difference does it make if or how long our Minister of Defence knew of these allegiations? Get a life Edward, this soldier doesn't need that kind of crap from you!
Raymond
said
Dan Murphy
said
I am naturally sympathetic to the Captain's plight. My fear is that he will be hounded by the military in a show trial in order that Canada be seen as "politically correct" in the eyes of the world. I guess we have to wait and see the facts of the situation but I fear that this soldier will not get a fair trial.
These guys are doing carrying out a very difficult assignment in an arena where it's not always clear who is who. The Taliband are not big on wearing uniforms and routinely "hide" amongst civilians, including women and children.
Canadians should be vigilant that this soldier is fairly prosecuted, not persecuted!
Garry in NS
said
RobO: CAR was disbanded after Somalia fiasco.
said
As for you, Valerie Clement, you got one thing right: you "cannot understand."
Why would try to generalize for all soldiers in WW1 and WW2 when one soldier in Afghanistan has been charged, though not yet tried or convicted, of committing a murder?
Get back to school and get some knowledge and reasoning power.
Sitoo, Moncton NB
said
been there
said
Nite Owl
said
Bill S., Ottawa
said
Lewie Callahan
said
Isn't this simply a natural corollary of fighting an enemy that refuses to wear a uniform? If so, why blame our soldier????
True Canadian
said
His boots aren't the problem.
said
Valerie Clement
said
Does this mean that all soldiers of ww1 and ww2 are murderers. I cannot understand why you would not be allowed to defend yourself against someone who is trying to kill you
Robert Rivard served in Afganistan 3 times
said
Sounds like Canada has Taliban hangover!
Next time you see any Canadian elected official in Afganistan (who only come for a photo op) Give them the middle finger salute.
RobO
said
For all you yahoo's who have posted nothing but negative comments, shame on you.
As a retired member of 20 years I can still remember being spit on by our own people because of Somalia!
That is when I figured out, that this country has no respect for our lives and what we do.
All I can say is I hope the people who have posted negative comments should never be in need of the military to dig them out or sand bag your area.
So before you think, maybe you should walk a mile in our combat boots and feel how it is to be fired upon in the heat of battle and you tell me if you can make a judgement call on who has a weapon and who doesn't!
These brave souls place their lives on the line every day for this country. Be it hera or in some unforgotten hell hole!
You should be more concerned with the crime and death in our own cities than slamming the troops.
So maybe step up and do some good for this country and serve your country prior to making insulting comments!
Michael from Toronto
said
If I were in a combat situation where there was imminent danger of insurgents over-running my unit; I would not hesitate to execute an insurgent even if he were disarmed or unarmed.
In WWII, this was the normal necessary thing to do if spies or enemy caught out of uniform in an active combat zone. It has nothing to do with the case being an Afghan or a Muslim. If you are not identifiable as a combatant and part of an attacking force you expect summary execution.
Edward, Medicine Hat
said
jan2comment
said
CANADIAN TROOPS OUT OF AFGHANISTAN NOW!
Mike Sibley
said
Mike Sibley
Pembroke, Ontario
Nite Owl
said
Gary
said
One thing about this situation, though, scares the bejeebers out of me and that is that the governemnt may think it necessary to crucify this soldier, regardless of whether he is actually guilty of a crime, in a misguided attempt to atone for Somalia. I, for one, do not fancy Capt Semrau's chances in a military court.
Something to consider: The difference between getting a medal and being charged with murder can be mere seconds.
A quote from a movie y'all may recognize, equally applicable to Afghanistan today as it was with Viet Nam 35 years ago: "Charging a man with murder in this place is like handing out speeding tickets at the Indy 500."
Gary in Ottawa
eddytoronto
said
CFMember
said
(another) CF Soldier
said
Please, reserve your judgment in this case until the details are better known.
When in a combat situation with insurgents, it is important for people to realize that this sort of firefight does not follow the "honorable" format of years past.
Our forces are fully uniformed, and clearly identified as combatants.
The insurgents, however, are not. Soldiers in combat have to make split second decisions, many of which are life or death.
Simply put, it is very difficult to tell the difference between a civilian and an insurgent, since they are not clearly marked. A person is a civilian one second, and clearly not a target, and when that same person produces an AK47 and shoots your buddy, he becomes an insurgent enemy.
This battle included hundreds of insurgents, over 100 of which were killed in the firefight. I would contend, and bet that I am correct, in saying that the man killed was VERY likely a combatant acting aggressively.
Either way, I hope the military justice system is fair and that the government is not simply making a "statement".
This man willingly put his life on the line, and if this shooting was an accident or the man shot was an insurgent, we should set him free, give him our apologies, and let him continue to protect our freedom.
CFSpouse
said
Doug, Medicine Hat
said
Claude Chantigny CD
said
Tk in BC
said
Wally "excop" from Montreal
said
kate
said
Let's also not foget that these guys see alot of things that would fell the lot of us. Imagine seeing your comrades blown to bits and having to pick up appendages off the side of the road - can't even imagine what that would to to a persons mind. I'm not making excuses, just saying that the kind of war that is being fought over there is not your typical war where you clearly know the enemy. Over there the enemy can be an innocent looking young child with a bomb strapped to them so I'd be careful before pronouncing hasty judgements.
John Q
said
I agree with Debbie
said
Anybody go NEAR them, they will react! Our Canadian soliders have to protect their lives!
This whole thing is getting OUT OF HAND! Cost too much money and too many lives!
Time to send our soliders back home and STOP wasting our tax payers' hard earn money! It cost MILLIONS of DOLLARS every single month. So far what did we accomplish? When will this end?
People in MIDDLE EAST has been on WARS for more than half a century. They need to learn to WORK IT OUT AMONG THEMSELVES! We CAN'T BABYSIT THEM FOREVER!
Time for them to GROW UP AND DEAL WITH THEIR PROBLEM!
I agree with Debbie
said
Anybody go NEAR them, they will react! Our Canadian soliders have to protect their lives!
This whole thing is getting OUT OF HAND! Cost too much money and too many lives!
Time to send our soliders back home and STOP wasting our tax payers' hard earn money! It cost MILLIONS of DOLLARS every single month. So far what did we accomplish? When will this end?
People in MIDDLE EAST has been on WARS for more than half a century. They need to learn to WORK IT OUT AMONG THEMSELVES! We CAN'T BABYSIT THEM FOREVER!
Time for them to GROW UP AND DEAL WITH THEIR PROBLEM!
George Poole in Lunenburg
said
George Poole in Lunenburg
said
GLENN --Toronto
said
Shawn
said
Suzy, If it weren't for soldiers, would you have the freedom to write what you just did?
Mike
said
It's a sad day when the bravery and servitude of our forces clashes with political agendas. While I agree the situation needs investigation, tact is certainly lacking here.
Many have commented that the "other side" "gets away" with their cowardly acts, and meanwhile we are slapped with this kind of hocus pocus. I agree, and as such I stand behind this young man and the sacrifice he is giving so I can live freely under my red and white flag.
Red for the sweat, tears and blood...too literally.
Anne
said
Sid in MTL
said
Simply absurd! Only in Bleeding-Heart Canada..go figure.....send them there to kill but then charge them with murder. Glad I retired from the military!
GLENN - Toronto
said
Alain Mason
said
Hopefully, this not an example of throwing the book at one token solder for PR political purposes, or because a senor officer did not like him.
Val Sheehan
said
GET REAL
said
Do the taliban give a crap about us,when they shoot only to wound or kill our soldiers.
Or how about sneaking around planting road side bombs or having suicide bombers blow themselves up only to kill our people. FOR WHAT?
Do they honor the rules of war or the rights of the people of the world ?
I THINK NOT !!!
Let the people of Afghanistan fight a civil war so they can rid themselves of the Taliban.
If this soldier is found guilty, then bring all of our people home, immediately.
NO MORE SUPPORT OR HELP FOR AFGHANISTAN .......
Someone is dead for nothing, that is the reality!
said
When you do something wrong you have to face the music. Too easy to try to find excuses while someone else lost his life!
Let's make sure we get to the buttom of this and take appropriate actions.
Wes
said
Glenn In BC
said
Second Thought
said
M. Cameron
said
J
said
If he did kill an innocent person though it is good that it will be made public in Afghanistan showing that NATO is there to protect and not hurt everyday Afghans. The people of Afghanistan should know, but it never hurts to have another reminder.
Raj
said
Neil
said
Bev.
said
As for Canada's image. Our image over there is of a nation that doesn't support it's troops, a nation that is so soft and weak that we don't fight back adequately. That's why our troops are targeted. It's a joke.
Yes lets improve our image, lets show that we are there to free the Afghan people from the Taliban and other terrorists, but let's also show that we support our troops and if need be will send another 100,000 more troops with equipment and blow the Taliban off the face of the planet. They could probably use the crater for a lake to improve the country.
It would be nice if we could paint all the enemy with flourescent paint so they could be picked out of a crowd but we can't, they hide in homes, churches, behind children and women, and in the market places.
The closest thing to identifying them would be to call out for anyone who isn't a Taliban supporter to step forward and strip to show they aren't armed or be shot. Anyone stopping someone from stepping forward could instantly be shot on the spot.
Darrell
said
Don
said
Les P
said
I'm sure this soldier was not just shooting anything that moves, but by understanding the way the Taliban operates and was merely protecting himself and his fellow soldiers.
25 years? Good luck finding new recruits to sign up for this kind of treatment.
ECG in Newfoundland
said
I understand our Forces have strict rules they have to abide by - but I really can't see the point or justice in this.
My prayers and thoughts are with the Captain and his family as well as all of our troops...keep the faith.
Barney in Trenton
said
Em
said
Al in Calgary
said
All that you can know at this stage is that a charge of second degree murder means that the NIS investigation must have uncovered enough evidence for a reasonable prospect of conviction in circumstances where the death was unjustified under the laws of war, including the applicable ROEs, and that the death was caused intentionally - as opposed to accidentally - but not premeditated. No one should be taking anything more out of this news than that.
Just because a captain is involved doesn't mean he didn't act inappropriately. All ranks are capable of violating the laws of war.
This officer is presumed innocent until proven guilty. I feel for him to have to endure this ordeal if he is innocent of any wrongdoing, but if he is guilty I fear the blot on the reputation of the CF is regrettably going to be blown out of proportion.
Fiat Justitia.
MM
said
I never thought I would say this, but I think it is time to bring the troops home.
They cannot fight the enemy with their hands tied behind their backs when they are in battle.
Is NATO trying to score brownie points with the Afgan's by making an example of a Canadian soldier?
This only serves to strengthen the Taliban.
Our prayers go out to Capt. Semrau and his family.
LDS
said
Makinawdandy
said
I just hope that they will end this bad movie soon. Please, please, please - pull the troops out NOW! We have had enough!
Get out of there now!
said
It makes you wonder how these solders were trained for such difficult situations.
We have no reason to be there in the first place and our federal Government was too affraid to say no to an American Terrorist, President Bush!
Shameful from both the American and Canadian Governments!
steve
said
Joe..
said
George
said
So a Canadian puts his life on the line and this is how he gets repaid. If they don't come back and receive second rate treatment and a slew of problems mentally and physically because of the war, he gets to go to jail?
Jey
said
Kay Kennedy
said
JKP Barrie
said
I'd rather think the overall good and improvements Canadian Military is carrying out daily, is the best all coalition forces can do in this difficult situation, that we all want to end.
Vern
said
Retired Sgt.
Vincent
said
This guy was "suspected" Taliban. What exactly does that mean? It probably means Capt Semrau BELIEVED he was Taliban.
If he wasn't Taliban, and was unarmed then Capt Semrau killed an innocent man. What would you say if your unarmed innocent husband or son or father was killed at the hands of an occupying forces hands? I'm pretty sure you would want justice. I know i simply wouldn't "move on" as some other poster commented.
If we're going to go in there to save lives, then our people should be prepared to die to protect innocent Afgans at all costs.
An Afgan live is worth no less then a Canadian life... a lot of people here seem to forget that fact.
grover1
said
brian in sarnia
said
On the other hand, there is a public image to consider with the Afghani people. They need to know there lives are deemed worthy of protection, and that we are not just there to "win something". If the soldier comes back and is convicted the Afghanis believe we expect nothing but the best from our soldiers. If the soldier is released once he lands on Canadian soil, the Afghanis could lose more faith in their "protectors". The charge should have never been laid.
Concerned Canadian
said
Nick
said
Alex (Toronto)
said
I would hope the military investigation service isn't wasting taxpayer's money by bringing up spurious charges without solid evidence. The question here is not whether a soldier made a mistake in battle, but whether he intentionally shot an unarmed civilian. This has nothing to do with collateral damage. If the soldier was doing his job, he should be acquitted. We have the best soldiers in the world, but as we saw in Somalia and elsewhere, there are a few bad apples, and if we don't punish the bad ones, the entire military will lose respect among our allies and, more importantly, adversaries.
I don't understand people who blame the media for reporting what they were told by the government.
Canadian soldiers overseas must set an example, observe the Geneva Conventions, Canadian law, and their lawful orders. We are not going to win a war by brute force, we need the support of the local civilian population, and that won't happen if we shoot them at random. That's basic counterinsurgency practice that some of these so-called supporters of the military don't seem to care about. If we're going to send soldiers into the field, it would be nice if we gave them a chance to win. Blindly "supporting the troops" including the ones who commit serious crimes doesn't help the soldiers as a group. We're supposed to be the good guys.
David in Sudbury
said
So many comments here saying they hope he is not convicted, just because he is a soldier. Not all soldiers are good people. Most are, but like anything else, some aren't.
Like most, I hope this was a justified killing, given the circumstances of war. I also hope this isn't a trumped up charge to win sympathy with the Afghan people. But the bottom line is that I hope he gets what he deserves - his freedom and apologies if that's what is warranted, or jail time if it truly was murder.
Saying that killing someone is justified simply because he is Taliban makes you no better than them. In their minds, what they do is justified. They often kill because of our beliefs, because we don't share their philosophies. We condemn them for it, yet many here say it's okay to do it to them. Don't become the same way they are. There won't be much of a world left to fight for if we do.
Helena
said
We send soldiers to do this exact same thing, so why is this man going to get charged for murder? What kind of logic are we operating on here?
Sandy
said
Ross S.
said
Goldens
said
John Wilson
Bridgetown NS
Nellieswife
said
Joe Face
said
Garry in Guelph
said
Incidents like this make the job that our coldiers are trying to do much more difficult. If we are to be successful, we need the Afghan people to view our people as their allies, not their enemy.
Rob
said
Lisa Hutchison
said
Walk in his shoes before you judge him
said
CM
said
Rambo
said
Now obviously I nor nayone else accept the millitary and the Good Captain know exactly what happened. BUT, if I read that correctly, our forces along with the Afghans Were DEFENDING agains an incursion from the enemy in WAR....So he is arrested and charged for murder while defending his comrades and innocent afghans.
Look Many a soldier has said that the enemy isnt in a specific type of uniform, They dress to look like civilians in order to confuse our boys. So one of our own is defending peoples lives and kills someone who he percieves as a hostile enemy and he is treated like this???? Give me a break.
All this is is political maneuvering.
I find it hard to believe that a well decorated Captain in our armed forces went berserk and decided to just shoot now, shoot some more and then when everyones dead ask questions.
Good luck to you Captain. I support you, and so do Most people in this great nation of ours:)
C10
said
That being said, we must remember, he is innocent until proven guilty, and I pray he did nothing wrong.
YA from Mississauga, ON.
said
The rules and principle must be kept high and Afghan people must be shown that we have indeed come to bring peace and Taliban are their foes. Once Taliban loose local support they will be like uprooted weed without any roots. This is the only way to succeed and that is what is required.
The Canadian military and along with coalition forces must respect every Afghan and their livelihood. When a crime is committed it must be treated as such and Afghan people must understand that we have high moral and civil values. That it is best for them to join us rather than condemn us.
This is a step in right direction. But it must not stop here.
Eagle42
said
Dan@Kentville,N.S.
said
Pete
said
schpid
said
The investigation is just a fact finding mission and if charges are warranted they will be raised. Anyone who thinks just because this guy is an officer means he would never make a mistake come on. He's human just like the lowest Private on the ground. As ridiculous as it may be, if a Taleban fighter is shooting at you one minute and throws his weapon down and walks away, his status as a combatant does change.
For MHB: when the enemy purposely uses schools, universities and religious site to store weapons and use as shelter while attacking, those become viable targets under the Laws of Armed conflict.
MHB
said
Matt
said
As long as the investigation and trial are fair I don't really see a large problem.
The question quite simply is was his response was in accordance with the ROE.
The intent is to ensure our forces are conducting themselves appropriately. We must ensure our ROE are robust enough to allow our soldiers to defend themselves and do their job. However we can not and must not give them blanket permission to kill anyone they feel like.
double standard
said
Mac in ottawa
said
In the meantime, however - stand up and yell at your opponent - are you friend or foe... as you duck bullets ! then shoot if he is foe ! (hello?!) the same guys that will shake your hand one day will slice it off the next !
To the powers at be in the military and Parliament - whooooa - standback and put yourself in this soldier's shoes...
Dave Aldred
said
Michael Shannon
said
RF from Ottawa
said
Elvis
said
Give him a medal. He was "in a prolonged firefight" and killed a suspected fighter that turned out to be unarmed? Good grief. Political correctness does not belong in a warzone.
John
said
Anne M
said
Patriot
said
Gabriel in Ottawa
said
luella gilchrist
said
Judy
said
Debbie
said
James, Melville
said
If he did something wrong, then the investigation will discover that.
Let the system do its work!
MHB
said
Bob
said
Mike B
said
Your being shot at.
You shoot back and kill what might have been an unarmed civilian who just happens to be in the same area as the enemy that has been shooting at you for days and you get charged with his murder.
Doesnt seem right to me.
I would like to see anyone that is put in this position react any differently.
You have a split second to make the decision as to whether you are going to shoot or not.
You hesitate and you or one of your brothers in arms dies.
Set him free.
He did the right thing under severe circumstances.
Mike B
Seaforth Ontario
Ping
said
Daniel in Van
said
DJ
said
Richard
said
In war, stuff happens like this. It is unfortunate.
In fact if we really do want to win this war I think a lot more civilians are going to die. The taliban hide with them and use them as shields. How can one not expect this to happen and continue to do so?
If this was a war fought 60 or 80 years ago I think it would have been over already as they would have been all wiped out. These days it is all "politically correct".
A Soldier's Point of View
said
Joseph.
said
B. Kelley, Ontario
said
dc in bc
said
If I was a young guy thinking possibly of joining the military and going to Afghanistan this story would end any such thoughts.
What are we over there for anyway, if it isn't to kill the Taliban?
B fm Ottawa
said
GUTshot!
said
If a soldier cant kill the enemy without fearing a criminal conviction, just how well do you expect the war to go in the big picture?
Either fight to win, or dont fight at all.
Helen from BC
said
B fm Ottawa
said
DEF London
said
KB
said
Beancounter
said
Our soldiers are stuck in these dejected countries fighting a battle to provide a safer North America, and when this happens we prosecute?
Too bad it didn’t happen on Canadian soil, at least he would probably getter a lighter sentence and parole within a year (but we only treat the true criminals that well). I Feel for this soldier, he went to war for Canada and now faces "further" imprisonment.
J.C.
said
bernse
said
CF member
said
Kevin
said
Bernard
said
Will
said
Dixie from Alberta
said
MHB
said
There are Two Sets of Rules
said
and No Rules/Laws for the Insurgents as they do not recognize the Rules of War or the Geneva Conventions
However the Insurgents can kill dozens of unarmed, defenseless, helpless people and get away with their cowardly methods of operation by hiding behind a child of convenience after dropping their arms to create the appearance of innocence.
Kay from Richmond Hill, ON
said
Suzy
said
Maybe if all soldiers (on all sides) were taken into custody, we wouldn't have wars to fight.
Wondering
said