Top Stories -   

1
Former prime minister Brian Mulroney testifies at the Oliphant Commission in Ottawa, on Tuesday, May 12, 2009. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Former prime minister Brian Mulroney testifies at the Oliphant Commission in Ottawa, on Tuesday, May 12, 2009. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) German-Canadian businessman Karlheinz Schreiber speaks with CTV's Tom Clark prior to Mulroney testifying in Ottawa, Tuesday, May 11, 2009. Former prime minister Brian Mulroney and his wife Mila arrive with lawyer Guy Pratt to testify at the Oliphant Commission in Ottawa, Tuesday, May 12, 2009. (Fred Chartrand / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Airbus led Mulroney to keep Schreiber deal secret

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Graham Richardson on avoidance tactics
Mulroney said he received $225,000 from Schreiber after leaving office and claims the money was to be used to lobby foreign governments to purchase Canadian-built armoured vehicles Schreiber had a stake in. But he kept quiet about the transactions in an attempt to avoid the kind of damaging allegations he faced during the Airbus scandal.
Power Play: Robin Sears, Mulroney spokesperson, on day one of the testimony
Former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney testified on day one of the Oliphant inquiry. He's exhausted but satisfied with testimony today, Sears said. Mulroney said he put $75,000 in one thousand dollar bill denominations in a safe in his home without reporting the money to his accountant.
Power Play: CTV's Graham Richardson and CP's Jennifer Ditchburn detail the Mulroney-Schreiber back story
Brian Mulroney says he wanted to keep his dealings with Karlheinz Schreiber out of the public eye because he was scarred from the ribbing he took during the Airbus scandal.
CTV Newsnet: Tom Clark, host of CTV's Power Play, sums up the day's testimony
The most important part of former prime minister Brian Mulroney's testimony is the context he provided for why he didn't want to go public with his dealings with Karlheinz Schreiber.
CTV Newsnet: Former prime minister Brian Mulroney testifies at the Oliphant inquiry
Mulroney discusses why he was so reluctant to go public with his dealings with Karlheinz Schreiber in light of the fallout of the Airbus affair.
CTV Newsnet: Former prime minister Brian Mulroney testifies at the Oliphant inquiry, part two
Former PM Brian Mulroney discusses his family upbringing and education, and how he first became involved in the Conservative party.
CTV Newsnet: L. Ian MacDonald, former Mulroney speechwriter, on Mulroney's testimony
While former prime minister Brian Mulroney is currently facing friendly questioning from his own lawers, the next few days will likely see some tough, even embarassing questions.
CTV Newsnet: Tom Clark speaks with Karlheinz Schreiber ahead of Mulroney's testimony
The host of CTV's Power Play speaks with German-Canadian businessman Karlheinz Schreiber ahead of Brian Mulroney's testimony on Tuesday, asking him whether or not he bribed the former prime minister.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (57) Facebook   

Date: Tue. May. 12 2009 8:39 PM ET

Brian Mulroney says he wanted to keep his dealings with Karlheinz Schreiber out of the public eye because he was scarred from the ribbing he took during the Airbus scandal.

"The enormity of those events scarred me and my family for life," Mulroney told a public inquiry on Tuesday.

"And it explains my conduct in trying to keep private the private commercial transaction I entered into with Mr. Schreiber after I left office, so as to avoid the same kinds of deceitful and false purveying of information that had led to the original Airbus matter in the first place."

The former prime minister's comments came during testimony at the Oliphant inquiry, where he also said his business relationship with German-Canadian Schreiber was "legal and involved no wrongdoing of any kind."

The inquiry is trying to get to the bottom of the hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash payments Schreiber made to Mulroney in 1993 and 1994.

"My business relationship with Mr. Schreiber was legal and involved no wrongdoing of any kind at any time on my part," Mulroney testified on Tuesday.

"I genuinely regret, however, that the circumstances surrounding these transactions, for which I am largely responsible, give rise to suspicions as to their propriety.

"I certainly accept that inadequately documented arrangements are inappropriate for former public office holders and obviously should be avoided at all times."

Schreiber says he negotiated a deal with Mulroney not long before he resigned as prime minister in June 1993. He wanted Mulroney to lobby on behalf of a proposal by Thyssen AG to build light-armoured vehicles in Canada.

Schreiber has testified that he made three $100,000 payments to Mulroney: the first in August 1993, another in December of that year and a final payment in December 2004.

Mulroney admits to having received cash payments from Schreiber, and maintains they were made after he left office.

However, he claims to only have been paid $225,000, which he declared for income tax purposes six years after the payments started.

Mulroney said he tried to keep the transactions with Schreiber private because he wanted to avoid the kind of accusations lobbied against him in relation to the 1988 sale of Airbus jets to Air Canada.

The former prime minister said he was accused of corruption in the affair and that the "enormity of those events" scarred him and his family for life.

"It explains my conduct in trying to keep private the private commercial transaction I entered into with Mr. Schreiber after I left office... so as to avoid the same kinds of deceitful and false purveying of information that had led to original Airbus matter in the first place," Mulroney said.

Mulroney says he broke no legal or ethical guidelines and that he lobbied foreign politicians in an effort to find export markets for Thyssen vehicles.

As he headed into the inquiry Tuesday, Schreiber denied ever bribing Mulroney, saying there was "no need."

Schreiber has testified that he and Mulroney exchanged friendly letters and phone calls while Mulroney was in office.

'This was the hardest moment,' says Mulroney aide

Mulroney said he didn't remember speaking to Schreiber while in office and he said his staff often wrote responses to letters written to him.

Robin Sears, Mulroney's spokesman, said Tuesday afternoon that the former prime minister is tired after several hours of testimony, but he is also "feeling pretty satisfied with the first day's work.

"This was the hardest moment in some ways. The opening day, the tension surrounding it and how well he could bear the stress of this inquiry was obviously on all our minds, but he seemed to do pretty well," Sears told CTV's Power Play.

Sears noted that the entire affair comes down comes down to Mulroney's choice to accept cash rather than a cheque.

"I don't think there's any more explanation or deconstruction one can do."

Meanwhile, Schreiber's lawyers said Monday they were worried their client could be booted out of Canada before the inquiry is over.

Schreiber is wanted in Germany on a list of charges that includes fraud, extortion and tax evasion. He has been allowed to remain in Canada to participate in the inquiry.

"I don't want to be put in a position where I wake up one day and get a phone call saying that they've whisked him away," Edward Greenspan, the head of Schreiber's legal team, told CP on Monday.

Greenspan said he was ready to go back to court if necessary to try and keep Schreiber in Canada.

With files from The Canadian Press


Comments are now closed for this story

Game Over in NB
said

Let's face it. Mr S. is facing a "noose" of sorts back home. Rather than go back home and swing, he is playing the political game and even using the cons against themselves. Good old Mr Harper has even left Mulroney on his own. Mr S. is a player and plays his game well. Quite frankly, let him go home now because he has already been found out to contradict his own testimony over the years.

As for Mr Harper, remember your friends, they got you to where you are. One day you may need and if you kiss off your friends, you usually end up all alone. Even your own members have stuck by Mulroney.

Oh, yes, that's right, you don't want to tarnish your reputation by hanging around someone who gives bad press. I guess that's why you trashed the coalition government only to now embrace the bloc if it means you staying in power. I am quite disappointed. At least when Mulroney was in government you knew where he stood. Do you?


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

I'M ON THE EDGE OF MY SEAT...

On an old dilapidated bus, on a slow and bumpy road to somewhere, perhaps nowhere.

While I heartfully agree that this Inquiry serves an exceedingly just purpose for the country, and that the in-office actions and behavior of a Prime Minister do, indeed, matter greatly, I just can't get behind a governmental (non-judicial) process that is principally underpinned by just two witnesses, one of whom is the "accused" and the other has been publicly tarred with his own conflicting statements, nutty assertions, and "wanted" status in another reputable country.

I'm still patiently waiting for the "Seven Scandals In One" (or whatever bull-crap we were promised).


kc in alberta
said

Just the attempted tax evasion alone should have led to charges.

We all know if any of us had been found hiding enormous amounts of cash income for 6 years there would have been penalties.


George Kowalski
said

A public inquiry to resolve a business deal between 2 guys which went bad.

Who cares? In a recession don't you think this many millions of dollars could be better spent?


KC
said

"Do we need to spend 14 million taxpayers dollars to discover that one guy outslimed another guy?"

A PM utilizing the powers of Parliament with the only evidence being undeclared cash contained in unmarked envelopes exchanged in hotel rooms, and the cash being squirrelled away in safety deposit boxes and in matresses. Do we need to spend $14 million? We NEED to start putting people in jails to send a message to others that this won't be tolerated. The corruption is at 3rd world levels. We all shake our heads about the corruption in African & Mexican societies but this stuff is full blown here. It's EVERYWHERE!!



Aaron in Toronto
said

Can CTV or any reader confirm if the Airbus scandal investigation took place in 1995 or prior to this? I google it and my understanding is this scandal was brought to light due to a letter leak to Brian Mulroney in 1995.

So if the timing of 1995 is right then what is Brian Mulroney talking about scarred from the ribbing he took during the Airbus scandal?

This is getting more interesting.

However, I still believe we should deport Mr. Karlheinz back to Germany. If he REALLY want to co-operate with this inquiry hearing then he can do so via video conference in the comfort of his jail cell in Germany


Bruce - Quebec
said

Anyone interested in personally enriching themselves using unethical practices while in public office is probably looking at Canada as the best place to set up shop in North America.

I'm astounded by Canadian's jaded view of ethics - looks like Canadian politicians give their electorate the ethics they deserves.

Canadians look down on Americans for their blind patriotism and morally bankrupt politicians but is it any better here?

"We don't want to pay for it (the inquirey)" - that's a good reason to put your head in the sand!

and their devotion to former leaders.


THE Fatman
said

14 million up in smoke. Only good thing about this is it's cheaper than bailing out the auto industry!


MK from Sask.
said

It seems everyone who submitted a comment agrees that this whole affair is a waste of taxpayers money. I do too! However, who is responsible for this waste? Mr. M. He knew full well that Mr. S was a wanted individual for illegal actions, like tax evation, yet Mr M chose to enter into deals with him anyway. Mr M accepted money from Mr S in 1993 yet did not see fit to report this income to Revenue Canada until 5 years later. Why?? Was Mr M trying to avoid paying taxes on this 'legal income'? Now, that it is public knowledge that Mr M has accepted secret payments from Mr S, I have to wonder if there is any simularity to the disputed airbus deal as well. It would be really interesting to see what the RCMP would find if they were granted access to the Swiss bank account.

This whole affair is a terrible waste of taxpayers money, brought on by one of Canada's most prominent citizen. As much as I dislike this waste, I do hope this inquiery will get to the bottom of it, whatever it takes, because I strongly believe that every Canadian has the right to know what really happend while Mr M was Prime Minister of Canada!


Catherine Greenidge
said

I believe the inquiry does matter, first because it demonstrates our former Prime Minister's character and the fact that he only decided to pay taxes on the money he received afterwards. It makes one wonder about a law for the rich and law for the everyday citizen. His behaviour is very inappropriate for the office that he served. Harper is wise to put distance between them.


Lee in Calgary
said

Until this inquiry came along this deal hadn't cost the Canadian taxpayer a penny. In fact because Mr. Mulroney had paid taxes on his consulting fee's and interest on the taxes owed for paying them after their yearly due dates we were in the black. Today we are in the middle of discovering that Mr. Mulroney entered into a verbal contract with Mr. Schrieber to lobby on behalf of a armoured vehicle company to build a factory in Canada and provide their military vehicles to the CF. It appears that Mr. Mulroney believed he was to lobby foreign governments so you have two high profile businessmen confirming why you have written contracts. Do we need to spend 14 million taxpayers dollars to discover that one guy outslimed another guy?


Mark
said

I like Sandi Adams comments best. What is our value system in Canada? What priority do we put on this value system and for being one of the most beloved countries in the world? This whole situation is not comfortable to me and I regret that mine and yours tax dollars are going into this investigation. However this situation relates to the top level of Canadian leadership so if not for our Country and the future of our children, then, what for?


Lorne
said

The inquiry may be expensive, but is required.

The only problem is that the questions are not probing enough and require a more direct attack at all parties.

There is too much courtesy towards the parties involved.

A barrage of questions should be continually fired at these parties to the affair.

Mulroney should be required to pay a substantial amount of interest on the income, as he did not claim the monies until 1999.

I don't care if his family is "scarred" as a result of the whole affair.

Sandi Adams
said

Sandi - Calgary
I agree with “Concerned Citizen”. If we as Canadian Citizens don’t care about getting to the bottom of this then how are these individuals ever held accountable? What does it say to our future politicians? It says they can pretty much get away with anything and we’ll turn the other cheek. What does it say about us, the people? It says we get exactly what we deserve.

I know people are tired of this whole mess. So am I. But I’m not prepared to let this go quietly into the annals of history as a minor error in judgment on Mr. Mulroney’s part. I want and "deserve" the truth. I want and deserve a definitive finding with an appropriate punishment if warranted. If Mr. Mulroney is innocent it will be proven as such. If he’s found to have perpetrated any wrongdoing during the commission of his leadership then that, too, will come out. But either way we need to ensure that our leaders (and I use that word very loosely these days) know they will be held accountable for their actions no matter how long it takes. We are the people who put them in power and we are the people who can throw them out. It’s that simple. We as individuals need to start taking some of the responsibility.



Mike
said

He never made public his dealings with Schreiber because it was his attempt to keep his "legitimate private life private"?? If it was so legitimate, why didn't he declare income from this respectable endeavour?


James Bateman, Region of Waterloo, Ontario.
said

In Re: "B.S." a.k.a. "Brian and Schreiber".
Another inquiry, another commission; yes, the new way of dispute resolution.
More big taxpayer dollars to keep the Law Corporations (merged in late 1990's) in the black and occupied.
These self-serving, grandiose, narcissists, have it pretty darn good....wouldn't you agree?
And the rest of us, well we are content with, "beer, hockey and bashing the U.S. of A.


DoasIsay
said

An expensive archeological dig..doubt we will even find a good fossil.


Gilbert in Ottawa
said

This is like an old re-run of M*A*S*H or Guilligan's Island... It has been dealt with some years ago, end of story.
Now all this blablabla at the enquiry is costing us around $14 millions and is allowing this guy to stay in Canada and avoid facing the charges against him in Germany. - Shut it down, send Mulroney back home to his retirement, and send Schreiber back to Germany. Case Closed.


bob
said

Regardless of the outcome, the taxpayers lose and the lawyers win. This inquiry is a wasteful misuse of funds.


Garth
said

I noticed a couple of times that Mulroney was indirectly leading some the questioning when Pratt forgot certain most likely "scripted, rehearsed" queries to Mulroney. Not one really tough or incriminating question was put to Mulroney. However this is no surprise as we all know that the main focus of this "inquiry" is to aquit Mulroney at all costs. This is another clear example of the Canadian political system run amuck and covering up one of its own. What a disgrace and sham.


Richard of Winnipeg
said

From my understanding Mr. M. had left office before receiving money from Mr. S.. People have pointed out that Jean C was raked over the coals for adscam. The difference being that Jean C was a sitting PM at the time. If Mr. M. is found guilty...what then...he paid his taxes...mind you later than most of us would have but they were still paid. This inquiry is all for the benifit of Mr. S...the man doesn't want to go back to Germany and will go kicking and screaming to prolong his departure.


DANIEL H
said

According to Richard Nixon he was not a crook!


WestofTheRockies
said

@Koster

There is no allegation of a bribe. Mulroney wasn't in office when this transaction took place. Therefore no bribe. This was an advance payment for certain services to be rendered, made in cash, which was not too bright, but nevertheless, not illegal.

This is just finger pointing by Karl to take the heat off him and put it on someone else and delay his inevitable return to Germany where he has legal problems also. A country where his type of weaselling does not convince anyone and he knows he is going to jail.

Here in Canada where the righteous must investigate beneath every stone for anyone citizen or not, he is successful in wasting vast amounts of OUR money with trumped up stories that have as their only evidence, notes which the criminal (Karl) is providing. Unbelievable. Can you say witch hunt kids?

Meanwhile, millions of dollars of illegal payments in Ad-scam as well as payments to bail out buddy’s golf courses etc. etc. etc. by Chrétien for which there is actual evidence, are just swept under the carpet because after all he’s a Liberal and therefore entitled.

Only in the Liberal Fiefdom of Canada.


Joe Sanity
said

I love all of these posters saying: "Canadians don't care, enough already!" I'll bet these are the same guys that wanted every stone overturned when it was Chrétien’s turn to have his feet held to the fire. When you guys say” Canadians don't care" you really are saying, "Us Tories wish we could sweep this one under the carpet". It must be nice to have adjustable morals.


Richard in Markham
said

I just can't past the fact that Brian waited 6 years to declare the money he received as income on his tax return. If the spotlight hadn't been turned on - would he have ever declared the income?


Justa Fella in ON
said

Apparently Mckenzie King had some questionable and possibly unethical business dealings with a european associate. You know what ? I think we should have an inquiry ! Witnesses could be a bit of an issues, but what the heck, are we not Canadians ? We love a good old fashion useless inquiry.


James Ireland
said

Concerning Mulroney,
If you or I had done the same thing we'd be in jail!
This man failed to declare to Revenue Canada the money until 1999 and this is not for lack of judgement. He clearly thought he could get away with it. Keep Schreiber here until we know just how thick those envelopes were and how many other people were in on it.
Mulroney and his quest for public affection is a really sad story.
S a Conervative I'm very glad to see that Mr. Harper has distanced himself from this man.
Jamie Ireland


Nick in Gatineau
said

I for one want to hear the truth.

An MP receiving money is not illegal. But one receives money in order for something to be done or because something has been done.

The only reason why Shreiber's credibility is being attacked is to determine whether or not Mulroney would have trusted him enough to do the work requested prior to payment.

If any work was done prior to payment; while he was in office... Mulroney would have committed a crime.

That's the platform of Mulroney's team.

Either way, MPs write the laws that govern them. That has to stop. The laws that govern them should be written by an independent body of ethics. The kind that can have an MP removed, the kind that can press charges against an MP, etc... Without any interference from anyone in Canada.


Jexopolis
said

Who gives? Mulroney is finished as a public figure .... He's the political equivalent of Marty McSorely ... Once feared, now simply despised.


Retired Soldier in Kingston, ON
said

Readers and fellow citizens are missing an essential point as to why the Schreiber "Commission of Enquiry" is dragging on forever, and why this miscreant (Karl Heinz Schreiber)is being catered too!!

The "Commission" has become a "cottage industry", providing gainful employment to armies of federal lawyers, clerks, courier agencies and MP's who are eagerly helping themselves to limitless sums of taxpayers money, while pretending to pursue
"justice"!

After all, if the "enquiry" in question was shut down by Parliament, all these "hired guns" would have to go out in a tough economy and get a "real job"!

And we all know how that would work out...Pro Patria!


Randolph, Saskatoon
said

No wrong done, simply a common business transaction amongst two influential and decent fellows.


Wes Hagel
said

Wes
Mr. Mulroney has done a lot of good in his life. I won't dismiss this for the 'appearance' of a breach of ethics. Live and let live!


Any chance of taking down politician: interesting.
said

You bet it's interesting.

Mulroney and every other political POS!


Jeff from Alberta
said

Honestly, why are we even talking about this? The fact that we are spending money on this is insane. Its over and done with and only politicians care now.


Concerned Canadian
said

Many posters seem to feel that we ought to forget about this, that it's too far in the past etc. But that's a very bad idea.

Personally I hope that Mr. Mulroney is innocent. But we have to find out whether our top politician was corrupt, even if it was 16 years ago.

The reason that we must find out is that in a democracy, you get the government that you deserve. If we don't send a message to all political parties that the people will not stand back and let them get away with corrupt practice, then we will get more of the same.

The Liberals were guilty in Ad Scam, got caught and were punished by the public. Good.

Now if it turns out that Mr. Mulroney is guilty, then he needs to be punished too. If we do this more consistently, then maybe we can limit the amount of corruption by our politicians.

Because what's the alternative? Let them get away with anything they like? If we do that, we're on our way to bannana republic status.

No. Let the inquiry continue, and hope for a good verdict.

But don't sit back and complain about the inquiry, then turn aound the next day and complain about how corrupt the government is.

It's only as corrupt as we allow it to be.


Alex (Toronto)
said

The Royal Commission is doing a good job of de-politicizing the investigation of what happened. Unfortunately the parties, especially the Conservatives, are still going to apply as much spin as they can manage.

A lot of Conservatives would be happy to have Mr. Mulroney and his supporters quit and go to the Liberals. Plenty of Liberals would be happy to welcome the remaining moderates that used to belong to the Progressive Conservative party. Might be the best solution for everyone.


Reece
said

Watching the specatacle on tv this morning I felt Mulroney's lawyer was wanting people to pity Mulroney. It was soooo hokey I had to turn off the tv, yet I'm mesmorized by the self-serving and selective memory of this man.

Mulroney, as a wannabe lawyer, my advice to you is to use the following words:

"I can't recall"




adm Saskatchewan
said

This has gone on far too long. All the money that has been spent on this inquiry could have been put to better use and the fact that this is still making headlines.... tell me does anyone find this interesting?


david
said

Sadly the reason no one cares about this is that we have come to a point in our society when we have all accepted a simple truth... when a politician opens his mouth, lies fall out. And politicians aren't to blame because business people are the same.... we are SWIMMING in lies 24/7. Simply we can't believe ANYONE any more... so it comes to this... why bother to ask when all you'll get is fabrication, fantsy and bulls##t?


Narin
said

There is a trade-off for Canada, the inquiry is to satisfy some citizens or keep the good image of the former Prime Minister. I vote for the latter option. The guy is wanted in Germany for bad conduct, so he is not clean, our Prime Minister is clean, I believe.


Jim in Ontario
said

Mulroney may have been stupid to accept cash payments for work done, but obviously there is nothing illegal about this. This hearing has generated no new information and is simply a means for Schreiber to avoid German justice and the Opposition to play games.

Peter in BC
said

Yawn


Pip
said

to Davis from Hamilton: right to the point. The past is past, and the time for such inquiries would have been a decade ago, when legal fees were cheaper.

As for all this fuss about "cash in brown paper bags": since when has cash ceased to be legal tender? Must we accept promissory notes (cheques) rather than legal tender, just so someone can trace all our financial transactions? More to the point, will one of the outcomes of this inquiry be a recommendation that every transaction must be traceable to a specific individual?

This inquiry is the result of too much government, and too much government inevitably leads to the eventual erosion of our rights and frredoms.



A Koster - BC
said

I care.. I care that people seem to accept it as fact that politicians can accept bribes and kickbacks and perks.
Politicians are nothing more than grossly overpaid public servants, and they are there as stewards of our money. When they forge these deals in secret and behind our backs, they are making them not for our benefit, but for the enrichment of themselves. How any of you can say it doesn't matter to you is beyond my comprehension.

Will in Ottawa
said

Gotta love the media frenzy and opposition parties (headed by the Libs) pushing to have tax payer's money spent so they can finally brush the dirt off their shoulders for Ad-scam. Nothing says 'benevolence' like a party who can finally say "we weren't the only ones to abuse the public trust." Liberal party of Canada: Blowing your cash so we can say 'et tu quoque'.


Dave
said

another word...
enough already.


DJ in Manitoba
said

I for one have had enough of this BS. No buddy cares what happens and I for one would not believe what is or has been said anyways. It is time to move on!!!!!


Steve in Manotick
said

After all this publicity and money spent lets finally get to bottom of this and put an end to it. Keep Schrieber here until this is finished, let the RCMP do their job with out Mr Harper's Iron Fisted interference. Who knows maybe the people of Canada may get their 2.1 million dollars plus interest back from the former PM. Oh but wait how much will cost to keep Mulrooney in jail??


Davis from Hamilton
said

You know what - I really don't care about this issue one bit. Funny thing is, I think most Canadians feel the same way. Frankly, determining whether an ethical guideline was, or was not, broken 16 years ago accomplishes what exactly???


James Doyle
said

Coast to coast political dishonesty, corruption, graft, job appointments to incompetents, and theft at all levels- federal, provincial and municipal governments and agencies. We are the suckers who pay and pay and pay, yet really have no control of our taxation destiny. What is the actual percentage of working Canadians who do not work directly or indirectly for the above, 40%, 50%, and 60% ??? WE NEED A UNITED TAXPAYERS COALITION AND GO ON A REFUSE TO PAY TAX STRIKE ACROSS CANADA!!


Raj
said

As Tom just asked Karl, will we hear the seven( 7) scandals that Karl promised we would hear.Of course Karl had no idea, lets get this over with.CBC are frothing at the mouth over this. LOL
I want BM to get what he has coming to him, but lets ship Karl home now, so he can be put in jail.45% of Canada think this is a total waste of money.I am one of them


L in Ottawa
said

To David in Toronto:

I agree with you. Your two points are both very well taken. I say send Mr. Schreiber back to Germany as the Germans wish, it's already been far too long in that regard, and stop wasting Canada's time and money attempting to damage Mr. Mulroney further for his poor judgment. He will take that unfortunate lapse of judgment to his grave no matter what the inquiry concludes. That's enough, and this should have ended quite a while ago for Mr. Schreiber, Mr. Mulroney, and the rest of us.


JB in Ontario
said

Forget the prison sentence, these two Businessmen and representatives from Canada and Germany made a business deal to stimulate their countries economies.

Different coumntries have different ways of doing business.

English teachers get paid each month in cash (over 1 000 000) won in South Korea. I know because I taught the English language overseas.

Yes, perhaps they should have written a cheque, but thats what happened over a decade ago. We have much more important issues to deal with. Let it go.


Earl Robert
said

Mr.Schreiber is wanted in Germany and most Canadians want him in Germany. So,lets see how far his smooth talking gets him. With the rate of exchange I'm sure he won't go far.


Charlie
said

One word, Enough!


David in Toronto
said

Let's please get this over with, send Mr S to his fate in Germany and let Mr M live with the clouds of doubt and suspicion he will surely have to deal with for the rest of his life for his bad judgement.
Mr S' charges in Germany are far more serious than his worth is to Canada's inquiry and Mr M's reputation will unfortunately forever be clouded which is punishment enough for a former leader of our country.


Michael (Ottawa)
said

Mr. Mulroney as a businessman, a lawyer and the Prime Minister at the time should know full well the optics of accepting large sums of cash in a paper bag is unwise, unprudent and a considerable ethical risk if he was to appear unblemished.

...

The RCMP "NEED" to be set free from the political interference imposed on them from the PMO's office and they need to be able to do their job in an impartial manner without political pressure on the RCMP brass.
For too long the RCMP brass have played lapdogs to Prime Ministers and cabinets and serious investigations of wrongdoing have vanished at the will of the political masters in Canada.

THAT HAS TO STOP if we are going to stop the political corruption which exists in Canada on all sides of the political spectrum.







Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest