Top Stories -   

1
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty gestures while answering questions from members of the media in Toronto on Thursday, Feb. 23, 2012. (Pawel Dwulit / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Finance Minister Jim Flaherty speaks about the Family Caregiver Tax Credit in Toronto on Thursday, Feb. 23, 2012. Finance Minister Jim Flaherty speaks about the Family Caregiver Tax Credit in Toronto on Thursday, Feb. 23, 2012.

Budget won't be draconian, austerity-focused: Flaherty

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: New tax credit misdirected?
A new tax credit to help families care for their sick relatives in Canada is being praised by the Canadian Cancer Society, but critics say it's being misdirected. Richard Madan investigates both sides of the story.
CTV National News: Pennies saved from tax credit
A tax credit for caregivers was introduced in last year's budget. But as Richard Madan reports the bid to ease the burden on families adds up to pennies a day.
CTV News Channel: Helping family caregivers
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty discusses the Family Caregiver Tax Credit and how it will provide relief to deserving Canadians by providing them some relief.
CTV News Channel: Flaherty answers questions
The finance minister discusses how Canada will work towards having to a balanced budget and what he hopes to accomplish at the meeting in Mexico.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (44) Facebook   

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty gestures while answering questions from members of the media in Toronto on Thursday, Feb. 23, 2012. (Pawel Dwulit / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Finance Minister Jim Flaherty speaks about the Family Caregiver Tax Credit in Toronto on Thursday, Feb. 23, 2012. Finance Minister Jim Flaherty speaks about the Family Caregiver Tax Credit in Toronto on Thursday, Feb. 23, 2012.

Photos

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty gestures while answering questions from members of the media in Toronto on Thursday, Feb. 23, 2012. (Pawel Dwulit / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

Date: Thu. Feb. 23 2012 10:42 PM ET

The upcoming federal budget won't be as draconian as some pundits suggest, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said Thursday.

Flaherty made the comment in Toronto while talking about the Family Caregiver Tax Credit that went into effect Jan. 1 and was announced in the 2011 budget.

The federal budget expected in mid-March will focus on "moderate" measures to cut government spending and encourages provinces to do the same, he said.

"We are not one of the countries, many of them in Europe, that have run up deficits for a long period of time, accumulated substantial debt and must really act dramatically - some of them in a draconian way in order to get their house in order again," he said.

However, the government has already asked departments and agencies to cut spending by up to 10 per cent to save about $8 billion.

Flaherty dismissed the option of raising corporate taxes to pay down the deficit.

The budget is also expected to lay out the future of the Old Age Security benefit, possibly setting a timetable to raise the age of eligibility to 67 from 65.

Even though he was talking about the caregiver tax credit, there were no new announcements. Instead, Flaherty touted the government's work since 2006 to help families care for loved ones with disabilities.

CTV News Channel's Mercedes Stephenson said it's a typical government approach to rehash previous announcements before a new budget is unveiled.

"It's (tax credit) in the budget and some people may not be aware of it because they didn't see it. This isn't something that was a surprise or new," she said from Ottawa Thursday.

Reminding Canadians about previous tax-relief efforts, particularly ones aimed at seniors such as the caregiver credit, serves to soften the approach of what could be a fairly austere budget, she said.

"We certainly are expecting some very significant cuts. A lot of people are saying this will be the budget of the decade . . . in terms of how much we will see cut, up to 20 per cent possibly from some departments the rumour says," Stephenson said.

The caregiver benefit provides a 15 per cent non-refundable tax credit on an amount of $2,000 to caregivers of infirm, dependent family members, including "for the first time spouses, common-law partners and minor children," Flaherty said.

"We recognize the sacrifices many Canadians make to care for their loved ones and the expenses involved in doing so," he said.

"In addition to introducing the (tax credit), we also removed the $10,000 limit on the amount of eligible expenses a taxpayer can claim under the medical expense tax credit," he said.

Flaherty also talked about the introduction of the Registered Disability Savings Plan and the expanded eligibility of the disability tax credit.

Follow John Size on Twitter

Comments are now closed for this story

Pistol
said

If they raise the retirement age to 67, where will the younger generation get their jobs. There are NOT enough out there now !!!If they raise the age, I will NEVER vote Conservative again !!!


MarcO
said

Here's an idea - allow MP's t collect those nice cushy pensions ONLY when they reach the age of 67.


Dano
said

The Latte Lefties just wish they would have the chance to feed their friends by raising taxes.


Greg Orbman
said

More than half of the Conservative government deficit is due to reduced government revenues. And no they now they say they will not make draconian cuts. How is continuing deficit budget fiscal responsibility?


Rose
said

People are so fed up with this government.Harming seniors, raising retirement, wasting money on C30, C10, C51 among other colossal spending like the F35's. G 8 costs, sharing our private information with other countries, almost half a trillion in debt.and the list goes on and on. Time for a few conservatives to cross the Floor of the House and stop this endless madness. Enough is enough. This is not what Canadians want.


Right as Always
said

See? This government is perfectly capable of passing a law that isn't draconian. You lefties are just a bunch of doubters. All you had to do was give them enough time.


paula
said

Fire some of the MP's..they are usually nodding off anyway. Cut their huge pensions. Get rid of Harper and his cartel NOW.They are constantly bringing up contentious issues as a smoke screen.Time to clean the slate. I am not lead by the party but by the individual and their credibility,. Not a big playing field their though.


Ken From Alberta
said

Does anyone trust a single word that comes from the mouth of a conservative anymore??


art
said

I don't know how he can smile when he knows he is going to put future seniors out on the streets.


Casey
said

'Won't be draconian'. That won't give us much comfort considering where it's coming from!


G James
said

What is going on? I thought our country is a wealthy nation. Where is our wealth going?


Steph
said

@ Spare Me: I am with you on that one! and to all the naysayers out there; why don t you wait until the budget actually comes out before venting your sour grapes rants.


Libertarian
said

@ Spare me. He worked in the mail room and wrote a couple of papers. That's was his only real job. If that is a qualifiier for being top dog then I'm far more qualified to be PM, as are most people. He needs to go back to the mail room. Second, Only Steve Harper is running Canada into the ground financially, not the opposition. Check your facts. Thanks


Ken - Calgary
said

Reversing corporate tax cuts: This is a no brainer (to all except those who don't have a brain)...


REFORMIST BE GONE!
said

As long as you persist funding the ridiculous crime bill and the immoral internet spying bill (which citizens will have to pay even if they do not want it), you people are nothing to me. I will do all I can to exert pressure on friends and families as well as with the opposition parties to make sure we put a stick in your wheels at every curve and when the time come, vote you out of parliament although. Canadians now know what it means to have REFORMIST in power, and Canadians are ready to vote them out!


Justin Ladd
said

Just wondering if Flaherty's austerity campaign plans to cut the 60% in equalization transfers or almost 10 billion bucks Quebec gets annually from Canada under the guise of being a have-not province???


Just Wait
said

This is ALL speculative, isn't it? So, out come the political stripes in all the comments, REGARDLESS of what will really happen or has taken place. Point is, Flaherty can't tell us what's in the budget until budget day, keep your pants on.


Pat
said

This man and this government has lost all credibility and I am a former conservative supporter.The Internet Surveillance bill did for me. These pigs can no longer be trusted.


Mike Calgary
said

They wonder why we spend so much money and have nothing to show for it, the canadian way !

If only we had a government to RUN this country, and not send it to the poor house.

It's time to nap, you've made the bed !


MikeW
said

Maybe the Federal budget wont be draconian but the Ontario (Greece) budget better be. The Federal Cons have done a nice job with the economy whereas the provicial Liberals LMAO


Spare Me
said

@ Libertarian: As someone with a graduate degree in economics who has consulted our federal government's own website with regard to approved budgetary spending, and as a libertarian political junkie who took purposeful note of the supporting votes in the House of Commons, I must tell you that you're flat-out wrong and being wishfully argumentative. Perhaps taking a course in Canadian parliamentary democracy would enable you to grasp how the governing party (especially in a minority position) cannot unilaterally spend billions of dollars. It requires the complicity of the Opposition. Thanks.


Joan in Real World
said

People should read up on basic economic tenents. Draconian cuts can CAUSE recessions, faster than they can prevent them. CONs were warned about this just this week. But by all means, don't let facts get in your way.


Bumcrack USA
said

Spare me... you seem to omit one basic fact. Big elephant in your room. We had NO deficit under the liberals, but rather surpluses. Deficits came with the Reformers, mostly from the GST and Big Corporate taxes. So how you can blame liberals and NDPers for the deficit is beyond me, but then again so is most of your "thinking".


Diana 3
said

Many wealthy elites be them corporate or political are invested as part owners or hold stocks in "Made in China" companies. I believe the reason these so-called "austerity plans" are being implemented around the world is simply because credit has dried up and they want to curb taxation so that it loosens up our wallets to keep catering to their greedy little "Made in China" wealth. If we pay less in tax it means we blow more in China-Marts which increases wealthy elites shares and investments. The less money we have due to costs of living and taxes the less we will be driving the consumerism that they so much want us to keep making them filthy rich. Flaherty knows the deal yet he' s peeing on all of our legs and telling us it's raining.


Granny Grunt
said

Take from the pockets of hard working Canadians to hand to the IMF which consists of European Royalty. Things have not changed much from the medieval days have they Jim?


Matt in NB
said

Flaherty - How can you justify building mega prisions when crime rate is declining? You say your asking provinces to cut budgets while at the same time forcing them to incure unimaginable expences to prossecute with a minimum sentence every single person who smokes marijuana? The Harper Gov will Bankrupt our country worse than anyone can imagine. I truly wish there was a God to help us all.


Diana 3
said

Many wealthy elites be them corporate or political are invested as part owners or hold stocks in "Made in China" companies. I believe the reason these so-called "austerity plans" are being implemented around the world is simply because credit has dried up and they want to curb taxation so that it loosens up our wallets to keep catering to their greedy little "Made in China" wealth. If we pay less in tax it means we blow more in China-Marts which increases wealthy elites shares and investments. The less money we have due to costs of living and taxes the less we will be driving the consumerism that they so much want us to keep making them filthy rich. Flaherty knows the deal yet he' s peeing on all of our legs and telling us it's raining.


MP Pension/Salarie Should Be Cut!
said

Will Flaherty and company throw themselves on the sword for their altruistic nation do-goodership (sarcasm intended) and take a pay cut of 40% ? Cutting their pay by 40% wouldn't exactly put them all in the poor-house like they expect struggling Canadians to be. Or do they just pontificate to the masses "do as I say and not as I do" as they clink the wine glasses acting the part of Champagne socialists in ivory towers living their champagne dreams on Canadian's beer wages? Is that what this country has amounted to? A feudal style society where a mass class of people pay the meal ticket for a guild class living off their struggles like slavery?


shawbrooke
said

There are not enough federal jobs that a 35% cut would influence the recession, any other place than in Ottawa. My guess is that if the public service handled it right, no one would miss the jobs, and most of those leaving would be leaving with a pension. There is a golden opportunity to downsize right now, with so many civil servants near retirement.A downsized civil service might start to attract people who want to work rather than sit out. There'd be enough work to go around.


PL1313
said

Corporate tax cuts:

It can be argued that there is little evidence that corporate tax cuts have stimulated economic activity in Canada.
The evidence suggests that the investment incentives have simply gone into corporate cash flow and really had no economic benefit. This is because agreements between Canada and the U.S. require that American companies pay federal and state governments in their home country the difference between any lower income-tax rate they are paying on their Canadian operations and what they would pay at home. When we reduce our tax rates below those of the United States, what we end up doing is transferring money to the U.S. Treasury.


Libertarian
said

Mail room Steve and his goons are tanking Canada fiscally to the tune of over 140 billion in the next 2 years. Nobody in opposition voted on that or said that was a good idea. Yet they did this because: 1. They are dumb, financially. ( don't cut revenue when you know you're going to need it and everyone tells you to not do it.)2. They are dumb, politically. ( When you tell everyone outside of Alberta to, essentially, "jam it" you don't build goodwill. And when you don't have goodwill, majority or not, getting things done easy goes out the window. 3. When their minions are told to stack the chat rooms and post nothing but smug obnoxious smears, again, you don't make friends.Suggestions for improvement: 1. be nice and play with others 2. Take a finance course ( or even home Ec. in high school) 3. recall your minions. Thanks


mike
said

just give tax relief for the average person. we already pay too much, especially in backwards quebec.


KJ in Calgary
said

Everything from Flaherty and his Cons is draconian!


Dorian
said

federal budget won't be as draconian, but will target the elderly, poor and disenfranchised . Watch for it


true
said

To Mr. Fed-Up: You say some of your clients are now Fed employees- do they know about your thinking. Talk about draconian- you would set this country into a recession oh I forget we are in one. What a slave plantation owner mentality - if the slaves are old and not performing up to your breeding standards, feed them to the KKK . I thought such thought and hatred toward other Canadians had dissipated but in the new era we see the rise of the kill or be killed attitude.Disgusting


Saskmike
said

God help us all.


Shar
said

I don't want a draconian budget for taxpayers but I hope the budget does address the pensions of both federal public servants and MPs. Future employees should not be given the choice -- defined contribution pensions only. Taxpayers cannot be expected to support defined benefit plans for an elite group of employees. The goal should be reduced taxation. Canadians do and have always paid dearly for the entitlements.


Spare Me
said

As a libertarian (fiscal conservative) who opposed most of the Conservatives' fat-budget spending during their minority government, I'm disappointed to see our federal finances in a sling. However, thankfully, to bring laughter to my heart, and a smile to my face, I have anti-Conservative Liberal and NDP supporters to entertain me with their absence of memory (or ignorance) that their party formally voted in favor of said fat-budget spending in the House of Commons, and, therefore, have no fiscal credibility in discussions concerning our current deficit/debt. (Oh, I hear angry keyboard tapping and smell rubber burning, signaling the expected formulation of "clever" partisan insults.)


thetruth
said

Good...federal government..put more people out of work.@Mr. Fed up I propose as part of the new public service cuts....all public servants stop doing business with you. Sorry we have to cut back somewhere...No more job for you. See how you like it.


Senior taxpayer
said

The problem is Flaherty says one thing, then the Human Resources Minister says another thing, then Tony Clement says another thing, and then the PM says -oops sorry where is our PM hiding these days.


testy
said

Of course this government doesn't think there is a need to increase corporate tax. Increasing tax is never an option for reformers. What is an option, is cutting and eliminating social programs. That's what conservative thinking is based on. People should ask themselves if an American-style no government program Canada is ultimately what they want. Cause that's what they are doing. Reducing taxes so they can say we have no money, which justifies cutting and eliminating programs. It's not rocket science.


Mr. Fed Up
said

Mr. Flaherty, we do not need draconian changes but we do need more aggressive measures than you seem to have been advocating in the past year. Having worked in a large mult6i-national and having gone through good and bad times I can assure you that 5-10% cuts across the board are a cop-out. Having public servants as clients in my new role I can assure you that the way you want to achieve cuts is three fold. 1) Look at a 35% cut across the public service, you will not have gotten rid of all the time-servers but it is a start. 2) Identify the areas whose mandate has decreased significantly over the years; I would suggest CBC, RCMP, NCC, Aboriginals Affairs and Foreign Affairs as places to start and right-size them. The right size for some may well be 0. 3) Allow those competent individuals from the right-sized organizations to apply across the remeainder of the government but for any one hired someone else has to go. Make the managers manage.


Bumcrack USA
said

well look a-here... what a couple of weeks of horrible press can do to government plans.Me thinks this government is on "save its hide" mode.


Stewie
said

Yes right Jim but your war toys, prisons, internet and crime bills are going to cost Canadian's their pensions. This government keeps getting bigger & we keep losing more everyday.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt appears on CTV's Power Play on Monday, May 28, 2012.

Federal government orders end to CP Rail strike

More   51 Comments 51    12 Video(s) 12

Air Canada says it appears an engine part fell from the plane and crashed into the windshield of a car in Mississauga, Ont. on Monday, May 28, 2012.

Air Canada plane makes emergency landing in Toronto

More

Dominic and Abby Maryk were found in Mexico four years after allegedly being abducted by their father.

Extradition sought in Winnipeg missing children case

More   4 Comments 4    4 Video(s) 4