Top Stories -   

1

FDA finds lead in 400 shades of lipstick

A model is reflected in a mirror as her lipstick is adjusted in the backstage of the Ferre' women's Fall-Winter 2010/2011 collection, part of the Milan Fashion Week, Friday, Feb. 26, 2010. (AP Photo/Alberto Pellaschiar) Lipstick
A model is reflected in a mirror as her lipstick is adjusted in the backstage of the Ferre' women's Fall-Winter 2010/2011 collection, part of the Milan Fashion Week, Friday, Feb. 26, 2010. (AP Photo/Alberto Pellaschiar)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (12) Facebook   

Date: Wednesday Feb. 15, 2012 10:27 AM ET

You might be applying more than a little colour when you next put on your lipstick.

A new analysis by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has found that 400 shades of lipstick from such well-known brands as L'Oreal and Cover Girl contain trace amounts of lead.

The worst offenders were Maybelline's Color Sensation in Pink Petal, which had 7.19 parts of lead per million (ppm). , L'Oreal Colour Riche in Volcanic had 7 ppm.

That's almost seven times the average level of 1.11 ppm found in the FDA tests. Several other brands, including Cover Girl and Nars had lead levels in the 4 to 5 ppm range. Here's the full list of the FDA's findings.

Still, all the lipsticks contained lead levels that the FDA insists are safe.

"Our results do not show levels of lead in lipstick that would pose a safety concern," the agency says on its website, where it posted the results back in December.

But some disagree.

The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics has been pushing the U.S. government to set limits on lead in cosmetics. The group also wants the FDA to study whether there are dangers to having lead-containing lipstick applied to human lips, where the neurotoxin can enter the mouth and be swallowed.

The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics' Dr. Mark Mitchell says there are concerns about ingesting small amounts of lead over time.

"Lead builds up in the body over time and lead-containing lipstick applied several times a day, every day, can add up to significant exposure levels," he said in a statement.

The FDA says there is no need to be concerned.

"Lipstick, as a product intended for topical use with limited absorption, is ingested only in very small quantities," the agency says on its website.

"The lead levels we found are within the limits recommended by other public health authorities."

The Personal Care Products Council, the trade group that represents the cosmetics industry, also says there is no reason for concern.

Halyna Breslawec, the group's chief scientist, told The Washington Post that many of the colour additives in lipstick are mineral-based and therefore contain trace levels of lead that are found naturally in soil and water.

Just the same, she said her group would like the FDA to set a 10 ppm limit on lead in cosmetics

Here in Canada, Health Canada's Natural Health Products Directorate limits lead in products applied to the skin to 10 ppm

The FDA says it's considering establishing a limit.

"Although we do not believe that the lead content found in our recent lipstick analyses poses a safety concern, we are evaluating whether there may be a need to recommend an upper limit for lead in lipstick in order to further protect the health and welfare of consumers," the agency says.

In Canada, the amount of lead allowed in products depends on the product.

The Drinking Water Guidelines in Canada limit the lead content in water to 0.010 ppm of water, for example. In candy, the FDA has established an acceptable oral intake of lead impurities at 0.1 ppm, whereas in nutritional supplements, the limit is 10 ppm.

Paint, which once contained between 400,000 and 70,000 parts per million of lead, is currently allowed to have no more than 600 ppm in the U.S.

Follow Angela Mulholland on Twitter

Comments are now closed for this story

Canadian Bob
said

The fact that harmful products make their way into the hands of consumers falls entirely on the governments that don't (or are unwilling to) have more measures in place to protect us.


JJ
said

USE Arbonne, they have NO LEAD and NO harmful chemicals!!!!


Cathy-wpg
said

What are they complaing about? They want a limit set of 10ppm, and the highest level found in the lipstick was 7.19, I don't see a problem. I have worked for years handling 95% lead solder every day all day, and had my lead levels checked out of concern; no issues found. It really doesn't absorb into your body that easily.


Dave in MB
said

Made in China, perhaps?


lo le
said

Well some has got to wonder if Fibromyalgia which affects women at a rate of 8 to 1 compared to men. Has no real cause identified or determined yet but does show to have a brain changes that are proven. Could lipstick be involved ?. Women should bring this up with their doctors when looking for causes of fibromyalgia. Ladies when they are running blood tests ask to have lead levels checked as well just to be on the safe side and know how much lead is in your body. Could this be a trigger or cause of fibro it is worth checking out. So next time when you want to buy a lipstick for $10 you can wonder what value am I getting for our hard earned money.


WM
said

ADA You complain about in my day type talk, but lets be real. Back in the day there was less Asthma in children, less Autism, less cancer and that was before all these new rules and regulations. People smoked,drank and put baby to bed on tummy. They ate less chemicals in their foods. More foods were purchased fresh, and made from scratch. They weren't microwaved, there wasn't as many things with electrcity in our houses. They didn't walk around with hand held electronics.1 car per family was a luxury. Before you rule out the back in my day talk perhaps you should actually listen. FYI I am in my early 30's and I still see the benfits of the good old days.


Lucy
said

oh soooo sorry Ada to offend you by referring to my youth.... it's still my opinion, I never said it was fact.... wait until you are older, I am positive you will say: "in my day"........As children we didnt have to inhale Fabreze, bathroom spray, eat so many additives in food etc. etc. ... as the children do now, and that's a fact!


ADA
said

Oh goodness, here we go with the "in my day" talk. Lucy, what about the fact that in your day, there wasn't much in the way of non-smoking areas, meaning that children were more easily exposed to second-hand smoke? Or that the advice back then was to put babies on their stomachs, which has since been linked to more cases of SIDS? Not to mention the fact that FDA testing has only gotten more rigorous as time has gone by, not less. Please, folks, opinions are not facts!


tommy
said

where are these products made? China?


Pip
said

' . . .many of the colour additives in lipstick are mineral-based and therefore contain trace levels of lead that are found naturally in soil and water." This means that most edible crops, particularly root crops like potatoes and carrots, also contain trace amounts of lead. Likewise, people living in Shield areas are subjected to more background radiation than those living elsewhere. There is a limit - imposed by economics, on what we can do to protect ourselves against heavy metals; we can curtail their use in cosmetics easily; but only by making foodstuffs more expensive can we eliminate them in that area. Meanwhile, what will happen? Lipstick sales drop off a tad for a couple of weeks, then pick up again after an advertising campaign. And people will still eat carrots and potatoes . . .


Lucy
said

I am sick and tired of manufacturers deciding what levels of "this and that" they think is safe for the public to use (and keeping quiet about it)..... it is a COMBINATION and ACCUMULATION of all the chemicals etc. in all the things we eat and use every day ... not just one item. At age 67 I believe we are being slowly poisoned over time and feel very very sad for all the children who are exposed to so many more things that are bad fortheir health, which were not around/used when our age group was growing up.


kg1
said

This is not news. I heard about this over 7 years ago. Dont wear lipstick very often anyway so it does not affect me, but i do worry about my friends when they put all that stuff on their face. Many cosmetic products have way to many parabens (cancer causing chemicals in them). I know the FDA says "hey the amounts are acceptable", sure but what happens when you use them every day, dont they accumulate in your system?


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Subscribe!

MedNews Express newsletter

CTV MedNews Express

Sign up for our weekly medical newsletter, delivered for free to your inbox.

CTV.ca Blogs

Dr. Marla Shapiro

Health Blog

Check out what our guest medical experts and CTV health reporters are writing about.

Twitter

Avis Favaro Twitter

Follow us on Twitter

Follow CTV medical specialist Avis Favaro on Twitter.

Facebook

Like us on Facebook!

Like us on Facebook

Stay connected to the latest health news while you're on Facebook with CTV MedNews

Today's Top Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt speaks in the House of Commons in Ottawa on Monday, May 28, 2012. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Federal government orders end to CP Rail strike

More   51 Comments 51    10 Video(s) 10

Dominic and Abby Maryk were found in Mexico four years after allegedly being abducted by their father.

Extradition sought in Winnipeg missing children case

More   4 Comments 4    3 Video(s) 3

Protesters opposing Quebec student tuition fee hikes demonstrate in Montreal, Sunday, May 27, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Quebec, students resume talks on tuition hikes

More   26 Comments 26    1 Video(s) 1