Top Stories -   

1

Guatemala's president considers legalizing drugs

Guatemala's President Otto Perez Molina answers a question during a joint news conference with El Salvador's President Mauricio Funes, where they addressed issues related to regional security and how to coordinate their fight against organized crime in Guatemala City, Monday Feb. 13, 2012. (AP / Rodrigo Abd)
Guatemala's President Otto Perez Molina answers a question during a joint news conference with El Salvador's President Mauricio Funes, where they addressed issues related to regional security and how to coordinate their fight against organized crime in Guatemala City, Monday Feb. 13, 2012. (AP / Rodrigo Abd)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (13) Facebook   

Date: Monday Feb. 13, 2012 11:10 PM ET

GUATEMALA CITY — U.S. inability to cut illegal drug consumption leaves Guatemala with no option but to consider legalizing the use and transport of drugs, President Otto Perez Molina said Monday, a remarkable turnaround for an ex-general elected on a platform of crushing organized crime with an iron fist.

Perez said he will try to win regional support for drug legalization at an upcoming summit of Central American leaders next month. He got his first public support on Monday at a security meeting with El Salvador President Mauricio Funes, who said he too is willing to consider legalization.

"We're bringing the issue up for debate. Today's meeting is intended to strengthen our methods of fighting organized crime," Perez said with Funes. "But if drug consumption isn't reduced, the problem will continue."

But after returning to El Salvador, Funes said he personally doesn't support legalization because it would "create a moral problem," though he supports Perez's right to bring up the issue for consideration.

"Imagine what it would mean," Funes said. "Producing drugs would no longer be a crime, trafficking drugs would no longer be a crime and consuming drugs would no longer be a crime, so we would be converting the region in a paradise for drug consumption. I personally don't agree with it and I told President Otto Perez so."

Perez's proposal comes as drug cartels have taken over large swathes of Guatemala and other Central American countries, fueling some of the highest murder rates in the world. A May 2011 report by the U.S. Congressional Research Service said that 95 per cent of all cocaine entering the United States flows through Mexico and its waters, with 60 per cent of that cocaine having first transited through Central America.

In just a month in office, Perez has transformed himself from one of Latin America's toughest advocates of military action against drug cartels to one of the region's strongest voices for drug legalization. His stance provoked strong criticism from the United States over the weekend, and intense discussion inside the country, where Guatemalans argued for and against his proposal in the streets and on radio talk shows.

One analyst said Perez's about-face could be designed to pressure the U.S. into providing military aid, currently banned by the U.S. Congress because of past human rights abuses.

"This is kind of like a shot across the bow, saying if you don't help us, this is what we can do," said Anita Isaacs, a Guatemala expert and professor of political science at Haverford College.

But Perez's backers said the change grew out of the realization that if demand continues in the U.S., the small country will never have the resources to fight the flow of illegal drugs from producers in South America to the world's largest consumer market in the U.S.

"Are we going to be responsible to put up a war against the cartels if we don't produce the drugs or consume the drugs? We're just a corridor of illegality," Eduardo Stein, a former Guatemalan vice-president who headed Perez's transition team.

"The issue of drug trafficking and consumption is not on the North American political agenda. The issue of drugs in the U.S. is very marginalized, while for Guatemala and the rest of Central America it's very central," he added.

U.S. President Barack Obama would cut funds to fight drug trafficking in Latin America in 2013, according to his budget proposal released Monday. While the Obama administration has promised to shift anti-drug resources from law enforcement and military intervention to treatment and prevention, funding would be restored to slightly higher than 2011 levels in the proposal after suffering a cut in 2012.

A growing number of former Latin American leaders have come out in favour of legalization, saying the U.S. efforts to fight drug trafficking in Latin America have only caused more violence and sucked up resources.

Colombia President Juan Manuel Santos has said he would be open to legalization if the entire world agreed.

"It's a theme that must be addressed," Colombia's Foreign Minister Maria Holguin told reporters in Cartegena Monday. "The war on drugs definitely hasn't been the success it should be and it's something the countries should discuss."

Honduras, another major transit country, has never formally considered legalization. Mexico President Felipe Calderon has said it wouldn't make sense to legalize drugs in the region as long as they remain illegal in the U.S.

Perez, 61, was elected in November and took office last month on a platform of cracking down on the country's rampant crime, a product of gang and cartel violence, along with the legacy of a bloody 1960-1996 civil war.

Army, police and paramilitary are blamed for killing the vast majority of 200,000 victims, most of whom were Mayan.

More than half of Guatemalans live in poverty in a nation of 14 million overrun by organized crime and Mexican drug cartels. Perez's predecessor, former President Alvaro Colom, sent troops to retake some provinces from the Zetas drug gang.

Perez, the first former general to be elected president since peace accords were signed in 1996, also took office with the mission of ending a long-standing U.S. ban on military aid imposed during the civil war because of concerns over human rights abuses.

Close advisers say he supports meeting the conditions set by various U.S. congressional appropriations acts for restoring aid that was first eliminated in 1978, including reforming a weak justice system and prosecuting war criminals.

But both U.S. and Guatemala officials agree that a reverse on the ban won't happen any time soon. Among other reductions, Obama's budget proposal cuts military aid to the region for fighting drugs by $5 million.

Perez first made his drug proposal over the weekend.

Political analyst Alvaro Pop said Guatemala would benefit from legalization "because it would get us out of a fight that has blocked our chances of developing as a country." But he added that Perez would have to carefully define exactly what he wants to legalize.

The U.S. Embassy in Guatemala issued a statement Sunday saying that legalizing drugs wouldn't stop transnational gangs that traffic not only drugs, but also people and weapons.

Comments are now closed for this story

Khrum Dman
said
0 0

I laugh when i read smoking pot will push you to use heroine and the like.The drug used is up to each and everyone.I like smoking pot because it takes the side effect of my regular medecines more managable.My doctors know about it and we have adjust the meds according to the use of pot.I dont feel drowzy like I was before and have a better life overall.Let me decide what is best for me period.


Linda
said
0 0

Jonathan from Saskatoon Evidence shows pot may trigger schizophrenia in people that already have it. The drugs used in bypass surgery some times triggers Alzheimer's, so what's your point John?


ultamatt
said
0 0

prohibition never did work and never will . the only thing does is create a giant untaxable underground economy spawning crime and violence , and creates an enormous tax-dollar sucking black hole war on drugs , which turns out to be a war on our children , instead of treating their addictions as health problems. sticking them in a cell with murderers and perverts doesn't teach them that we want whats best for them.


Jonathan from Saskatoon
said
0 0

@ SM: Marijuana is also a drug very closely associated with schizophrenia. As in symptoms of the disease appeared after staring to use the drug, or became more severe. It is also the first drug used by those who later become addicted to every other narcotic. Not that every pot smoker gets schizo or moves on to heroine etc, but there is a defined link between the rise in addiction to harder drug use and the rise in schizophrenia and the rise in marijuana use.


Finally
said
0 0

Finally. Now Mexico needs to do the same thing. We are causing the deaths of tens of thousands of Mexicans,Guatemalans and Colombians. Once it is legal in the those countries the beheading and corpses hanging from freeway overpasses will move into the US and Canada where they belong. Then maybe we will get serious about addressing the problem instead of making it a point of amusement in sitcoms and movies. Good for Guatemala.


MT
said
0 0

Msame thing in decriminalizing drugs. Crimes were gone, and consumption went DOWN. Why, because it's no longer illegal.


SM
said
0 0

U.S can not and will not improve Guatemala, so do what you have to do Guatemala President. No matter how old I get I will never see a good reason to make marijuana illegal. I don't support any other drug, marijuana is a plant that is grown naturally.


shawbrooke
said
0 0

So he's volunteering to pay the health costs for all those people who start using or use more because now it's legal? Oops, forgot to ask what kind of health services the country provides. Guess they're not that concerned about productivity either. Remind me to remind friends not to get off the boat when the cruise takes them there.


Rick W in BC
said
0 0

Personally I have no use for drugs and even less use for drug dealers and cartels, but it is obvious to any intelligent individual that our current methods of drug control are not working. There are several advantages to legalizing drugs, the biggest one is that is the Government in true mercenary fashion can tax the crap out of them, which remove money from the drug cartels who will definately be not impressed. Next is the drug source or supplier, a legal government approved drug source/supplier has to meet proper standards for quality control which again removes it from the cartels use and control. Once fully legalized the government can take the profits they will make and put it into health care and anti-drug advertizing the same way it is done with tobacco. The hard part is convincing the world's biggest country of drug users to get onboard namely the United States of America.


Sandra
said
0 0

While we're at it why don't we decriminalize theft, murder and rape? If we can't deal with criminals, just make the crimes legal! What an idea!! Then we can honestly say there is no crime in Canada.


Goldens
said
0 0

Done properly with the right controls this makes a lot of sense.


Dave in Ottawa
said
0 0

I hate drugs. They kill people, and worse, reduce them to the status of animals...both the users and the sellers.Having said that, what we are doing doing now is clearly not working. The gangs, fueld by drug sales, are taking over our cities and there seems to be damn little the police and courts can do about it. It is the same as prohibition, the gangs took over and made a killing selling banned substances to people who wanted them and didn't care what they had to do, or who they had to deal with, to get them. Drugs are no different.To me, what will work best is to legalize and control them, the same way alcohol was controlled. Even if you tax them to death, they will still be cheaper than street level and a hell of a lot safer for all concerned. Put the taxes back into medicare. And, best of all, watch the dealers wilt into the pavement.


James
said
0 0

The war on drugs was never about the good of the people; Portugal decriminalized all narcotics ten years ago and consumption has dropped by half. This is about the government being completely unwilling to give up one tiny shred of its control of the people. If you give the government an inch it takes a mile, and then it absolutely refuses to consider giving anything back. Remember this later in the week when the Cons propose their internet surveillance bill.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt speaks in the House of Commons in Ottawa on Monday, May 28, 2012. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Federal government orders end to CP Rail strike

More   51 Comments 51    10 Video(s) 10

Dominic and Abby Maryk were found in Mexico four years after allegedly being abducted by their father.

Extradition sought in Winnipeg missing children case

More   4 Comments 4    3 Video(s) 3

Protesters opposing Quebec student tuition fee hikes demonstrate in Montreal, Sunday, May 27, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Quebec, students resume talks on tuition hikes

More   26 Comments 26    1 Video(s) 1