Top Stories -   

1

CAW boss accuses Caterpillar of breaking the rules

caterpillar, electro-motive
caterpillar, electro-motive

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (50) Facebook   

Selected Comment

Kenny old boy, give it a rest. you led your sheep to pasture. well done

crjdriver

CAW boss accuses Caterpillar of breaking the rules

talking about
CAW boss accuses Caterpillar of breaking the rules

Date: Friday Feb. 10, 2012 10:42 PM ET

TORONTO — The head of the Canadian Auto Workers union is accusing Caterpillar Inc. of not following the rules in its 2010 takeover of a London, Ont. locomotive plant it has decided to shut down.

CAW national president Ken Lewenza has written a letter to Industry Minister Christian Paradis, calling on him to release the financial details of Caterpillar's takeover of Electro-Motive Canada.

Lewenza is pressing hard to get the government involved, either to pressure the company to reverse its closure decision or to sweeten the financial payments now being negotiated in a closeout deal between the union and company.

The federal government has said that the takeover was never looked at by Investment Canada because it fell under the current threshold of just over $300 million.

But Lewenza said Friday no public, independently verifiable data supports that claim and Caterpillar's own financial statement reported US$1.3 billion in assets associated with the takeover.

"We are not convinced that the existing provisions of the Investment Canada Act were accurately and fairly applied in the Electro-Motive acquisition, "Lewenza said in the letter to Paradis, the federal minister responsible for Investment Canada.

"The London facility was the largest and most strategic manufacturing entity in Electro-Motive, and represented about half of the firm's total employment at the time of the Caterpillar takeover," Lewenza said.

"What proportion of the firm's value was actually represented by the Canadian operation -- including fair value for the Canadian division's intellectual property and other intangible assets? "

The American-based heavy equipment maker announced last week that it will close its Electro-Motive plant in London, Ont., a month after it locked out about 450 workers.

The company, which had demanded wage cuts of about 50 per cent from the workers -- saying their wages were way above company plants in the U.S. and Mexico -- is shifting locomotive production to its other North American factories.

The union said the shutdown will hit the industrial economy in southwestern Ontario hard and cut another 1,700 spinoff jobs linked to the locomotive plant.

Ontario's manufacturing economy has been battered in recent years from the restructuring of the North American auto sector and other blue-collar industries, leading to the shutdown of several auto and truck plants across southern Ontario, home of Canada's auto sector.

The provincial jobless rate jumped to 8.1 per cent last month, well above the national average, and the struggles of the economy are squeezing revenues and putting pressures on the Ontario government's finances.

Lewenza said if the data associated with Caterpillar's purchase of Electro-Motive turns out to be inaccurate, the government can impose penalties.

Lewenza's letter to Paradis also called on the government to strengthen regulations over foreign investment by:

-- Improving transparency of the "ultra-secretive" Investment Canada process and allowing input from affected stakeholder groups;

-- Closing loopholes that exempt most takeovers from scrutiny, including those that are too small or reflect indirect purchases of companies.

-- Strengthening and more clearly defining the "net benefit" test used to approve foreign acquisitions.

-- Ensuring that government can enforce commitments attached to approved takeovers.

"Failure to act by your government reflects not legislative weakness, but a political unwillingness to defend Canadian citizens," Lewenza said in the letter.

Ottawa promised in 2009 to update the Investment Canada Act but so far Paradis has said little about foreign takeovers in Canada since taking over the portfolio from Tony Clement last year.

Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty renewed calls for a review of the legislation last week after the sudden shutdown of the Caterpillar plant.

The sale of Illinois-based Electro-Motive Diesel by U.S. investment firms Greenbriar Equity Group and Berkshire Partners to Caterpillar subsidiary Progress Rail Services was not covered by the Investment Canada Act.

Ottawa has blocked just two foreign takeovers under the act -- BHP Billiton's hostile bid for PotashCorp in 2010 and an attempt by MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Ltd. (TSX: MDA) to sell its space division to U.S. defence firm Alliant Techsystems Inc. in 2008 in a friendly deal.

Both deals were rejected after furious public outrage and in the case of the BHP bid for Potash, a campaign by Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall, whose province faced the biggest impact by the potential deal.

Proposals under consideration for a new Investment Canada Act include the addition of public hearings to the process, clarification of how the minister determines a net benefit and changes to the net benefit test.

In a 2008 report on Canadian competitiveness by Red Wilson, a senior executive with experience in both the private and public sectors, it was recommended that the threshold for review under the act -- which stood at $312 million last year -- be increased to $600 million and eventually $1 billion.

The report also recommended that the onus be changed from the investor having to prove a net benefit to the minister having to show a net harm.

Comments are now closed for this story

JGL
said
0 0

@dean in Abby....I agree unions should go....I also hope the feds open the door so more mexican and philipino immigrants come in and help lower the average wage to about a 1/3 of what it is so as a business owner I can increase productivity at no increase in cost by hiring 3 for the price of 1 today....and please no one cry to me about affording anything....its our own fault by all getting overpaid for the jobs we do...no one is worth what they get paid these days...anyone saying so must be a leftie.


Greg
said
0 0

Thanks to the crash of the US housing market Americans can afford to work much cheaper, Canada will continue to bleed jobs until our housing market crashes. Take off your tin foil hats stock away some grits cause tough times are coming for many Canadian's. Happens every time we get a conservative government.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

@ Prof Go Cart: Indeed. Life's all about choices, my friend. One can choose to walk away from a job, or accept lower pay. Companies (and their divisions) can choose to be less profitable, and competitive, and suffer, or, move operations to a place that facilitates the enhancement of productivity and profit. The reason the CEO made big money is because he ran Caterpillar successfully and returned money to shareholders. Decisions like this are made with unfortunate frequency. (Often employees don't get the opportunity to work for less. The axe simply falls.) Business isn't charity. It's about money, and profit. No money and no divisional profit, no jobs. An American corporation bought out an American corporation, and saw fit to shift and consolidate. Your blame is misguided. PM Harper is in China to further commercial trade and Canadian business, and bolster employment. Thanks.


Joe
said
0 0

The Unions especially the CAW are responsible for the gradual destruction of Ontario's manufacturing sector.


Stewie
said
0 0

Jobs are leaving Canada left right & center, Harper has created massive debt with his corporate welfare, with Harper at the helm it won't be long till were in the same shape as Greece. The anti-union folks will be laughing all the way to their tents when their housing prices drop 75%. Mind you Harper has the immigration flood gates open so wealthy foreigners can keep buying up our real estate.


Prof Go Cart
said
0 0

Prof. Pye Chartt If the job doesn't pay the bills it's better to find a job that will rather than bankruptcy & living on the street. I don't know about the cost of living in this town but at 16.50 per hour in Vancouver you'd have to live on the street. The CEO received a 10.5 million dollar bonus & cat made record profits so there was no reason for the drastic cut in wages. Now they run back to the USA & say thanks for the corporate welfare. Too bad we didn't have a government in Canada that stood up for the Canadian people, he's off in China rewarding the Chinese for vetoing the UN's sanctions on Syria.


retiti
said
0 0

i love what unions have done for our working people. thanks to them, in the past, we have rules for every working person, union or not. unions now are just bloated fat cats trying to get paid spa days, and 50% more pay for unskilled jobs. companies now are slaves to share holders. it must be profit at all costs, no matter what. both are just as guilty as the other in this case. perhaps we need to step back as a society and change our priorities. why do people need to be billionaires? why cant we all just be happy having a good, comfortable life?


Dean in Abby
said
0 0

Whatever! Do you ever hear of businesses crying that unions who have ruined their business have broken the rules? Outlaw unions and we'd all be better off.


Tom
said
0 0

union boss complains about company "breaking the rules", what, the union hates competition? Only unions can break rules and laws? Fact is, the company broke no rules or laws. CAW blew it big time and I hope the union leaders uffer for thier stupidity.


Brian, Milton
said
0 0

Further to what I had said earlier, when I worked in the union environment at a factory, I was a TPT (Temporary Part Timer) and still had to pay uniuon dues, yet not entitled to any of their so called benefits. I had no choice but to pay these dues. Whatever, guess the union was in dire straits financially. What I witnessed some union members with their conduct, if they worked for me they would be fired! If they did this outside of the factory, they would have been charged criminally! Yet, the union went to fgreat lengths to keep these losers in their jobs (wasn't just one individual). When they were on strike years before that, they blocked a main road leading into the city from vehicular traffic. All to make their point. Yes, they made their point! They showed the world what kind of attitude they had. It actually looked good that Navistar closed that plant also. Ken Lewenza, what have you and your previous cohorts done for your members? Like many people have said, you still have your jobs and perks, while your membership is dwindling. May I suggest you and your memberships go "Occupy Caterpillar" and their head office. See if you can get away with that!!


H
said
0 0

Believe that Fran below has said it best and i certainly hope that the Cdn. voting public remmember this at the next Fed. election..Fran said 0 1 Better get used to it folks. With Harper's series of trade agreements with China, these type of plant closures will be a dime a dozen in Canada, especially in Ontario's manufacturing sector. And with a government happy to break unions, nobody is safe. That's what happens when you elect yourself a corporate government.


Stargod
said
0 0

@Mexico Union Made ... agree completely with you, I hate Unions BUT I also hate ABUSERS and this is not the first time Caterpillar has been involved in shutting down an office and plant ... seems every time the Canadian economy gets strong, the Caterpillar squiggles away !! CHECK YOUR HISTORY. A sale of 2 American based companies and the buyer wishes to close a foreign plant, they have the right. The only thing we can do is sharpen the pencil and be sure all wage settlements, taxes and fees are paid in full b4 allowing any closure There are proper legalities that must be followed & held.. Proper notice, not notice by threat must be given and all wages up to and including the proper official day of closing must be honored.


Robert B
said
0 0

I know , I'm back just aother cat product to be shunned .. where? in Marcs work warehouse Cat labeled products its easy to do it...


Robert B
said
0 0

I never ever got an answer from the unions leadership do they ... do they .. take a cut in wages when their members take a cut???????Or a cut in leadership/earnings... Do their members have a choice in this issue??? Lewenza is a ghost rider... and not a good one..


Bob,Calgary
said
0 0

What Ken Lewenza really means is beef up the Foreign Investment Review act so that it protectsUNION members because in reality these union leader maggots care only about their members, As far as I can tell EMD was bought by Caterpillar from another foreign owned entity so why would the FIRA apply? Guys like Ken Lewenza care only about seeking advantage for their members at the disadvantage of everyone else. The Canadian dollar has risen to par against the US buck and since Canadians are nowhere near as productive as Americans we will continue to lose industry to the U.S. EMD has a U.S. plant that will manufacture diesels with workers paid at half the rate of the London union members. It would be downright negligent of Caterpillar not to either reduce their London costs or move their manufacturing operations to the U.S. In my opinion the union dropped the ball on this one and should have sought solutions to the cost gap far before the final negotiations. From what I have seen union leaders like Lewenza, Ryan, Moist, and that big blowhard at the Canadian Federaion of Labor are pretty mediocre opponents to Business leaders they negotiate with. My fervent hope is that union power is steadily decreasing in Canada and a true even playing field will result.


Don in N.S.
said
0 0

Ah, Anne, this is an American company who bought another American company out which just happen to be located in Ontario. This was not a Canadian company so there is nothing the Government can do. The union screwed there members not the government.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

@ Tim: What puts more money in your pocket, a job at half the pay, or, no job at all. (Take your time in answering.) Unless I had a better option, I would have taken it. If I had a better option, I wouldn't be complaining now. Perhaps if the CAW had been more reasonable in negotiating, Electro-Motive workers would be back on the job now at 35-40% less pay, and keeping their eyes open for something better while they at least collected a cheque. Just a thought.


Gord
said
0 0

Kenny, all your grandstanding and righteous indignation for Joe and Jill Sixpack's benefit who are now employed won't change anything. Any employer to stay competitive must prune contantly and profits made elsewhere have no relevance to London. The company made a bet on London and lost a bundle and have taken steps to stop the losses, pruned and will continue business elsewhere without you. Wake up and smell the coffee my friend. That's all.


Ron
said
0 0

If this company had been losing money then I could almost understand why they were looking for pay cuts. This certainly was not the case. What was @ stake here was pure greed. What was their profits last quarter 4 billion? How much profits do they want? It also seems to me that many American company's have now decided they are not making enough money outside their borders especially in Canada with the dollar on par. So they just close up shop. The union is trying to get a fair severance package. Well good luck with that. The power has swung from unions to big corporations & we are going to see the middle class hit very hard


rule?
said
0 0

Broken rules or not manufacturing cannot compete in Canada. There are far too many rules.


81
said
0 0

I said it many years back that the Government has let the people down when Massy Ferguson packed up and moved south throwing hundreds of workers onto the unemployment line and freezing others pensions to 1970 prices. I warned that that was only the beginning and sadly I have been proven right as so many jobs have moved south of our borders, and unless the Government steps in to put a stop to this it will only continue and get worse.


Cambridge Wayne
said
0 0

This is to "Tim". How much are those workers making now? Where are theri lives headed now? Where will they be in 5 or 10 years?


lc
said
0 0

Nothing like a union story to bring out the fascists.The globalists will not be happy until we return to the days Scrooge handing out lumps of coal and loons are waving pompoms cheering them on.Sick!.


Sheri
said
0 0

50% pay cut WITH a job is better than 0% with NO JOB! Unions close companies and the employees that paid into the unions for years are the ones that suffer. If YOU owned the company would you want to pay $35/hour or $20/hour for the same position. Companies are in business to make money...period! Unions need to GO NOW!


Joan in Real World
said
0 0

When the next statistics come out regarding the growing gap between rich and poor, and the slow death of the middle class, and you wonder how that happened, remember this example. This is how its done. --- Union breaking and union bashing serve the interest of big corporations, not Canadians.


Chris Cross
said
0 0

@Tim: Whats better? $16 per/hr with benefits or unemployment that lasts one year and no benefits? If I were making $32 per/hr and the company was faced with A) close the plant throw everyone out of work or B) take the paycut so that you could continue working and getting benefits to help save your own job. And before you ask if I have ever had to do it, the answer is "yes" I was more interested in keeping my family fed and a roof over their head then to letting my pride getting me kicked out in the street and getting my food from a food bank.


MikeW
said
0 0

@Tim as opposed to having the company shut down and put you out of work - Brilliant. Or maybe accept the offer and while continuing to be employed look for work elsewhere at a higher wage. Oh there's the rub who will pay unskilled labor higher wages than $ 17 an hour


Brian, Milton
said
0 0

To Tim, I learned long time ago that 50% of something, i.e. wages, is better than 100% of nothing. Unions have had their day. I am self-employed, and have been since 1979. I worked in a union environment for a short period about 5 years ago. That company has now closed up also because of the union's stance. This union has been labled militant for years, and refused to accept a reasonable offer, because as they put it"they deserved more". Why did they deserve more? These union workers do not have a penny invested in the companies they work for, yet they expect a king's ransom in return. I do not feel sorry for any one of them. Good for Caterpillar!!


Head in the clouds
said
0 0

@ Tim - Irrelevant if we would take a 50% pay cut - why not ask the 700 electro motive workers? Right now I bet they would. And the 50% paycut number was for new unskilled hires. Trades still retained their rates, as did the current employed. The CAW & Ken Lewenza rolled the dice and lost.


NS
said
0 0

Let's look at the present day BIG picture. Unions are supposed to protect workers, that is why they were created, all are agreed. Presently in Canada there are no sweat shops, or abusive child labor. Thank you unions for your historical help in achieving this. But since our workers in North America are so well taken care of, the unions just push for higher and higher wages. The companies overhead to to expensive to operate here, so they choose to relocate to a place where there is cheaper labor. Our Canadian unions are now hurting Canadian workers, and creating more sweat shop conditions in other countries, a lose lose situation. The only winner in Canadian unions, are the union administrators, who are the fat cats that workers originally needed protection from.


Fran
said
0 0

Better get used to it folks. With Harper's series of trade agreements with China, these type of plant closures will be a dime a dozen in Canada, especially in Ontario's manufacturing sector. And with a government happy to break unions, nobody is safe. That's what happens when you elect yourself a corporate government.


Will
said
0 0

No sympathy for the union goons who fleeced their members for the last time. Enough is enough, people need to wake up and realize that the union exists for itself not the members they claim to represent.


Bumcrack USA
said
0 0

No matter how you look at it, this stinks. Caterpillar made $5 billion in profits last year and wanted employees to take a 50% pay cut. It knew it was offering them a deal they couldn't accept, in order to shut them down and move to the States. Anybody who blames the union for this should have their head examined. Nice place for a photo-op, hey Steve?


Jon in Burlington
said
0 0

When will the Kens and Syd's learn you can't push around big company's, the workers paid for the mistakes of the CAW and its leadership.This is not the governments fault, it is the unions leaders fault.Did the deal suck, sure it did, but 50% of something is a lot better than 100% of nothing.As a person who has never had the backing of a union. do what we do when you lose a job, suck it up, get up and dust yourself off and start pounding the streets and find another job.I am not sure whether to laugh or cry when I see these guys picketing a closed plant.


rod
said
0 0

seize assets ok ..situation..im a company looking to put down a factory, looks at canada..overpriced workforce, gov regulation and gov has history of grabbing assets...looks south..half price workforce,nice juicy buy american provisions...hmm i wonder where i should place said factory.. so get il high and mighty on the company see where it leads long term...


Mexico Union Made
said
0 0

We are trying to run a country for all Canadians. However the unions take no issue with tying up the Government inviting them to help fight their battles and minimizing Government services and resources from all non union Canadians. Apparently to a union member, there is only one deserving entity and that be unions. It's time to shut em down. If you think you need a group to help you negotiate wages and reasonable working conditions then why don't you just go to work somewhere else? You are the reason Mexico and China exist as manufacturers.


Tim
said
0 0

How many of you would take a 50% pay cut?


Huh?
said
0 0

Let me get this straight...An Americian based company sold a Americian based company to another Americian based company, and the CAW wants the Canadian goverment to impose penalties?


Al
said
0 0

Not taking sides here, but one has to remember that this was not a foreign takeover of a Canadian company. It was one American company buying out another American company. One of the plants just happened to be in Ontario. No loss of Canadian ownership or intellectual property was involved.


dualstrats
said
0 0

how about the union repays the employees back their share of dues...


Wild Frank
said
0 0

How dare these companies remain profitable so that the greedy shareowners like that nice old lady whose mutual fund invests in Catepillar to assure her income in retirement, because the government pension isn't enough to live on. Yeah. Shame on her demanding profits. What about that unionized line worker earning $35 dollars an hour? Well - someone has to carry the water - you pick!


Jon in London ON
said
0 0

"Failure to act by your government reflects not legislative weakness, but a political unwillingness to defend Canadian citizens," said Ken Lewenza. Yeah! It's the governments fault! Certainly not like the willingness of the CAW to defend its members. The CAW sure showed Catepillar a thing or two. Seems to me that the rank and file of the CAW need to address the actions of Ken Lewenza. Didn't the Ford plant just close last fall? And Stirling Trucks before that? Gee......what is common thread here? Electro -Motive workers, and members of London CAW Local 27 - at $101K per year for Ken to bargain on your behalf - are you really getting your money's worth? Well, at least Ken still has a job. Can Ontario become a right-to -work province?


MikeW
said
0 0

You don't get it Kenny, with economies the way they are these days there are no rules. You need to rethink your role in the business world or get sucked down the toilet. i have zero sympathy for you and yours. And oh by the way just got told there won't be raises again this year. And no i dont want a union to protect me because you will just protect me right out the door


BC Railroader
said
0 0

Nice try, CAW!I am a railroader with 14 years experience in the industry. EMD/GMD was an American "branch plant" in Canada. No "Canadian" technology is leaving the country. Mr Lewenza threw the dice against Cat and lost. CAW= "Closed Another Workplace"- case closed.


Paul
said
0 0

Union is just mad cause "the bully just got punched in the nose".


tim
said
0 0

the problem with these american companies is they dont seem to relize that it cost more to live in Canada than the US , or the price of doing bussines. all the VIP's make a bundle and get stock so what do they care , Top level managment is killing companies , all they want is something on their resume


Mike
said
0 0

I am not a union fan, never will be but the workers got the raw end of the deal here. The company profited $5 billion last quarter and told their workers they needed to take a 50% pay cut. Then they lock out the workers and shut the plant down. Doesn't matter who you are or who you work for, that is simply terrible. No Caterpillar products in my store anymore.


Anne
said
0 0

When a foreign company buys a Cdn company and then does that - if ANY funds have been given to them by the Cdn Govt (us) they should be made to return every dime, or OUR Govt seizes all assets.


crjdriver
said
0 0

Kenny old boy, give it a rest. you led your sheep to pasture. well done


fedup
said
0 0

Our government should have better rules and regulations in place for foreign companies in order to protect the employees. Too many company's of late have packed up and left leaving their employees without any notice.Foreign companies should pay our government a monthly fee, like an insurance premium so in the event the company goes belly up or leaves, there's a fund the employees can be paid from


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt speaks in the House of Commons in Ottawa on Monday, May 28, 2012. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Federal government orders end to CP Rail strike

More   51 Comments 51    10 Video(s) 10

Dominic and Abby Maryk were found in Mexico four years after allegedly being abducted by their father.

Extradition sought in Winnipeg missing children case

More   4 Comments 4    3 Video(s) 3

Protesters opposing Quebec student tuition fee hikes demonstrate in Montreal, Sunday, May 27, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Quebec, students resume talks on tuition hikes

More   26 Comments 26    1 Video(s) 1