Top Stories -   

1
A pickup truck passes a mining shovel at an oil sands mine near Fort McMurray, Alta., in this July 9, 2008 photo. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh Peter Kent is seen announcing the new oilsands monitoring plan in Edmonton, Alta., on Friday, Feb. 3, 2012. Oilsands Image.

Feds, Alberta to boost monitoring of oilsands

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Edmonton: Monitoring the oilsands
Politicians pledged more testing, and more transparency, in monitoring the air and water around the oilsands as they announced a $50 million partnership between the province, and federal government. Scott Roberts reports.
Power Play: Oilsands monitoring plan unveiled
Environment Minister Peter Kent and Diana McQueen, the Alberta environment and water minister, discuss the plan to track down the impact oilsands have on the environment and whether this strategy is to help improve the oilsands' negative image.
Power Play: Oilsands need to be monitored
Green Party Leader Green May says she is pleased to hear there will be an oilsands monitoring plan, and explains why this strategy is important.
CTV News Channel: Some skeptical of plan
John Bennett, the executive director of Sierra Club says he wants to know how the oil sands monitoring plan will work and whether it will be enforced.
CTV News Channel: Oilsands impact plan
Mercedes Stephenson says the government is set to reveal the details of their long-awaited plan.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (25) Facebook   

A pickup truck passes a mining shovel at an oil sands mine near Fort McMurray, Alta., in this July 9, 2008 photo. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh Peter Kent is seen announcing the new oilsands monitoring plan in Edmonton, Alta., on Friday, Feb. 3, 2012. Oilsands Image.

Photos

A pickup truck passes a mining shovel at an oil sands mine near Fort McMurray, Alta., in this July 9, 2008 photo. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh

View Larger Image

Date: Fri. Feb. 3 2012 11:08 PM ET

Ottawa and provincial regulators in Alberta will take a greater hand in monitoring the environmental effects of the oilsands, according to a new plan revealed on Friday.

But instead of an independent monitoring system, bureaucrats will chiefly analyze the data -- at least for now.

Environment Minster Peter Kent defended that caveat by noting that the data collected from the monitoring system will be eventually be available to academics and NGOs, in addition to government scientists.

"This will be a much more comprehensive monitoring of water and air and biodiversity," Kent told CTV's Power Play on Friday.

The announcement comes after years of concern that explosive oilsands growth has been permanently altering the landscape and the ecosystem in the region around Fort McMurray, Alta.

Still, Kent said that the data would also be used to defend the industry against a growing public backlash that has seen environmentalists from around the world decry Alberta's oil industry as unsustainable.

"It's not a prosecutorial system, it's a scientific system to dispel an awful lot of the myths and mischaracterizations that we see today."

But Green Party Leader Elizabeth May took issue with Kent's assertions that the oilsands were being unjustly slammed.

While May welcomed the new plan, she noted that what came before was a "negligent lack of monitoring."

May noted that the new system was instigated by scientific data that showed toxic chemicals were seeping into the region's Athabasca River.

"The lack of monitoring constitutes an illegal activity that violated the Fisheries Act on a daily basis," said May.

"I hope they get it right, I think they have to"

Science-based

Kent noted that the plan is based on 18-months of peer-reviewed consultations with scientists and policy makers.

The new monitoring system could be in place as early as the spring. It's expected that there could be 172 monitoring sites in the region around the oilsands. Currently, there are 110 sites.

Officials will also cast a wider net and search for more chemicals and potential pollutants.

"Basically, what we're doing is establishing relevant data upon which to base future regulatory decisions," said Kent, speaking from Edmonton.

The plan will also monitor areas in Saskatchewan and the Northwest Territories and will be paid for by the industry at an estimated cost of $50 million.

While scientists have been monitoring the region for years, Alberta Environment Minister Diana McQueen conceded that its time to take it to the next level.

"We know that we need to do more to up our game in regards to that," she said, adding that she wants to make sure "that as we grow the oilsands and grow the economy in Alberta, that we're also growing environmental management."

When asked what would be the result if a growing number of pollutants are indeed discovered in the wilds of northern Alberta, McQueen was quick to point out that leaders will respond.

"If there are areas that arise … that's the whole point of this system."

With a report from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Prof. Pye Chartt
said

@ Canadian Bob: To be worthy and credible, an "honest case" can only be determined by "honest people" who don't give science, engineering, and technology a back seat to their robotic anti-commercial ideology and anti-Conservative partisanship. You're not fooling anyone but yourself, Bob. If the evidence indicated that a constructed pipeline was essentially "safe" and environmentally benign (no 100% guarantees exist in this world for the extraction, refining, manufacture, and/or transportation of ANY substance), it's pretty obvious that you wouldn't accept the final assessment by Harper & Company. Spare us, then, the phony rationale and bogus political "dare." Thanks.


Frank Buchan
said

Some amusing comments.To the chap wondering if OAS can be cut enough to pay for this -- the article explicitly states it is to be paid for by the industry. So...no connection there, and just more misdirected emotion.As to the value of this plan, the crux of the problem I have with it is that when you don't go third-party (independent of governments, industry and environmental interests) you introduce automatic bias. I have worked with a few large oil interests indirectly, and sadly even when they intend to do what is right, their bottom line interests influence their workers in ways that no amount of policy presentation can change.What is probably saddest about this is that if you lop of both extreme views, somewhere in the middle ground there is an opportunity to develop this resource wisely, well and within a range of acceptable risk. But that will be ignored because the rational people in that middle just don't scream loud enough to be noticed.


Peter
said

"The Harper (oil industry)"Must be nice to be so completely asleep like you are. It's funny how it's all "Alberta's oil" until it comes down to the $20 Billion yearly in transfer payments and $8 billion yearly in federal taxes. Must be nice to be so completely ignorant of the oil sands as to not rememebr Jean Chretien giving the go ahead for the oil sands in the late 70's, or his re-invenstment in them on Canada's behalf only months after signing Kyoto.Face it ken-doll you haven't the foggiest noion about the political landscape in Canada or the oil sands.


DL in Kingston
said

'The plan says aboriginal leaders will be consulted later.' This speaks volumes on how 'real' this oversight will be. But, the Harper Gov't is doing this for Americans who make decision in the states.


back and to the left
said

Will they use the same group of credible people that the tobacco companies used?


Ken
said

The Harper (oil industry) government and the Alberta (oil industry) government crafting environmental policies for the oil industry. We'll certainly see a lot accomplished there (not).


Trevor in High School
said

This sounds pretty reasonable, a lot more sites are being evaluated for more pollutants, and despite what "Island Man" commented before actually reading the article the oil companies are picking up the tab, this is a genuine multilateral agreement that I wish wasn't so unusual in this country these days..


George Thompson
said

Baloney !


Island Man
said

Will OAS Pension Cuts be enough to Pay for this New Agency?


Paul R
said

50 million dollars, where is this money going? Hopefully not to any environuts. These marxist would lke nothing better than to shut down these valuable Canadian Oilsands, that other countries would give anything to own.


D in AB
said

Why are not consulting aboriginal groups now?


Canadian Bob
said

I love this. A new long-awaited plan on the environmental effects of the oilsands. This after all their "XL pipeline" and "cut it through the mountains to the coastline" priorities. Why don't you figure out just what the environmental effects will be, and then present an "honest" case to the people of Canada on this disastrous project. Moved oil is spilled oil. Prove me wrong. I dare you!


Get Real
said

I don't care about the enviro freaks, exploit all that we got,, and dump the UAE, Iran and so on!! Never mind OPEC, produce as much as WE Canadians NEED,, at a much lower price, the enviro freaks can go protest in Middle East with their oil,, we will keep ours!! ANYONE AGREE WITH MY STATEMENT???


JM
said

Regional and local oil sands environmental management had no influence on the US decision regarding KXL. The US is very aware that these are beyond and irrelevant to their jurisdiction.


Always Right
said

Bouah-ha-ha-ha-ha! Alberta and the federal Conservatives are teaming up to ensure the oil industry respects the environment. I don't even know what's in the plan, but does it matter? Look who's running it? Why not put me in charge of making sure no one drinks that case of beer in the fridge. This has no credibility whatsoever. 100% smokescreen by this unethical, biased, dishonest government.


peter in mb
said

I agree 100% with GWH said. I guess you can call me a (neo con) or (centrist minded Canadian). Because that is what leftwing liberals like to call me because I was (formally a liberal) and now (newly conservative). Why? Because I dare to question leftwing liberals who think they have the divine right to rule and have ideas that border line on communism. Also as a neo con I have the same use for leftwing Eco terrorists like Green Peace that I do for ultra right wing anti abortion activists. I have NO use for extremists who try to force their beliefs on other people and resort to breaking the laws of Canada by spiking trees so a lumberjack gets killed when he dose his job, or a women is threatened with physical assault if she wants and abortion. I am a centrist minded Canadian or (neo con) and proud of it.


Mark - Alberta
said

The enviro-freaks won't be happy with this. Unless they completely shut down the industry completely, that is.


Montrose
said

We have Canadian developed technology available to help clean up carbon pollution from the oilsands, if both levels of government would get serious about dealing with it.CO2Solutions.


Van
said

I get a kick out of some folks. They condemn the new program and they don't even know what it entails. Typical


GHW
said

Independent unbiased fact based balanced regulation that allows the industry to move forward and prosper while offering sensible protection of our long term environment, sure sounds good. Just don't let the sky-is-falling anti-capitalist occupiers, otherwise known as environmentalists, anywhere near the process. These folk are nothing short of economic terrorists and should be ignored. Its time we centrist minded Canadians took charge of our future and shut these yahoo's down. The balanced political center is the place to be people. We can't let the radical left or right dominate these discussions.


5th Generation Canadian
said

Rather like setting the Fox and the Coyote to watch the henhouse; isn't it?


pigbone
said

Hey Bob what do you for a living and where do you live I would bet that anything you do you benefit from the oil sands and all the money they give the gov't and all the money sent from Alberta and Saskatchewan to the rest of the country.


Will
said

Cue environuts. Think of it this way: Canadians are cleaning up mother nature's oily mess. Far more will leak out over time than will create contamination through processing and cleanup.


Phillip Martin
said

Incomplete article regrettably.
The oilsands has been monitored since its beginnings by both Provincial and Federal Agencies but the data is based on each companys findings and is not on an up to date electronic format. There are warehouses full of paper from many years but one common overall electronic system is preferable. The implication is that no system exists and that is completely wrong as all workers know. Samples of air and water are taken by helicopter and remotely by off road vehicles.


Bob
said

What a line of crap, they will not track anything just MORE smoke and mirrors


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt speaks in the House of Commons in Ottawa on Monday, May 28, 2012. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Federal government orders end to CP Rail strike

More   51 Comments 51    10 Video(s) 10

Dominic and Abby Maryk were found in Mexico four years after allegedly being abducted by their father.

Extradition sought in Winnipeg missing children case

More   4 Comments 4    3 Video(s) 3

Protesters opposing Quebec student tuition fee hikes demonstrate in Montreal, Sunday, May 27, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Quebec, students resume talks on tuition hikes

More   26 Comments 26    1 Video(s) 1