Top Stories -   

1
facebook timeline, facebnook changes, mark zuckerberg Users can create visual story of their lives on Facebook.

Is Facebook a wise investment?

Viewer

CTV News Video

Canada AM: Benefits from going public
Dave Valliere of the Ted Rogers School of Management describes the benefits a company receives when they go public, and explains what the move means for Facebook users.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (8) Facebook   

facebook timeline, facebnook changes, mark zuckerberg Users can create visual story of their lives on Facebook.

Photos

facebook timeline, facebnook changes, mark zuckerberg

View Larger Image

Date: Tue. Jan. 31 2012 12:07 PM ET

On the eve of Facebook's anticipated initial public offering, is it worth investing in the company that revolutionized the way we connect online?

A report published by the Wall Street Journal Friday has touched off a flurry of speculation that Facebook could file IPO papers with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as early as Wednesday.

In an interview with CTV's Canada AM, IT and finance expert Dave Valliere says the timing of the sale begs the question: why now?

Valliere, who chairs the Ted Rogers School of Management Entrepreneurship and Strategy at Ryerson University in Toronto, says companies will often decide to go public when they need an injection of cash.

"That's useful if you have some great projects in mind. So people think of that as a good signal from the company -- they must have something exciting up their sleeve that they need more money than they already have," Valliere said, suggesting that would give investors might have reason to buy in.

But looking at the nearly eight-year-old company's track record, he would be surprised if that's the case.

"This is not actually known as a particularly innovative company. Somebody had a very clever idea at the beginning of it, but it's not like Google, with its Google Labs on the side constantly inventing new things.

"Facebook just does little incremental improvements, steadily."

So if the IPO is geared to turning the company's stocks liquid, Valliere suggests potential investors think twice.

"It's one thing to be a billionaire on paper, but you can't sell those shares," he said, explaining that selling shares to the public is the best way of turning money on the books into takeaway cash.

When a company's founders are looking to crystallize their wealth, however, it's time to ask questions about the future of the company.

But if you do decide you want to own a piece of Facebook, it's hard to get in on that initial sale.

"The investment bank that runs the process will give them to their friends -- big investment funds, big pension funds and people like that," Valliere said.

Only then might those initial investors turn around and sell shares to the public.

Based on Valliere's analysis, however, waiting until the dust settles might be wise.

Calling the company "grossly-overvalued," Valliere told Canada AM that a valuation of between $75 and $100 billion would see Facebook trading five times higher than Apple and 3 times higher than Google. Combine that with a price-earnings ratio of 80 -- compared to Google's 19 and Apple's 12.7 -- and Valliere says Facebook's stock might not hold up after a first-day pop.

Speculation that a Facebook IPO could raise as much as $10 billion dollars, ranks the company among the world's 25 largest and the biggest ever for a U.S. Internet company.

Google currently holds that record, after raising a total of $1.9 billion -- including shares sold by early investors as well as extra stock issued to meet the heavy demand -- and grabbing a market value of $23 billion when it went public in 2004. Google's market cap now stands at $190 billion -- down from a peak of approximately $235 billion in November 2007.

It's not known whether Facebook's $10 billion IPO target includes early investors' shares.

Facebook, famously started by Mark Zuckerberg and his Harvard college roommates in 2004, now has more than 500 investors with a stake in the company.

Since the company passed the 500-shareholder mark in 2011, U.S. rules require it to open its books by late April of this year. That's fuelled speculation the company will try to time its IPO to reap some financial reward from disclosing its quarterly financial results and other details.

Forbes magazine has pegged 27-year-old Zuckerberg's net worth at $17.5 billion, mostly drawn from trading in the company's limited stock.

In Valliere's view, whether you think the company is a good investment or not, owning a share in the company would at least give you bragging rights over the man who Time magazine named its 2010 person of the year.

"You get the fun of saying I'm part-owner of Facebook -- he (Zuckerberg) works for me."

Comments are now closed for this story

A Koster
said

I've never been tempted to use Facebook or Twitter for that matter.. which is even worse.. but then I've been comping since early 90's and got caught up in the Newsgroups for a year or two.. if anybody remembers those.. road to nowhere.. used programs like ICQ with phone, and Roger Wilco and so on. Seriously, I've never really understood how Facebook is soooo revolutionary and to me, it has serious security and privacy issues... hype begets fads and fads fade away... besides, it's old now.. definitely not worth investing in.


Shane
said

Jump in on the start up sell after a few months make some money and bail before everyone realizes they bought a whole lot of nothing.


Gorg
said

@ Prof Pye Chart, oh no!! "Societal disease, mentally detached, curious, boring, meddling, nosy, unhip lemmings, uncompetitive, narcistic, mental chewing gum for losers". Ow, ow, ow!! That's a full load!! LOLAll kidding aside, it does take up a lot of time. But that's beside the point. Question is, why do they need anyone else's money when they are worth billions?? As far as I'm concerned, they're doing more than just fantastic! As they say on the Dragon's Den "where's the money". Sure there are sales! What's my return on investment? What's the debt load? Is it overvalued? Til the questions are anwered by Facebook, I'm out!


Syl
said

Not a good or safe investment for the long term. FB has no substance and makes or gives nothing of value. Like the fad that it is, it too shall 'go it's way' and disapear from our lives.


There was a time...
said

At some point in its' life, FB would be a sound investment, and to some extent it still is. Along the same lines as fur traders and cosmetic companies that test on animals. Case in point, the Flash games that now tell you they will be sending advertisements on your behalf to all your friends. So if you don't mind how the company earns its' money, then yes FB is a good investment. If you would prefer not to associate with spammers, then I say go elsewhere.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

I was told many years ago to favor investments in companies that I understood and products that I valued and respected. (That's why I bought into Google in the very beginning. I used it each day, and thought it was superior. Simple as that.) Facebook, however, is a social-media phenomenon that I don't really get. I view it largely as a symptom of societal disease rather than a functional benefit to our modern way of life. Too many detached, nosy, curious, bored, meddling, competitive, and narcissistic goofballs surround it, and use it to facilitate their head issues. Businesses, like unhip lemmings, try to make sense of it but fail more often than not. Facebook is basically mental chewing gum for losers, in my opinion. Its IPO may well represent a dandy investment, but I'll be passing purely on principle.


Paul ~ Kitchener
said

One answer & its simple ~ "NO" !


Mq
said

"This is not actually known as a particularly innovative company. Somebody had a very clever idea at the beginning of it, but it's not like Google, with its Google Labs on the side constantly inventing new things." This is exactly why. They are riding a single idea. What happens next year, or heck the day after it goes public, when someone invents the new 'hot social' buzz. To simply invest in popularity is foolish. Beyond the site, there are no R&D or liquid owning's to draw from. I'm honestly surprised it has lasted as long as it has. It's only a matter of time before Google puts all of its might behind a mega android phone that will bye pass face book all together. It opened the world's eyes to the possibilities of social programming. However you do not have to look much further then RIM to know what thinking your the top and can't be touched gets you, to see how foolish such an investment is. Keep your investments to gold and oil. Anything 'internet based' is more then high risk, it's reckless.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt speaks in the House of Commons in Ottawa on Monday, May 28, 2012. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Federal government orders end to CP Rail strike

More   51 Comments 51    10 Video(s) 10

Dominic and Abby Maryk were found in Mexico four years after allegedly being abducted by their father.

Extradition sought in Winnipeg missing children case

More   4 Comments 4    3 Video(s) 3

Protesters opposing Quebec student tuition fee hikes demonstrate in Montreal, Sunday, May 27, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Quebec, students resume talks on tuition hikes

More   26 Comments 26    1 Video(s) 1