Top Stories -   

1

After 400 years, is technology rendering KJV redundant?

The Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams poses for photographers with the 400 year old King James Bible at Lambeth Palace Library's newest exhibition in London, Wednesday, May 25, 2011. Lambeth Palace Library's new exhibition 'Out of the Original Sacred Tongues', which is open until July 29, 2011, celebrates the 400th anniversary of the King James Version. King James Bible; Bible
The Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams poses for photographers with the 400 year old King James Bible at Lambeth Palace Library's newest exhibition in London, Wednesday, May 25, 2011. Lambeth Palace Library's new exhibition 'Out of the Original Sacred Tongues', which is open until July 29, 2011, celebrates the 400th anniversary of the King James Version.

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (22) Facebook   

Date: Friday Dec. 30, 2011 4:33 PM ET

More than four centuries ago, the invention of the printing press revolutionized the written word and made it possible for the then-brand new King James Version of the Bible to become the most widely-distributed book on the planet and the definitive translation of the scriptures.

That book, complete with its thees and thous and strange idioms and expressions transplanted from another era, had a profound and unprecedented influence on the way English-speaking people thought, spoke and viewed the world.

Now, as English-speaking Christians mark the 400th anniversary of the KJV's birth in 1611, technology is once again dramatically changing the way the Bible is read and interacted with, changing the very way Christians interpret their faith.

"'Please tap to Matthew 1:1" may be what we hear from the pulpit some day,'" said Mark Stephenson, author of "Web-Empowered Ministry" and a consultant who helps churches adapt to the era of the Internet, social media, and devices such as tablets and smart phones.

"Technology is taking the Bible to new levels of convenient access and interactive understanding. Paper Bibles have physical limitations that limit where it can be, and when it can be read. The complete Bible text is now available online, on a computer, and on e-readers, tablets, phones," he said.

And though the King James Version may have been considered the definitive English translation for hundreds of years, there are now plenty of other widely accepted, accurate and modern translations that are readily available at the fingertips of anyone online.

Stephenson, who is based in Ohio, said he uses his Android smart phone to access the Bible in any number of different translations at any given time. It's always in his pocket.

"The Bible is literally always at my finger tips and only a few taps away," Stephenson told CTVNews.ca in an interview conducted, perhaps appropriately, over email.

"The Bible app I use has an audio option as well. All I need to do is click on 'play' and the scripture is read out loud and I can follow along reading the text."

Maps, concordances and a search tool are all there too, along with reading plans that help the user get through the Bible in a year, or functions that allow group discussion of passages and online Bible studies.

And in the very near future, Stephenson predicts, electronic Bibles will become even more interactive and integrated, with a focus on linking to interactive resources and creating social networks among believers, outside the walls of the church.

"This is the next big leap in delivery of the Word of God since the printing press," he said.

"The interactive and connected Bible of the near future will bring us the Word of God in the way that we can each understand it the best and will include options to explore deeper and to connect with others to study together and to learn together."

KJV a unifying, binding force?

Interestingly, the King James Version of the Bible accomplished many of those same goals 400 years ago.

Though previous English translations such as the Geneva Bible were already in existence, it was the official version authorized by King James himself that would quickly become widely available throughout the entire far-flung English-speaking world.

Within 100 years of the first versions coming off the printing press, copies had radiated out from England to Scotland, Wales, Ireland, the wilds of North America, India, the West Indies, parts of Asia and virtually anywhere else the English language was spoken.

"It became one of the few things that bound together the increasingly diverse and far-flung English speaking world," said Ian Henderson a religious studies professor and translation expert at McGill University.

The ubiquitous nature of the KJV allowed Christians in all those places to possess their own copy of the scriptures and to interpret it in whatever context they found themselves, from a lonely diplomatic posting in British-ruled India, to the Wild West of America. It also helped create a deep sense of community among believers who could come together to read, discuss and interpret the words that formed the foundation of their faith – regardless of whether they were anywhere near a church.

"It had a deep social value," Henderson said, explaining that for most of the last 400 years the KJV was used as a sort of reverse dictionary and was often the text with which people learned to read and comprehend the written word.

In many homes, he said, it was read aloud on a daily basis during family devotions.

As a result, the KJV deeply informed the way Westerners viewed the world.

"Regardless of which community you belonged to within the English-speaking world, regardless of your beliefs to a large extent, this text would be the text you would use to think and speak about all sorts of deep realities, certainly about God but also sports and whatever else came to mind," he said.

"No matter what you believed you were able to think in words that came from St. Paul, no matter what you believed you thought the 'truth would set you free,' which is Jesus speaking in John's gospel."

That commonality of thought, language and belief throughout the English-speaking world no longer exists to the same degree, but the KJV's footprints are evident everywhere throughout Western art, culture and language.

Whenever someone walks on "streets paved with gold," dies of "a broken heart," realizes that "a leopard cannot change its spots" or admits that "the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak," they pay tribute to the KJV and the scholars who translated it.

In fact, those scholars took great pains to translate the original Greek and Hebrew scriptures as accurately and as literally as possible -- even when the words didn't necessarily make sense in the culture of the time.

Many expressions that sounded foreign and awkward 400 years ago ("by the skin of his teeth" comes to mind) have now been adopted into common English and are used daily by people who have no idea they are quoting the KJV.

Rather than simply remove the awkwardly-translated expressions and phrases and replace them with more modern and contextual language, as later translators did, the translators recruited by King James I sought to preserve the style and tone of the original writings, while at the same time ensuring the average reader could understand the message, Henderson said.

"There was a deep sense that much of this is poetry, God-given, and it isn't supposed to sound like you just wrote it yourself, it isn't supposed to sound too familiar and cozy and comfy."

Internet era a "stage" in the Bible's evolution

With a history of printing the KJV that is almost as old as the book itself, the University of Cambridge's story is deeply intertwined with the official translation authorized by King James I.

The first edition rolled off the Cambridge University Press in 1629, followed by a second edition in 1638 -- both of which are considered formative in the process of revising the original 1611 text.

The university has maintained its copyright to publish the KJV -- one of a select few publishers granted rights from the monarchy -- and is now the longest continuous publisher of the Bible.

For hundreds of years, that didn't change much, said Chris Wright, Bibles director at the Cambridge University Press.

He told CTVNews.ca that printing technology improved over the years, mistakes became less frequent and slight variations were made to the text to improve its readability. And Cambridge came up with hundreds of different editions, sizes and bindings to meet various market demands for the wildly popular book.

But for the most part, the KJV just kept rolling off the presses and people kept buying it.

Four hundreds of years, he said simply, "the Bible was the KJV."

"It was probably never even referred to as the King James Version because up until the end of the 19th century it was simply the only version, it was the only one people knew about in English."

Not surprisingly, old Cambridge catalogues show numerous versions of the KJV available for order, across a wide spectrum of sizes, styles and prices, he said.

But in the last 50 years or less, Cambridge has had to adapt its business strategy when it comes to printing the Bible, Wright said.

"It's no longer the case that the KJV is the Bible of choice," he said.

Cambridge now publishes as many as 10 different translations of the Bible, from the English Standard Version to the New International Version and the Revised English Bible. In fact, the KJV makes up just a tiny fraction of those Bibles, mostly in high-end, specialty editions for a niche market.

"We continue to publish the (King James Version of the) Bible for reasons of historical continuity more than anything else. We've been doing it quite a long time and we'll continue to keep doing it for a long time," Wright told CTVNews.ca from Cambridge, England.

The university has no plans to enter the digital age when it comes to the KJV. Others are already doing that and doing it well, and Wright said the university has decided to stay focused on its area of expertise -- the publication of fine printed products.

However, the KJV remains the "cornerstone" of Cambridge's Bibles division, he said, and the Cambridge University Press has produced three new editions in 2011 to reflect that, including a "flipback" style version -- the first of its kind in the U.K.

Perhaps surprisingly, given his role at Cambridge, Wright said he's not saddened by the KJV's diminished place on the world stage and the role technology is playing in shaping the future of the Bible.

It's simply the latest development, he said, in the evolution of the book many consider to be the most influential piece of literature ever written.

"The Achbishop of Canterbury (Dr. Rowan Williams) spoke about it last month and he reminded people that the translators of the King James Version were not themselves intending or expecting to produce a definitive edition of the Bible," Wright said.

"They wanted to make a good version even better. He made that point. It's a stage on the path, it's not fixed for all time but actually a developmental stage. The KJV is not the end of the process, but part of it."

Follow Andy Johnson on Twitter @AJinTO


Comments are now closed for this story

Canadian Bob
said
0 0

Sorry Jeremy. Your comments are exactly what Christopher Hiutchens was speaking about. His writings upset "Christians" who can only retaliate by quoting the scriptures. Hitchens comments are based on proven fact. The Bible is not. And Luke "anything" proves absolutely nothing. To say he was deluded and opinionated sound awfully opinionated to me.


Sam C
said
0 0

@Bob... you have said it yourself: "those teachings have been misused under the guise of "christianity". The Bible itself is not the problem, it is the MISUSE of the Bible that is the problem.


Albert
said
0 0

Some people say the bible isn't relevant today. But it still is. Regarding C Hitchens, the bible said over a thousand years ago, "See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world rather than on Christ." - Col 2:8


Jeremy
said
0 0

Bob: Christopher Hitchens was a deluded, opinionated blow-hard. Now that he's dead, I'll bet he would give anything to let people know he was wrong (after meeting God face-to-face the moment after he died). There is an example of this in the bible where a dead man wanted to go back and warn his family. See Luke 16: 19-31


Canadian Bob
said
0 0

There's nothing sanctimonious about my earlier comment, and for those who believe otherwise, I have read the Bible. I do not disagree with many of its teachings, however one cannot deny that those teachings have been misused under the guise of "christianity" to foster hatred, engage in religious wars and further divide mankind like so many other faith based scriptures. Like myself, some will say the Bible has failed in getting its messages across. With consideration given to diminishing congregations in so many churches and the lack of christian morals in society, it is hard to believe that the Bible has been anything close to a success. I wouldn't dare to tell anyone how to lead their life. I have my beliefs, and I live my life in accordance with that belief, on the other hand, I have had so-called "christians" engaging in very non-christian behaviour interfering in my life for as long as I can remember. Perhaps reading Christopher Hitchens' book God Is Not Great will provide a perspective more in tune with reality?


Simon
said
0 0

The bible is one of the most intact books of the ancients. With so many copies in existence, it's easy to see that it hasn't been changed by man over the years. Yes, there are many translations, but like translating any language from one to another, there are types of translations (such as word for word, thought for thought, concept for concept), but that doesn't alter the original text or its meanings.


Alison
said
0 0

The notion that the bible has caused many of the world's wars is silly. A quick look throughout history shows that most wars were started by pride, greed, and power-seeking. Even if you look at the last 100 years, it doesn't take long to see people cause wars, not what's in the bible.


Chris in Edmonton
said
0 0

Well said Canadian Bob. The bible has been at the root of many conflicts throughout history. And not just this version either. There are many religous writings that have been interpreted in many different ways. Take the Koran for instance. It is actually a very peace loving scripture but we don't see that in todays world.It is almost impossible to see how many times the bible has been translated improperly throughout the last 200 years. It was left open to an individuals interpretation many times in the past and it would have been easy for these people to include their own opinions while copying it.


leftwingpinko
said
0 0

lets hope it's rendering religion defunct


JR
said
0 0

Canadian Bob: The Bible much like a gun has no volition and can do nothing of it’s own. It is more of a user problem. The Beatle’s song Helter Skelter was supposedly a motivating factor in Charles Manson’s murder of Sharon Tate, and yet the song did not incite this behaviour in others. We must take responsibility for our own actions and stop blaming books and songs and aliens! We are violent by nature and that is what needs to be addressed.JK: No matter how you word it, anyone who thinks that they will be saved because of their actions while others will perish in eternal damnation is self righteous. I imagine the “chosen” will be terribly disappointed when they realize that “everything will work out and it will work out for EVERYONE!”


Pip
said
0 0

For four centuries the "hard copy" version has been the choice of most readers of the bible. It is there, solid in your hands. While a digital version is convenient for a spur-of-the-moment reference, as has been pointed out, what happens if the 'Net goes down. Already we suffer from older computer media and programs being no longer accessible because of format changes in storage media and programming languages. Do any of those old programs punched out on paper tape run on modern machines? Were they even converted to later media like punch card, magnetic tape, floppy disk, hard disk, CD-ROM? How much has been lost because of the need to move to "new, improved" means of data storage? The hard copy of the King James Version will remain - unless some politically correct government decide that all religious books should be burned. Even then, they would never get every copy, leaving it and the holy texts of other religions to be available to future generations.


Manitoban
said
0 0

I'm with Canadian Bob, Unlike some of the posters here, I've actually studied the bible (don't confuse that with "read it"...I attended an acredited bible college, and spent 30 years in post credit study), I also hold several degrees in culture. The collection of various writings that have been "man compiled" into what we call the bible are hardly unique, and are of dubious origins and authorships. Also, they are not nearly the oldest religious writings and so hardly supportable as authoritative.If you want to claim the bible is an extrodinary book, and the word of god, you do so out of faith...not reason or evidence. For the rest of the world, it has been a highly devisive tool that has led to a tremendous sense of entitlement to its followers...not unlike most "holy" writings from any religious sect.


JJ Calgary
said
0 0

Got my Bible on my iPad!


Lynn
said
0 0

I'm inspired by this article! I plan to read through the Bible in 2012 in the New International Version. It's such an important text, I must read through it completely at some point in my life.


KEVIN
said
0 0

@Canadian Bob - so sanctimonious. You know the biggest problem with your sanctimonious comment is that you are doing exactly what you complain against. Are you going to tell us which messages we should follow or can I tell you which messages you should follow. The problem is not with the Bible, but with us and our inability to do what is right all the time, and our inability to know right all the time. For that very reason the Bible is needed, whether your conscience is agreeable to it or not.


Terry
said
0 0

JK: Well said!! I agree completely. Bob: Take time to read it with the intent in which it was written. The Bible is the most amazing book on earth, no matter the form (paper, electronic, audio, etc.)


JK
said
0 0

To the poster named "Canadian Bob"The Bible has not failed, only individuals who failed or refused to follow the true spirit of its teachings. No book on Earth has such sublime beauty and specifics on teaching how to love, and whether you believe it or not, the God of Israel does promise eternal life to those who he deems worthy of such a gift, if they can apply the "hard doctrines" such as forgiveness (i.e. 77 x 7), love your enemies and praying for them who use you. A true Christian who understands the Bible will not feel a sense of pride of haughtiness as some chosen vessel. They will feel an inner humility when they grasp the difficulty of trying to live by God's standards in this world, and will feel a sense of profound gratitude that translates into joy for the privilege of being able to try.


Canadian Bob
said
0 0

While the Bible contains a multitude of messages that man should follow, it is also one of the most bastardized and misinterpreted publications out there. It's words, like the words of many other religious teachings have resulted in needless wars, countless deaths, discrimination and hatred beyond our comprehension as followers take it upon themselves to enforce their misguided beliefs on the rest of mankind. The book, while perhaps full of good teachings has failed to do its job. No matter where or how it is made available, it will continue to divide the masses by granting many a "self-induced" sense of undeserved privilege.


Al
said
0 0

The 400 year book in the photo will be around longer than any of our modern technology will be. All we have to do is see how the advancement of media has come and gone in the last 100 years. From the rotating gramaphone cylinder to cds. Most of this technology is obsolete and in a fragile state. Cellulose magnetic tape for example. How stable is a cd? Will there be a device still operating in 400 years that will play this media? What happens if the WWW crashes and data is gone? The dead sea scrolls were miraculously somewhat preserved by luck mostly. Historians are curators of precious information. Are humans not going to be reading in the future but being dictated to by an avatar?


Mark Lewis
said
0 0

I have several including the Original 1611 and I read them all the time.


KEVIN
said
0 0

The KJV is a translation of the original manuscripts, but certainly not the oldest of translations. It may be the most enduring translation in the English world, and sufficed for the church for four hundred years. People do need to understand tday that there are good solid translations of the original manuscripts, and there are paraphrases, mock interpretations and several poorly translated versions of the english bible out there too.


GB
said
0 0

Check out youversion.com


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt speaks in the House of Commons in Ottawa on Monday, May 28, 2012. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Federal government orders end to CP Rail strike

More   51 Comments 51    7 Video(s) 7

Dominic and Abby Maryk were found in Mexico four years after allegedly being abducted by their father.

Extradition sought in Winnipeg missing children case

More   4 Comments 4    3 Video(s) 3

Protesters opposing Quebec student tuition fee hikes demonstrate in Montreal, Sunday, May 27, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Quebec, students resume talks on tuition hikes

More   26 Comments 26    1 Video(s) 1