Top Stories -   

1
In this Feb. 28, 2008 file photo, rail cars arrive in Milton, N.D., loaded with pipe for TransCanada's Keystone Pipeline project, which carries crude oil across Saskatchewan and Manitoba, and through North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri and Illinois. (Grand Forks Herald, Eric Hylden THE CANADIAN PRESS / AP) This map shows the proposed Keystone XL pipeline route, which originates in Hardisty, Alta., then cuts diagonally across the southwest corner of Manitoba before entering the U.S. (TransCanada) Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman gestures during a news conference in Lincoln, Neb., Thursday, Nov. 10, 2011, in which he announced that the U.S. State Department wants TransCanada to explore rerouting its proposed Keystone XL pipeline. (AP / Nati Harnik) pipeline, keystone XL, protesters, Parliament Hill pipeline, keystone XL, protesters, Parliament Hill This map shows the proposed Keystone XL pipeline route, which originates in Hardisty, Alta., then cuts diagonally across the southwest corner of Manitoba before entering the U.S. (TransCanada)

Harper 'disappointed' with U.S. pipeline decision

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Decision postponed
The Keystone XL pipeline project has been delayed until further notice by the U.S. state department. Many are wondering if the pipeline still has a chance. Janet Dirks has more.
CTV National News: Digging deeper on delay
CTV's Chief political correspondent Craig Oliver discusses possible reasons for the pipeline delay.
CTV Edmonton: Pipeline project hit with delay
The U.S. State Department has put the brakes on the Keystone XL pipeline project, calling for a review. The province said it's disappointed, but environmentalists are celebrating the small victory. Bill Fortier reports.
CTV Calgary: Keystone XL delayed
The U.S. is ordering review of TransCanada's route for Keystone XL pipeline. Reg Hampton reports.
Power Play: Keystone decision delayed
Michelle Rempel, the parliamentary secretary to the environmental minister, Megan Leslie, an NDP environmental critic, and Elizabeth May, the Green Party Leader discuss Keystone and the delayed decision and the many disappointments and concerns.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (75) Facebook   

In this Feb. 28, 2008 file photo, rail cars arrive in Milton, N.D., loaded with pipe for TransCanada's Keystone Pipeline project, which carries crude oil across Saskatchewan and Manitoba, and through North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri and Illinois. (Grand Forks Herald, Eric Hylden THE CANADIAN PRESS / AP) This map shows the proposed Keystone XL pipeline route, which originates in Hardisty, Alta., then cuts diagonally across the southwest corner of Manitoba before entering the U.S. (TransCanada) Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman gestures during a news conference in Lincoln, Neb., Thursday, Nov. 10, 2011, in which he announced that the U.S. State Department wants TransCanada to explore rerouting its proposed Keystone XL pipeline. (AP / Nati Harnik) pipeline, keystone XL, protesters, Parliament Hill pipeline, keystone XL, protesters, Parliament Hill This map shows the proposed Keystone XL pipeline route, which originates in Hardisty, Alta., then cuts diagonally across the southwest corner of Manitoba before entering the U.S. (TransCanada)

Photos

In this Feb. 28, 2008 file photo, rail cars arrive in Milton, N.D., loaded with pipe for TransCanada's Keystone Pipeline project, which carries crude oil across Saskatchewan and Manitoba, and through North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri and Illinois. (Grand Forks Herald, Eric Hylden THE CANADIAN PRESS / AP)

View Larger Image

Date: Thu. Nov. 10 2011 9:45 PM ET

Prime Minister Stephen Harper is "disappointed" with news that Washington will delay a decision on whether to approve TransCanada's controversial Keystone XL pipeline project.

The U.S. State Department announced in a statement on Thursday that due to "national concern ... the department has determined it is necessary to examine in-depth alternative routes."

Under the current proposal, the pipeline would traverse Nebraska's Sandhills region and an aquifer that's a source of water for several states -- something that has been of particular concern to environmentalists lobbying against the project.

The review could be completed "as early as the first quarter of 2013," the State Department said, which would be months after the next presidential election.

TransCanada's proposed pipeline would funnel crude from the oilsands in northern Alberta to refineries in Texas, 2,700 kilometres away.

The Prime Minister's Office issued a statement shortly after learning of the delay, expressing dissatisfaction.

"We are disappointed with today's decision," the statement said. "We continue to believe the Keystone XL pipeline will create thousands of jobs and billions in economic growth on both sides of the border."

The move also prompted criticism from newly elected Alberta Premier Alison Redford, who pledged to visit Washington next week to lobby for the $7-billion project.

But U.S. President Barack Obama praised the decision, saying in a statement that it's necessary since the project "could affect the health and safety of the American people as well as the environment."

Opposition MPs in Ottawa also welcomed the decision.

New Democrat environment critic Megan Leslie noted that exports of crude from the oilsands have run into regulatory trouble in both U.S. and in Europe.

"Right now, we are laughing stocks. We are being told no repeatedly," she said on CTV's Power Play.

For months, protesters ranging from environmentalists to farmers have been lining up against the proposed pipeline. As recently as Sunday a crowd of thousands gathered near the White House in the hopes of pressuring Obama to scrap the project.

The decision to review the pipeline's route takes political heat off Obama, who runs the risk of angering environmental groups if he approves it, and angering labour and business groups if he blocks it.

TransCanada argues that a delay would cost the company millions of dollars and keep thousands of workers from taking jobs building the pipeline.

But on Thursday, TransCanada CEO Russ Girling said in a statement on Thursday that he's confident the contentious pipeline will eventually be built.

"This project is too important to the U.S. economy, the Canadian economy and the national interest of the United States for it not to proceed," he said.

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

alehic
said

Why don't we just build our own pipeline from west to east and stop importing oil?


Downey
said

To the people who say, "The US doesn't want our oil." That is not the case whatsoever!!! It's not the US that doesn't want the oil/pipeline, it's Obama and the fringe left wing nuts. Please don't lump all of the US together with this decision. Things aren't going to get better until Obama is booted from office.Worst President EVER...yes, that includes Carter.


kat
said

This is what is called a 'political action".Obama wants to keep his job for another four years.Oh yeah where were all those jobs he promised. Fooled again America.This is a prime example of the few dictating to the many.


Cynical
said

I wonder how many of those saying "build the pipeline to the east" or "build the pipeline to the west" or " build new refineries in Canada and export the finished product" would actually be on board were the pipeline to pass close to their home, or the refinery be built up-wind of them? NIMBY comes to mind.


Shawn
said

I don't blame the Americans one bit for not wanting an oil pipeline going over an aquifer that supplies severals states. In fact I envy them for having the balls for standing up and fighting of such a serious issue - we Canadians can learn a thing or two from them because we just take it all the time.


mamapeggie
said

Will I guess now all the oil the US needs will have to go by rail and truck, cause that's so environmentally sound. Why don't these protestors think beyond their noses!!!!


emilio.bruno
said

Here's an idea, Move the refineries to Alberta. Why let the Americans' get all the jobs? Keep them in Canada, it's our Crude!


Mark in Newmarket
said

This is a purely political motivated decision that Obama was made to make and he really had no choice. At the moment, the media and a handful of fundamentalists have made this pipeline appear to be the end of civilization as we know it. Obama is doing whatever he can to appease the voters knowing that next years election maybe a huge loss for him personally since he is sitting so low in the polls now. This pipeline will eventually will go through regardless of what these fundamentalists think, it is going to be a necessity for the US if they want to stop buying oil from countries that they deem as unstable and Canada and our resources are there only key to stop bringing oil offshore from these countries.


Robert B
said

And Canadians we now diversify our assets westward.!!! How do these American Partial owners think they can change this??!! Give them hell Steve!!!


john mapplebeck
said

why would any sane person want to put a pipeline in a water system, bloody morons thats who


frank
said

Why we are not building our own refinery up in the north, instead of selling our oil like some African country...The cost can't be higher than the pipe line. Let the Americans whine ...


Great News!!!!!!
said

Now lets build a mega refinery in Canada and sell the distillates to the Yanks for a profit. Keep the jobs in Canada!!!


Gloria
said

Climate change has been directly linked to, the burning of fossil fuels. We will eventually run out of fossil fuels. We should be investing in renewable energy now.How many more off shore rigs exploding, tanker spills, poisoned air, contaminated rivers, streams and lands from pipeline bursts will it take, for common sense to trump greed? Fracking for gas, uses obscene amounts of water. It poisons the underground water for absolute miles. people can even light the water of fire, coming out of their faucets.Scientists have found acid in the ocean, right up to the shores of BC. They were stunned. They thought the acid way out in the deep. The acid eventually eats the shells off the crustaceans. Our coral is turning white. Our oceans are dying from, an overdose of Carbon Monoxide. This is a serious wake-up call. If we don't get rid of fossil fuels, the planet will get rid of us. In the future there will be wars, over food and clean drinking water. Water is a dirty a business as oil. Read: the Water War Crimes.


Vern in Alberta
said

So the Americans don't want the pipeline, here is a solution. Shut off the oil, not one drop will be sold there. Not one cubic metre of natural gas will be sold to the U.S. China will buy all we can produce. Let the Americans buy their oil and gas from the Middle East, from countries that finance terrorism, the ones who fly aircraft into office towers. And if there is a coup in the countries that supply oil, and their supply is cut off, remember that the oil here is dirty and you did not want it. Hope President Obama wakes up, smells the coffee and realizes that Alberta is a safe secure supply that is friendly to their country.


Maggie in Calgary
said

See, that's ok. It is better for Canada to refine the oil in Canada. A pipeline through the U.S.would just promote over processing of the oilsands without boosting Cnadian economy.


Parker Brown
said

With this kind of investment a greater number of jobs could be generated in renewable energy technology.


B.C Ottawa
said

This is for Bruno: each job from alternative energy greated by Mr. McGuinty is costing the taxpayers of Ontario $250000. Wonderful


rawcanadian
said

This could be very good for us, that the US is willing to balk and take a knife to their own economic throat, because our own Canadian folk may be even more incented to build proper refining in Canada. That's why this line is necessary, to refine our raw product and are we not sick of simply flowing our raw resource out of country? This is not "oil to keep for Canada" so far as it is unrefined. Lets build up our own value-add infrastructure and get busy refining our own product!


JakeSmith
said

BSE and softwood lumber taught us that the Americans are not our friends and they're unreliable partners We need to go to the west coast with this oil and get it into Asia to hedge our bets.


JPC
said

instead of building a $7 billion pipeline to ship crude south why don't we spend that money and build our own refineries and create the jobs in this country?


Jason Calgary
said

Let's take a few things away from this decision. First, if the US decides to cancel the project then the oil stays in Canada for processing or gets pipelined to ports to be shipped overseas. Winner: Canada; Loser: USA. Second, USA has to get their oil from overseas. Winner: foreign governments & oil funded terrorists; Loser: USA. Third, the US economy crashes even further because of the lack of jobs and investment in major projects. Winner: up for grabs; Loser: USA. Finally, US Oil companies will look to Canada for investment and production possibilities leading to more jobs and wealth in Canada. Winner: Canada; Loser: USA.

So tell me again why they are against this? The environment? Please! They have more environmental issues already than this project will ever create. And any problems that do occur would be cleaned up faster than Bill Clinton's dates' dress.


Pippa Martins-St. Onge
said

The posturing over this pipeline is all Political in nature. It will be built, that has already been assured. One only needs to look at the photos showing the stockpiled pipe.


Bob
said

Boo whoooo harper


P. Reed
said

Score one for the environment! Finally! Maybe we will have more green energy in place before this review is over and the pipeline will be irrelevent. Here's hoping!


Vince
said

I doubt the pipeline will proceed given the economics. This is likely a watershed moment in our relationship with the US. To my American friends I can say today, 60% of your oil comes from countries your State Department tells you not to visit. Places like Iran, Saudi, Qatar, Iraq, Venezuela, Nigeria. Worst of all you are funding Iran's desire to build atomic weapons that will surely destabilize the planet. Nice. Our Prime Minister's job now is to ensure there is an export pipeline from Alberta to the ports that can service the Far East... no studies or protests - let's just get it done. Then I believe the oil currently flowing South should be quietly diverted West.


PDinVIC
said

Great news! Now let's not let them chnage their mind. Let's ensure we protct the land from any possible oil disaster and if we need oil we have it for Canada.


Gilbert in Kelowna
said

Thank you Elizabeth May for the thoughtful, researched responses. I don't care if you are for or against the pipe line: Don't you wish Conservative MPs would actually answer a question when asked?


The View from Niagara
said

Obama keeps digging himself into a hole by appeasing the fringe left. It'll be good riddance for his sorry presidency shortly...


Mac
said

well if the US doesn't want our business, we shouldn't be hounding them in desperation for it when clearily they don't need it and CLEARILY don't WANT it.
Well, there's two countries: China and India that are desperate for it, and would gladly take it. So.. how bout we build a much shorter pipeline to export to Asia where the markets are more in our favour?


R. E. Lee, Cold Lake, AB
said

What we need to know now is, how much does the Chinese government want to invest in the Northern Gateway pipeline from Alberta to BC ?


Dave in Alberta
said

O.K., if they don't want our oil, I for one, don't want to support them. I'm buying my gasoline from Canadian companies from now on, like Husky, Mohawk, and Petro-Canada. Time to build to the west coast of B.C..


Doug
said

Very good decision, now we can get on with doing something here while the US plays the Obama re-election tune. They won't do anything until after 2012.

We could use at least two new refineries.

One in the north of AB,Sask or Man and one in the East for On and PQ.


Point Break
said

The White House delays Keystone XL decision, directly mentioning CLIMATE CHANGE not just new route. This is a very big deal. Next pipeline to be blocked is Enbridge's proposed Northern Gateway pipeline through the Great Bear Rainforest! Bring it on!


Richard
said

This is when the special interest groups representing the small minority win against the will of the majority. Remeber kids, who runs the government exactly??


bruno
said

So the government thinks that this is too bad since it could have created thousands of jobs. If they gave the same incentives to alternative energy sources as they do the oil industry, e.g. faster capital depreciation, $800m for CCS(as opposed to $400m for alternative sources), then perhaps we would see thousands of jobs in the alternative energy industry. But what would one expect from a government that is pro big oil anyway?


Getyouroilsomewhereelse
said

Just a thought - maybe we should keep our oil, refine it ourselves and supply it to Canadians first, then gouge Americans at the pump rather than the other way around.


charlie
said

Business as usual south of the border - never take a controversial stand in an election year. Everyone who has his head screwed on straight knows the pipeline will be built - just not approved when too many folks can be upset. Delaying allows the environmentalists to pat themselves on the back for stopping it (sure they did) and labour, who are more realistic, to say that it has been delayed, not killed, so there are jobs in the pipeline (pun intended). A fine example of doing what is best for the President and the Democratic Party, rather than for the American people. Too bad that Obama is stuck in campaign mode, and not leading!


Bob in Chatham
said

Why can't we build a big refinery and ship the US the finished product. Keep the jobs, and the revenue in Canada !


Joel
said

It's insane that we send crude down to be refined and then buy back the processed oil and gas. It would cost billions to build refineries in Canada and refineries obviously need to be built in the right places, but isn't it better for us in the long term?


Mea
said

Looks to me like that pipeline would create more jobs in Canada with the new route! And, considering my husband is a welder in SK, we'd love the extra work. I say just add a liner to the project to protect against spills and allow for easier collection of the oil if it does leak so little would be wasted. And, that liner would add even more jobs up here, plus could route more oilfields together in one pipeline.


Kevin
said

Why not build our own refineries...? We should not rely on anyone to refine our own oil.This is just like shipping our logs to china for processing, then selling it back to us.


JD, Ontario
said

This will go ahead when the political risks are reduced. The pipeline jobs (Canada's job creation portion) will be there next year or whenever this gets approval. If Ottawa wants to move this faster then have Trans Canada examine alternative pipeline routes to a port for shipment overseas.


Ken
said

Cut the U.S. off and find a way to ship it overseas to countries that want our oil.


Les
said

they should cancel the pipeline and call their bluff
the pipeline going through the way we planned or nothing


Stephen
said

Actually they may be doing us a favour just maybe the next plan should include processing the bitumen here in Canada before exporting. Keep the refining jobs here too.


Halifaxgus
said

Why not ship the oil from Canada?


Brian
said

I agree with Hollis and can't understand why we don't supply our whole country with oil first and then maybe we can export the rest. Why not create all these jobs in Canada where they should be anyway. We place to much reliance on our neighbors to the south who always like to operate under protectionism. Look at the softwood lumber deal. They want to play these kind of game s let them play with themselves or find someone else. Its time Canada took the lead and stopped catering to everyone else.


George W O
said

For political reasons only America does it to Canada again. Obama is like the others.


JB in Ontario
said

President Obama is making the right decision. It is a delay which is better than nothing. I don't think he is a coward at all, quite the opposite. The people of Nebraska, environmentalists and farmers will be happy to hear this along with other people who are concerned about the XL pipeline. Sometimes Presidents have to make unpopular decisions. He made the right one.


Oil Man
said

Now that the environmentalists have prevented the XL pipe line - maybe they should look south to the Gulf of Mexico where the deep sea drilling is continuing on a BP rig. The oil from there is 30% of the USA requirement and is being piped from the rigs to the refineries in the Gulf region. What if the pipe breaks or another rig explodes?


cfs_Alberta
said

We shouldn't be sending our oil anyway. Process it here and sell the word the end product!


john messom creston bc
said

the only way to play fair game with the us is to stop us business coming to canada the us does not want the pipe come to the state or any business come to the us but yet they want to bring business to canada or china they want every thing their way well it is about time we do something about it dont support us store in canada that will smarting them up fast


Alberta Boy
said

Hollis I agree build the refineries here in Alberta and give Canadians the jobs or better yet help the Americans who want to work in these refineries to move here and pay taxes here.I am okay with the Americans working here.


rod
said

sry to burst enviro bubbles here but be it china via west coast or via arctic oil sands oil will flow eventually period..


Randy
said

Stop XL to the states and build more refineries in Alberta. We all know the price of gas goes up every time there's a hiccup at a refinery and nothing to do with the price of oil. This will create more jobs for Canadians, uninterrupted fuel supplies, better pricing and access fuel can be trucked to the states. Creating even more jobs.


Joel
said

The longer you spend reviewing, the more time we have to plan another pipeline to Kitimat for Oil to China.


Jason P
said

Liberal in Quebec. Helps to know what you're talking about but that's always a stretch for Liberals anyways. Americans are active in participating in this project getting the oil to the US. It's not like we're begging for them to take it. Americans need it not only for jobs but for a secure source of energy as well. If the Americans don't want it that's fine. The Chinese would probably line up for it to be piped to the coast for shipment.


A Koster
said

"As the U.S. State Department proceeds with a special review of the Obama administration's handling of TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline proposal, pipes for the project are already being delivered south of the border. Truckloads of pipe from Canada are arriving daily in Gascoyne, N.D., where they are being stockpiled, Radio-Canada reporter Marc Godbout reported Monday." [cbc] ..It appears that acceptance of the new route has been a foregone conclusion by Keystone et al.. no matter what is being said today, it's not over yet.


Bob
said

Excellent, now get the PMO's office to help Trans Canada to build a pipeline to the west coast and ship our oil to China and Asia where we would benifit most and plan a better avenue for our resources that will keep Canada out of a recession and financially and fiscally stronger than relying on the USA which will see minimal growth for the next 5-10 years.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

Politics. When the going gets rough, roll up your sleeves...and delay the decision. Maybe if the government hired some more consultants it could buy some additional time. Gosh, we don't want to rush this thing. It's only been planned and discussed ad nauseam. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) tabled its final environmental impact report in August and indicated that the pipeline would pose no significant impacts to resources if environmental protection measures were followed. Slow down. Elections are more important. Hey, I know; let's consider re-routing it. Sounds good.


Freeman
said

No surprise here. Obama showed promise but has shown no backbone on any issues since elected president.
As for Canada? Does Mr. Harper et al have the courage to diversify our energy strategy?
For starters: Canadian built and owned refineries in North eastern Alberta. Use nuclear energy rather than natural gas to power oil sands extraction. Build three sets of export pipelines 1) Prince Rupert, 2) Churchill, 3) Inuvik area as a keystone to our sovereign energy policy.
Negotiate a sizeable export contract with both India and China for refinery ready crude oil and liquified natural gas. Freeze the quantity of petroleum exports to the USA at the current levels.


Barry Wynn
said

Lets get the pipe line project going as is, okay Mr. Obama, and tell them Mr. Barry Wynn ordered it built in the same route as planned. Mr. Wynn and Mr. Obama, why!! waste our dollars until 2013. Throw aside the possible votes you might get from those NGOs pumping iron in rosier!! pooh tents.


MARG MM
said

Obama is fighting for his political life, so is afraid to make a decision before their next election. Guess they don't need jobs that badly after all!!!!!!


Armand Guerin
said

Score one for the good guys!


Will
said

So we will just sell our oil to another customer, no problem there. To paraphrase Peter Lougheed, Let the bastards freeze in the dark.


Doug in Alberta
said

Well, no need to send Broncconier cause he can't mess it up any worse. Save the money he would have been paid and pocket the money



Dave in Ottawa
said

GREAT NEWS!! Route it through Toronto.


WT in SASK
said

by the time the US gets its head out of its rear and realizes that it cannot afford to invade and "stabilize" every mid east country for its oil, we will have sold all of the oil sands oil to China, and the US will be out of luck.at least by then, there will be no oil left here, for them to justify invading Canada


Canadian Bob
said

I guess those silly "gimme, gimme" protestors have been heard to some degree? Imagine that, people looking out for their interests, and being forced to protest to communicate that message, and being heard. Congratulations. This was a huge mistake from the beginning, and I hope that the ultimate result is that the pipeline is killed altogether. Fingers crossed indeed!


Len
said

Know the money coming in is nice but it's also comforting to know that we'll keep our energy for us, even though the oil companies will gouge us. We can stay warm in the great Canadian north.


hollis
said

we should build the pipe line . only build it from the west coast to the east coast so we could supply all the needs of canada. we would also have to build a few more refinaries along the way we are sending our oil state side while we have to import oil from arab states this makes no sence to me. let the americans get their exter oil from the middle east.


higgy
said

Obama your a bloody coward.


Really
said

Big Mistake U.S.of A!Now we can get on with selling our ethical oil to say India or China. Oh well they will have all the money honey.Might us well deport the protestors along with the exported oil and they can really have a hay day protesting in China and India. lol


Brock Landers
said

You win tree huggers. Now...let's just send the oil to China and the US can keep getting it's oil from the Middle East. Remind me again...how much does it cost to keep US troops their?


Liberal from Quebec
said

Thank you Mr. Obama for not giving in to our shameful government's brown nosing.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt speaks in the House of Commons in Ottawa on Monday, May 28, 2012. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Federal government orders end to CP Rail strike

More   51 Comments 51    7 Video(s) 7

Dominic and Abby Maryk were found in Mexico four years after allegedly being abducted by their father.

Extradition sought in Winnipeg missing children case

More   4 Comments 4    3 Video(s) 3

Protesters opposing Quebec student tuition fee hikes demonstrate in Montreal, Sunday, May 27, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Quebec, students to resume talks on tuition hikes

More   26 Comments 26    1 Video(s) 1